Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on you.
It was sad, real sad.

Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down to the
bottom of the barrel.

And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat touting
your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but few
else.

Sad, really sad.

On Apr 15, 2:25 am, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on
you.
It was sad, real sad.

Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down to
the
bottom of the barrel.

Sigh. We all have our detractors, Frank. Kali's have been almost
exclusively kooks and trolls, not regular, contributing members of
spp.

Further, if the "some psychology doctor" you're referring to is "Wyatt
Ehrenfels," he belongs to the genus *K0okus Gargantous Bitterus*, and
had problems with quite a few people around here. (I've never been
fully convinced WE wasn't Brad Jesness in disguise.)

SPP has a long and convoluted history that doesn't fully reveal itself
in the posting archives. I've had difficulty figuring out what
happened during my absence (even knowing a few of the players), and
can easily imagine how you could get the wrong impression from what
you've read. The reality is, Kali has been--or *was,* when this group
was actually populated by academics and intellectuals--a highly
respected and valued member. A lot of people like her.

And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat touting
your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but few
else.

Sad, really sad.

She's never struck me as someone who considers herself elitist, but
one can hardly fault her for enjoying a well-reasoned and supportable
discussion. I think, if you look a little harder, you'll find she's at
least as silly as she is intellectual, and not the way you've
portrayed her at all.

"marcia" <marcia12345.c@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb5ed41c-9d24-4229-8424-7fae10ebd849@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 15, 2:25 am, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on
you.
It was sad, real sad.

Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down to
the
bottom of the barrel.

Sigh. We all have our detractors, Frank. Kali's have been almost
exclusively kooks and trolls, not regular, contributing members of
spp.

Further, if the "some psychology doctor" you're referring to is "Wyatt
Ehrenfels," he belongs to the genus *K0okus Gargantous Bitterus*, and
had problems with quite a few people around here. (I've never been
fully convinced WE wasn't Brad Jesness in disguise.)


A rather long commentary about her mentioned a name like Ehrenfels, I
don't remember there being a Wyatt attached.

SPP has a long and convoluted history that doesn't fully reveal itself
in the posting archives. I've had difficulty figuring out what
happened during my absence (even knowing a few of the players), and
can easily imagine how you could get the wrong impression from what
you've read. The reality is, Kali has been--or *was,* when this group
was actually populated by academics and intellectuals--a highly
respected and valued member. A lot of people like her.


It is amazing how many don't, it's huge out there.

And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat touting
your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but few
else.

Sad, really sad.

She's never struck me as someone who considers herself elitist, but
one can hardly fault her for enjoying a well-reasoned and supportable
discussion. I think, if you look a little harder, you'll find she's at
least as silly as she is intellectual, and not the way you've
portrayed her at all.


She came off as a thoroughbred elitist snob

her with nothing to
substantiate any claims.

On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

is not very bright, not intelligent. One
does not have to agree with a persons political beliefs to recognize
well founded idea's and intelligent reasoning. Even Bills counterparts
respected him and thought well of him. Unless you speak of progressives
and they are all to agendized to see any truth anywhere and reasoning
has no place in their speech.

On Apr 15, 2:25 am, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on you.
It was sad, real sad.

Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down to the
bottom of the barrel.

Sigh. We all have our detractors, Frank. Kali's have been almost
exclusively kooks and trolls, not regular, contributing members of
spp.

Further, if the "some psychology doctor" you're referring to is "Wyatt
Ehrenfels," he belongs to the genus *K0okus Gargantous Bitterus*, and
had problems with quite a few people around here. (I've never been
fully convinced WE wasn't Brad Jesness in disguise.)

SPP has a long and convoluted history that doesn't fully reveal itself
in the posting archives. I've had difficulty figuring out what
happened during my absence (even knowing a few of the players), and
can easily imagine how you could get the wrong impression from what
you've read. The reality is, Kali has been--or *was,* when this group
was actually populated by academics and intellectuals--a highly
respected and valued member. A lot of people like her.


And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat touting
your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but few
else.

Sad, really sad.

She's never struck me as someone who considers herself elitist, but
one can hardly fault her for enjoying a well-reasoned and supportable
discussion. I think, if you look a little harder, you'll find she's at
least as silly as she is intellectual, and not the way you've
portrayed her at all.

marcia
(having a scrambled neuron day)

In <fu3qtp$u7l$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"marcia" <marcia12345.c@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb5ed41c-9d24-4229-8424-7fae10ebd849@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 15, 2:25 am, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
Since someone reposted your real name I did a little web search on
you.
It was sad, real sad.

Seems everyone is dissing you from some psychology doctor on down
to
the
bottom of the barrel.

Sigh. We all have our detractors, Frank. Kali's have been almost
exclusively kooks and trolls, not regular, contributing members of
spp.

Further, if the "some psychology doctor" you're referring to is
"Wyatt
Ehrenfels," he belongs to the genus *K0okus Gargantous Bitterus*,
and
had problems with quite a few people around here. (I've never been
fully convinced WE wasn't Brad Jesness in disguise.)


A rather long commentary about her mentioned a name like Ehrenfels, I
don't remember there being a Wyatt attached.

Gerald Giarmo, aka Whyatt Ehrenfels. Given the fact that you
have your nose shoved firmly up Linda's skirt, you should know
who that is.

SPP has a long and convoluted history that doesn't fully reveal
itself
in the posting archives. I've had difficulty figuring out what
happened during my absence (even knowing a few of the players), and
can easily imagine how you could get the wrong impression from what
you've read. The reality is, Kali has been--or *was,* when this
group
was actually populated by academics and intellectuals--a highly
respected and valued member. A lot of people like her.


It is amazing how many don't, it's huge out there.

Just can't please all the people all of the time.

And there you are sitting in a self appointed cat birds seat
touting
your intellectualism. You might consider yourself an elitist but
few
else.

Sad, really sad.

She's never struck me as someone who considers herself elitist, but
one can hardly fault her for enjoying a well-reasoned and
supportable
discussion. I think, if you look a little harder, you'll find she's
at
least as silly as she is intellectual, and not the way you've
portrayed her at all.


She came off as a thoroughbred elitist snob

"Thoroughbred elitist snob"? lol

her with nothing to
substantiate any claims.

My claims were well substantiated. You snipped out all the
evidence and ran away from the thread.

On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.

is not very bright, not intelligent. One
does not have to agree with a persons political beliefs to recognize
well founded idea's and intelligent reasoning. Even Bills counterparts
respected him and thought well of him. Unless you speak of
progressives
and they are all to agendized to see any truth anywhere and reasoning
has no place in their speech.

Poor Frank.

. "He seems to have issues with women" *snicker*.

He never finished his Ph.D. and projected his shortcomings all
over me, quite, um, generously.

On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.


Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

In <fu647h$77m$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of
someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.


Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

You're the one making the claim. Prove it.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,
and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu647h$77m$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of
someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.


Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

You're the one making the claim. Prove it.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,
and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.


So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true
intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me
yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?

On another note, Ehrenfels rl counterpart did graduate and get his Ph.
D.

I have yet to see where you achieved the same

In <fu8p88$as7$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu647h$77m$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of
someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.


Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

You're the one making the claim. Prove it.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,
and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.


So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true
intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me
yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?

What else did you write in the paragraph? I don't even think I
read the whole thing.

On another note, Ehrenfels rl counterpart did graduate and get his Ph.
D.

Actually he did, I had him mixed up with someone else.

I have yet to see where you achieved the same

That's okay with me. Think what you want.

Your name, address, phone number, real estate information, tax
information, current employer, and academic background would be
required first, just to level the playing field, "Frank".

But then I still won't post anything about my personal or
professional life to Usenet again. I shared just enough to get
myself stalked and harassed at school and at work several years
ago by people like you.

In <fu8p88$as7$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu647h$77m$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of
someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.


Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

You're the one making the claim. Prove it.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,
and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.


So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true
intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me
yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?

What else did you write in the paragraph? I don't even think I
read the whole thing.

On another note, Ehrenfels rl counterpart did graduate and get his Ph.
D.

Actually he did, I had him mixed up with someone else.

I have yet to see where you achieved the same

That's okay with me. Think what you want.

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8sf0$454$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu8p88$as7$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu647h$77m$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of
someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.


Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

You're the one making the claim. Prove it.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,
and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.


So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true
intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me
yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?

What else did you write in the paragraph? I don't even think I
read the whole thing.


T

In <fu954t$lj...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:





"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8sf0$454$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu8p88$as...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu87sg$84k$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu647h$77...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
On the Web there were some comments about
unfinished masters degree in something, and a couple schools were
mentioned. Nothing in a positive light.

Her own comments to threads here in the last few days spoke of
someone
who thinks more of themselves than they ought. An intellectual, a
scientist, lol, I think not and anyone who would discount a true
intellectual like Bill Buckley

Where did I do that? Evidence, please. note bene: Your lack of
reading comprehension skills don't count, here.

Just do a search with his name over the last week or so.

You're the one making the claim. Prove it.

It'll show up,
I cannot understand why you feel so sensitive about it now?

What will show up is the fact that I was laughing at you, Frank,
and it had nothing to do with Bill Buckley.

So let me get this straight, when I mentioned Bill as a true
intellectual and you replied "LOL" that means you were laughing at me
yet agreeing that he was a true intellectual?

What else did you write in the paragraph? I don't even think I
read the whole thing.

On another note, Ehrenfels rl counterpart did graduate and get his Ph.
D.

Actually he did, I had him mixed up with someone else.

I have yet to see where you achieved the same

That's okay with me. Think what you want.

Yawn

Your name, address, phone number, real estate information, tax
information, current employer, and academic background would be
required first, just to level the playing field, "Frank".

"Kimberley"

Well, where is it?

But then I still won't post anything about my personal or
professional life to Usenet again. I shared just enough to get
myself stalked and harassed at school and at work several years
ago by people like you.

Now you sound just like Linda. You're saying people just like me?

[...]

Don't you have some stalking of someone in Kentucky or Las Vegas
to keep you occupied? Maybe you could have better spent your
time looking at satellite images of other poster's houses on
Google and posting cryptic messages to seemingly nobody in
particular, like, "why did you move?.