| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Tired Light is Still Dead
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
|
| Author |
Message |
| Sam Wormley |
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael Helland wrote:
Quote: On May 1, 4:54 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
In Helland lingo
f = c/w, where c is a constant
w = c/f, where c is a constant
And the shift is that f goes down, and w goes up.
Yes--that is what is observed in nature.
Quote:
My point is that if f goes down, c goes down, and w stays constant
No--that IS NOT observed in nature.
Doppler Effect
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/DopplerEffect.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Sam Wormley |
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael Helland wrote:
Quote: On Apr 30, 7:06 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Show us your equations.
Ok.
Show me the data my math should accommodate.
For example, a 1D x axis has points A and B. They are 1 million light
years apart.
If a photon leaves point A and arrives at point B, because of
expansion it will have traveled 1 million light years + 20km.
Give me a set of data, such as:
t (in million years) x (distance from origin in light years)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
2
3
4
5...ect
I should be able to provide an algorithm that produces that, and the
rest of Hubble's Law, based on deceleration in non-expanding space.
I suggest using Ned Wright's calculator
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:46 pm
|
|