Celestial chickens and re: Pearse, a true xian troll

Main Page | Report this Page

Science Forum Index » Medicine - Cardiology Forum » Celestial chickens and re: Pearse, a true xian troll

Page 1 of 1

Author

Message

J A

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:03 pm

Guest

"Roger Pearse" <roger.pearse@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:11e16382-58fd-44de-8687-08c65df04ad6@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

<snip Pearse lying, obfuscation and running> Wink

)

Here's where we started, and what this Pearse dwarf is trying to change the
subject from.

His last drivel was pretending that the subject was "atheism",
which he's trying to pretend is itself a "religious" belief.

J666

Quote:

How many of the Celestial Chicken's chickens have given their life so man
can live. How many chickens have died on a barbecue spit so that we can
live.

You mock because you don't understand the verses in the Bible that say,
"He did for our sin", etc. You fail to understand the meaning of the
suffering and death of Christ. Yet it is so obvious that it is an outrage
that it has not been taught in the past.

Me:
He's playing on the fact that for thousands of years before (and after) the
jesus myth, people sacrificed animals to the "gods", then ate the remains in
feasts.

Jesus "sacrificed",,,, shamen priests giving people waffers and grape
juice,,,, you should be able to get the idea.

The jesus myth that we were all raised with, is just a compilation of
earlier myths that people are no longer aware of, and they think is
describing some unique actual event (it's not).

From Encyclopædia Britannica:

The reason why Christmas came to be celebrated on December 25 remains
uncertain, but most probably the reason is that early Christians wished the
date to coincide with the pagan Roman festival marking the "birthday of the
unconquered sun" (natalis solis invicti); this festival celebrated the
winter solstice, when the days again begin to lengthen and the sun begins to
climb higher in the sky.

The traditional customs connected with Christmas have accordingly developed
from several sources as a result of the coincidence of the celebration of
the birth of Christ with the pagan agricultural and solar observances at
midwinter.

In the Roman world the Saturnalia (December 17) was a time of
merrymaking and exchange of gifts. December 25 was also regarded as the
birth date of the Iranian mystery god Mithra, the Sun of Righteousness.

On the Roman New Year (January 1), houses were decorated with greenery and
lights, and gifts were given to children and the poor. To these observances
were added the German and Celtic Yule rites when the Teutonic tribes
penetrated into Gaul, Britain, and central Europe. Food and good fellowship,
the Yule log and Yule cakes, greenery and fir trees, and gifts and greetings
all commemorated different aspects of this festive season. Fires and lights,
symbols of warmth and lasting life, have always been associated with the
winter festival, both pagan and Christian. Since the European Middle Ages,
evergreens, as symbols of survival, have been associated with Christmas.
Christmas is traditionally regarded as the festival of the family and of
children, under the name of whose patron, Saint Nicholas
<eb://gateway/g?gtype=article_view&doc_name=core/05/71/23_1.html> (q.v.), or
Santa Claus, presents are exchanged in many countries.
===

For those wanting a full academic treatment on how christianity took over
existing pagan myths and celebrations see:

Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E. by Ramsay MacMullen , Yale University
Press

some reviews from
http://www.speroforum.com/book/item.asp?ItemId=0300080778&SI=Books

Summary: The History Christianity Never Told
This is a very important book, one that every student of religious history
should read. Ramsay MacMullen has undertaken the task of speaking on behalf
of a people who were not allowed to speak for themselves: the pagans of the
Roman Empire. He points out that the focus of history has been on
Christianity; after all, Christians wrote the histories of that era. But he
notes as well that the estimates on Christian numbers by Tertullian and
Eusebius are "manifestly absurd", an expression "of the authors' zeal and
their sense of the distance traveled by their church since the first
century." What this amounts to, in MacMullen's view, is that "the
Christians, not only in their triumphant exaggerations but in their sheer
bulk, today, seriously misrepresent the true proportions of religious
history."

Orthodox Christianity was not interested in voices raised in protest. What
were seen as heretical writings were burned, as were non-Christian texts and
"copyists were discouraged from replacing them by the threat of having their
hands cut off." And Christianity's own historians were not interested in
giving a balanced accounting of events. MacMullen comments that Eusebius
"disclaimed the telling of the whole truth. Rather, he proposed to limit his
account to 'what may be of profit.'"

This book attempts to set the record straight. MacMullen notes that
previously scholars had thought that paganism had been defeated by the end
of the fourth century and all converted to the new faith. This is not true,
he tells us. "Stain Augustine did not live in a Christian world" he says and
in the book's five chapters proceeds to demonstrate the truth of this
assertion.

We see that paganism of the late Roman Empire was alive and well. "It used
to be thought that, at the end, the eradication of paganism really required
no effort" and that paganism had become a hollow husk. "But historians seem
now to have abandoned this interpretation...The real vitality of paganism is
instead recognized; and to explain its eventual fate what must also be
recognized is an opposing force, an urgent one, determined on its
extinction." And we see the extreme measures to which Christianity was
willing to resort to stamp out all opposition: fines, confiscation, exile,
improsionment, flogging, torture, beheading, and crucifixtion. "What more
could be imagined? Nothing. The extremes of conceivable pressure were
brought to bear." Nor was this violence restricted to pagans. Speaking of
the fourth century, MacMullen says "more Christians died for their faith at
the hands of fellow Christians than had died before in all the
persecutions."

Like Pagans and Christians before it, Christianity & Paganism in the Fourth
to Eighth Centuries must be read for the truth of the past to be understood.
The facts have for long been misrepresented and misunderstood, and MacMullen
brushes these obstructions away with a masterful hand to reveal the vibrancy
of a pagan world scholarship has long consigned to oblivion. I cannot
recommend it highly enough.

Summary: Paganism: Tolerance and Tradition
As far as I know Ramsay MacMullen could not in any way be accurately
described as a Pagan. In fact, he does say some things that indicate that he
almost certainly is not one. Nevertheless, this is one history book that
every well-educated Pagan should read. It's not a pretty story - in fact its
an excrutiatingly painful story.

MacMullen deals with most of the important myths about the rise of
Christianity and the downfall of Paganism:
(1) that Pagans voluntarily chose to convert to Christianity without
coercion
(2) that women, slaves and the rural populations were less loyal to Paganism
than the urban male elites
(3) that Paganism "went quietly"
(4) that Paganism simply disappeared without a trace

All of these myths are laid to rest by MacMullen. May they rest in peace.

Despite (apparently) not being a Pagan himself, MacMullen nevertheless
displays an uncanny sympathy for and understanding of Classical Paganism. In
particular he adeptly captures the spirit of Paganism with the two words
"tradition" and "tolerance". Paganism was a Religion and a world-view in
which tradition was honored and revered - it was a way for human beings to
feel a strong connection to the past and to each other. And it was also a
Religion in which tolerance was taken for granted. This is the real
take-home lesson of this book.

MacMullen calmly tells the tale of how Christianity grappled with a simple
fact: nobody knew exactly how to go about imposing one religion on everyone.
It had never been done before and the very idea was not so much
objectionable as it was simply incomprehensible. MacMullen tells the
horrifying story of how the Christians slowly perfected the repressive
machinery necessary to enforce spiritual and psychological conformity. At
first edicts against Paganism could be safely ignored - but as the decades
and centuries went on, through a combination of savage mob-violence and
state terrorism, Paganism was driven underground.

MacMullen makes it clear that Paganism fought to survive. Without probably
intending to, he leaves the door wide open for future investigations of the
ways in which Paganism continued to survive as a clandestine Religion.

Summary: Awsome Book, Crappy Footnotes
Well, a lot has been said about this book. Let me just say this: this book
is most likely the best out there on the subject. MacMullen's arguments and
knowledge of his sources is unquestionable.

This book serves to document the first of many crimes committed by the
Christian religion: the bloody persecution of paganism. Temples were
destroyed, books burned, and yes, people killed. People would not have to
wait for the crusades and the Inquisitions to get a religiously-inspired
blood bath. And the terrible thing is, though most at least know of the
Inquisitions, the crusades, the Witch trials, etc. nobody remembers the
persecution of the pagans, so they basically got away with it. This book
serves, in particular, to outline the despicable deeds of Justinian; I
cannot wait to get the Secret History. Theodosius, Justinian, et al go down
in history with Hitler, Stalin, Moa Zedong, and Pol Pot as the greatest mass
murderers in history. Cannot recommend enough. Except for the footnotes;
prepare for days of fun as you cite them in discussions and then have
trouble actually finding out what in the heck MacMullen is referring to. I
don't get it, the notes in Christianizing the Roman Empire were certainly
not perfect, but they at least did not require a companion volume to read.
Oh, and I liked his writing, if that counts for anything.

Summary: TGIF?
McMullen has an interesting style that some may find irritating but I rather
enjoyed. At times he uses orotund and convoluted sentences reminiscent of
Gibbon or Samuel Johnson. At other times he lapses into the first person and
uses contractions and old-fashioned slang such as "argy-bargy." It is rather
like listening to conversation over the port in the Senior Common room of
some ancient college.
I was irritated by the references. These occupy a large part of the book and
are grouped as end-notes (Gibbon had footnotes). They often give only a
single name of author without date or place of publication. If you track
down the author in the bibliography (which is separate) you often still
don't get anywhere, even if you remember where in the text you started off.
Sometimes the references contain references.
The question of which festivals and folk customs represent survivals of
pre-Christian religions is more complex than he acknowledges. It's better
dealt with by Ronald Hutton in "Pagan religions of the Ancient British
Isles."
I've always been intrigued by the names of the days of the week in
Indo-European languages. In French you have Vendredi for Friday. In Welsh we
have Dydd Gwener. Who was Gwener?

Summary: Excellent!
This is a fantastic research book, & for those of you interested in the
history of Christianity & Paganism, this is a good & easy read. I'll leave
the details for you to read in the book, but this book should prove
enlightening.

Roger Pearse

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:37 pm

Guest

On 30 Apr, 00:03, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:

Quote:

"Roger Pearse" <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:11e16382-58fd-44de-8687-08c65df04ad6@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
snip Pearse lying, obfuscation and running> Wink

)

Here's where we started...
(troll, evasions snipped)

There is, no doubt, some reason why this appears in
sci.med.cardiology, but it is not apparent to me. Take your silliness
somewhere else.

All the best,

Roger Pearse

monkfish

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:46 am

Guest

Roger Pearse wrote:

Quote:

On 30 Apr, 00:03, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:
"Roger Pearse" <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:11e16382-58fd-44de-8687-08c65df04ad6@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
snip Pearse lying, obfuscation and running> Â Wink

He is an evangelistic atheist.
The best way to handle people like him is
to set the followup-to header to alt.atheism
or something other than your own newsgroup.

--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy.

J666

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:54 am

Guest

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 3:37:19 -0500, Roger Pearse wrote
(in message
<053ae541-9acc-427d-8a29-9ccb12ca1436@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>):

Quote:

Compared to the absurdities of the Three Assinities, this makes far more
sense.

Laus Pollo

J666

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:12 pm

Guest

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:00:09 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <0cCdnZGnrLGXZ4XVnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@earthlink.com>):

Quote:

cardiologist and web entrepreneur, Andrew chung MD, Phd.

chuckle chuckle

chungle chungle

J A

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:59 pm

Guest

"monkfish" <monkfish@nowhere> wrote in message
news:YMydnWhCsM3R5YXVnZ2dnUVZ_viunZ2d@ptd.net...

Quote:

Roger Pearse wrote:

On 30 Apr, 00:03, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:
"Roger Pearse" <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:11e16382-58fd-44de-8687-08c65df04ad6@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
snip Pearse lying, obfuscation and running> Wink

All I posted were some historical information from credible sources on how
christian holidays and myths came into being, from pagan sources.

Atheism is not a religion, dummy, it means a disbelief in supernatural
beings.

You're a disbeliever, too.

There are thousands of gods that have been worshipped by homo sapiens
in the past and present.
Start here: <http://www.lowchensaustralia.com/names/gods.htm>
Can you tell me which ones you believe in and which you don't, and
show the EVIDENCE for the existence of the ones you believe in?

Or, if you're stupid enough to think all god claims need to be
disproved by non-believers instead of PROVED by the believer - then
also give evidence for the non-existence of all the gods you don't
believe in.

J A

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:00 pm

Guest

"Roger Pearse" <roger.pearse@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:053ae541-9acc-427d-8a29-9ccb12ca1436@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On 30 Apr, 00:03, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:

Quote:

"Roger Pearse" <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:11e16382-58fd-44de-8687-08c65df04ad6@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
snip Pearse lying, obfuscation and running> Wink

)

Here's where we started...
(troll, evasions snipped)

Quote:

There is, no doubt, some reason why this appears in

sci.med.cardiology, but it is not apparent to me. Take your silliness
somewhere else.
<

LOL. More Pearse evasion.

As you well know, it's a reply to some drivel you yourself posted in a
thread that included sci.med.cardiology - the thread was started by the
noted
cardiologist and web entrepreneur, Andrew chung MD, Phd.

<chuckle chuckle>

Roger Pearse

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:13 pm

Guest

On 1 May, 00:59, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:

Quote:

"monkfish" <monkfish@nowhere> wrote in message

news:YMydnWhCsM3R5YXVnZ2dnUVZ_viunZ2d@ptd.net...

Roger Pearsewrote:

On 30 Apr, 00:03, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:
"Roger Pearse" <roger.pea...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:11e16382-58fd-44de-8687-08c65df04ad6@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com....
snip Pearse lying, obfuscation and running> Wink

)

Here's where we started...
(troll, evasions snipped)

There is, no doubt, some reason why this appears in
sci.med.cardiology, but it is not apparent to me. Take your silliness
somewhere else.

All the best,

Roger Pearse

He is an evangelistic atheist.

All I posted were some historical information from credible sources on how
christian holidays and myths came into being, from pagan sources.

Allow me to correct your memory. You posted some hearsay copied off
the dumber part of the web, and then went all atheist when
challenged. Smile.

Quote:

Atheism is not a religion, dummy, it means a disbelief in supernatural
beings.

The inability and refusal of atheists to discuss their own religious
position is a source of constant amusement to those of us who think
for ourselves.

Quote:

You're a disbeliever, too.
There are thousands of gods that have been worshipped by homo sapiens
in the past and present.
Start here: <http://www.lowchensaustralia.com/names/gods.htm
Can you tell me which ones you believe in and which you don't, and
show the EVIDENCE for the existence of the ones you believe in?

Sloganising is SO characteristic of atheists. This one is a trick, of
course; its excludes your own religious beliefs from the list and
then tries to insinuate that all the beliefs on the list must be wrong
because there are so many.

Perhaps you would like to explain just why your religious position is
right and all the other ones wrong.

Start here: <http://www.lowchensaustralia.com/names/gods.htm>, and
detail what you know about each one listed.

Quote:

Or, if you're stupid enough to think all god claims need to be
disproved by non-believers instead of PROVED by the believer - then
also give evidence for the non-existence of all the gods you don't
believe in.

Funny how every atheist post consists of demanding that other people
prove things, while the atheist doesn't have to prove anything! Of
course the demand is sincere, but that's because atheists are
sincerely pretty unthinking. Any fool can tell that every religious
position has to be evaluated for itself, not for what it does not
believe in but for what it does.

The manner in which atheists act suggests that their main principle is
"convenience".

The way in which atheists respond to such comments is usually to issue
an unsubstantiated denial, change the subject or hurl abuse. Prove me
wrong if you can.

All the best,

Roger Pearse

monkfish

Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 5:26 pm

Guest

J A wrote:

Quote:

"Roger Pearse" <roger.pearse@googlemail.com> wrote in message

Allow me to correct your memory. You posted some hearsay copied off
the dumber part of the web, and then went all atheist when
challenged. Smile.

The sources you claim are "hearsay copied off the dumber part of the web"
are from the Encyclopedia Britannica and a well regarded professor's
history book
published by Yale University Press (with some reviews from people who have
read it) .

Have you found the myth that tells us
to love our enemies yet?

--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because atheists there
consider quoting the Bible proselytizing and as such it is prohibited by
their undebatable policy.
--
The best way to handle spams is to ignore them. But if you must reply to
them, you should at least set the followup-to header to something other
than your own newsgroup.

J A

Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:03 pm

Guest

"Roger Pearse" <roger.pearse@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:8d52218d-6b36-41af-b93f-7f28e615ca2c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On 1 May, 00:59, "J A" <a...@re.com> wrote:

Quote:

the dumber part of the web, and then went all atheist when
challenged. Smile.
<

The sources you claim are "hearsay copied off the dumber part of the web"
are from the Encyclopedia Britannica and a well regarded professor's
history book
published by Yale University Press (with some reviews from people who have
read it) .

The fact that you have to lie so blatantly, shows how bankrupt and weak you
are, and just how false christianity is. <smile>

Here's what I posted that put him into a panic and got him shrieking..

...... thousands of years before (and after) the jesus myth, people
sacrificed animals to the "gods", then ate the remains in
feasts.

Jesus "sacrificed",,,, shamen priests giving people waffers and grape
juice,,,, you should be able to get the idea.

The jesus myth that we were all raised with, is just a compilation of
earlier myths that people are no longer aware of, and they think is
describing some unique actual event (it's not).

From Encyclopædia Britannica:

The reason why Christmas came to be celebrated on December 25 remains
uncertain, but most probably the reason is that early Christians wished the
date to coincide with the pagan Roman festival marking the "birthday of the
unconquered sun" (natalis solis invicti); this festival celebrated the
winter solstice, when the days again begin to lengthen and the sun begins to
climb higher in the sky.

The traditional customs connected with Christmas have accordingly developed
from several sources as a result of the coincidence of the celebration of
the birth of Christ with the pagan agricultural and solar observances at
midwinter.

In the Roman world the Saturnalia (December 17) was a time of
merrymaking and exchange of gifts. December 25 was also regarded as the
birth date of the Iranian mystery god Mithra, the Sun of Righteousness.

On the Roman New Year (January 1), houses were decorated with greenery and
lights, and gifts were given to children and the poor. To these observances
were added the German and Celtic Yule rites when the Teutonic tribes
penetrated into Gaul, Britain, and central Europe. Food and good fellowship,
the Yule log and Yule cakes, greenery and fir trees, and gifts and greetings
all commemorated different aspects of this festive season. Fires and lights,
symbols of warmth and lasting life, have always been associated with the
winter festival, both pagan and Christian. Since the European Middle Ages,
evergreens, as symbols of survival, have been associated with Christmas.
Christmas is traditionally regarded as the festival of the family and of
children, under the name of whose patron, Saint Nicholas
<eb://gateway/g?gtype=article_view&doc_name=core/05/71/23_1.html> (q.v.), or
Santa Claus, presents are exchanged in many countries.
===

For those wanting a full academic treatment on how christianity took over
existing pagan myths and celebrations see:

Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E. by Ramsay MacMullen , Yale University
Press

some reviews from
http://www.speroforum.com/book/item.asp?ItemId=0300080778&SI=Books

Summary: The History Christianity Never Told
This is a very important book, one that every student of religious history
should read. Ramsay MacMullen has undertaken the task of speaking on behalf
of a people who were not allowed to speak for themselves: the pagans of the
Roman Empire. He points out that the focus of history has been on
Christianity; after all, Christians wrote the histories of that era. But he
notes as well that the estimates on Christian numbers by Tertullian and
Eusebius are "manifestly absurd", an expression "of the authors' zeal and
their sense of the distance traveled by their church since the first
century." What this amounts to, in MacMullen's view, is that "the
Christians, not only in their triumphant exaggerations but in their sheer
bulk, today, seriously misrepresent the true proportions of religious
history."

Orthodox Christianity was not interested in voices raised in protest. What
were seen as heretical writings were burned, as were non-Christian texts and
"copyists were discouraged from replacing them by the threat of having their
hands cut off." And Christianity's own historians were not interested in
giving a balanced accounting of events. MacMullen comments that Eusebius
"disclaimed the telling of the whole truth. Rather, he proposed to limit his
account to 'what may be of profit.'"

This book attempts to set the record straight. MacMullen notes that
previously scholars had thought that paganism had been defeated by the end
of the fourth century and all converted to the new faith. This is not true,
he tells us. "Stain Augustine did not live in a Christian world" he says and
in the book's five chapters proceeds to demonstrate the truth of this
assertion.

We see that paganism of the late Roman Empire was alive and well. "It used
to be thought that, at the end, the eradication of paganism really required
no effort" and that paganism had become a hollow husk. "But historians seem
now to have abandoned this interpretation...The real vitality of paganism is
instead recognized; and to explain its eventual fate what must also be
recognized is an opposing force, an urgent one, determined on its
extinction." And we see the extreme measures to which Christianity was
willing to resort to stamp out all opposition: fines, confiscation, exile,
improsionment, flogging, torture, beheading, and crucifixtion. "What more
could be imagined? Nothing. The extremes of conceivable pressure were
brought to bear." Nor was this violence restricted to pagans. Speaking of
the fourth century, MacMullen says "more Christians died for their faith at
the hands of fellow Christians than had died before in all the
persecutions."

Like Pagans and Christians before it, Christianity & Paganism in the Fourth
to Eighth Centuries must be read for the truth of the past to be understood.
The facts have for long been misrepresented and misunderstood, and MacMullen
brushes these obstructions away with a masterful hand to reveal the vibrancy
of a pagan world scholarship has long consigned to oblivion. I cannot
recommend it highly enough.

Summary: Paganism: Tolerance and Tradition
As far as I know Ramsay MacMullen could not in any way be accurately
described as a Pagan. In fact, he does say some things that indicate that he
almost certainly is not one. Nevertheless, this is one history book that
every well-educated Pagan should read. It's not a pretty story - in fact its
an excrutiatingly painful story.

MacMullen deals with most of the important myths about the rise of
Christianity and the downfall of Paganism:
(1) that Pagans voluntarily chose to convert to Christianity without
coercion
(2) that women, slaves and the rural populations were less loyal to Paganism
than the urban male elites
(3) that Paganism "went quietly"
(4) that Paganism simply disappeared without a trace

All of these myths are laid to rest by MacMullen. May they rest in peace.

Despite (apparently) not being a Pagan himself, MacMullen nevertheless
displays an uncanny sympathy for and understanding of Classical Paganism. In
particular he adeptly captures the spirit of Paganism with the two words
"tradition" and "tolerance". Paganism was a Religion and a world-view in
which tradition was honored and revered - it was a way for human beings to
feel a strong connection to the past and to each other. And it was also a
Religion in which tolerance was taken for granted. This is the real
take-home lesson of this book.

MacMullen calmly tells the tale of how Christianity grappled with a simple
fact: nobody knew exactly how to go about imposing one religion on everyone.
It had never been done before and the very idea was not so much
objectionable as it was simply incomprehensible. MacMullen tells the
horrifying story of how the Christians slowly perfected the repressive
machinery necessary to enforce spiritual and psychological conformity. At
first edicts against Paganism could be safely ignored - but as the decades
and centuries went on, through a combination of savage mob-violence and
state terrorism, Paganism was driven underground.

MacMullen makes it clear that Paganism fought to survive. Without probably
intending to, he leaves the door wide open for future investigations of the
ways in which Paganism continued to survive as a clandestine Religion.

Summary: Awsome Book, Crappy Footnotes
Well, a lot has been said about this book. Let me just say this: this book
is most likely the best out there on the subject. MacMullen's arguments and
knowledge of his sources is unquestionable.

This book serves to document the first of many crimes committed by the
Christian religion: the bloody persecution of paganism. Temples were
destroyed, books burned, and yes, people killed. People would not have to
wait for the crusades and the Inquisitions to get a religiously-inspired
blood bath. And the terrible thing is, though most at least know of the
Inquisitions, the crusades, the Witch trials, etc. nobody remembers the
persecution of the pagans, so they basically got away with it. This book
serves, in particular, to outline the despicable deeds of Justinian; I
cannot wait to get the Secret History. Theodosius, Justinian, et al go down
in history with Hitler, Stalin, Moa Zedong, and Pol Pot as the greatest mass
murderers in history. Cannot recommend enough. Except for the footnotes;
prepare for days of fun as you cite them in discussions and then have
trouble actually finding out what in the heck MacMullen is referring to. I
don't get it, the notes in Christianizing the Roman Empire were certainly
not perfect, but they at least did not require a companion volume to read.
Oh, and I liked his writing, if that counts for anything.

Summary: TGIF?
McMullen has an interesting style that some may find irritating but I rather
enjoyed. At times he uses orotund and convoluted sentences reminiscent of
Gibbon or Samuel Johnson. At other times he lapses into the first person and
uses contractions and old-fashioned slang such as "argy-bargy." It is rather
like listening to conversation over the port in the Senior Common room of
some ancient college.
I was irritated by the references. These occupy a large part of the book and
are grouped as end-notes (Gibbon had footnotes). They often give only a
single name of author without date or place of publication. If you track
down the author in the bibliography (which is separate) you often still
don't get anywhere, even if you remember where in the text you started off.
Sometimes the references contain references.
The question of which festivals and folk customs represent survivals of
pre-Christian religions is more complex than he acknowledges. It's better
dealt with by Ronald Hutton in "Pagan religions of the Ancient British
Isles."
I've always been intrigued by the names of the days of the week in
Indo-European languages. In French you have Vendredi for Friday. In Welsh we
have Dydd Gwener. Who was Gwener?

Summary: Excellent!
This is a fantastic research book, & for those of you interested in the
history of Christianity & Paganism, this is a good & easy read. I'll leave
the details for you to read in the book, but this book should prove
enlightening.

Quote:

Atheism is not a religion, dummy, it means a disbelief in supernatural
beings.

The inability and refusal of atheists to discuss their own religious
position is a source of constant amusement to those of us who think
for ourselves.

He won't even attempt to defend his cult.

Instead, he just pretends that not believing in supernatural myths is
itself a religion.

A transparent, poor show. Still, it's revealing since it shows he won't even
attempt to defend his "beliefs". <smile>

<snip further troll rubbish>

Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:02 am Science Forum Index