| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Math - Symbolic Forum » Unnamed posters in the NG
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Mehran Basti |
 Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
There are individuals in variety of newsgroups posting articles under unknown names.
These are individuals like: gam23, don, James, YAM, etc.
I believe general public should completely ignore their postings.
Every one posting here should have their first and last name at least once written, as well as from what institution or city or state they are sending their letters.
Those unnamed individuals might be directed by one person (s) to write on behalf of them in variety of situations for public control of the media in broad sense.
They might be also directed to ridicule or insult the writers here.
This is a FIRST STEP, to ignore these unknown persons for better atmosphere of the newsgroup and honest scientific debate.
From now on I will not open the postings of those without proper names and certainly will not respond to them.
I hope you do the same, until they properly identify themselves in complete family name.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dave |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Mehran Basti wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
There are individuals in variety of newsgroups posting articles under unknown names.
These are individuals like: gam23, don, James, YAM, etc.
I believe general public should completely ignore their postings.
Every one posting here should have their first and last name at least once written, as well as from what institution or city
I agree with you.
Anonymous |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Ivar Rosquist |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:58:37 +0100, Mehran Basti wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
There are individuals in variety of newsgroups posting articles under
unknown names.
These are individuals like: gam23, don, James, YAM, etc.
I believe general public should completely ignore their postings.
You forgot to add Basti to the list. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Henry Poincare |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:52:31 -0400, Mehran Basti wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
There are individuals in variety of newsgroups posting articles under
unknown names.
These are individuals like: gam23, don, James, YAM, etc.
I believe general public should completely ignore their postings.
Yeah, sure. You're absolutely right. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dave |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Mehran Basti wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
There are individuals in variety of newsgroups posting articles under unknown names.
These are individuals like: gam23, don, James, YAM, etc.
I believe general public should completely ignore their postings.
Every one posting here should have their first and last name at least once written, as well as from what institution or city or state they are sending their letters.
I did not see your institution or city in your post. Was it Broadmoor
Hospital, in Berkshire?
Anonymous. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:07 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dear Newsgroup:
I believe Newsgroups should not allow unknown names to be used in the
media, for greater public trust in our scientific debates.
I believe the administrators of newsgroups should request some
information about the writers upon registration.
They can provide secure sites for collecting the information, such as
address, SSN, education, etc.
It is appropriate to request about professional background of writers.
What I mean, is that these information are confidential, only the
users name such as John Doe will be surfaced on the postings.
This is essential for the health of these debates.
For example posters using the names like m8C27, Cindy, Tom, etc.
might use obscenity or offensive words without any further personal
consequences.
We are not dealing with ghosts, we are dealing with peoples.
Some of them actually might be one person.
Thus the newsgroups should make sure that a unique person is using the
media.
I personally do not respond (now) to short or unknown form or number
names.
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| pnachtwey |
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:15 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On May 1, 2:07 am, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: I believe Newsgroups should not allow unknown names to be used in the
media, for greater public trust in our scientific debates.
What debate?
Quote: I personally do not respond (now) to short or unknown form or number
names.
Dr.Mehran Basti
Excuses, excuses.
You don't provide answers to people with simple questions even of they
provide their name. I am still waiting for you so show tell us the
units for x' x and g of this x'+x^2=g(t) energy formula. Providing the
units should be simple enough and still I haven't seen an answer.
Don't send me to a site the doesn't exist. Reply to this post. What
are the units? No units, no creditibility.
Peter Nachtwey |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mehran Basti |
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 12:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
What debate?
I personally do not respond (now) to short or
unknown form or number
names.
Dr.Mehran Basti
Excuses, excuses.
You don't provide answers to people with simple
questions even of they
provide their name. I am still waiting for you so
show tell us the
units for x' x and g of this x'+x^2=g(t) energy
formula. Providing the
units should be simple enough and still I haven't
seen an answer.
Don't send me to a site the doesn't exist. Reply to
this post. What
are the units? No units, no creditibility.
Peter Nachtwey
Obviously, that is your narrow and conventional viewpoint of the equation.
Not those of revolutionary ones like me.
There are no direct units, and you cannot understand by words, it needs to follow the way the formula understood in my new math.
So, you have your opinion, fine, but then science in the future debates the issue.
It is not as simple as you imagine.
As I have mentioned before, one needs to understand what the formula means in its structure broadly (as viewed by the universe).
By the way, I have to answer some questions raised (on this thread) broadly.
America is now in crisis in many aspects, and they should fix many avenues, including some kind of administering avenues of public media such as newsgroups.
I believe the way it is now, newsgroups contributing to more public dislike of sci, just a lot of garbage materials we see presented.
What I am saying, it needs to be modified in its presentation form.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mehran Basti |
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 2:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Reply to this post. What
are the units? No units, no creditibility.
Peter Nachtwey
In another article, on New Energy Formula, you have commented:
“
Now ignore Dr Basti and maybe he will go away until he figures out
unit analysis. “
What happened that you have responded?
I guess you are like many others are suspicious of the silence of the math community on my postings on many topics and newsgroups.
Possibly you have sensed about the public suspicion of this behavior of the math community.
Well, you talk to them, or write an article about them, expressing your curiosity.
There is no escape for them; sooner or later they need to come up with the right answers and solutions, since their behavior cannot continue forever.
I am independent in my endeavor, thus they cannot shift their problems to me (but already blocked all avenues to me in the math community activities, and I have to tolerate it as usual).
Eventually the developments of my New Math will answer everyone’s questions.
To answer your question precisely, I say the revolutionary new math has substantially different implications in all areas of science.
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dave |
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
pnachtwey wrote:
Quote: What
are the units? No units, no creditibility.
Peter Nachtwey
You mean by providing units he would get some credibility? IMHO, he is
mentally deranged and needs medical treatment by a psychiatrist. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:50 pm
|
|
