| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » Why do Fusion reactor not Comming out?
Page 3 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| G=EMC^2 Glazier |
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Cactus saul My pulse reactor machines I guarantee for 70 years. Giving
out + energy they will pay for themselves in 10 years 7.5 billion
sounds like a lot but that also includes my end Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier |
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jeff Bill Gates need not wory about my pulse fusion machine. It has to
work However I would pay him back weakly Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Saul Levy |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Your end? Does that mean you put your ASS into it, BEERTbrain? lmao!
How can you guarantee anything for 70 years?
Saul Levy
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:32:01 -0400, herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:
Quote: Cactus saul My pulse reactor machines I guarantee for 70 years. Giving
out + energy they will pay for themselves in 10 years 7.5 billion
sounds like a lot but that also includes my end Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Saul Levy |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Since BEERTbrain isn't going to be around anywhere near another 70
years, that's not a problem, Jeff! lmao!
Take the money and RUN!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:57:36 +0000 (UTC), Jeff?Relf<?@?.Invalid>
wrote:
Quote: How are you going to give Bill Gates his money back ( 7.5 billion ),
if your “ pulse fusion machine ” doesn't work as advertized ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Saul Levy |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The way you write, Jeff, it's damn hard to believe you've never done
drugs! lmao!
Did the woman take all your money? lmao!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:36:55 +0000 (UTC), Jeff?Relf<?@?.Invalid>
wrote:
Quote: I enjoy your posts, Mr. Smith,
and Benj's bogeymen don't interest me at all.
While libel is illegal, and it can get you in trouble,
Usenet is seldom censored.. use a killfile instead.
I doubt Google would block Benj. He's posted from:
“ ppp-69-213-185-252.dsl.wotnoh.AmeriTech.NET; Columbus, OH ”.
This year, I've been voted a kook award each month:
January: “ Kook of the Month ”
February: “ Clueless Newbie ”
March: “ Goofy-Assed Baboon ”.
Others have said that my excessive use of drugs and whores
has turned my brain into “ scrambled eggs ”.
I've Never done drugs, rarely do I drink;
and, since 1991, I've been with only one woman ( very briefly ). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:15 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Cactus Saul My end could very well mean I put my ass on the line
garanteeing my pulse fusion invention. It would take 7 billion bucks to
build. 500,000 is my end Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Tom Potter |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Sanny" <softtanks@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a08e6959-7f15-47e2-ac74-cba53e55e5a0@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote: In 1950 It was predicted Fusion will be achieved in 20-30 years.
Later in 1980 Again it was predicted Fusion reactor will be possible
in 20-30 years.
Later in 2000 Again it was predicted Fusion reator will give infinite
cheap energy in 20 year.
Time keep passing and we are not seeing any good progress.
Is it because of Couroption that it failed?
Or there is any technical Problem.
Once I read SuperComputers will help in designing Fusion Reactor.
Today we have PetaFlop Computers are they of no use in designing
Fusion Reactor?
What are the things stopping in developing a Commercial Reactor.
Today Robotics & Computer field is so advanced still why it is so
costly to design a Fusion Reactor.
There are so many ways to create it By Laser/ By Plasma and other
techniques why no good result is Comming.
Is it due to any Conspiracy or Corruption that this work is delayed?
Bye
Sanny
It is my perception
that the search for controlled fusion
got off to a wrong start.
Because the hydrogen bomb worked,
it appeared that a brute force approach would work,
and fusion researchers took the approach of
trying to pump energy into a confined space
until the temperature reached a level that
fusion would occur as it does on the Sun.
As they were unable to confine enough energy to
create fusion in magnetic bottles,
when high power LASERs appeared,
researchers tried to use LASERs to concentrate enough
energy at one point to create fusion.
I suggest that a more sophisticated approach
should be taken.
Magnetic moment is minimized in nuclei,
and charge is minimized in the outer atom.
The key to maintaining fusion would be to:
1. Bring streams of
two protons and two neutrons
together at a moving point
(Much like a welder moves his torch.).
2. Give the protons enough momentum
to overcome the repelling charge
and get them together at a tiny point.
3. Experiment with the orientation
of the magnetic moments,
and the time delays of each stream
to get the most efficient reaction.
In other words, you have to get the
two protons to overcome the charge barrier,
and get them together with the two neutrons
at a tiny point, and as there will be a great increase in temperature
when the four particles bond, you have to keep moving the point
in order to minimize the affect of the temperature
on the incoming nucleon streams.
(As the energy radiates
as a function of the fourth power of the temperature,
you have to keep the temperature at the point of fusion
as low as possible to keep the random kinetic energy of the
protons and neutrons as low as possible before fusion.
this is done by moving the point,
and tapping off the power at the previous point
after fusion occurs.)
The neutrons should probably be gated
to lead the protons and provide some
charge shielding in order to minimize the
momentum the protons need
to overcome the charge barrier.
The four streams could be mounted on a wheel
that had an radius and angular velocity such that
in 360 degrees, conditions were right to get four
more nucleons together, and the output power could
be directed out like a jet engine exhaust.
As you suggest computer programs
should be used to model
how to bring two protons and two neutrons
together at a LOW TEMPERATURE point,
using the least amount of energy,
and how the energy release at the point
would affect the next combination event.
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Benj |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 1:06 pm, dlzc <dl...@cox.net> wrote:
Quote: Dear Benj:
... so no apology ...
Your abuse reported.
David A. Smith
----------------------------
Dear David A. Smith:
So no apology...
Your abuse reported.
Benj |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Benj |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 2:36 pm, Jeffâ–˛Relf<âś—@âś—.Invalid> wrote:
Quote: I enjoy your posts, Mr. Smith,
and Benj's bogeymen don't interest me at all.
Then pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!
Quote: While libel is illegal, and it can get you in trouble,
Usenet is seldom censored.. use a killfile instead.
Note that telling the truth is an absolute defense for slander or
libel!
(I already clearly demonstrated that David actually IS the liar I
called him)
And false reports and charges are crimes as well. I would love to get
David into court and have him explaining just how he can prove that
"no conspiracies exist". That would be funny! I presume he'd have to
go for the old "everybody knows" argument!
Quote: I doubt Google would block Benj. He's posted from:
“ ppp-69-213-185-252.dsl.wotnoh.AmeriTech.NET; Columbus, OH ”.
Hell, Google blocks me all the time! But it's only because their
software is so hosed! And as for Ameritech, if you can get them to do
ANYTHING in regard to the internet please tell me how you did it!
They are about as responsive as a rock.
PS. Unlike most of the anonymous name-callers here, I am in the phone
book! My identity is no secret.
Quote: This year, I've been voted a kook award each month:
January: “ Kook of the Month ”
February: “ Clueless Newbie ”
March: “ Goofy-Assed Baboon ”.
Damn! I've been complaining about NOT being voted "kook of the month"
for quite some time now!
I'd sure like to know how you did it! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Richard Henry |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 22, 3:20 pm, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, dlzc <dl...@cox.net> wrote:
Is it due to any Conspiracy or Corruption
that this work is delayed?
No.
David A. Smith
David lies. It has been squelched as so many developments are which
have political implications. There is NO greater and more important
implication than the destruction of the control of the world through
energy sources (Oil, coal,etc). Any decent (meaning simple and
inexpensive) fusion device would be impossible to control and hence
impossible to be used to control the world. Such a device would have
to be hidden through conspiracy, corruption and ignorance.
In the case of Cold Fusion (better termed low energy fusion), we see a
combination of all three. Those in power rely on the gullibility and
ignorance of physicists to accept whatever some on tells them (like
David above) and to not think for themselves, nor to examine any data
in detail. They especially rely on them not to look into any hints of
conspiracy of any kind (assuming they don't want their careers to end
right now) and also to rely on their paid minions in the "peer review"
system to keep any "unwanted" research out of the "accepted" journals
to allow undesirable facts to be ridiculed and the scientists
reporting them to be denigrated. Such is the way the world works in
2008.
Benj lies. Or perhaps is just interestingly ignorat - able to type
(and afford an internet connection); unable to show any knowledge.
Benj - consider this possibility - there is only one conspiracy. You
are the traget.
Chew on that for a while. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Richard Henry |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 11:36Â am, Jeffâ–˛Relf<âś—@âś—.Invalid> wrote:
Quote: I've  Never  done drugs, rarely do I drink;
OK, good so far.
Quote: and, since 1991, I've been with only one woman ( very briefly ).
I think I see your problem.*
*Coincidentally, the punchline to the world's best engineering joke. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Saul Levy |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Looks like you'll never see it, BEERTbrain! lmao!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:15:44 -0400, herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:
Quote: Cactus Saul My end could very well mean I put my ass on the line
garanteeing my pulse fusion invention. It would take 7 billion bucks to
build. 500,000 is my end Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier |
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Cactus Saul With a half billion bucks I could live in Switzerland and
take those MSP pills($1,000 each),and take up skiing Why not
Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Saul Levy |
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Wasn't that $500,000, BEERTbrain? You slipped a few decimal places?
lmao!
Frankly, you aren't worth $500,000,000!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:13:47 -0400, herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:
Quote: Cactus Saul With a half billion bucks I could live in Switzerland and
take those MSP pills($1,000 each),and take up skiing Why not
Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier |
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Cactus Saul When it comes to money I count good. Its half a billion and
that in numbers is 500,000,000. not 500,000 You have it at five
hundred thousand. Your a piker Go figure Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 3 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:16 pm
|
|