Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very
well be a woman.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

In <ftr1cg$8cl$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...





"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you

"marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...



On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...

"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that
was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you

At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she is his
mom.

12 years yet no provable education.

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8cl$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?


I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out in news:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8cl$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was
so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?


I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?




Peter has been here for far longer than you

On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...





"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that
was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you


At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

In <ftr1cg$8cl$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

On Apr 13, 3:24 pm, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
"marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...



On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...

"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that
was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you

At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she is his
mom.

12 years yet no provable education. :(

I think he has a Master's in Psychology, IIRC.

You and Peter have
certainly gotten off on the wrong foot,

but really, he's a nice guy
(believe it or not).

I like Kali, too, so you won't catch me dissing her. Last I heard she
was very close to finishing her PhD, and may have done so by now, idk.

On Apr 13, 3:24 pm, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
"marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...



On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...

"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a
nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he"
could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that
was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame
defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he
is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you

At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating
back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she is
his
mom.

12 years yet no provable education. :(

I think he has a Master's in Psychology, IIRC. You and Peter have
certainly gotten off on the wrong foot, but really, he's a nice guy
(believe it or not).

I like Kali, too, so you won't catch me dissing her. Last I heard she
was very close to finishing her PhD, and may have done so by now, idk.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message
635b4aaa-4a8e-4232-9756-29aca0faba46@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
marcia <marcia12345.c@gmail.com> writes
On Apr 13, 3:24 pm, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
"marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...



On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...

"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a
nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he"
could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and
that
was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame
defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he
is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you

At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating
back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she is
his
mom.

12 years yet no provable education. :(

I think he has a Master's in Psychology, IIRC.

One in neurophysiology too, but it is no longer possible to call me
'the three degrees' as my friends once did. I have passed that stage
by a long chalk.

You and Peter have
certainly gotten off on the wrong foot,

His behaviour has been lacking in civility and evidence. He appears to
prefer the argumentum ad hominem to the process of producing evidence
to back his claims, and that is why I have plonked him; there is no
point in trying to reason with a sack of hammers. The killfile is the
most efficient and usual route with such as he.

I draw your attention to the behaviour of one Michael Newton and JMP,
who completely ignored his fantasies about devil worship and
psychology. I learned this lesson vicariously.

but really, he's a nice guy
(believe it or not).

Shucks, I don't know what to say now. Wanna marry me? ;-)

On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...





"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you


At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

On Apr 13, 3:24 pm, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
"marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:75ce29f2-fcb6-415f-83f4-f68ed0bed098@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...



On Apr 13, 12:05 pm, ThePsyko <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:
On 12 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out innews:ftr6mi$vp$1@aioe.org...

"Kali" <k...@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <ftr1cg$8c...@aioe.org>, Frank dawgf...@ten.hut said:
Peter claims to be an intellectual based on education.

He has none to be found in the history of this group. He is a nym.

You can't say you are familiar with the history of spp. It is
obvious in everything you've written that you aren't.

He can claim all he wants, but he is a fraud. In fact "he" could
very
well be a woman.

So could you, "Frank".

And I could be a man.

At the current time he claims to have plonked me, lol, and that
was so
he did not have to prove something that he cannot prove.

You're projecting again.

He knew that he used hearsay docs as a basis for his lame defense.

Your failure to comprehend the evidence that you, yourself
presented, is hardly Peter's fault.

Follow his messages, he loves to use references to a penis, he is
infatuated with them.

And you claim to know the history of the group?

I've read some of the history and did a few specific searches.

Are you Peter's mom?

Peter has been here for far longer than you

At least 12 years... I find SPP references to "Peter Hood" dating back
to June 3, 1996. He's practically a fossil.

Oh, that explains it, that would mean Kali is *really* old if she is his
mom.

12 years yet no provable education. :(

I think he has a Master's in Psychology, IIRC. You and Peter have
certainly gotten off on the wrong foot, but really, he's a nice guy
(believe it or not).

I like Kali, too, so you won't catch me dissing her. Last I heard she
was very close to finishing her PhD, and may have done so by now, idk.

From : Kali <kali@powder.keg
Message-ID : <ftr3md$ogi$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com

Cock in a Frock..