Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Energy Forum  »  Global Cooling is Now on Us.
Page 2 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Dan
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:29 pm
Guest
Bob Brock wrote:
Quote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:32:53 -0700 (PDT),
hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com wrote:

On Apr 29, 2:12 am, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-americia.net> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:10:59 -0700 (PDT),





hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 12:14 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0%2C25197%2C23583376-50134...
Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh
Phil Chapman | April 23, 2008
THE scariest photo I have seen on the internet iswww.spaceweather.com,
where you will find a real-time image of the sun from the Solar and
Heliospheric Observatory, located in deep space at the equilibrium
point between solar and terrestrial gravity.
What is scary about the picture is that there is only one tiny
sunspot.
Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the
average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined
during the past decade, despite the continued increase in the
atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, and now the global
temperature is falling precipitously.
All four agencies that track Earth's temperature (the Hadley Climate
Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
in New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and
Remote Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by
about 0.7C in 2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the
instrumental record and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the
temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that
global warming is over.
snip
Inexperienced meteorologists often find themselves "chasing"
observations. That is a useless exercise. I imagine climatologists
do the same thing to the same end.
When I was in high school, were were facing an ice age. Oil would run
out by Y2K. And we were switching to the metric system.
We are Y2k+8. Noticed anything significant happening to oil prices
during that time frame? Yeah, I know you want to blame Bush.
Yeh. Stop the pumps. There's no more oil. Bush made it all go away.

A little later, Howard Ruff predicted an impending economic collapse
and the Hunt brothers tried to corner the silver market.
I just don't get excited by the fear mongers anymore.
I just don't get excited by the fear mongers onymore.

If you are prepared, you shouldn't be afraid.

There really is no suitable preparation for the next ice age (triggered
by the current global warming).

Quote:
If you aren't prepared
after being told about the risks, the cleansing of the gene pool will
not only be refreshing, it will be entertaining.

But you have no idea what genes will permit survival under conditions to
prevail at a later date, so that is a silly statement.

Dan
Guest
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:13 pm
On Apr 30, 11:28 am, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 28, 11:23 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:

The facts don't lie.

Temperatures have been falling for the last decade.

Graham

show us the graph.

The reference in the article is from:
http://www.spaceweather.com

QUIET SUN: Experts say the sun is quiet. Indeed, the 11-year solar
cycle is at low ebb. But just how quiet can a 1027 ton nuclear
explosion (i.e., a star) ever be? Consider the following photo taken
yesterday by Pete Lawrence of Selsey, UK:

All kinds of pictures and learnin fer ya there cowboy.
Curly Surmudgeon
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:16 pm
Guest
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:14:12 -0700, knews4u2chew wrote:

Quote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0%2C25197%2C23583376-5013480%2C00.html

Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh

Phil Chapman | April 23, 2008

THE scariest photo I have seen on the internet is www.spaceweather.com,
where you will find a real-time image of the sun from the Solar and
Heliospheric Observatory, located in deep space at the equilibrium point
between solar and terrestrial gravity.

What is scary about the picture is that there is only one tiny sunspot.

Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the
average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined during
the past decade, despite the continued increase in the atmospheric
concentration of carbon dioxide, and now the global temperature is falling
precipitously.

All four agencies that track Earth's temperature (the Hadley Climate
Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in
New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and Remote
Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by about 0.7C in
2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record
and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the temperature does not
soon recover, we will have to conclude that global warming is over.
snip

That's the problem with using a single data point to make decisions.

Apr 30 2008 6:31pm from rss
Subject: Global warming? Next decade could be cooler, says study
PARIS (AFP) - Global warming could take a break in the next decade thanks
to a natural shift in ocean circulations, although Earth's temperature will
rise as previously expected over the longer term, according to a study
published on Thursday in the British journal Nature.


http://www.afp.com/english/news/stories/newsmlmmd.270e667b80745062919fc6e8c448
db78.251.html

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supporting a Mad President is Unpatriotic
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Brock
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:20 pm
Guest
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:20:19 -0400, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
<paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Quote:

"Bob Brock" <bbrock@i-americia.net> wrote
If you are prepared, you shouldn't be afraid.
If you aren't prepared after being told about
the risks, the cleansing of the gene pool will
not only be refreshing, it will be entertaining.





Let me ask you this: Wouldn't the African Pigmy Tribes be more able to
survive a total depletion of oil better than the wired and fired hi-tech
world of New Yorkers? And the best part is, they won't even know what's
happening - if indeed it happens as you want desperately to believe.

So in the end, "the least of you" will inherit what's left of the earth
rings true.

I would venture to say that there are some tribes and communities that
would hardly notice the demise of civilization via economic collapse.
A major cooling would possibly benefit some places.
Bob Brock
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:25 pm
Guest
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:29:49 -0700, Dan <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Bob Brock wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:32:53 -0700 (PDT),
hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com wrote:

On Apr 29, 2:12 am, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-americia.net> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:10:59 -0700 (PDT),





hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 12:14 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0%2C25197%2C23583376-50134...
Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh
Phil Chapman | April 23, 2008
THE scariest photo I have seen on the internet iswww.spaceweather.com,
where you will find a real-time image of the sun from the Solar and
Heliospheric Observatory, located in deep space at the equilibrium
point between solar and terrestrial gravity.
What is scary about the picture is that there is only one tiny
sunspot.
Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the
average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined
during the past decade, despite the continued increase in the
atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, and now the global
temperature is falling precipitously.
All four agencies that track Earth's temperature (the Hadley Climate
Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
in New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and
Remote Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by
about 0.7C in 2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the
instrumental record and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the
temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that
global warming is over.
snip
Inexperienced meteorologists often find themselves "chasing"
observations. That is a useless exercise. I imagine climatologists
do the same thing to the same end.
When I was in high school, were were facing an ice age. Oil would run
out by Y2K. And we were switching to the metric system.
We are Y2k+8. Noticed anything significant happening to oil prices
during that time frame? Yeah, I know you want to blame Bush.
Yeh. Stop the pumps. There's no more oil. Bush made it all go away.

A little later, Howard Ruff predicted an impending economic collapse
and the Hunt brothers tried to corner the silver market.
I just don't get excited by the fear mongers anymore.
I just don't get excited by the fear mongers onymore.

If you are prepared, you shouldn't be afraid.

There really is no suitable preparation for the next ice age (triggered
by the current global warming).

Mankind's predecessors didn't completely die out during the last one.
I think that something else, or perhaps several something else's, will
cull mankind before we reach the next ice age. Oil depletion being
one of them. Which is why I pointed out that current oil prices
support peak oil theory.

Quote:

If you aren't prepared
after being told about the risks, the cleansing of the gene pool will
not only be refreshing, it will be entertaining.

But you have no idea what genes will permit survival under conditions to
prevail at a later date, so that is a silly statement.

There are things that one can do to prepare for oil shortages,
economic collapse, and the wars to control energy supplies.
z
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:49 am
Guest
On May 1, 1:13 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:
The facts don't lie.

Temperatures have been falling for the last decade.

Graham

show us the graph.

The reference in the article is from:http://www.spaceweather.com

the graph of temperatures falling for the last decade. you must have
seen something to convince you, right? don't you think we should get
to see it too? is it secret? or are you worried it would not convince
us?
z
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:52 am
Guest
On Apr 30, 2:35 pm, "Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

Quote:
Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the
average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined
during the past decade, despite the continued increase in the

show us the graph.

Well, some people vowed it'd be a "cold day in hell" when they would file a
tax return again, but the lure of getting a couple of hundred bucks had them
lining up on April 15th - the coldest it's ever been on April 15th in eons -
to file their returns.

Oh yeah, the end of April (well, ok, it was last night) had frost and freeze
warnings through all north Georgia.

--
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
----------------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia

ah, so the evidence which convinced you that "the average temperature
on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined during the past
decade" is "April 15th - the coldest it's ever been on April 15th in
eons" and "the end of April (well, ok, it was last night) had frost
and freeze warnings through all north Georgia."

well then, that's damn convincing, i would definitely submit a paper
if i were you.
Dan
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:00 am
Guest
Bob Brock wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:20:19 -0400, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote:

"Bob Brock" <bbrock@i-americia.net> wrote
If you are prepared, you shouldn't be afraid.
If you aren't prepared after being told about
the risks, the cleansing of the gene pool will
not only be refreshing, it will be entertaining.




Let me ask you this: Wouldn't the African Pigmy Tribes be more able to
survive a total depletion of oil better than the wired and fired hi-tech
world of New Yorkers? And the best part is, they won't even know what's
happening - if indeed it happens as you want desperately to believe.

So in the end, "the least of you" will inherit what's left of the earth
rings true.

I would venture to say that there are some tribes and communities that
would hardly notice the demise of civilization via economic collapse.
A major cooling would possibly benefit some places.

With the simple exception that humans are MOBILE, and some people, if it
came to it, would try to move in on the areas inhabited by the [tribe of
choice]. The people coming might well have the numbers, weapon
superiority, and desperation to at least cause a dent in the knowledge
bank of the tribe.

Things will get very ugly under such circumstances, and it will be a
crapshoot as to what genes are lucky enough to survive (as it has always
been).

Dan
Paul Thomas, CPA
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:14 am
Guest
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
Quote:
With the simple exception that humans are MOBILE,


Much less so these days without petroleum fuels.





Quote:
and some people, if it came to it, would try to move
in on the areas inhabited by the [tribe of choice].


To what end? There's nothing there that anyone wants. Those people don't
have food, oil, housing, health care, etc.

The point is that they haven't had these things for eons, or at least not to
the point of dependency upon them. How much pain are they feeling "at the
pump" when they still get around on foot, a cart pulled by oxen, etc. How
difficult will their lives be when the world's electrical grid goes dark,
since they live without electricity and in the dark their whole lives.





Quote:
Things will get very ugly under such circumstances,

Yeah, "Wow, there's no oil or electricity here, let's go to Sub-Africa to
have a better life."





Quote:
and it will be a crapshoot as to what genes are lucky enough to survive



No computer, no cell phone, no TV, no Wii, no car, no heat, no AC, no
grocery......

You'd be lucky to last a week.





--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
----------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Dan
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:29 am
Guest
Bob Brock wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:29:49 -0700, Dan <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote:

Bob Brock wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:32:53 -0700 (PDT),
hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com wrote:

On Apr 29, 2:12 am, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-americia.net> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:10:59 -0700 (PDT),





hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 12:14 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0%2C25197%2C23583376-50134...
Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh
Phil Chapman | April 23, 2008
THE scariest photo I have seen on the internet iswww.spaceweather.com,
where you will find a real-time image of the sun from the Solar and
Heliospheric Observatory, located in deep space at the equilibrium
point between solar and terrestrial gravity.
What is scary about the picture is that there is only one tiny
sunspot.
Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the
average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined
during the past decade, despite the continued increase in the
atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, and now the global
temperature is falling precipitously.
All four agencies that track Earth's temperature (the Hadley Climate
Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
in New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and
Remote Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by
about 0.7C in 2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the
instrumental record and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the
temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that
global warming is over.
snip
Inexperienced meteorologists often find themselves "chasing"
observations. That is a useless exercise. I imagine climatologists
do the same thing to the same end.
When I was in high school, were were facing an ice age. Oil would run
out by Y2K. And we were switching to the metric system.
We are Y2k+8. Noticed anything significant happening to oil prices
during that time frame? Yeah, I know you want to blame Bush.
Yeh. Stop the pumps. There's no more oil. Bush made it all go away.

A little later, Howard Ruff predicted an impending economic collapse
and the Hunt brothers tried to corner the silver market.
I just don't get excited by the fear mongers anymore.
I just don't get excited by the fear mongers onymore.
If you are prepared, you shouldn't be afraid.
There really is no suitable preparation for the next ice age (triggered
by the current global warming).

Mankind's predecessors didn't completely die out during the last one.

They certainly both had adaptable skills and adapted (mentally) on the
fly. Their starting population was such that there was very little
intraspecific competition. I'm talking about the batman survivalists
("I'll make a tool and resource set that will let me survive several
generations").

Preparation will not necessarily be needed, of a resource kind, as there
will be tools and other things galore after the first few die offs, but
the actual genetic necessities will be totally unknown until after the
fact, as is the case in all geological-time-scale biological events.

Quote:
I think that something else, or perhaps several something else's, will
cull mankind before we reach the next ice age. Oil depletion being
one of them. Which is why I pointed out that current oil prices
support peak oil theory.

Lots of Capitalism at work independent of actual production capability
in the short term. Humans are very clever, just none too smart.

If the trigger point is reached (melting of Arctic Ice Cap), the flip to
ice age can be less than one generation, if the science is correct.

Quote:
If you aren't prepared
after being told about the risks, the cleansing of the gene pool will
not only be refreshing, it will be entertaining.
But you have no idea what genes will permit survival under conditions to
prevail at a later date, so that is a silly statement.

There are things that one can do to prepare for oil shortages,
economic collapse, and the wars to control energy supplies.

Population density will have a lot to say about that, even in our
loosely populated (by comparison) continent. There is a lot of farmland
in the Great American Desert (remember that phrase - it is the current
breadbasket of the continent) that is inhospitable without a cheap
source of natural gas. Think Dust Bowl for what it used to be like.
The Oglala Aquifer is getting smaller by the day, as it is a fossil
remnant of the last ice age being pumped out at much faster than its
recharge rate.

Dan
Paul Thomas, CPA
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:42 am
Guest
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
Quote:
There is a lot of farmland in the Great American Desert
(remember that phrase - it is the current breadbasket of
the continent) that is inhospitable without a cheap source
of natural gas. Think Dust Bowl for what it used to be like.





What an idiot you are. Do you just not know the mechanics of what caused
the dust bowl era here in the US? Prior to that time, it was fertile for
the types of natural crops and grasses that it reaped.

If anything, irrigation (water) is more important than gas in farming those,
or almost any other lands.




--
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
----------------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia
Dan
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:38 am
Guest
Paul Thomas, CPA wrote:
Quote:
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
With the simple exception that humans are MOBILE,

Much less so these days without petroleum fuels.

People can travel long distances on foot.

Quote:
and some people, if it came to it, would try to move
in on the areas inhabited by the [tribe of choice].

To what end? There's nothing there that anyone wants. Those people don't
have food, oil, housing, health care, etc.

Were there nothing, the [tribe of choice] would not be still living
there. When circumstances change, so will expectations.

Quote:
The point is that they haven't had these things for eons, or at least not to
the point of dependency upon them.

So they all died off? But the OP said they were there...

Quote:
How much pain are they feeling "at the
pump" when they still get around on foot, a cart pulled by oxen, etc. How
difficult will their lives be when the world's electrical grid goes dark,
since they live without electricity and in the dark their whole lives.

When EVERYONE is desperate, things will not be quite as they are today...

Quote:
Things will get very ugly under such circumstances,

Yeah, "Wow, there's no oil or electricity here, let's go to Sub-Africa to
have a better life."

Where did you get that? Are you of the opinion that there are only
rural tribes in Africa. How charmingly naive.

Quote:
and it will be a crapshoot as to what genes are lucky enough to survive

No computer, no cell phone, no TV, no Wii, no car, no heat, no AC, no
grocery......

You'd be lucky to last a week.

That was supposed to be an insult, right? Just checking...

And a CPA is going to survive on, what again?

Dan
Dan
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:44 am
Guest
Paul Thomas, CPA wrote:
Quote:
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
There is a lot of farmland in the Great American Desert
(remember that phrase - it is the current breadbasket of
the continent) that is inhospitable without a cheap source
of natural gas. Think Dust Bowl for what it used to be like.

What an idiot you are. Do you just not know the mechanics of what caused
the dust bowl era here in the US? Prior to that time, it was fertile for
the types of natural crops and grasses that it reaped.

Which is, of course, why the people traveling through it named it The
Great American Desert...

Quote:
If anything, irrigation (water) is more important than gas in farming those,
or almost any other lands.

You are remarkable. Ignorant, and willing to demonstrate it to all.

Look up exactly WHEN the area became "fertile." Look up the
circumstances of this transition, and the exact nature of the REASONS
for the transformation.

When you have researched that, come back and we can have a civilized
talk on the subject.

Next time, have at least SOME information at your disposal before you
start talking on a subject which you know nothing about. oh, and nice
clippage: go back to the stuff you cut out, it will be a great starting
point for your researches, since I did include most of the pertinent
information (but very succinctly, so you do need to understand the
events to know that it was a complete outline summary).

Dan
Paul Thomas, CPA
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 12:01 pm
Guest
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
Quote:
Paul Thomas, CPA wrote:
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
With the simple exception that humans are MOBILE,

Much less so these days without petroleum fuels.

People can travel long distances on foot.




I'm sure of that. But at a much more slower pace, with much less luggage.
So you tell me, are they carying tons of guns and ammo, or food to eat on
their quest to "cause a dent" in some third world country for reasons yet to
be known.






Quote:
How much pain are they feeling "at the pump" when they still get around
on foot, a cart pulled by oxen, etc. How difficult will their lives be
when the world's electrical grid goes dark, since they live without
electricity and in the dark their whole lives.

When EVERYONE is desperate, things will not be quite as they are today...




Not in rural Burkina Faso. They'll not be as desperate as say, you will be.






Quote:
Yeah, "Wow, there's no oil or electricity here,
let's go to Sub-Africa to have a better life."

Where did you get that?



From you. You're the one who proposed that massive groups of armed men,
women and children wil desend upon places that can (because they do) survive
on nothing.





Quote:
Are you of the opinion that there are only rural tribes in Africa. How
charmingly naive.



Yet, you proclaimed that:
"With the simple exception that humans are MOBILE,
and some people, if it came to it, would try to move in
on the areas inhabited by the [tribe of choice]. The
people coming might well have the numbers, weapon
superiority, and desperation to at least cause a dent
in the knowledge bank of the tribe."




Are you of the opinion that there are only rural unarmed, inept at
protecting themselves, tribes in Africa?

Seem as if you believe that someone who hasn't the food to ewat will carry
heavy weaponry across water - on foot - to do battle with people who have
been surviving on their lands for decades without running water in some
cases.




--
"For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For
those who do not, none will suffice." - Joseph Dunniger

Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia
Paul Thomas, CPA
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 12:15 pm
Guest
"Dan" <dnadan56@hotmail.com> wrote
Quote:
Look up exactly WHEN the area became "fertile."





Apparently, according to you, shortly after someone brought a gallon of gas
out west.

But the fact remains, you can take 600,000 cubic feet of natural gas to both
poles of the earth and not have anything close to fertile soil for crops.
And the fact remains that 100 billion cubic feet of natural gas can't make a
flower grow in the desert sands.

In fact, gas is pretty far down the list of things necessary to grow crops.
Water, nutrients, oxygen, and a seed are necessary. Soil would be oh so
helpful, but you can grow plants in almost anything, even a sponge, plastic
mulch, and other synthetic fibers. Gas - petroleum gas - isn't on the list
of necessary things.






So, why was it that you predicted armed groups of people would walk across
water to invade some third world country again?
 
Page 2 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:54 pm