| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Medicine - Cardiology Forum » Jesus is love
Page 5 of 7 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Bill M |
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc16@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:fb23ed97-625f-403f-af43-7684b993fa26@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote: friend Andrew wrote:
satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) despairingly posted:
It draws attention to the vacillating lunacy of following
non existent gods and THAT is quite a lot, looked at from a
psychological viewpoint.
I hadn't realised you were trained in psychology.
'Psychology' n. The study of the human mind, a treatise on
or a system of it [P.O.D.]
I realised you understood the word. I simply had no idea you had spent
any time studying the subject.
The study failed with the false belief that love resides in the mind
because true love is found in the hearts of our souls.
What is a heart doing pumping blood in our spiritual soul?
Your either delusional or drunk!
Those who
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:19 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Fred Jones |
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc17@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:7bfd916f-0535-4ed0-9785-f04993b70a24@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Lying is satins native language? Religion speaks it quite well also. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Nicodemus |
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:56 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc19@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:e4bfd2b2-4f58-4c7c-8c70-7fc44cb2a4eb@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
I Beleive In God. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| bob young |
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:30 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Andrew wrote:
Quote:
On 2008-04-27 04:41:01 +0100, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> said:
It draws attention to the vacillating lunacy of following
non existent gods and THAT is quite a lot, looked at from a
psychological viewpoint.
I hadn't realised you were trained in psychology.
'Psychology' n. The study of the human mind, a treatise on
or a system of it [P.O.D.]
I realised you understood the word. I simply had no idea you had spent
any time studying the subject.
Been a favorite subject of mine for years, I have many
books by Jung, Freud, Miller, Wundt, James, etc.
The are/were people restless to inquire into the workings of
the human mind, trying to ferret out why we behave the way
we do and why we do what we do. For example, right up to
date, an Austrian male reported yesterday as having fathered
seven children with his own daughter - that kind of thing.
There are two basic viewpoints. The human mind is a kind of
divine creation, not perfect but all the same something
different and special, set apart from the minds [brains] of
other living things, and;
The human brain is an exception to the evolutionary rule,
some even say a freak within the scope of nature,
recognising as we do the difficulty in observing the human
mind as the only tool available to do this is, regrettably,
just another mind.
A favorite tool is the Bell Curve where human attributes are
measured and plotted on a graph. The simplest is a
classroom of boys who are measured for height. The very
shortest will fall within the left hand bottom curve of the
bell shape and the ultra tall in the opposite lower corner
of the bell, the average make up the sides and top [the
body] of the bell. If itelligence or IQ is used we get a
similar shape.
Very basic, but if we could measure 'religious tendency' the
same would apply, far on the right would be the ultra
religious person [the fundamentalist], whilst the rest of
the RH side of the bell would be normal religious types
swinging left to those who do not care about gods and on the
far left people like me.
If nothing else it shows how different we all are and that
at the end of the day none of us are right, even though we
would like to think we are.
Who shall decide, when doctors disagree
[Pope] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| monkfish |
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:30:02 -0500, bob young wrote:
Quote: Andrew wrote:
On 2008-04-27 04:41:01 +0100, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com
said:
It draws attention to the vacillating lunacy of following non
existent gods and THAT is quite a lot, looked at from a
psychological viewpoint.
I hadn't realised you were trained in psychology.
'Psychology' n. The study of the human mind, a treatise on or a
system of it [P.O.D.]
I realised you understood the word. I simply had no idea you had spent
any time studying the subject.
Been a favorite subject of mine for years, I have many books by Jung,
Freud, Miller, Wundt, James, etc.
Hard to believe.
What does it mean for us to sublimate our needs
to the point of loving even our enemies?
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| bob young |
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
monkfish wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:30:02 -0500, bob young wrote:
Andrew wrote:
On 2008-04-27 04:41:01 +0100, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com
said:
It draws attention to the vacillating lunacy of following non
existent gods and THAT is quite a lot, looked at from a
psychological viewpoint.
I hadn't realised you were trained in psychology.
'Psychology' n. The study of the human mind, a treatise on or a
system of it [P.O.D.]
I realised you understood the word. I simply had no idea you had spent
any time studying the subject.
Been a favorite subject of mine for years, I have many books by Jung,
Freud, Miller, Wundt, James, etc.
Hard to believe.
What does it mean for us to sublimate our needs
to the point of loving even our enemies?
what is the point of answering your posts?
Quote:
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| monkfish |
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bob young wrote:
Quote: monkfish wrote:
What does it mean for us to sublimate our needs
to the point of loving even our enemies?
what is the point of answering your posts?
You will learn to be grateful for everything.
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| bob young |
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
monkfish wrote:
Quote:
bob young wrote:
monkfish wrote:
What does it mean for us to sublimate our needs
to the point of loving even our enemies?
what is the point of answering your posts?
You will learn to be grateful for everything.
I am very grateful to the 'DELETE' button
<PRESS>
Quote:
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD |
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| bob young |
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:
Yes that is the origins of banal beliefs, repeat claims
often enough even intelligent people will believe them.
That is what Hitler's propaganda chief said
'Tell the masses a big lie often enpough and in time they
will all beleive it" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 5 of 7 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:05 am
|
|