Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Environment Forum  »  Global Cooling: Warming Worriers Snowed Under
Page 2 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
V-for-Vendicar
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:03 pm
Guest
"Whata Fool" <whata@fool.ami> wrote
Quote:
Well, according to that graph, between 1877 and 1977 there was near
zero warming, so it must be all in the last 30 years, a whole 0.6 degrees,

Which corresponds to 1.1'F

Considering that a temperature difference of only 2'C is sufficient to
induce a 100,000 year ice age, and the temperatuer has increased by more
than 1/4 of that amount in just 30 years, I would say the temperature change
is substantial.

Projections show the the temperature rise in the current century to be
even higher. Roughly about 3.5'C or a 2.9'C temperature change from
present.

The current rate of Global Warming over the last 10 years is about 2'C per
century.
Polly the Parrot
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:36 am
Guest
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:57:43 -0400 "V-for-Vendicar"
<Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

Quote:
If you think it is zero then you need to review some remedial
statistics.

You can't compute a trend by arbitrarily selecting two end points
and then drawing a line between them.

Thanks for the patronising lesson, dickhead.
mrbawana2u
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:18 am
Guest
On Apr 26, 5:57 pm, neutral...@gmail.com wrote:

Quote:
[delusions of a tard flushed]

Tell us about life being created in a lab, fucktard.
mrbawana2u
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:20 am
Guest
On Apr 26, 5:57 pm, neutral...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 25, 11:36 am, Robert Blass <bl...@messenger.xcx> wrote:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT), neutral...@gmail.com sayd
the following:

Would about 150 years be sufficient?
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh%2Bsh/index...

LOL that is a 'cycle' that will soon show temps going down again.

So tell me, [turds flushed]

Tell us about life being created in a lab, retard.
0NBZ0
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:50 pm
Guest
"Whata Fool" <whata@fool.ami> wrote in message
news:h71614le23pjf00g4jr2rllukpnmfkn3g6@4ax.com...
Quote:
Polly the Parrot <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:55:57 -0400 "V-for-Vendicar"
Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

I would be interested in the result.

Here you go

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png

Thanks.
Since 1940 it seems to have increased by only 0.45 Celsius, unless I
am
reading this wrong? Since 1860 still even less than one (1) degree
Celsius?
Hardly warming?
Well, according to that graph, between 1877 and 1977 there was
near
zero warming, so it must be all in the last 30 years, a whole 0.6
degrees,
really scary, good thing we now have digital thermometers, or we would
never been aware of the horrors of a 0.6 degree warming.


WRONG - and alarmist to boot!

According to the attached graph about 0.3 warming from 1850 to 1940
and another 0.2 from 1980 to 1998!

Cooling from 1998 to present.

Where did you get this garbage from????

BTW what "horrors"???????


Regards

Bonzo


"If scientists say they are 100% sure, or that they are absolutely
certain about the cause and effect and ignore variables which might show
that they could be wrong, they are practicing junk science. Junk science
happens when scientists believe something based on just some of what
they see."
V-for-Vendicar
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:06 pm
Guest
Quote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:57:43 -0400 "V-for-Vendicar"
Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

If you think it is zero then you need to review some remedial
statistics.

You can't compute a trend by arbitrarily selecting two end points
and then drawing a line between them.


"Polly the Parrot" <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote
Quote:
Thanks for the patronising lesson, dickhead.

Don't hate me because I'm smarter than you... Parrot.
V-for-Vendicar
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:09 pm
Guest
Quote:
[delusions of a tard flushed]


"mrbawana2u" <mrbawana2u@gmail.com> wrote
Quote:
Tell us about life being created in a lab, fucktard.

The genome has already been created from base nucleotides, and inserted
into cells. The components of those cells are then created by the genome.
Within several generations, all components of the resulting cells have been
created by the Artificial genome, and hence the cells are completely
artificial. Created in the lab.

Expect a formal announcement within the next month or so.
V-for-Vendicar
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:10 pm
Guest
"0NBZ0" <0NBZ0@doooooooooooooooodoooooooooo.com> wrote - Nothing But
Stupidity

You can't compute a trend by arbitrarily selecting two end points
and then drawing a line between them.

MMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN
Polly the Parrot
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:55 am
Guest
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:06:29 -0400 "V-for-Vendicar"
<Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:

Quote:
Thanks for the patronising lesson, dickhead.

Don't hate me because I'm smarter than you... Parrot.


How can I hate anybody smarter than myself?
Guest
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:16 am
On Apr 25, 1:36 pm, Robert Blass <bl...@messenger.xcx> wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT), neutral...@gmail.com sayd
the following:

Would about 150 years be sufficient?
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh%2Bsh/index...

LOL that is a 'cycle' that will soon show temps going down again.

You guys are pretty fun to watch play.

Is it me or does the provisional data for 2008 shows a big drop?

And if the '98 el Nino is thrown out there'd be a lower trend line,
even without this year's La Nina. It'd be more in accordance with
CO2's regular logarithmic curve without water vapor feedbacks. How far
off-trend are contemporary temperatures, discounting some easing of
insolation from reduced solar luminance? Not much.

/leebert
mrbawana2u
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:47 am
Guest
On Apr 28, 12:09 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
Quote:
[delusions of a tard flushed]

"mrbawana2u" <mrbawan...@gmail.com> wrote

Tell us about life being created in a lab, fucktard.

The genome has already been created from base nucleotides, and inserted
into cells. [flushed]

Yep. "inserted into cells"...live cells...
mrbawana2u
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:01 am
Guest
On Apr 28, 12:09 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
Quote:
[delusions of a tard flushed]

"mrbawana2u" <mrbawan...@gmail.com> wrote

Tell us about life being created in a lab, fucktard.

The genome has already been created from base nucleotides, and inserted
into cells.

Correct...it's never been done.
mrbawana2u
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:30 pm
Guest
On Apr 29, 4:02 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
Quote:
"mrbawana2u" <mrbawan...@gmail.com> wrote
Tell us about life being created in a lab, fucktard.
V for Vendicar wrote:
The genome has already been created from base nucleotides, and inserted
into cells.

"mrbawana2u" <mrbawan...@gmail.com> wrote

Correct...it's never been done.

In fact, [turds flushed]

it has never been done or you could provide an example.
mrbawana2u
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:42 pm
Guest
On Apr 29, 8:19 pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
Quote:
"mrbawana2u" <mrbawan...@gmail.com> wrote
Tell us about life being created in a lab, fucktard.
it has never been done or you could provide an example.

I'm a MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN

You're not THAT smart.

Quote:
http://www.pnas.org/misc/classics4.shtml

it has never been done or you could provide an example.
V-for-Vendicar
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:54 pm
Guest
Quote:
Don't hate me because I'm smarter than you... Parrot.

"Polly the Parrot" <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote
Quote:
How can I hate anybody smarter than myself?

Out of jealousy, most probably.
 
Page 2 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:43 pm