|
Science Forum Index » Environment Forum » KKKonservatism is always a complete
Page 5 of 7 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Genaro |
 Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
news:ZQcRj.55531$612.34126@read1.cgocable.net:
Quote:
"Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
If the world has to judge Americans at all shouldn't they also
consider the intelligence in these forums?
Mostly shown by Non-AmeriKKKans
-------
You've completed the study? I'd be interested in seeing the
statistics. Would you mind posting them?
------- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Poetic Justice |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael Price wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 7:24 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
"James" <kingko...@iglou.com> wrote
I doubt you know the difference in rednecks and hillbillies
A redneck will marry his cousin, a Hillbilly will marry his sister?
Quote: "V-for-Vendicar" wrote:
James is deeply in tune with the inferior breeds.
"Michael Price" <nini_...@yahoo.com> wrote
Nobodies inferior to you you hatefilled moron.
Yup. AmeriKKKa is filled to the brim with Nobodies like you Michael..
Well no, I'm Australian and fairly unusual. But nobody in America I
can
think of is inferior to you. Seriously you are profoundly ignorant
and
incapable of education. You lie so badly all I have to do is remember
what I said further up the thread and I can catch you out. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Poetic Justice |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Michael Price wrote:
Quote: On Apr 24, 12:46 am, "Ouroboros_Rex" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
Michael Price wrote:
On Apr 21, 11:04 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
The general history of Human Social Evolution.
"Michael Price" <nini_...@yahoo.com> wrote
In other words nothing but his prejudiced reading of what he thinks
is social history.
I note that a monotinic trend in history is the ever increasing
regulation placed upon the human population.
So now you claim there's evidence. Why not present it when your
claim was
challenged?
KKKonservatives whine about that trend all the time, and that whine
is now the basis of their failed political ideology.
No idiot conservatives have been for increasing regulation of human
behaviour since before the term libertarian was coined. In fact the
fact that "liberals" stopped being pro-freedom was the reason
libertarianism was coined. Libertarians are not conservative.
The fact that increasing regulation has been a disaster for all it's
alleged goals is of course of no interest to you.
Probably because it's largely false.
Has increasing regulation made us richer? No it caused the great
depression.
Has it benefitted the poor? No it shut the poor out of employment.
Has it made products safer? No and to be frank that was never really
it's
purpose. In fact sellers have been PREVENTED from for instance
testing
for BSE.
Liberals love to regulate social behavior, conservatives want to
regulate social behavior.... Libertarians want to stay out of social
regulation. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Poetic Justice |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Genaro wrote:
Quote: "V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
news:zMNPj.56620$dA2.42827@read2.cgocable.net:
"Michael Price" <nini_pad@yahoo.com> wrote
It's always useful when people criticise americans for
being brain dead
I agree.
It's best if the world sees AmeriKKKa for what it is....
Worthless and
powerless, and completly Inept.
-------
I can understand how someone might draw that conclusion after
examining the actions and statements made by our current
congress.
-------
We set in not one but two countries, our economy was growing until
Liberalism caught up to the mortgage industry. We had to regulate it so
that the *POOR* could qualify for loans they couldn't afford. Why would
anyone be surprised when the poor missed their house payments?
Another disaster brought to you by big government regulating and
micromanaging our lives. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Genaro |
| Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Poetic Justice <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote
in news:E5lRj.53866$r76.182@bignews8.bellsouth.net:
Quote: Genaro wrote:
"V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote
in news:zMNPj.56620$dA2.42827@read2.cgocable.net:
"Michael Price" <nini_pad@yahoo.com> wrote
It's always useful when people criticise americans for
being brain dead
I agree.
It's best if the world sees AmeriKKKa for what it is....
Worthless and
powerless, and completly Inept.
-------
I can understand how someone might draw that conclusion
after examining the actions and statements made by our
current congress.
-------
We set in not one but two countries, our economy was growing
until Liberalism caught up to the mortgage industry. We had
to regulate it so that the *POOR* could qualify for loans
they couldn't afford. Why would anyone be surprised when the
poor missed their house payments?
Another disaster brought to you by big government regulating
and micromanaging our lives.
-------
And if you think health care is expensive now, wait 'til it's
free.
------- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Michael Price" <nini_pad@yahoo.com> wrote
Quote: Well for a start I'm not a conservative.
Of course you are. Your Libertairan. That's about as KKKonservative as
they come. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:18 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote
Quote: Liberals love to regulate social behavior, conservatives want to regulate
social behavior.... Libertarians want to stay out of social regulation.
And thereby make Child pornography and animal mutilation perfectly legal. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:19 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote
Quote: A redneck will marry his cousin, a Hillbilly will marry his sister?
What do they call a person who marries his mother?
Answer...
A Christian KKKonservative. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
Quote: And if you think health care is expensive now, wait 'til it's
free.
Nothing is free of course. All of the Socialist states have their health
care paid out of the tax revenue obtained by the government.
The fact is, that with the Failed AmeriKKKan system, the costs are 20%
higher than Canada's, and 10% of the AmeriKKKan people have no health care
coverage. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Genaro |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
news:_7zRj.61445$dA2.5095@read2.cgocable.net:
Quote:
"Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
And if you think health care is expensive now, wait 'til
it's free.
Nothing is free of course. All of the Socialist states
have their health
care paid out of the tax revenue obtained by the government.
The fact is, that with the Failed AmeriKKKan system, the
costs are 20%
higher than Canada's, and 10% of the AmeriKKKan people have
no health care coverage.
-------
Did you factor in the tax cost to Canadians and the quality of
their health care?
How many illegals, those who have not applied for health care,
and those who were between jobs are included in the 10% figure?
We all witness daily the results of a gov't-run education
system. Why should I believe health care would be any
different?
Even if your percentages were accurate that hardly constitutes
a failed system and certainly not one to be discarded in favor
of "a plan" that would resemble the US Tax Code.
Simply put, there is no reasonable justification for scrapping
a system that works for the vast majority of Americans unless
you are a socialist who believes everyone should have the same
and less of it.
------- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Poetic Justice |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Genaro wrote:
Quote: "V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in
news:_7zRj.61445$dA2.5095@read2.cgocable.net:
"Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
And if you think health care is expensive now, wait 'til
it's free.
Nothing is free of course. All of the Socialist states
have their health
care paid out of the tax revenue obtained by the government.
The fact is, that with the Failed AmeriKKKan system, the
costs are 20%
higher than Canada's, and 10% of the AmeriKKKan people have
no health care coverage.
-------
Did you factor in the tax cost to Canadians and the quality of
their health care?
Of course he didn't factor in the wait.
Or who gets that limited money when two people need a kidney and one
needs a heart and there is only enough to do the the heart *or* the two
kidneys.....
Why if they hadn't been taxing away your money you could go to America
and get a heart. They take away your money and spend it on others and
on pay raises and government paperwork and leave you to die.
He didn't count the fact that our drug companies charge us more for the
same drugs that they sell in Canada, so we in the US that buy
Pharmaceutical Drugs are subsidizing Canadians medical care.
Quote: How many illegals, those who have not applied for health care,
and those who were between jobs are included in the 10% figure?
We all witness daily the results of a gov't-run education
system. Why should I believe health care would be any
different?
Kids are as dumb as they ever were.....
You're right on that one, education is another government success
story right. Government wastes more money than any system, how could
they be more efficient on only this particular item. If you want to
create a Boondoggle all you need is to get government in on something....
Our Government isn't the same as Canada and therefore you can't simply
move some numbers across the border and expect the same results anyways.
The VA is government health care... great stuff huh.
Liberals complain about it constantly.
Quote: Even if your percentages were accurate that hardly constitutes
a failed system and certainly not one to be discarded in favor
of "a plan" that would resemble the US Tax Code.
It would make our taxes go up by 20% to pay for it, that would put us at
about 50% for Federal income tax alone, then start adding on the long
list of other taxes like:
State sales tax
State income tax
Gas tax
Liquor tax
tags
property tax
....
....
Quote:
Simply put, there is no reasonable justification for scrapping
a system that works for the vast majority of Americans unless
you are a socialist who believes everyone should have the same
and less of it.
------- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Michael Price" <nini_pad@yahoo.com> wrote
Quote: Has increasing regulation made us richer? No
Regulation is the definition and codification of the allowed (legal)
interactions between people.
Law = Regulation, and without Law there is Lawlessness and Brutal Anarchy,
and in Anarchy there is no progress, only a fight for survival against
lawless hoards.
Since there has been progress, it is a result of law. and hence as a
result of regulation.
Libertarians like Michael Price may never accept this simple truth. My
solution to their ignorance is to treat them as they would treat others,
with brutal lawlesness. Perhaps in their dying moments they will realize
the extent of their Childish Error. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: "Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
If the world has to judge Americans at all shouldn't they also
consider the intelligence in these forums?
Quote: "V-for-Vendicar" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote
Mostly shown by Non-AmeriKKKans
"Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
Quote: You've completed the study? I'd be interested in seeing the
statistics. Would you mind posting them?
Cast pearls before AmeriKKKan swine? Don't be silly.
As you are an AmeriKKKan, you undoubtedly wouldn't comprehend them.
AmeriKKKans apparently can't even interpret simple graphs and tables. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Poetic Justice" <@http://Poetic-Justice.Talk-n-Dog.com> wrote
Quote: We set in not one but two countries, our economy was growing until
Liberalism caught up to the mortgage industry. We had to regulate it so
that the *POOR* could qualify for loans they couldn't afford.
What regulation did Libertarian Greenspan and the KKKonservaive Bush
government and KKKonservative Congress implement that forced banks to
provide bad loans?
We are waiting. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| V-for-Vendicar |
| Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Genaro" <genaro@mariners.win> wrote
Quote: Did you factor in the tax cost to Canadians and the quality of
their health care?
Canadian health care quality is higher than that which is generally
available in the U.S.
And as for Canada's standard of living. Your right. That too is higher
than that in the U.S.
Vancouver 3rd in world in quality of life survey
Last Updated: Sunday, March 13, 2005 | 5:56 PM ET
CBC News
Vancouver's natural assets and temperate climate make it one of the best
cities in the world in which to live, a new survey says.
The annual quality of life survey released by Mercer Human Resource
Consulting placed Vancouver third out of 215 cities, the same as last year.
Vancouver's climate helped it rise in the rankings, according to Mercer
spokeswoman Danielle Bushen.
The only two places that beat the West Coast city were Zurich and Geneva in
Switzerland.
Toronto edged up one spot in the rankings to 14th place. Montreal was 22nd,
up two spots, Ottawa was unchanged in 20th spot, and Calgary was 25th, down
one.
All five Canadian cities in the survey were praised for their relatively
high levels of "personal safety and security" and for being in a politically
stable country.
Baghdad was deemed the world's least secure city because of ongoing civil
unrest and threats of attack in the city. Luxembourg was ranked the top city
for personal safety and security.
In the United States, the highest-rated cities were Honolulu and San
Francisco, tied in 25th spot with Calgary, while Houston, in 68th spot,
ranked lowest. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
