| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Relativity Forum » Explaining "dark energy".
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:14 am |
|
|
|
|
HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS
Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our “local group”
of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the quiescent center of the
universe, and since all the trillions of other galaxies are expanding
away from us, I am led to further conclude they all came out of said
center at various times more than 13.7 billion years ago, and orbit
the center just like us, only at speeds exceeding escape velocity.
Simple centrifugal force then, is the “dark energy” powering the
expansion.
These ideas are my original intellectual property and have been
continuously copyrighted by me since 1990, all rights reserved.
Dwain W. Higginbotham Miami, Fla. 23 April 2008
Email—dwhig265@peoplepc.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| dlzc |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear dwhig...:
On Apr 23, 2:14 pm, dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Quote: HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS
Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,
They are not expanding uniformly away from us. We have non-trivial
~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at large. No "center" is
visible in that direction either.
Quote: I am led to further conclude they all came out of said
center at various times more than 13.7 billion years
ago, and orbit the center just like us, only at speeds
exceeding escape velocity. Simple centrifugal force
then, is the “dark energy” powering the expansion.
The ancient church will be so happy that you are now proselytizing for
them.
Quote: These ideas are my original intellectual
property and have been continuously copyrighted by me
since 1990, all rights reserved.
Dwain W. Higginbotham Miami, Fla.
23 April 2008
Email—dwhig...@peoplepc.com
Better take this all up with Ptolemy. I think his name is on it, and
it is now in the public domain.
David A. Smith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:46 am |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 23, 5:34 pm, dlzc <dl...@cox.net> wrote:
Quote: Dear dwhig...:
On Apr 23, 2:14 pm, dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS
Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,
They are not expanding uniformly away from us. We have non-trivial
~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at large. No "center" is
visible in that direction either.
DWH "Various times" would imply non uniformity. "Quiescent" implies
theres nothing to see.
Quote:
I am led to further conclude they all came out of said
center at various times more than 13.7 billion years
ago, and orbit the center just like us, only at speeds
exceeding escape velocity. Simple centrifugal force
then, is the “dark energy” powering the expansion.
The ancient church will be so happy that you are now proselytizing for
them.
These ideas are my original intellectual
property and have been continuously copyrighted by me
since 1990, all rights reserved.
Dwain W. Higginbotham Miami, Fla.
23 April 2008
Email—dwhig...@peoplepc.com
Better take this all up with Ptolemy. I think his name is on it, and
it is now in the public domain.
David A. Smith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| dlzc |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear dwhig...:
On Apr 23, 2:46 pm, dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 5:34 pm,dlzc<dl...@cox.net> wrote:> Dear dwhig...:
On Apr 23, 2:14 pm, dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS
Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,
They are not expanding uniformly away from us. We have
non-trivial ~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at
large. No "center" is visible in that direction either.
DWH "Various times" would imply non uniformity.
No, it does not "imply", since the entire Universe is constrained to
orbit "us" FTL. And our local group's components are not static...
Andromeda is coming right at us, and the Magellanic clouds (and more)
are moving away. "Orbitting" makes this motion more problematic.
Quote: "Quiescent" implies theres nothing to see.
There should be something to see, a center.
No center. Motion still away from "us", (more or less) uniform wrt
"us", not some mythical center.
David A. Smith |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:54 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 23, 6:28 pm, dlzc <dl...@cox.net> wrote:
Quote: Dear dwhig...:
On Apr 23, 2:46 pm, dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 5:34 pm,dlzc<dl...@cox.net> wrote:> Dear dwhig...:
On Apr 23, 2:14 pm, dwhig...@peoplepc.com wrote:
HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS
Observational evidence leads me to conclude that our
“local group” of 40 or so galaxies orbit what is now the
quiescent center of the universe, and since all the
trillions of other galaxies are expanding away from us,
They are not expanding uniformly away from us. We have
non-trivial ~300 km/sec velocity wrt the Universe at
large. No "center" is visible in that direction either.
DWH "Various times" would imply non uniformity.
No, it does not "imply", since the entire Universe is constrained to
orbit "us" FTL. And our local group's components are not static...
Andromeda is coming right at us, and the Magellanic clouds (and more)
are moving away. "Orbitting" makes this motion more problematic.
DWH. Thanks for responding. Since we see no red or blue shifts
regarding the rest of the local group, Andromeda has to be orbiting
faster than the rest of us and is already above escape velocity, and
when it's projected to collide with us it will long ago have left the
local group. This idea is also copyrighted but I might give you a
small chunk of the prize
Quote: "Quiescent" implies theres nothing to see.
There should be something to see, a center.
DWH. There might be the Mother of all black holes there.
No center. Motion still away from "us", (more or less) uniform wrt
"us", not some mythical center.
DWH When I say "us" I mean the entire local group, not just the Earth
or Milky Way. The distances involved make it very difficult to
document any proper motion.
Quote: David A. Smith- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text - |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:26 pm
|
|