Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Medicine - Vision Forum  »  The Variability of the Refraction of the Eye
Page 2 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Szczepan Białek
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:21 am
Guest
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com>
Quote:

"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

But myopia sometimes disappear. It must have some reason.

Do you mean axial myopia? Or the temporary shift caused by out-of-control
blood sugar?

Not the temporary shift. Study shown: "that myopia can get worse, be steady
or decrease" in long period of time.
S*
Zetsu
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:50 am
Guest
On 25 Apr, 20:17, "Mike Tyner" <mty...@mindspring.com> wrote:
Quote:
"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bia...@wp.pl> wrote

I was told that the children errors "jumps". Is it truth?

In children, refraction can vary drastically due to accommodation.

The sclera and other anatomical structures do not suddenly grow or shrink.

We have agreed that the accomodation is automatically started with
converging. This is done by parasympathetic nerves. Is it not possible
that this nerve system works incorrectly?

Yes. Sometimes the parasympathetic overaction serves a purpose, so we don't
say "incorrect".

In any event, parasympathetic overaction is not anatomical refractive error.
It goes by many names - spasm of accommodation, latent hyperopia, tonic
accommodation, all the same mechanism.

It is the reason children are often given atropine or cyclopentolate before
measurements are made.

-MT

What causes the parasympathetic overaction?
Mike Tyner
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:08 am
Guest
"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

Quote:
Not the temporary shift. Study shown: "that myopia can get worse, be
steady or decrease" in long period of time.

According to textbooks, two reasons myopia often gets better between age
20-40:

1) Tonic accommodation decreases with age
2) The crystalline lens grows slightly flatter.

These things occur in everybody, not just myopes.

Nearsighted people get a little better.
Emmetropic people get a little farsighted.
Farsighted people get a little more farsighted (sometimes a lot more
farsighted)

-MT
Mike Tyner
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:46 am
Guest
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail.com> wrote

Quote:
What causes the parasympathetic overaction?

It's a normal reflex.

In farsighted people, it maintains focused vision, so the "cause" would be
the activity of a normal reflex loop.

In young people who aren't farsighted, "overaction" isn't very common.

When it does occur, we call it spasm of accommodation, or pseudomyopia.

Sometimes it provides better binocular balance, as in convergence
insufficiency.

Other times there's no measurable benefit and it's actually detrimental to
performance.

In those cases, anxiety is usually the most-cited cause.
Mike Tyner
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:50 am
Guest
These are all distinguished from the normal half-diopter or so of tonic
accommodation you find in most people. I don't call that "overaction,"
because everybody does it.

-MT

"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:5sSdnZviCN58MInVnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Quote:

"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail.com> wrote

What causes the parasympathetic overaction?

It's a normal reflex.

In farsighted people, it maintains focused vision, so the "cause" would be
the activity of a normal reflex loop.

In young people who aren't farsighted, "overaction" isn't very common.

When it does occur, we call it spasm of accommodation, or pseudomyopia.

Sometimes it provides better binocular balance, as in convergence
insufficiency.

Other times there's no measurable benefit and it's actually detrimental to
performance.

In those cases, anxiety is usually the most-cited cause.



Szczepan Białek
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:50 pm
Guest
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote
news:wpidnVCvaaZO8YnVnZ2dnUVZ_ruqnZ2d@giganews.com...
Quote:

"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

Not the temporary shift. Study shown: "that myopia can get worse, be
steady or decrease" in long period of time.

According to textbooks, two reasons myopia often gets better between age
20-40:

1) Tonic accommodation decreases with age

I am here to lern. Lern how to decrease myopia.

Now I have known how to do it temporary:
1. " the lens to return to its "normal" shape when blood sugar comes down."
,Does it mean that the tonic accomodation decreases when blood sugar comes
down?
2. "For good refraction you must relax" . Does it means take a rest?
If yes, it can allow to take the following conclusions:

Blood sugar go together with the potassium. After effort the potassium in
the blood is also higher. So the high tonic accomodation may by caused by
high potassium (in Na solution a muscle is relaxed but in K solution
contracted).
The only remede may be the John Rollo's diet.
Is it quite foolish?
S*
Mike Tyner
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:05 pm
Guest
"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

Quote:
I am here to lern. Lern how to decrease myopia.

I've looked for 20 years. I've never found a reliable method for reducing
real (anatomical) myopia.

About age 50, tonic accommodation disappears. Still many, many people with
myopia.

If you could "cure" all the tonic accommodation in younger myopes, there
would still be many, many myopes.

Tonic accommodation is not real myopia. It's OK to reduce tonic
accommodation. Sometimes the results are dramatic because a few people show
LOTS of tonic accommodation.

But still tonic accommodation causes only a LITTLE of total myopia.

It is naive to say you're "curing myopia" by removing tonic accommodation.

Most real myopia happens because the eye grows too long.

We know a way to slow it down, but our FDA has not approved the treatment.

Quote:
Now I have known how to do it temporary:

Useless to do it temporary.

Quote:
1. " the lens to return to its "normal" shape when blood sugar comes
down." ,Does it mean that the tonic accomodation decreases when blood
sugar comes down?

No. Osmosis has nothing to do with accommodation.

Quote:
2. "For good refraction you must relax" . Does it means take a rest?
If yes, it can allow to take the following conclusions:

No, it means effort or "straining" or even thinking about your eyes will
tend to stimulate accommodation and create measurement artifact. If you want
accurate refraction, relax. If you are too young to understand, like 5 or 6,
we use eyedrops to MAKE you relax. Then we know refraction is accurate, not
spoiled by tonic accommodation. Tonic accommodation is easy to measure, easy
to explain, easy to treat. No great accomplishment to "fix" tonic
accommodation.

Quote:
Blood sugar go together with the potassium. After effort the potassium in
the blood is also higher.

Well you might make a case for elevated potassium in the aqueous but I'm
wondering if you know much about osmosis and the normal range of blood
electrolytes and solutes. I don't think you could vary K+ or Na+ enough to
get the osmotic pressure of 350 mM/L sugar in the aqueous. Hyperkalemia
would kill you pretty quick, sodium somewhat longer.

Quote:
So the high tonic accomodation may by caused by high potassium

This is foolish.

Quote:
The only remede may be the John Rollo's diet.

I don't think you will find much connection between diet and tonic
accommodation.

Quote:
Is it quite foolish?

You are not likely to find a reliable method for curing real (anatomical)
myopia. Tonic accommodation is small potatoes.

-MT
Szczepan Białek
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:16 am
Guest
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote
news:NdOdnYY18cAlZYnVnZ2dnUVZ_oaonZ2d@giganews.com...
Quote:

"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

I am here to learn. Learn how to decrease myopia.

I've looked for 20 years. I've never found a reliable method for reducing
real (anatomical) myopia.

I subscribed the vision group 3 months ago. I have never heard about Dr
Bates and the next.
Quote:

About age 50, tonic accommodation disappears. Still many, many people with
myopia.

If you could "cure" all the tonic accommodation in younger myopes, there
would still be many, many myopes.

Tonic accommodation is not real myopia. It's OK to reduce tonic
accommodation. Sometimes the results are dramatic because a few people
show LOTS of tonic accommodation.

This is the key aspect. Blurry is nothing wrong but an big discomfort which
accompany the tonic accomodation is very unpleasant..
Quote:

But still tonic accommodation causes only a LITTLE of total myopia.

But is unpleasent.
Quote:

It is naive to say you're "curing myopia" by removing tonic accommodation.

Most real myopia happens because the eye grows too long.

Not at all is better than "LOTS of tonic accommodation".
Quote:

We know a way to slow it down, but our FDA has not approved the treatment.

Could you describe this treatment in a few words.
Quote:


Blood sugar goes together with the potassium. After effort the potassium
in the blood is also higher.

Well you might make a case for elevated potassium in the aqueous but I'm
wondering if you know much about osmosis and the normal range of blood
electrolytes and solutes. I don't think you could vary K+ or Na+ enough to
get the osmotic pressure of 350 mM/L sugar in the aqueous. Hyperkalemia
would kill you pretty quick, sodium somewhat longer.

Sodium has narrow range (in blood) the potassium much wider. For salt loser
is better to keep low potassium in the diet than very high sodium.
Quote:

So the high tonic accomodation may by caused by high potassium

This is foolish.

The only remede may be the John Rollo's diet.

I don't think you will find much connection between diet and tonic
accommodation.

It will be seen in a short time. I will try it on myself. Cuts on plant
starch do not kill me.
Quote:

You are not likely to find a reliable method for curing real (anatomical)
myopia. Tonic accommodation is small potatoes.

Me not. But thanks your real information - who know. Find do not means
discovere - it may be very old but not commonly approved.
Up to now I have found the John Rollo, John Schneider and John Bershak. Will
be the next John?
S*
Mike Tyner
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:24 am
Guest
"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

Quote:
Sometimes the results are dramatic because a few people show LOTS of
tonic accommodation.

This is the key aspect. Blurry is nothing wrong but an big discomfort
which accompany the tonic accomodation is very unpleasant..

Rarely enough to "suffer" in myopia. If you want to relieve suffering, find
the uncorrected +4 diopter _hyperopes_ and give them glasses.

Quote:
But still tonic accommodation causes only a LITTLE of total myopia.

But is unpleasent.

Not usually.

Quote:
Not at all is better than "LOTS of tonic accommodation".

It's pretty rare in myopia. It's common in hyperopia.

Quote:
We know a way to slow it down, but our FDA has not approved the
treatment.

Could you describe this treatment in a few words.

Pirenzepine gel in each eye at bedtime. Every night for ten years.

Quote:
Sodium has narrow range (in blood) the potassium much wider. For salt
loser is better to keep low potassium in the diet than very high sodium.

For osmotic pressure to dehydrate the crystalline lens, you'd need fatal
levels of sodium or potassium.

Quote:
I don't think you will find much connection between diet and tonic
accommodation.

It will be seen in a short time. I will try it on myself. Cuts on plant
starch do not kill me.

Tonic accommodation is not myopia.

-MT
Zetsu
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:35 am
Guest
On 28 Apr, 13:24, "Mike Tyner" <mty...@mindspring.com> wrote:
Quote:
"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bia...@wp.pl> wrote

Sometimes the results are dramatic because a few people show LOTS of
tonic accommodation.

This is the key aspect. Blurry is nothing wrong but an big discomfort
which accompany the tonic accomodation is very unpleasant..

Rarely enough to "suffer" in myopia. If you want to relieve suffering, find
the uncorrected +4 diopter _hyperopes_ and give them glasses.

But still tonic accommodation causes only a LITTLE of total myopia.

But is unpleasent.

Not usually.

Not at all is better than "LOTS of tonic accommodation".

It's pretty rare in myopia. It's common in hyperopia.

We know a way to slow it down, but our FDA has not approved the
treatment.

Could you describe this treatment in a few words.

Pirenzepine gel in each eye at bedtime. Every night for ten years.

Sodium has narrow range (in blood) the potassium much wider. For salt
loser is better to keep low potassium in the diet than very high sodium.

For osmotic pressure to dehydrate the crystalline lens, you'd need fatal
levels of sodium or potassium.

I don't think you will find much connection between diet and tonic
accommodation.

It will be seen in a short time. I will try it on myself. Cuts on plant
starch do not kill me.

Tonic accommodation is not myopia.

-MT

What's worse: hypermetropia or myopia?
Szczepan Białek
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:56 pm
Guest
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com>wrote
news:ubydnU_KNr6WX4jVnZ2dnUVZ_qSonZ2d@giganews.com...
Quote:

"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

We know a way to slow it down, but our FDA has not approved the
treatment.

Could you describe this treatment in a few words.

Pirenzepine gel in each eye at bedtime. Every night for ten years.

Too troublesomeli.
Quote:

Sodium has narrow range (in blood) the potassium much wider. For salt
loser is better to keep low potassium in the diet than very high sodium.

For osmotic pressure to dehydrate the crystalline lens, you'd need fatal
levels of sodium or potassium.

But I base on "Apparently, the act of convergence lengthens the eye". High
potassium in the blood contracts the external muscles. Sodium relax.
Quote:

I don't think you will find much connection between diet and tonic
accommodation.

It will be seen in a short time. I will try it on myself. Cuts on plant
starch do not kill me.

Tonic accommodation is not myopia.

Step by step. Less of temporary jumps would be nice.
S*
Mike Tyner
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:06 pm
Guest
"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote

Quote:
Pirenzepine gel in each eye at bedtime. Every night for ten years.

Too troublesomeli.

Unless you're at -3.00 headed for -13.00.

Quote:
But I base on "Apparently, the act of convergence lengthens the eye".

It is not "apparent". It is a wild, unfounded assumption contrary to the
facts. Many farsighted people converge too much. They don't get nearsighted.

Quote:
High potassium in the blood contracts the external muscles. Sodium relax.

The external muscles do not cause myopia. The internal muscles do not cause
myopia. The sclera causes myopia.

Quote:
Step by step. Less of temporary jumps would be nice.

I don't know what "temporary jumps" are. Myopia is not temporary jumps.

-MT
Mike Tyner
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:24 pm
Guest
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail.com> wrote

Quote:
What's worse: hypermetropia or myopia?

There's no answer without context.

What's worse: being too tall or being too short?

At my age, hyperopia would be worse. At your age, hyperopia might not even
matter.

In 16th-century China, the aristocratic families prized literacy and
intelligence, lived well into presbyopia, and successful clerics and
scholars had many concubines and children to pass on their myopia genes.

In 18th-century America, hunting and fighting and outdoor skills were
paramount. Not many lived past 40, and "defective vision" was something kept
hidden away in shame.

In 1974 Cambodia, wearing glasses was a death sentence.

Simple answers, like simple cures, do not always work.

-MT
Szczepan Białek
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:05 am
Guest
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com>wrote
news:aJmdnYyPmNXj14vVnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Quote:

"Szczepan Białek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> wrote


But I base on "Apparently, the act of convergence lengthens the eye".

It is not "apparent". It is a wild, unfounded assumption contrary to the
facts. Many farsighted people converge too much. They don't get
nearsighted.

In Turkey it is "apparent":
http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Doi=55551
Quote:

High potassium in the blood contracts the external muscles. Sodium relax.

The external muscles do not cause myopia. The internal muscles do not
cause myopia. The sclera causes myopia.

I try to find a correlation between myopia and diet plus nerve system.
Quote:

Step by step. Less of temporary jumps would be nice.

I don't know what "temporary jumps" are.

When error changes during one day.
S*
Guest
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:38 pm
Dear Pramesh Rutaji.

Yes, when a scientific concept becomes excessively complex, then a
"simplifying" assumption can
help clear the air. For instance, checking the eye for its dynamic
behavior,
is easier that claiming that a -3 diopter lens has NO EFFECT on the
eye's refractive STATE.

Enjoy,




OCCAM'S RAZOR.


Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle
attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar
William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any
phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating
those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the
explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in
Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of
succinctness"): "entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem",
or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity".

This is often paraphrased as "All other things being equal, the
simplest solution is the best." In other words, when multiple
competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle
recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions
and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam's
razor is usually understood.

Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is
more often taken today as a heuristic maxim (rule of thumb) that
advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity, often or especially in
scientific theories.




On Apr 29, 7:24 pm, Pramesh Rutaji <p297tongue6...@newsguy.com> wrote:
Quote:
Mike Tyner wrote:
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote

What's worse: hypermetropia or myopia?

There's no answer without context.

What's worse: being too tall or being too short?

At my age, hyperopia would be worse. At your age, hyperopia might not even
matter.

In 16th-century China, the aristocratic families prized literacy and
intelligence, lived well into presbyopia, and successful clerics and
scholars had many concubines and children to pass on their myopia genes.

In 18th-century America, hunting and fighting and outdoor skills were
paramount. Not many lived past 40, and "defective vision" was something kept
hidden away in shame.

In 1974 Cambodia, wearing glasses was a death sentence.

Simple answers, like simple cures, do not always work.

Occam's razor.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor

I'm not disagreeing with you that the question lacked a framework.

--

Pramesh Rutaji

p297tongue6...@newsguy.com - remove tongue to reply- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
 
Page 2 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:55 pm