Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Cryptography Forum  »  JSH: Surprising statistics
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Jesse F. Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:50 am
Guest
JSH <jstevh@gmail.com> writes:

Quote:
You fit it more than I. Consider, you are on a worldwide forum
speaking as if you were a medical expert on a severe psychological
disorder, while I'm puzzling out loud about the weird high ranking
of my blog postings in search engines like Google, where readers can
just do a search on "definition of mathematical proof" to start
wondering themselves.

As others have pointed out, this search result isn't so surprising.
You're searching for a particular string that occurs as a heading on
your page. Of course your page will come up fairly high.

Try these other searches:

mathematical proof definition
definition proof mathematics
what is a mathematical proof?
mathematical proof defined
mathematical logic definition of proof

I don't see your blog on the first page of any of those. On the other
hand, it occurs when searching for

proof in mathematics definition

as well as "definition of mathematical proof" with or without
quotations.

It is silly to think that these latter two searches suggest you're an
important mathematical researcher.

--
Scissors and string, scissors and string,
When a man's single, he lives like a king.
Needles and pins, needles and pins,
When a man marries, his trouble begins. --- Mother Goose
Lits O'Hate
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:53 pm
Guest
On Apr 30, 10:14 am, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
You fit it more than I. Consider, you are on a worldwide forum
speaking as if you were a medical expert

While you're on a worldwide forum speaking as if you were a
mathematics expert (indeed, a "true, living, super genius,"
who "understands the Internet, I think, far better than any
of you can possibly come close to comprehending, with, your,
I'm afraid, um, limited intellects.")

Quote:
You are the one gratuitously seeking attention for yourself by hanging
on to my postings

While you are the one gratuitously seeking attention by
obsessing over web counters and search results.

Quote:
So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis

Ah ha! So now *you're* the expert on NPD!

Quote:
To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental illness,
what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world should
anyone ever listen to you at all?

You're asking someone to provide evidence that he's not a
Narcissist by providing a list of his accomplishments? That
makes no sense.

--
"The Microsoft company needs to just die and end the scourge of
its existence upon the world. Money is not everything Mr. Gates,
as you are quite rich now and I think you're a turd, so how do
you like them apples?" -- James Harris
Srieg Kuden
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:36 pm
Guest
"Lits O'Hate" <litsohate@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:76ffbb40-64ab-417c-b163-be9e4baddf99@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Apr 30, 10:14 am, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
You fit it more than I. Consider, you are on a worldwide forum
speaking as if you were a medical expert

While you're on a worldwide forum speaking as if you were a
mathematics expert (indeed, a "true, living, super genius,"
who "understands the Internet, I think, far better than any
of you can possibly come close to comprehending, with, your,
I'm afraid, um, limited intellects.")

You are the one gratuitously seeking attention for yourself by hanging
on to my postings

While you are the one gratuitously seeking attention by
obsessing over web counters and search results.

I think ya'll are talking about me.

Quote:

So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis

Ah ha! So now *you're* the expert on NPD!

It's not that bad, look at Rev Write and Obamama.
There is a cause I have heard, early childhood (2-4 or so) trama via
another NPDer

Quote:

To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental illness,
what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world should
anyone ever listen to you at all?

You're asking someone to provide evidence that he's not a
Narcissist by providing a list of his accomplishments? That
makes no sense.

I have more accomplishments, and more valuable. I can use Excel.

Quote:

--
"The Microsoft company needs to just die and end the scourge of
its existence upon the world. Money is not everything Mr. Gates,
as you are quite rich now and I think you're a turd, so how do
you like them apples?" -- James Harris
Joel Davison
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:41 pm
Guest
JSH wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 30, 6:16 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
JSH wrote:
On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
Wouldn't you have to say though that the bottom line of all this
"seeking of attention" is nothing more than a symptom of your
Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
I know, by me responding with this post, I'm just feeding your disorder,
but my main concern here is to shine some light on what's really going
on with this new-found interest in statistics of yours, and to set the
facts straight for those that might not be aware of your disorder.
There is no new interest in statistics. I've been monitoring them for
months; years in some areas.
Well, I wasn't really expecting you to admit to having NPD.

In fact, you don't have to. Anybody can see from your posts, both past
and present, that you are driven by a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis, you show why people with
it are so annoying: not able to do on their own they find ways to put
themselves in positions where they do not belong to get attention they
cannot honestly earn.

You mean like what you've been doing here for the last 12+ years?

Quote:
To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental illness,
what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world should
anyone ever listen to you at all?

That's OK, you can keep your soapbox. I don't want it.

As long as the "playing field" is now level, and everybody understands
why you are so infatuated with how many hits your blog postings are
getting in Google, that's all I'm interested in.

Carry on now. Off you go.
Jesse F. Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:14 pm
Guest
"Lits O'Hate" <litsohate@yahoo.com> writes:

Quote:
"The Microsoft company needs to just die and end the scourge of
its existence upon the world. Money is not everything Mr. Gates,
as you are quite rich now and I think you're a turd, so how do
you like them apples?" -- James Harris

What's the source for this quote?
--
"If you people knew really, in your heats [sic], and minds, who I
actually am, would you even reply to my posts? I'd probably get that
hero worship crap." -- JSH explains why the greatest mathematician
in the world masquerades as a moron.
JSH
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:51 pm
Guest
On Apr 30, 4:41 pm, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
Quote:
JSH wrote:
On Apr 30, 6:16 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
JSH wrote:
On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
Wouldn't you have to say though that the bottom line of all this
"seeking of attention" is nothing more than a symptom of your
Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
I know, by me responding with this post, I'm just feeding your disorder,
but my main concern here is to shine some light on what's really going
on with this new-found interest in statistics of yours, and to set the
facts straight for those that might not be aware of your disorder.
There is no new interest in statistics. I've been monitoring them for
months; years in some areas.
Well, I wasn't really expecting you to admit to having NPD.

In fact, you don't have to. Anybody can see from your posts, both past
and present, that you are driven by a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis, you show why people with
it are so annoying: not able to do on their own they find ways to put
themselves in positions where they do not belong to get attention they
cannot honestly earn.

You mean like what you've been doing here for the last 12+ years?


You're a nobody, hanging on to get attention.

Where will you be on these newsgroups in 12 years?

Nowhere, unless you're parasitically attaching yourself to other
posters like you're doing with me.

Quote:
To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental illness,
what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world should
anyone ever listen to you at all?

That's OK, you can keep your soapbox. I don't want it.


Mathematicians lie as a group. My point is that math society is
broken.

At the end of it all, none of you can present facts.

You can insult though.

I'll give you that, as you're nasty little turds.

Quote:
As long as the "playing field" is now level, and everybody understands
why you are so infatuated with how many hits your blog postings are
getting in Google, that's all I'm interested in.

Carry on now. Off you go.

My blogs get pathetically few hits.

That's not the issue.

What IS the issue is high rankings for postings of mine on blogs and
now I'm ready to simply warn search engines like Google and Yahoo! as
I need an explanation.

If no one can give me one, then I'll look to the US Congress to force
transparency.

I see search engines as a utility.

If I do not get an answer I will use the bizarrely high search results
that I see to push the case that there is something weird going on,
and ask for an answer.

So to Google and Yahoo! and the other search engines. You are being
warned.

I don't have a problem with search results on my blogs disappearing
from high levels, but if they stay there, I am warning you that I may
use that to push some congressional inquiry and break open how you do
what you do.

I don't like apparent contradiction.

And you are not beyond my ability to drag into Congress to explain.
None of you are.

Test me here, and you'll see soon enough how serious I am on this
issue.

Drop the rankings on my postings or else.

And I do not forget that the Google founders are mathematicians. If
they are mathematicians first and foremost then they may find that
some time behind prison bars is where they will land.

I'm tired of the games. I want transparency, or else I'll do my best
to force it, even if it breaks business models.

Drop my rankings you idiots. Or I will make you.


James Harris
David C. Ullrich
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:09 am
Guest
On Thu, 1 May 2008 00:51:55 -0700 (PDT), JSH <jstevh@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Apr 30, 4:41 pm, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
JSH wrote:
On Apr 30, 6:16 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
JSH wrote:
On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
Wouldn't you have to say though that the bottom line of all this
"seeking of attention" is nothing more than a symptom of your
Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
I know, by me responding with this post, I'm just feeding your disorder,
but my main concern here is to shine some light on what's really going
on with this new-found interest in statistics of yours, and to set the
facts straight for those that might not be aware of your disorder.
There is no new interest in statistics. I've been monitoring them for
months; years in some areas.
Well, I wasn't really expecting you to admit to having NPD.

In fact, you don't have to. Anybody can see from your posts, both past
and present, that you are driven by a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis, you show why people with
it are so annoying: not able to do on their own they find ways to put
themselves in positions where they do not belong to get attention they
cannot honestly earn.

You mean like what you've been doing here for the last 12+ years?


You're a nobody, hanging on to get attention.

Where will you be on these newsgroups in 12 years?

Nowhere, unless you're parasitically attaching yourself to other
posters like you're doing with me.

While (at least in your imagination) you'll be remembered forever
as the person who made more posts to usenet containing incorrect
mathematics than any other person ever. Hard to see why you're
so proud of that.

Quote:
To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental illness,
what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world should
anyone ever listen to you at all?

That's OK, you can keep your soapbox. I don't want it.


Mathematicians lie as a group. My point is that math society is
broken.

At the end of it all, none of you can present facts.

You can insult though.

I'll give you that, as you're nasty little turds.

As long as the "playing field" is now level, and everybody understands
why you are so infatuated with how many hits your blog postings are
getting in Google, that's all I'm interested in.

Carry on now. Off you go.

My blogs get pathetically few hits.

That's not the issue.

What IS the issue is high rankings for postings of mine on blogs and
now I'm ready to simply warn search engines like Google and Yahoo! as
I need an explanation.

If no one can give me one,

See Jesse's post.

Quote:
then I'll look to the US Congress to force
transparency.

And again (and again and again and again): If you don't
like it when people say you're crazy then don't write
so many things that sound like a raving lunatic.

Quote:
I see search engines as a utility.

If I do not get an answer I will use the bizarrely high search results
that I see to push the case that there is something weird going on,
and ask for an answer.

So to Google and Yahoo! and the other search engines. You are being
warned.

I don't have a problem with search results on my blogs disappearing
from high levels, but if they stay there, I am warning you that I may
use that to push some congressional inquiry and break open how you do
what you do.

I don't like apparent contradiction.

And you are not beyond my ability to drag into Congress to explain.
None of you are.

Actually we all are. Your ability to drag us into Congress is zero.
You have never dragged anyone into Congress and you never will.
Never. Not once.

Quote:
Test me here, and you'll see soon enough how serious I am on this
issue.

Drop the rankings on my postings or else.

And I do not forget that the Google founders are mathematicians. If
they are mathematicians first and foremost then they may find that
some time behind prison bars is where they will land.

I'm tired of the games. I want transparency, or else I'll do my best
to force it, even if it breaks business models.

Why is it you've never carried out any of these threats
to break people and institutions?

Quote:
Drop my rankings you idiots. Or I will make you.


James Harris

David C. Ullrich
Lits O'Hate
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 8:04 am
Guest
On Apr 30, 8:14 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
Quote:
"Lits O'Hate" <litsoh...@yahoo.com> writes:
"The Microsoft company needs to just die and end the scourge of
its existence upon the world. Money is not everything Mr. Gates,
as you are quite rich now and I think you're a turd, so how do
you like them apples?" -- James Harris

What's the source for this quote?

It's from a blog entry James was too embarrassed to leave up.
I forget which blog it was, probably the lostincomment one.

I wish I'd saved the whole thing. It was a great rant about
music files James bought from Microsoft. He couldn't figure
out how to migrate them to a new computer.

Sounds like a job for DMESE!

--
"I have some of the greatest intellectual accomplishments in
the history of the world, freely available 24 hours a day
through the Internet, and this world does not know it. There
could be no more brilliant life imaginable." -- James Harris
amzoti
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:18 am
Guest
On May 1, 12:51 am, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 30, 4:41 pm, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:





JSH wrote:
On Apr 30, 6:16 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
JSH wrote:
On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Joel Davison <jo...@plainearth.net> wrote:
Wouldn't you have to say though that the bottom line of all this
"seeking of attention" is nothing more than a symptom of your
Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
I know, by me responding with this post, I'm just feeding your disorder,
but my main concern here is to shine some light on what's really going
on with this new-found interest in statistics of yours, and to set the
facts straight for those that might not be aware of your disorder.
There is no new interest in statistics.  I've been monitoring them for
months; years in some areas.
Well, I wasn't really expecting you to admit to having NPD.

In fact, you don't have to. Anybody can see from your posts, both past
and present, that you are driven by a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
So you not only better fit the NPD diagnosis, you show why people with
it are so annoying: not able to do on their own they find ways to put
themselves in positions where they do not belong to get attention they
cannot honestly earn.

You mean like what you've been doing here for the last 12+ years?

You're a nobody, hanging on to get attention.

Where will you be on these newsgroups in 12 years?

Nowhere, unless you're parasitically attaching yourself to other
posters like you're doing with me.

To challenge that observation--I'm giving you a soapbox--tell the
group what else you can talk about besides my supposed mental illness,
what other accomplishments you might have, and why in the world should
anyone ever listen to you at all?

That's OK, you can keep your soapbox. I don't want it.

Mathematicians lie as a group.  My point is that math society is
broken.

At the end of it all, none of you can present facts.

You can insult though.

I'll give you that, as you're nasty little turds.

As long as the "playing field" is now level, and everybody understands
why you are so infatuated with how many hits your blog postings are
getting in Google, that's all I'm interested in.

Carry on now. Off you go.

My blogs get pathetically few hits.

That's not the issue.

What IS the issue is high rankings for postings of mine on blogs and
now I'm ready to simply warn search engines like Google and Yahoo! as
I need an explanation.

If no one can give me one, then I'll look to the US Congress to force
transparency.

I see search engines as a utility.

If I do not get an answer I will use the bizarrely high search results
that I see to push the case that there is something weird going on,
and ask for an answer.

So to Google and Yahoo! and the other search engines.  You are being
warned.

I don't have a problem with search results on my blogs disappearing
from high levels, but if they stay there, I am warning you that I may
use that to push some congressional inquiry and break open how you do
what you do.

I don't like apparent contradiction.

And you are not beyond my ability to drag into Congress to explain.
None of you are.

Test me here, and you'll see soon enough how serious I am on this
issue.

Drop the rankings on my postings or else.

And I do not forget that the Google founders are mathematicians.  If
they are mathematicians first and foremost then they may find that
some time behind prison bars is where they will land.

I'm tired of the games.  I want transparency, or else I'll do my best
to force it, even if it breaks business models.

Drop my rankings you idiots.  Or I will make you.

James Harris- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hi James,

do you think you could also take google to congress over the spam
postings on sci.math and sci.crypt?

Heck, why stop there!
Richard Tobin
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 4:11 pm
Guest
In article <32ab14bb-6162-445c-ac0b-da4a537595a5@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
JSH <jstevh@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Mathematicians lie as a group.

Does that make them a Lie group?

-- Richard
--
:wq
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:28 am