| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Anthropology - Paleo Forum » Gorilla-sized thick-enameled wetland waders?
Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| mclark |
 Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 11:46 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 9:02 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:39 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Apr 23, 5:18 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:10 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Apr 22, 7:27 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 6:51 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Apr 22, 3:38 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 2:58 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Is this true? Do you really believe that spears couldn't be used for
fish? Why not?
Think you will ever be able to follow a thread without screwing up?
Would you like to make aretraction?
Umm, no, I don't think so.....
You really should. Really.
No, you have just proven, once again, that you are a brainless, lying
troll.
I'm going to give you a hint:
"You dimwits read between the lines then try to take
me to task for things I never stated. Quote me directly you stooge."
Remember saying that, you hypocritical idiot?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Ohhh! That's too bad. Now I have no choice but to continue to ask
you to make the retraction.
So, how about it, Lee. Would you like to make the retraction?
"Quote me directly you stooge."- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Read upthread.
You really should make the retraction. Ask Mikey.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Ask Mikey what, exactly, Dimmy?
Say, how about a link to that hypothesis
of yours? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mclark |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 3:51 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 12:37 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Do you agree with Lee
that spears couldn't be used for fish?
The reason the is no direct quote about Lee's position from McGin is
because Lee never said any such thing. Claud is a liar. Quote me
directly you lying piece of horse shit.
Are you really as dumb as you pretend?
What he said, and where is that URL, Dimmy?
Maybe you'd like to make a retraction about that
URL before you get caught with your pants down
....again. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Marc Verhaegen |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Claudius Denk |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 1:51 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 12:37 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Do you agree with Lee
that spears couldn't be used for fish?
The reason the is no direct quote about Lee's position from McGin is
because Lee never said any such thing. Claud is a liar. Quote me
directly you lying piece of horse shit.
Are you really as dumb as you pretend?
I don't know what you're so nervous about. It's not like you have a
real hypothesis anyway.
So now you admit that spears could be useful for fishing. And I
suspect if I were to continue to poke at you long enough you'd also
eventually admit that spears could be useful in treed habitat also.
This being the case one can only wonder why it is you are so insistent
that hominid evolution primarily involved a long distance running/
walking lifestyle in treeless savanna habitat. Can you explain this
to us? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Claudius Denk |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 5:29 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 3:51 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:37 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Do you agree with Lee
that spears couldn't be used for fish?
The reason the is no direct quote about Lee's position from McGin is
because Lee never said any such thing. Claud is a liar. Quote me
directly you lying piece of horse shit.
Are you really as dumb as you pretend?
What he said, and where is that URL, Dimmy?
Maybe you'd like to make a retraction about that
URL before you get caught with your pants down
....again.
Okay, Mikey,. You are a witness. I offered him the retraction. All
Lee had to do was not respond. Now he's going to go through the same
thing you went through.
When are you two geniuses going to learn? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mclark |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 12:27 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 5:29 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Apr 23, 3:51 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:37 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Do you agree with Lee
that spears couldn't be used for fish?
The reason the is no direct quote about Lee's position from McGin is
because Lee never said any such thing. Claud is a liar. Quote me
directly you lying piece of horse shit.
Are you really as dumb as you pretend?
What he said, and where is that URL, Dimmy?
Maybe you'd like to make a retraction about that
URL before you get caught with your pants down
....again.
Okay, Mikey,. You are a witness. I offered him the retraction. All
Lee had to do was not respond. Now he's going to go through the same
thing you went through.
When are you two geniuses going to learn?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So does this mean that we're not going to get
that URL to your "new" hypothesis? I guess
we'll just have to use the old one then.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Claudius Denk |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 4:01 am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 12:27 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Apr 23, 5:29 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Apr 23, 3:51 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:37 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Do you agree with Lee
that spears couldn't be used for fish?
The reason the is no direct quote about Lee's position from McGin is
because Lee never said any such thing. Claud is a liar. Quote me
directly you lying piece of horse shit.
Are you really as dumb as you pretend?
What he said, and where is that URL, Dimmy?
Maybe you'd like to make a retraction about that
URL before you get caught with your pants down
....again.
Okay, Mikey,. You are a witness. I offered him the retraction. All
Lee had to do was not respond. Now he's going to go through the same
thing you went through.
When are you two geniuses going to learn?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So does this mean that we're not going to get
that URL to your "new" hypothesis? I guess
we'll just have to use the old one then....- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
For the record: you can't say I didn't offer him the opportunity to
make a retraction. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Lee Olsen |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 7:38 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 4:01 am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:27 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On Apr 23, 5:29 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Apr 23, 3:51 pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 12:37 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Do you agree with Lee
that spears couldn't be used for fish?
The reason the is no direct quote about Lee's position from McGin is
because Lee never said any such thing. Claud is a liar. Quote me
directly you lying piece of horse shit.
Are you really as dumb as you pretend?
What he said, and where is that URL, Dimmy?
Maybe you'd like to make a retraction about that
URL before you get caught with your pants down
....again.
Okay, Mikey,. You are a witness. I offered him the retraction. All
Lee had to do was not respond. Now he's going to go through the same
thing you went through.
When are you two geniuses going to learn?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So does this mean that we're not going to get
that URL to your "new" hypothesis? I guess
we'll just have to use the old one then....- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
For the record: you can't say I didn't offer him the opportunity to
make a retraction.
What's the matter, troll, too stupid to find a direct quote? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Claudius Denk |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I don't know what you're so nervous about. It's not like you have a
real hypothesis anyway.
So now you admit that spears could be useful for fishing. And I
suspect if I were to continue to poke at you long enough you'd also
eventually admit that spears could be useful in treed habitat also.
This being the case one can only wonder why it is you are so
insistent
that hominid evolution primarily involved a long distance running/
walking lifestyle in treeless savanna habitat. Can you explain this
to us? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Lee Olsen |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 9:17 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: I don't know what you're so nervous about.
It's not like you have a real hypothesis anyway. When do you think you
will be getting a hypothesis?
Quote: So now you admit that spears could be useful for fishing.
Quote brainless Claud: "Do you really believe that spears couldn't be
used for fish?"
Now, dimwit, once again, quote me directly, do not paraphase what you
think you though I said. Since you can't, thanks for proving once
again whan an asshole liar you are. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Claudius Denk |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 10:55 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 9:17 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>I don't know what you're so nervous about.
It's not like you have a real hypothesis anyway. When do you think you
will be getting a hypothesis?
So now you admit that spears could be useful for fishing.
Quote brainless Claud: "Do you really believe that spears couldn't be
used for fish?"
Now, dimwit, once again, quote me directly, do not paraphase what you
think you though I said. Since you can't, thanks for proving once
again whan an asshole liar you are.
What you did or didn't say is a matter of record. It's up to the
individual reader to determine what you meant by it. But I think the
evasiveness you've shown clearly identifies you as somebody with
something to hide. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Lee Olsen |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 11:39 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 10:55 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 24, 9:17 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>I don't know what you're so nervous about.
It's not like you have a real hypothesis anyway. When do you think you
will be getting a hypothesis?
So now you admit that spears could be useful for fishing.
Quote brainless Claud: "Do you really believe that spears couldn't be
used for fish?"
Now, dimwit, once again, quote me directly, do not paraphase what you
think you though I said. Since you can't, thanks for proving once
again whan an asshole liar you are.
What you did or didn't say is a matter of record. It's up to the
individual reader to determine what you meant by it. But I think the
evasiveness you've shown clearly identifies you as somebody with
something to hide.
IOW, you are still a liar, you made this up, every word:
Quote brainless Claud: "Do you really believe that spears couldn't be
used for fish?"
Now, dimwit, once again, quote me directly, do not paraphase what you
think you thought I said. Since you can't, thanks for proving once
again what an asshole liar you are. Strawman arguments are all you
ever had. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Claudius Denk |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Olsen,
Why don't you be honest about what is plainly obvious to anybody
reading these exchanges: you have no interest in advancing the science
your sole interest is in preserving the status quo. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mclark |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:57 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 9:38 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 4:01 am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
[tripe]
So does this mean that we're not going to get
that URL to your "new" hypothesis? I guess
we'll just have to use the old one then....- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
For the record: you can't say I didn't offer him the opportunity to
make a retraction.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
We've seen this before, Dimmy --you, offering
someone "the opportunity" to make a "retraction".
Yet, I haven't seen you clearly define just what
it is you would like retracted. Is this inability
to express yourself related to your inability to
provide a URL to your "new and improved"
hypothesis? Having trouble reading for
comprehension? Is there anything I can
do to help? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Lee Olsen |
| Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 24, 12:28 pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote: Olsen,
Why don't you be honest about what is plainly obvious to anybody
reading these exchanges:
If the plainly obvious was "obvious" you would not need to be
paraphrasing
what I didn't say. What is plainly obvious is the fact that you can't
read or else you would quote what I actually said, just as you demand
from others:
"You dimwits read between the lines then try to take
me to task for things I never stated. Quote me directly you stooge."
Sound familiar? Now, again, start quoting. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:23 pm
|
|