Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Physics Forum  »  GOD = RELATIVISTIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE
Page 19 of 19    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19
Author Message
George Hammond
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:37 pm
Guest
On Thu, 01 May 2008 21:29:44 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)">
wrote:

Quote:


SNIP RANT


[Hammond]

You claim to be a physicist but refuse to post your CV,
your real name, or any verification.
From the low intellectual quality of your posts I
conclude you are a fraudulent crackpot with possibly a
charity degree in some lamebrain applied Science field, at
best.
You have not posted ONE SCIENTIFIC COMMENT to this
thread, merely an endless stream of aggravated incompetent
remarks. Get off this thread.
=====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================
monkfish
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:55 pm
Guest
none wrote:

Quote:
George Hammond wrote:
On Thu, 01 May 2008 19:18:38 GMT, "John Smith"
bobsyoungbro@yahoo.com> wrote:

"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:igsi14le1jhh72oegu4pqrv5nehp6t6tl8@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:29:12 -0700 (PDT), Roger Pearse
[Hammond]
In all fairness, what you have stated is prevailing
wisdom as of 2008 ad.
However, unbeknownst to either you or the Religious
community, in fact Physics has discovered (and published)
the world's first scientific proof of God (Hammond 2003).

[John Smith, antiSPOG heckler]
"Physics" has discovered nothing!
One, lonely old, psychotic, moron has bellowed crap - whch he pretends
is actually science.


[Hammond]
Sorry heckler, I've already published the discovery of the
Structural Model and the Scientific proof of God in two peer
reviewed copyright academic journals and they are sitting on
the library shelves in Universites around the world. This
secures my priorities in the discovery for the duration.
That is to say nothing of 50,000 posts to usent about it,
all archived by Google and half a dozen other data bases and
witnessed by 50,000 Usenet responders plus another 500,000
people who have hit my website in the past 9 years.
Sorry, you're not going to do anything to interfere with
my priorities. Screw.
You notice that no one cares about your "proof" and the only
interest it gets is for people to laugh at. No one takes
it seriously. Those who read it cannot take it seriously.
It is the worst piece of an attempt to ignore science and
get to a desired conclusion that any of us has seen. Your
derivation makes congress look quiet and logical.


Why are you talking to him?


--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because atheists there
consider quoting the Bible proselytizing and as such it is prohibited by
their undebatable policy.
--
The best way to handle spams is to ignore them. But if you must reply to
them, you should at least set the followup-to header to something other
than your own newsgroup.
 
Page 19 of 19    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:01 am