OK, Carole, then you should have no trouble explaining why seismology
shows a solid earth. In particular, you should have no trouble
explaining why S- waves show generally increasing velocity with depth to
a depth of roughly 2200 km, showing that the shell of the earth is at
least that thick.. Further, you should be able to explain why P-waves
show a continuing increase in velocity from there to the center of the
earth, showing that the density of the stuff below 2200 km is higher
than that in the shell above. Further, you should be able to explain
why, if there is a free surface in the interior of the earth, all
seismic waves are not reflected from it. Further, you can make your own
seismometer and see for yourself that the Secret Hollow-Earth Cabal does
not muck with seismograms. You are the one making an extraordinary
claim here - it's up to you to show why seismograms are really
compatible with a hollow shell, despite not showing effects which must
be there if the hollow earth hypothesis is true.

"John Kepler" <jekepler@amplex.net> wrote in message
news:48139158_1@nntp2.nac.net...

Yes, I know what you're going to say ... gere she goes again with
one of her whacky theories.

You said it, not me!

But is it really so whacky?


Yes.....yes it is! Next question?

John


Yes, but you're all so predictable, so mind controlled, so under the
thumb as it were. What good little new world order subjects ...just
the way you were meant to be. They have written and ok'd all the
science books, all the geology books and created all the "approved"
theories for centuries.

I can guarantee you that not one of you has
actually read anything on the hollow earth theory, and why proponents
think its hollow.

For one thing, there is NO north or south pole. The point where the
compass points downward is a big circle 1000 km or so in
circumference -- so its not a point but an actual line or a magnetic
circle. The slope that goes into the hole at the north pole graduates
so slightly that people don't notice when they're in it.

The aurora boralis is the light from the inner sun which gets broken
up like a prism when it shines through the fog in the hole.

Other
facts are that when explorers go past a certain latitude 75 deg or
whatever,

the temperature begins to warm up and many explorers have
noticed that.

Also as you go north there are insects, pollen, and
bird life.

Do some reading. I dare you.

And what does anybody actually know about all the DUMBS (deep
underground military bases) around the world which amount to well
over 100. What goes on in them? We know virtually nothing about what
goes on under the ground except what they want us to know.

Carole www.conspiracee.com

And what does anybody actually know about all the DUMBS (deep underground
military bases) around the world which amount to well over 100.

What goes on in them?

We know virtually nothing about what goes on under the ground except what
they want us to know.

Carole
www.conspiracee.com

"Carole" <hubbca@iimetro.com.au> wrote in
news:48137c5c$0$1604$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:

Yes, I know what you're going to say ... gere she goes again with one
of her whacky theories.
But is it really so whacky?
Yes, I would have thought so at one time and anybody who suggested
differently was fit for a straight jacket in my mind.

snip


But there are heaps more, including answers to all the objections as
to why it isn't so.

So happy reading.

Carole
www.conspiracee.com



OK, Carole, then you should have no trouble explaining why seismology
shows
a solid earth. In particular, you should have no trouble explaining why
S-
waves show generally increasing velocity with depth to a depth of roughly
2200 km, showing that the shell of the earth is at least that thick..
Further, you should be able to explain why P-waves show a continuing
increase in velocity from there to the center of the earth, showing that
the density of the stuff below 2200 km is higher than that in the shell
above. Further, you should be able to explain why, if there is a free
surface in the interior of the earth, all seismic waves are not reflected
from it. Further, you can make your own seismometer and see for yourself
that the Secret Hollow-Earth Cabal does not muck with seismograms. You
are the one making an extraordinary claim here - it's up to you to show
why
seismograms are really compatible with a hollow shell, despite not showing
effects which must be there if the hollow earth hypothesis is true.

The reptoids have installed physical modeling transducers in the ceiling
area of the hollow core. These modeling transducers intercept and modify
the seismic waves in order to emulate the behaviour of a solid cored
planet.

Rather basic really.

If this was just a shell,

have to be made of a material unknown to
science but many times heavier than Lead.

We know virtually nothing about what goes on under the ground except what
they want us to know.

I think that all these rumors about a conspiracy are a conspiracy.
There's no conspiracy. There's just this secret committee that sits
around and makes up silly ideas like hollow earth, expanding earth, and
hollow expanding earth and propagates them to their minions so they in
turn can pretend they're "in the know" about super secret stuff that
nobody knows anything about. Then they put it all on the Interweb so
everyone can read all this secret knowledge.

On 2008-04-26 11:49:56 -1000, "Carole" <hubbca@iimetro.com.au> said:

We know virtually nothing about what goes on under the ground except what
they want us to know.

No, you know nothing about what goes on under the ground because you
haven't bothered to look. Nobody can hide seismic waves. You can
collect a worldwide suite of seismograms after any largish earthquake
from a variety of web sites and go ahead and perform the analysis
yourself. Better yet, google "homemade seismometer" and build your own
instrument. After a few months with just your own single instrument
you'll have enough information from different earthquakes to deduce a
pretty good Earth model (admittedly it would be radially symmetric, but
that's adequate to disprove the hollow Earth). I recommend that you not
look at any seismology texts beforehand (after all, you do not want to
be tainted by the "conspiracy")---just work out how to analyse the data
yourself from first principles---it's simple enough.

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:55:21 -0500, Jim Willemin wrote:


OK, Carole, then you should have no trouble explaining why seismology
shows a solid earth. In particular, you should have no trouble
explaining why S- waves show generally increasing velocity with depth to
a depth of roughly 2200 km, showing that the shell of the earth is at
least that thick.. Further, you should be able to explain why P-waves
show a continuing increase in velocity from there to the center of the
earth, showing that the density of the stuff below 2200 km is higher
than that in the shell above. Further, you should be able to explain
why, if there is a free surface in the interior of the earth, all
seismic waves are not reflected from it. Further, you can make your own
seismometer and see for yourself that the Secret Hollow-Earth Cabal does
not muck with seismograms. You are the one making an extraordinary
claim here - it's up to you to show why seismograms are really
compatible with a hollow shell, despite not showing effects which must
be there if the hollow earth hypothesis is true.

The reptoids have installed physical modeling transducers in the ceiling
area of the hollow core. These modeling transducers intercept and modify
the seismic waves in order to emulate the behaviour of a solid cored
planet.

Rather basic really.

In article <48137c5c$0$1604$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
01.iinet.net.au>, hubbca@iimetro.com.au says...
Yes, I know what you're going to say ... gere she goes again with one of her
whacky theories.
But is it really so whacky?
Yes, I would have thought so at one time and anybody who suggested
differently was fit for a straight jacket in my mind.

However, the more I read about the hollow earth theory the more convinced I
am that there is a huge coverup -- so what's news considering how much lies
and propaganda there is in every field of human endeavour -- medicine,
science, military, economy and not to forget history. It seems the lies
never end, the more you dig the more lies there are. its just layer upon
layer like a sarah what's-her-name cheesecake -- just lies, garbage and
junk.

A person has to be a hardy soul and persistent to sort out the truth from
the crap, what they want us to believe.
Information is power and they want to keep people enfeebled, they treat them
like mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed on excrement.

There are some marvellous online sources for this topic, one of the main
ones being Admiral Byrd's flight into the gap at the north pole (but there
really isn't a north pole as such).
Also Admiral Byrd later flew on a mission to the south pole and there is
some funny stuff going on there too.

One of the good sources on this topic is at
THE HOLLOW EARTH
http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/files/Underground-Bases/Hollow-Earth/adml
byrd.txt
he Greatest Geographical Discovery in History
Made by Admiral Richard E. Byrd in the Mysterious Land Beyond the Poles
The True Origin of the Flying Saucers

By Dr. Raymond Bernard A.B., M.A. Ph.D.

But there are heaps more, including answers to all the objections as to why
it isn't so.

So happy reading.

Carole
www.conspiracee.com






Are you Mrs. Brad Guth?

In article <4813ee52$0$30173$4c368...@roadrunner.com>, Gerard Fryer
wrote:





On 2008-04-26 11:49:56 -1000, "Carole" <hub...@iimetro.com.au> said:

We know virtually nothing about what goes on under the ground except what
they want us to know.

No, you know nothing about what goes on under the ground because you
haven't bothered to look. Nobody can hide seismic waves. You can
collect a worldwide suite of seismograms after any largish earthquake
from a variety of web sites and go ahead and perform the analysis
yourself. Better yet, google "homemade seismometer" and build your own
instrument. After a few months with just your own single instrument  
you'll have enough information from different earthquakes to deduce a
pretty good Earth model (admittedly it would be radially symmetric, but
that's adequate to disprove the hollow Earth). I recommend that you not
look at any seismology texts beforehand (after all, you do not want to
be tainted by the "conspiracy")---just work out how to analyse the data
yourself from first principles---it's simple enough.

Carole, we're serious about this.

You have a computer. You can build your own seismometer. (You should
build your own instead of getting a "real" one. You could build it from
a kit: that way you can examine all the parts and confirm that it works
as advertised.) Gather your own data. Think about what seismic waves
should look like when they come from earthquakes in various different
places in the world, both with and without a hollow Earth. Compare the
data with your hypotheses and come to your own conclusions.

But there is one reason why you should NOT build your own seismometer.
As long as you have not gathered and analyzed your own data, you can, in
ignorance, believe whatever you want about the "secrets" of the interior
of the Earth. If you build a seismometer, you will have to come the
conclusion that the Earth is solid (as in not hollow) and abandon your
hollow-earth hypothesis.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How do you know this?