On 27 Apr, 19:29, Williamknowsbest <William.M...@gmail.com> wrote:
We have significant space launch assets and capabilities available
now. Here is how I plan to use them to transform life on Earth;
1) terrestrial solar power - Sunlight is an off-world resource that
steams abundantly to Earth today. Developing a means to capture
sunlight cheaply and make it useful to today's energy market is the
challenge. This is the first step. The reward? Dominance in a $4
trillion per year energy market that is growing in real terms 10% and
more per year and is capable of 100 fold increase as costs moderate
and then decline.
http://www.usoal.com
http://www.mokindustries.com
I have just one comment on the enginerring. I have looked at the
references. I would have preferred flat morrors on the ground
reflecting up to a tower raher than a parabolic assemblage on the
ground. A minor detail perhaps, but it is minor details that will
affect costings in a big way.
I have a comment on your first reference, and it is this. Hydrogen is
also required to convert heavy crudes into gasolene. The new refinary
near Homs in Syria will handle Venezuelan crude, this as all oilmen
know is a exceptionally heavy tarry crude.
We need to have a plan for the intoduction of the hydrogen economy. We
need a number of intermediate goals. Eventually all our energy will be
pure hydrogen derived from solar power. Hydrogen will exist alongside
oil for quite a period of time. We need to plan for this period, the
use of hydrogen in refining will come at an early point. We will need
oil for lubrication and petrochemicals for a long time.
2) reusable space launch - taking existing chemical rocket engines
and today's electronics and materials - fabricate a multi-stage fully
reusable launch system around a common airframe and a common engine
set. This is most easily done by buying the space launch assets of
major aerospace companies that are seeking to improve high margin
businesses. I have detailed designs for a flyback article built
around a modified ET airframe with an aerospike engine powered by 5
RS68 pumpsets - and a TPS on the nose. Fold away wings (think
Tomahawk cruise missile) deploy subsonically. GPS systems help
loitering tow aircraft recover re-entering boosters. A single ET with
an inline upper stage (used later as a deep space kick stage) place 75
tons into LEO. Three ETs put 225 tons into LEO. Seven ETs - put 550
tons into LEO. To justify this investment there are two markets that
will be served;
How international will your program be. A credible program as far as I
can see must be a blobal one.
a) communications satellite constellation - 660 satellites each
massing 10 tons in 30 orbital planes maintain polar orbit around the
Earth. Each satellite acts as a communications router with 6 open
optical 50 THz data links to nearest neighbors. Each satellite has an
uplink/downlink phase array microwave antenna that uses GPS signals to
paint stationary doppler corrected virtual cells across the face of
the Earth. Simple low cost chipsets maintain communication through a
wide range of digital devices including low cost handsets and
broadband computer links. $100 billion per year is earned by the
network that costs less than $60 billion to install. Additional
services include;
i) basic internet - $100 billion
ii) banking and financial services - microbanking - $1,000
billion
iii) international shipping and trading and tracking services -
$1,000 billion
iv) telepresence/telerobotics - $3,000 billiion - service side
+ hardware sales
I think you will have a job doing this from space. Fiber optics is the
dominany technology. This is pushing up to 800GHz per strand
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,193344,00.html 100GHz with 10
colors. 80 colors will be 800GHz
Any satellite system is going to be pushed to keep up with such speed.
The problem would seem to be not the speed of trunk networks but in
transmission from node to computer.
b) 2.2 GW solar power satellite - a 225 ton power satellite
consisting of thin film concentrator high intensity PV cells, and free
electron lasers - tuned to the bandgap energy of silicon - power large
terrestrial arrays at high efficiency, increasing their output 16x
from pure sunlight alone - permiting each satellite to earn over $10
million per week in energy sales.
c) 4.0 GW solar power satellite - a 500 ton power satellite
consisting of thin film concentrator as above - earns $1 billion per
year in revenue for 30 years while costing less than $700 million to
build and deploy.
2.2 and 4GW seem very small. Feasibility studies. I would be looking
to demonstrate highly sterrable beams. That to me would be the main
point. 4GW is small beer in global energy terms.
In fact 4GW would probably be what you might need to power a Nerva
type engine. At 10km/s 4GW represents 4*10^5N or about 40 tons of
thrust. If you were to concentrate the radiation into 1m square
(perfectly possible using phase locking) you would have the Nerva
engine - 10km/sec using LH as working fluid without any nuclear
reactor.
Feasibly study for this. Power aircraft too using this radiation. I
think 2.2/4 GW is significant and would represent a feasibility study,
but would consitute quite a small fraction of terrestrial capacity.
3) Modify upper stage (from inline booster) to operate as reusable
injection stage and lander.
a) Lunar operations - a kick stage puts a direct ascent lander on
course to the moon while returning to Earth for vertical descent and
landing near the launch point. The reusable lander places 25 tons on
the moon and returns it to Earth - an 8 to 10 day cycle time - flown
twice per month. The vehicle may also deposit 40 tons one way. It
carries up to 40 people on board. Two flights can place 40 people on
the moon for a year. A small fleet opens the age of interplanetary
tourism and settlement.
b) Mars operations - modifying the kick stage to execute a 2 year
orbit out and back is a simple way to return kick stages to Earth -
and send payloads to Mars quickly. The lander and kick stage tether
together and spin up -as in the Gemini tests with the Agena target
vehicle - to produce artificial gravity. The kick stage has a habitat
built into it - launched 'wet' - to allow living quarters in
transit. Upon approach to mars the crew enters the lander - climbing
the tether from one ship to the other - disconnects the kick stage,
and aerobrakes to a landing on the Mars surface. The 2 year orbit is
such that 6 months after landing, the kick stage passes Mars on its
way back to Earth. The lander then uses its propellant to take off,
and meet the returning kick stage, and spend 6 months returning to
Earth. Upon approach to Earth the lander and kick stage separate,
both aerobrake to a soft landing near the launch center - both are
reusable - cycle time 2 years -
c) Asteroidal operations - using the lander propulsion system to
circularize the orbit in the asteroid belt allows exploration of
several asteroids before returning to Earth by firing the lander
propulsion system again.
4) ICF experimentation - hydrogen flouride laser initiated
deuterium-tritium primaries set off boron-protium secondaries of
arbitrary size.
He3 is the thing to use in space, as I have explained.
a) This is first used to create 50 GW space power systems that
use Free Electron Lasers to power terrestrial solar installations
without large power satellite. A 75 ton satellite carrying 150 tons
of pulse units is capable of operating 30 years without resupply.
b) This is next used as a propulsive unit testing a wide range
of capabilities
5) ICF high thrust high performance drive
a) conversion of chemical booster fleet of 5 HLRLVs into 35
interplanetary cruisers capable of sending 500 tons to the moon in a
matter of hours, and 500 tons to Mars in a matter of days, and 500
tons to the Asteroid belt in a matter of days.
i) Lunar Republic
*) First bank of luna
ii) Mars Republic
iii) Asteroidal development
*) asteroid survey
**) asteroid return
b) build custom fleet of 'handy-size' interplanetary shipping
- 35 ships each carrying 20,000 tons of payload operate throughout the
inner solar system to support a variety of interplanetary objectives
i) Lunar dvelopment
ii) Mars development
ii) Earth development - build industrial ring to support Earth
6) Factory satellites - bring tens of billions of tons of raw
material from the asteroid belt safely to Earth orbit each year and
lift teleoperate factory elements to them Each year., Powered by
laser energy beamed to them from GEO, operated telerobotically by
people on Earth, and making things more cheaply than they can be made
on Earth, and in unlimited quantities without harming the environment
- products rain down precisely to where they're needed. Anyone may
work from anywhere and receive pay and buy any product. While Earth
is a primary consumer, the Moon and Mars are large secondary conumers
of space made products at low cost.
a) mining
b) smelting
c) industrial goods
d) consumer durable goods
e) consumer non-durable goods
i) food
ii) paper and wood
f) space homes
7) Laser powered VTOL MEMs based propulsive skin aircraft widely
available - promotes dispersion from major cities and provides
personal ballistic transport anywhere within 42 minutes or less.
Propulsive skin is an interesting concept. There is research I know on
skin to reduce drag. In point of fact though electric propulsion might
mean that you could get away with conventional propellors.
8) Fuiller style 'Cloud Nine' floating cities - made on orbit and
deorbited to float. Each 1 km diameter sphere is guided heated and
powered by lasers from space - and carries 50,000 people on board.
66,000 cities eventually provide quality food, clothing, homes, jobs
and lifestyle for the 3.3 billion of the world's poorest people -
allowing them to accumulate rather quickly an asset base for their
future. These people will be among the firstr waves of emmigrants
off-world, joining the wealthy early-adopters among the stars.
9) Space homes - as the cost of space homes decline to less than the
cost of terrestrial homes, more and more people emmigrate from Earth.
Financial planning software along with appropriate payscales and
banking services worldwide, allow most of the 3.3 billion to retire
after 15 years of labor - as fully autonomous industrial robots
displace telerobotic labor over the same period. Many elect to buy
homes for the first time, and most, having become used to life aboard
'cloud nine' residences, elect to own their own space colony. VTOL
ballistic transports gain orbital capabilites in this time period.
10) Improved propulsion - propulsion and power systems for space
colonies drop in price to make a mobile interplanetary colony a
reality. This combined with autonomous robots and stable financial
growth - make this the golden age of interplanetary development. Mars
and the Moon gain their own industrial ring - and massive space colony
'parks' are developed throughout the Asteroid belt and beyond.
11) sun orbiting power satellites - long distance beaming of terawatt
and more laser energy throughout interplanetary space - along with
compact powersats operating within 3 million km of Sol, give fusion
generators a run for their money. And provide the basis for first
generation laser light sail spacecraft for interstellar voyages.
Smaller space colonies are highly automated, and reduced in weight -
with improved life support - to carry families across interstellar
distances - this includes stasis and longevity research success -
along with improved virtual reality and social contextual software.
12) high mass high energy atom smashers - black holes smaler than
atoms but massing more than a mountain range are assmpled by colliding
shaped pieces of iron-56 at 1/3 light speed or more. Slight variation
in collision conditions charge and spin the black holes precisely -
precisely engineering their event horizons. A decade of research has
the potential to create a new class of engineered product - one
capable of warping space and time - and building such things as time
telephones (instantaneous ...
I think you need to keep the far future vision in mind, yes. but tou
also need to think in terms of pushing present day technology in the
near term, and think of what you can do in terms of feasibility
studies.
I also think that in terms of launcher development, you need to think
internationally, towards Arianespace and Energia.
- Ian Parker