"Sanny" <softta...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a08e6959-7f15-47e2-ac74-cba53e55e5a0@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
In 1950 It was predicted Fusion will be achieved in 20-30 years.
Later in 1980 Again it was predicted Fusion reactor will be possible
in 20-30 years.
Later in 2000 Again it was predicted Fusion reator will give infinite
cheap energy in 20 year.
Time keep passing and we are not seeing any good progress.
Is it because of Couroption that it failed?
Or there is any technical Problem.
Once I read SuperComputers will help in designing Fusion Reactor.
Today we have PetaFlop Computers are they of no use in designing
Fusion Reactor?
What are the things stopping in developing a Commercial Reactor.
Today Robotics & Computer field is so advanced still why it is so
costly to design a Fusion Reactor.
There are so many ways to create it By Laser/ By Plasma and other
techniques why no good result is Comming.
Is it due to any Conspiracy or Corruption that this work is delayed?
Bye
Sanny
It is my perception
that the search for controlled fusion
got off to a wrong start.
Because the hydrogen bomb worked,
it appeared that a brute force approach would work,
and fusion researchers took the approach of
trying to pump energy into a confined space
until the temperature reached a level that
fusion would occur as it does on the Sun.
As they were unable to confine enough energy to
create fusion in magnetic bottles,
when high power LASERs appeared,
researchers tried to use LASERs to concentrate enough
energy at one point to create fusion.
I suggest that a more sophisticated approach
should be taken.
Magnetic moment is minimized in nuclei,
and charge is minimized in the outer atom.
The key to maintaining fusion would be to:
1. Bring streams of
two protons and two neutrons
together at a moving point
(Much like a welder moves his torch.).
2. Give the protons enough momentum
to overcome the repelling charge
and get them together at a tiny point.
3. Experiment with the orientation
of the magnetic moments,
and the time delays of each stream
to get the most efficient reaction.
In other words, you have to get the
two protons to overcome the charge barrier,
and get them together with the two neutrons
at a tiny point, and as there will be a great increase in temperature
when the four particles bond, you have to keep moving the point
in order to minimize the affect of the temperature
on the incoming nucleon streams.
(As the energy radiates
as a function of the fourth power of the temperature,
you have to keep the temperature at the point of fusion
as low as possible to keep the random kinetic energy of the
protons and neutrons as low as possible before fusion.
this is done by moving the point,
and tapping off the power at the previous point
after fusion occurs.)
The neutrons should probably be gated
to lead the protons and provide some
charge shielding in order to minimize the
momentum the protons need
to overcome the charge barrier.
The four streams could be mounted on a wheel
that had an radius and angular velocity such that
in 360 degrees, conditions were right to get four
more nucleons together, and the output power could
be directed out like a jet engine exhaust.
As you suggest computer programs
should be used to model
how to bring two protons and two neutrons
together at a LOW TEMPERATURE point,
using the least amount of energy,
and how the energy release at the point
would affect the next combination event.
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.htmlhttp://notsocrazyideas.blogspot..comhttp://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.comhttp://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
** Posted
fromhttp://www.teranews.com**- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
