Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Physics Forum  »  Tired Light is Still Dead
Page 3 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
Sam Wormley
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:15 pm
Guest
Michael Helland wrote:
Quote:
On May 1, 4:54 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:

In Helland lingo

f = c/w, where c is a constant
w = c/f, where c is a constant


And the shift is that f goes down, and w goes up.

Yes--that is what is observed in nature.

Quote:

My point is that if f goes down, c goes down, and w stays constant

No--that IS NOT observed in nature.

Doppler Effect
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/DopplerEffect.html
Sam Wormley
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:44 pm
Guest
Michael Helland wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 30, 7:06 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Show us your equations.

Ok.

Show me the data my math should accommodate.

For example, a 1D x axis has points A and B. They are 1 million light
years apart.

If a photon leaves point A and arrives at point B, because of
expansion it will have traveled 1 million light years + 20km.

Give me a set of data, such as:

t (in million years) x (distance from origin in light years)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
2
3
4
5...ect

I should be able to provide an algorithm that produces that, and the
rest of Hubble's Law, based on deceleration in non-expanding space.


I suggest using Ned Wright's calculator
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
 
Page 3 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri May 16, 2008 11:55 pm