| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Astro - Amateur Forum » Australia state bans laser pointers after attacks
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Bert Hyman |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BradGuth |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 21, 12:53 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
Some of the spendy commercial (weapons grade) laser pointers are
downright lethal to human eyesight within as little as a few ms
exposure, and many can even start fires from a considerable distance,
or cause enough thermal damage for subsequently creating a tire blow-
out. Perhaps a 1 mw laser-pointer power limit (good enough for home
or classroom usage) could be accepted as reasonably failsafe
alternative for public use, or simply calling it semi-idiot/moron-
proof rated (easily compliance field tested by enforcement).
An affordable commercial/science/astronomy rated laser, as point-of-
sale or official permit/registration shouldn't impose any problems,
unless you've got a nasty record of being a legally certified moron/
idiot, and apparently Australia has more than it’s fair share of those
certified moron/idiot types. Of course that doesn’t do much of
anything for moderating those illegally purchased, stolen, lost or
discarded commercial lasers. So, if you’re a serial bad guy to start
off with, it’s not a real problem. Go figure.
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chris L Peterson |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 21 Apr 2008 19:53:28 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
If they're including 5 mW lasers in this ban (which is not clear in this
report), that's pathetic. A simple spotlight is far more capable of
dazzling a pilot, and (AFAIK) those are still legal.
Just one more example of the kind of stupid legislation you get when
scientifically ignorant (or just totally ignorant) people run
governments.
NSW is a nice place to visit, but obviously no place to live.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| thad@thadlabs.com |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 21, 5:17 pm, David Weinshenker <daz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: [...]
What sort of power level is output by the "weapons grade laser
pointers" you mention? Are "Class IV" lasers (>500 mW, capable
of causing skin burns on direct exposure as well as rapid, severe
eye injury) actually available in a hand-held "pointer" format
these days?
[...]
Some of them are half a Watt and advertised in ASTRONOMY and
Sky & Telescope. They'll pop balloons at 100 feet, light a
cigarette, and generally just burn things (eyes, wood, etc.)
Visit <http://www.wickedlasers.com/> (one of the astro
advertisers) and watch the videos of people burning things
with them. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BradGuth |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 21, 5:17 pm, David Weinshenker <daz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 21, 12:53 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
They're back ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080421/tc_nm/australia_lasers_dc
High-powered hand lasers, including so-called "star pointers"
used by astronomers, would be listed as prohibited weapons in
New South Wales state with jail terms of up to 14 years for
anyone carrying them without a permit.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | b...@iphouse.com
Some of the spendy commercial (weapons grade) laser pointers are
downright lethal to human eyesight within as little as a few ms
exposure, and many can even start fires from a considerable distance,
or cause enough thermal damage for subsequently creating a tire blow-
out. Perhaps a 1 mw laser-pointer power limit (good enough for home
or classroom usage) could be accepted as reasonably failsafe
alternative for public use, or simply calling it semi-idiot/moron-
proof rated (easily compliance field tested by enforcement).
Eye hazard with brief exposure certainly exists for the higher end of
the portable laser pointers: output power levels of several mW would
definitely put them in the "Class III" ("avoid direct eye exposure")
category - for example, the Orion "Skyline Deluxe", rated at 5 mW, is
labeled as a "Class III" laser - while below 1mW of visible emission
is "Class II" ("do not stare into beam") where the blink response is
considered fast enough to protect against damage.
What sort of power level is output by the "weapons grade laser
pointers" you mention? Are "Class IV" lasers (>500 mW, capable
of causing skin burns on direct exposure as well as rapid, severe
eye injury) actually available in a hand-held "pointer" format
these days?
Most of these need intelligence to use, thus eliminating 99.9% of
humanity right off the bat.
Green Laser Pointer from Wicked Lasers.
http://www.wickedlasers.com/Green_Lasers-3-1.html
http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/Spyder_II_GX-26-3.html
http://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/Photonic_Disruptor-65-3.html
http://www.wickedlasers.com/index.php?p=more_products&catalog=_150mW_300mW&title=Laser%20Pointers%20between%20150mW%20-%20300mW
TechLasers
http://www.techlasers.com/?gclid=CLjgm8nV7ZICFQgegwodd0oF3g
http://www.techlasers.com/portable-green-lasers-ex-600mw-p-86.html
. - Brad Guth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| L.A.T. |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Chris L Peterson" <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in message
news:460q04ptfp4sgg4d15sqoqieqkjm537mre@4ax.com...
Quote: On 21 Apr 2008 19:53:28 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
They're back ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080421/tc_nm/australia_lasers_dc
High-powered hand lasers, including so-called "star pointers"
used by astronomers, would be listed as prohibited weapons in
New South Wales state with jail terms of up to 14 years for
anyone carrying them without a permit.
If they're including 5 mW lasers in this ban (which is not clear in this
report), that's pathetic. A simple spotlight is far more capable of
dazzling a pilot, and (AFAIK) those are still legal.
Just one more example of the kind of stupid legislation you get when
scientifically ignorant (or just totally ignorant) people run
governments.
NSW is a nice place to visit, but obviously no place to live.
Certainly not if you are the type of reader who gets sucked in by
journalese. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bert Hyman |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In news:gL8Pj.3746$ko5.1936@news-server.bigpond.net.au "L.A.T."
<tonyt@sci.net.au> wrote:
Quote:
"Chris L Peterson" <clp@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote in message
news:460q04ptfp4sgg4d15sqoqieqkjm537mre@4ax.com...
NSW is a nice place to visit, but obviously no place to live.
Certainly not if you are the type of reader who gets sucked in by
journalese.
Please take this opportunity to set us all straight.
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Weinshenker |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
BradGuth wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 21, 12:53 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
They're back ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080421/tc_nm/australia_lasers_dc
High-powered hand lasers, including so-called "star pointers"
used by astronomers, would be listed as prohibited weapons in
New South Wales state with jail terms of up to 14 years for
anyone carrying them without a permit.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | b...@iphouse.com
Some of the spendy commercial (weapons grade) laser pointers are
downright lethal to human eyesight within as little as a few ms
exposure, and many can even start fires from a considerable distance,
or cause enough thermal damage for subsequently creating a tire blow-
out. Perhaps a 1 mw laser-pointer power limit (good enough for home
or classroom usage) could be accepted as reasonably failsafe
alternative for public use, or simply calling it semi-idiot/moron-
proof rated (easily compliance field tested by enforcement).
Eye hazard with brief exposure certainly exists for the higher end of
the portable laser pointers: output power levels of several mW would
definitely put them in the "Class III" ("avoid direct eye exposure")
category - for example, the Orion "Skyline Deluxe", rated at 5 mW, is
labeled as a "Class III" laser - while below 1mW of visible emission
is "Class II" ("do not stare into beam") where the blink response is
considered fast enough to protect against damage.
What sort of power level is output by the "weapons grade laser
pointers" you mention? Are "Class IV" lasers (>500 mW, capable
of causing skin burns on direct exposure as well as rapid, severe
eye injury) actually available in a hand-held "pointer" format
these days?
I once worked with an argon-ion laser with an output of a few
watts, which could definitely burn holes in things (and would
have easily been capable of starting fires or damaging tires)...
but that had a water-cooled tube several feet long, and a power
supply (also water-cooled) in a floor-standing cabinet which
delivered a few hundred volts at some tens of amperes to the
tube (rectified directly from a 480V 3ph. mains supply)... is
that sort of performance now feasible in a battery-powered
pen-style "pointer" laser? (I'd think, even with the improvements
in solid state lasers in the past 30 years, that such a device
would quickly become too hot to hold in your hand if the battery
didn't run down first...)
-dave w |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Ralph Hertle |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 10:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Brad Guth:
Universities have all those nice gamma, uv and xray emitters. Then there
are the neutron generators that produce the really destructive directed
neutron beams. Problem is, the magnets are inordinately heavy, require
cooling, and the electricity supplies and data controls are greatly
unwieldy.
Specific tests and objective laws are required. Lasers of all types,
frequencies and energy levels are used in a diversity of applications.
All they need to do is to ban the direction of the lasers just as
firearms may not be pointed at certain things. A policeman may return
fire if a laser of any hue is pointed in his direction, and that is
rightly so.
If a laser pointer on some amateur astronomer's telescope is claimed to
be a danger, and the scope is described by the consensus postulator as
having a barrel projection similar to a mortar gun, the consensus
postulator should be placed in jail. The consensus postulators are the
criminals.
Are consensus postulators going to get badges and holographic ID cards?
The consensus freaks don't have factual and logical science on their
side. They rely upon the legislators to invoke police actions against
their targets. There are several types of weapons that are more
interesting than lasers. For example, the home made pulse jet engines
that could be used to power a scaled down V1 bomb. That's what would
really get the attention of the FAA and the pilots.
Consensus postulators are the types of criminals who made free speech in
Salem, Mass., illegal and punishable by death. The consensus postulators
also promoted fiat paper currency in Salem, Mass., and they conned the
populace into believing that the money had value, which it ultimately
didn't. Great Britain and later the USA bought into the legalized paper
money confidence game, and we are still suffering from the
paper-money-is-good promises of the consensus postulators.
If the religio-scientists and pragmatist attorneys back up the
anti-laser consensus postulators in the same way that they banned
asbestos fire insulation in the New York City World Trade Center Towers
contributing to the fires that weakened the frames and collapsed the
buildings, there will be trouble.
In another instance the consensus fear-mongers managed to get an entire
safe nuclear electric power generating station on Long Island, New York,
closed down. It never re-opened. L.I. can live in pragmatist illusory
safety that they won't get irradiated, and that the can escape the
Island without the bad traffic congestion if need be. Traffic congestion
was promoted as one of the top reasons for closing down the plant.
The real danger to America is from the consensus postulators who gain
legal powers. They need to be stopped in the schools and universities.
Ralph Hertle |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Weinshenker |
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 10:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
thad@thadlabs.com wrote:
Quote: On Apr 21, 5:17 pm, David Weinshenker <daz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
[...]
What sort of power level is output by the "weapons grade laser
pointers" you mention? Are "Class IV" lasers (>500 mW, capable
of causing skin burns on direct exposure as well as rapid, severe
eye injury) actually available in a hand-held "pointer" format
these days?
[...]
Some of them are half a Watt and advertised in ASTRONOMY and
Sky & Telescope. They'll pop balloons at 100 feet, light a
cigarette, and generally just burn things (eyes, wood, etc.)
Visit <http://www.wickedlasers.com/> (one of the astro
advertisers) and watch the videos of people burning things
with them.
Interesting - up to a few hundred mW in a handheld, battery-powered
unit: it seems a bit disingenuous to refer to these as "laser pointers"
though; "portable industrial lasers" would be more accurate... surely
you don't need -that- much power for a "pointer"...?
-dave w |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Martin Brown |
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
thad@thadlabs.com wrote:
Quote: On Apr 21, 5:17 pm, David Weinshenker <daz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
[...]
What sort of power level is output by the "weapons grade laser
pointers" you mention? Are "Class IV" lasers (>500 mW, capable
of causing skin burns on direct exposure as well as rapid, severe
eye injury) actually available in a hand-held "pointer" format
these days?
[...]
Some of them are half a Watt and advertised in ASTRONOMY and
Sky & Telescope. They'll pop balloons at 100 feet, light a
cigarette, and generally just burn things (eyes, wood, etc.)
Visit <http://www.wickedlasers.com/> (one of the astro
advertisers) and watch the videos of people burning things
with them.
That is seriously scary if the public can buy 1W class IV green lasers
without having the first clue about laser safety. Heaven knows what
power the IR pump laser is putting out if the frequency doubler was
removed. These are not laser pointers so much as sub lethal weapons.
Sub 3mW laser pointers are fine but anything more than that probably
should not be sold without appropriate safety training.
The NSW 14 year jail for owning one seems a bit extreme though - but for
misusing one especially against aircraft then fair enough.
Regards,
Martin Brown
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helpful person |
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:39 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 692
|
On Apr 21, 3:53 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
I'm tired of all the discussion regarding laser pointer power. To me
it seems ridiculous that you can buy a 5mW laser pointer for use by
the general public. However, you cannot put the same 5mW laser into a
piece of industrial equipment without considerable care and warnings.
In my belief the problem is the laser pointer, not the industrial
laser safety requirements. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Chris L Peterson |
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT), Helpful person
<rrllff@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: I'm tired of all the discussion regarding laser pointer power. To me
it seems ridiculous that you can buy a 5mW laser pointer for use by
the general public. However, you cannot put the same 5mW laser into a
piece of industrial equipment without considerable care and warnings.
In my belief the problem is the laser pointer, not the industrial
laser safety requirements.
Well, since a 5mW visible laser is substantially harmless, there really
should be no problem. And in fact, I've designed non-consumer
instrumentation utilizing class 3a lasers (in the U.S.), and no special
care was required, no requirements invoked, except for applying the
standard class 3a warning label (the same label required on pointers).
Regulations on class 3a and lower lasers in the U.S. are generally very
light, regardless of application, simply because there's no evidence and
no history of harm or damage.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helpful person |
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:16 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 692
|
On Apr 23, 11:02 am, Dr J R Stockton <j...@merlyn.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote: In sci.astro.amateur message <90vr0417n42v549c191oqgtb5deuq8k...@4ax.com
, Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:59:28, Chris L Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu
posted:
Regulations on class 3a and lower lasers in the U.S. are generally very
light, regardless of application, simply because there's no evidence and
no history of harm or damage.
Devices readily available to the general public, especially but not only
when designed to be used in the manner of a pointer, should not be
capable of doing permanent harm or damage; and that should include the
harm or damage that can be caused by malicious or thoughtless dazzling.
Consider what might happen if, at night, you were driving down a
mountain road or landing a light aircraft, and a group of vandals ahead
decided to try the effect of one or more of there laser pointers on you.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. *...@merlyn.demon.co.uk/??.Stock...@physics.org
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Correct <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line precisely "-- " (SoRFC1036)
Additionally if a young child came into possession of a 5mW kaser
pointer. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dr J R Stockton |
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In sci.astro.amateur message <90vr0417n42v549c191oqgtb5deuq8kn68@4ax.com
Quote: , Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:59:28, Chris L Peterson <clp@alumni.caltech.edu
posted:
Regulations on class 3a and lower lasers in the U.S. are generally very
light, regardless of application, simply because there's no evidence and
no history of harm or damage.
Devices readily available to the general public, especially but not only
when designed to be used in the manner of a pointer, should not be
capable of doing permanent harm or damage; and that should include the
harm or damage that can be caused by malicious or thoughtless dazzling.
Consider what might happen if, at night, you were driving down a
mountain road or landing a light aircraft, and a group of vandals ahead
decided to try the effect of one or more of there laser pointers on you.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. *@merlyn.demon.co.uk/??.Stockton@physics.org
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
Correct <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line precisely "-- " (SoRFC1036) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:03 pm
|
|