Jim Thompson wrote:
Why should NON-citizens have _any_ rights?

Who decides who the NON-citizens are ?

In 1930s Germany a certain political party decided the Jews were NON-citizens.

I see that Thompson is basically a Nazi at heart.

say.

Graham

MooseFET <kensmith@ rahul.net> wrote:
[...]Now that habeas is gone without a wimper,
I can't imagine what will cause the uprising.

Jim Thompson wrote:
You _are_ hallucinating. Perhaps the right of habeas corpus is
diminished or gone for NON-citizens, but I think that is a good thing.

Ah. Your end of the boat doesn't have the hole in it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:IukIc89-ulUJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...+First-*-*-*-the-Communists+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-no-one-left-*-*-*-*-*#Variations

Why should NON-citizens have _any_ rights?

Right. Let's create an underclass of exploited green card holders

Who is it that polishs that ivory tower of yours?

Jim Thompson wrote:
Perhaps the right of habeas corpus is diminished
or gone for NON-citizens, but I think that is a good thing.
Why should NON-citizens have _any_ rights?

JeffM wrote:
Right. Let's create an underclass of exploited green card holders

Jim Thompson wrote:
You leftist weenies are never bothered by facts...

I responded directly to what YOU said.
If you MEANT something different,
you should have SAID something different.

most of these "immigrants" have NO green card... they're illegals.

Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out.

[snip]
Who is it that polishs that ivory tower of yours?

A Hispanic housekeeper who IS A CITIZEN.
You're the kind of non-thinker that gives engineering a bad name :-(

I note that you convieniently snipped out
the *arithmetic* part of my post.
To summarize that:
If all that was available to the pool was *legal* labor,
the US economy would take a serious hit.
The (Republican?) agricultural barons would see it first,
as they are addicted to that cheap, exploitable labor force.

On Thu, 1 May 2008 06:52:20 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net
wrote:

On May 1, 5:58 am, JosephKK <quiettechb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:43:40 -0400, T <nospam.k...@cox.nospam.net
wrote:
[snip]


I don't fear the government here in the U.S. I know that when push comes
to shove we'll only take so much before armed rebellion happens.

You are hallucinating again. We the people have shitted away most of
what the Constitution had granted.


A few generations from "Give me liberty or give me death" to "Here are
my rights. Please take them but just protect me from that scarry man"
is disapointing. Now that habeas is gone without a wimper, I can't
imagine what will cause the uprising.

You _are_ hallucinating. Perhaps the right of habeas corpus is
diminished or gone for NON-citizens, but I think that is a good thing.
Why should NON-citizens have _any_ rights?

A fair bit back a few people got together and made this claim:
*** begin quote ***
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed,
*** end ***

I wonder what happened to them? Did they go on to found a government
or anything like that? :

[snip]

Why should NON-citizens have _any_ rights?

A fair bit back a few people got together and made this claim:
*** begin quote ***
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal ...

I wonder what happened to them?

On May 1, 6:47 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Why should NON-citizens have _any_ rights?

Who decides who the NON-citizens are ?

In 1930s Germany a certain political party decided the Jews were NON-citizens.

I see that Thompson is basically a Nazi at heart.


No, I think he considers the Nazis weenies.... :)



Not too surprised I have to

say.

Graham