| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Neutrons and radiation
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| foolsrushout |
 Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Androcles wrote:
Quote: This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
"foolsrushout" <666@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:funb2n$peb$2@aioe.org...
| Helmut Wabnig wrote:
| > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:27:14 -0700 (PDT),
| > mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com wrote:
|
|
|
| >>Neutrons are not electromagenic.
|
| >>Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
|
|
| > I agree with Mitch Raemsch.
| > Neutrons are not electromagenic.
|
|
| You're trolling as well?
I agree neutrons are not electromagenic too.
Nor are magents, magtens, matgens, magens, mangets...
Trolling isn't relative, it is purposeful. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:08 am |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 23, 8:32 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 22, 11:27 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:23 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
This is about your speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.
Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge..
No.
Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
where you can find (in the section Interactions):
"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."
ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.
There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.
Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.
And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.
MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
You aren't listed here:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html
which covers from 1901 to 2007.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.
Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.
Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Neutrons are not electromagenic.
What does "electromagenic" mean?
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
No, you're not.
Oh, wait, let me guess- you don't believe that you're not listed at
the Nobel homepage.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
*which covers from 1901 to 2007.
It won for 2008
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel laureate 2008 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Androcles |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
"foolsrushout" <666@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:funhmc$lo4$1@aioe.org...
| Androcles wrote:
|
| > This message is brought to you by Androcles
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
| >
| > "foolsrushout" <666@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:funb2n$peb$2@aioe.org...
| > | Helmut Wabnig wrote:
| > | > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:27:14 -0700 (PDT),
| > | > mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com wrote:
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >>Neutrons are not electromagenic.
| > | >>
| > | >>Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > I agree with Mitch Raemsch.
| > | > Neutrons are not electromagenic.
| > |
| > |
| > | You're trolling as well?
| >
| > I agree neutrons are not electromagenic too.
| > Nor are magents, magtens, matgens, magens, mangets...
|
| Trolling isn't relative, it is purposeful.
That may be, but is it electromagicent?
See, there are trolls and there are malicious trolls.
Now a lot of contributors are agreeing with
Raemsch (Twice Nobel Laureate 2008)
that neutrons are not electromagenic, but I don't
agree with a lot of malicious trolls such as the Nobel
Laureate that said
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
and the time each way is the same.
"we establish by definition that the ``time'' required by light to travel
from A to B equals the ``time'' it requires to travel from B to A." --
Albert Fuckwit Einstein.
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| nuny@bid.nes |
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 23, 1:08 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 8:32 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:27 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:23 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
This is about your speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.
Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.
No.
Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
where you can find (in the section Interactions):
"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."
ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.
There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.
Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.
And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.
MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
You aren't listed here:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html
which covers from 1901 to 2007.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.
Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.
Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Neutrons are not electromagenic.
What does "electromagenic" mean?
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
No, you're not.
Oh, wait, let me guess- you don't believe that you're not listed at
the Nobel homepage.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
*which covers from 1901 to 2007.
It won for 2008
Nobel prizes for a given year are awarded on 10 December of that
year, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
The 2008 Nobel prizes have not yet been awarded.
http://search.nobelprize.org/search/nobel/?q=raemsch&i=en&x=8&y=9
Mark L. Fergerson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:49 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 23, 9:29 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 1:08 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:32 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:27 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:23 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
This is about your speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions"..
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.
Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.
No.
Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
where you can find (in the section Interactions):
"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."
ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.
There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.
Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.
And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.
MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
You aren't listed here:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html
which covers from 1901 to 2007.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.
Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.
Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Neutrons are not electromagenic.
What does "electromagenic" mean?
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
No, you're not.
Oh, wait, let me guess- you don't believe that you're not listed at
the Nobel homepage.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
*which covers from 1901 to 2007.
It won for 2008
Nobel prizes for a given year are awarded on 10 December of that
year, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
The 2008 Nobel prizes have not yet been awarded.
http://search.nobelprize.org/search/nobel/?q=raemsch&i=en&x=8&y=9
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I won. When do you think the winners find out?
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| nuny@bid.nes |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 26, 4:49 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote: On Apr 23, 9:29 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 1:08 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:32 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:27 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:23 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
This is about your speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.
Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.
No.
Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
where you can find (in the section Interactions):
"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."
ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.
There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.
Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.
And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.
MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
You aren't listed here:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html
which covers from 1901 to 2007.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.
Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.
Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Neutrons are not electromagenic.
What does "electromagenic" mean?
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
No, you're not.
Oh, wait, let me guess- you don't believe that you're not listed at
the Nobel homepage.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
*which covers from 1901 to 2007.
It won for 2008
Nobel prizes for a given year are awarded on 10 December of that
year, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
The 2008 Nobel prizes have not yet been awarded.
http://search.nobelprize.org/search/nobel/?q=raemsch&i=en&x=8&y=9
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I won. When do you think the winners find out?
From:
http://nobelprize.org/prize_announcements/magic_call.html
"Minutes just before the announcement, the Prize Awarding
Institution calls the Nobel Laureates to inform them that they have
been awarded the Nobel Prize."
And from:
http://nobelprize.org/prize_announcements/
"The announcement of the Nobel Laureates for the year is made on the
same day that the Nobel Prize-Awarding Institutions choose from among
the names recommended by the respective Nobel Committees. Immediately
after the vote, a press conference is held by the concerned Nobel
Prize Awarder."
There have been no press conferences announcing Prize winners for
2008.
Now, if you'd claimed two _Ig_Nobels, at least one for time travel,
nobody would have minded.
Mark L. Fergerson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:26 pm |
|
|
|
|
On Apr 29, 5:32 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 26, 4:49 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 9:29 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 1:08 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:32 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 11:27 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:23 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:51 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 22, 1:56 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:14 am, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 21, 4:58 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutrons don't radiate EM. They do not have an electro magnetic field
therefor they don't have the field to give birth to light.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
This is about your speed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
Pay particular attention to the section "Interactions".
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of many isotopes (frinst C13) depends
entirely on the magnetic moment of an 'extra' neutron.
Perhaps that is a misinterpretation as the neutron has no charge.
No.
Neutrons have an empirically measured magnetic moment, which by
definition means it feels magnetic fields. You apparently didn't
bother to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
where you can find (in the section Interactions):
"Although the neutron has zero net charge, it may interact
electromagnetically in two ways: first, the neutron has a magnetic
moment of the same order as the proton (see neutron magnetic moment);
second, it is composed of electrically charged quarks."
ElectroMagnetic charge is the prerequiset for interacting with light.
There is no such thing as "electromagnetic charge" for subatomic
particles.
Neutrons have nonzero electric polarizability (the ability to
develop externally measurable internal charge displacements in
response to an externally applied electric field) and spin angular
momentum, giving them nonzero magnetic moments. Together those
properties allow neutrons to interact with externally applied
electromagnetic fields.
And not just time-varying fields, either. When a neutron is placed
in a static (not changing over time) magnetic field its spin angular
momentum vector (spin axis, to you) precesses at a rate proportional
to the field's strength.
MItch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
You aren't listed here:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/all_laureates_ln.html
which covers from 1901 to 2007.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I don't believe the neutron is magnetic. That is fudge.
Your beliefs are not in agreement with empirical reality. Please
stop posting them to sci.physics.
Also, please provide evidence you are "Twice Nobel Laureate 2008";
that is not subject to opinion.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Neutrons are not electromagenic.
What does "electromagenic" mean?
Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
No, you're not.
Oh, wait, let me guess- you don't believe that you're not listed at
the Nobel homepage.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
*which covers from 1901 to 2007.
It won for 2008
Nobel prizes for a given year are awarded on 10 December of that
year, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
The 2008 Nobel prizes have not yet been awarded.
http://search.nobelprize.org/search/nobel/?q=raemsch&i=en&x=8&y=9
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I won. When do you think the winners find out?
From:
http://nobelprize.org/prize_announcements/magic_call.html
"Minutes just before the announcement, the Prize Awarding
Institution calls the Nobel Laureates to inform them that they have
been awarded the Nobel Prize."
And from:
http://nobelprize.org/prize_announcements/
"The announcement of the Nobel Laureates for the year is made on the
same day that the Nobel Prize-Awarding Institutions choose from among
the names recommended by the respective Nobel Committees. Immediately
after the vote, a press conference is held by the concerned Nobel
Prize Awarder."
There have been no press conferences announcing Prize winners for
2008.
Now, if you'd claimed two _Ig_Nobels, at least one for time travel,
nobody would have minded.
Mark L. Fergerson- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
We will find out then!!!
Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:59 pm
|
|