Worked for me.

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when Pablo
started posting to spp. I was here the entire time,
and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much
disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about lack
of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence of
her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will find
some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ...
which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26, 2000
in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with
Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM
folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for quite
some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after her
reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your
assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent
enough for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly
wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster until 2004.
Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted threads she
participated in - something I did with a lot of the
alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same goes for
Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly around Jan.
2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links first,
and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you
had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to admit
fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest in
personal improvement that might be one way of looking at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them
is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do so
is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best
and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than to
attract attention and/or give others ammo with which to ruin
you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and fix
it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those who
make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention (pathetic)
and it's likely to attract destructive attention (stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only assume
that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody who
brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was
aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until
2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your
point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call it
bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you want, but
the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

runs

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84B4FFF42B5E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q806c.5el.19.1@news.alt.net:

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine
and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the
EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't
find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

I'm gonna have to start a list of messages where you stick your foot
in your mouth,

Meh. A list. Be my guest, k00ky.

so I can quickly relocate them and laugh at them

You misspelled titter.

from time to
time. There's that nasty "buds" one from a while back, and now this
gem. I imagine there will be more.

Your delusional snippage does not change the facts.

I have not attempted to change any facts. I simply responded to the
last fourteen (or so) lines of your post.

What about you, bitchboi?

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q81j4.aks.19.1@news.alt.net:

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84B4FFF42B5E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q806c.5el.19.1@news.alt.net:

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine
and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the
EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't
find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

I'm gonna have to start a list of messages where you stick your foot
in your mouth,

Meh. A list. Be my guest, k00ky.

so I can quickly relocate them and laugh at them

You misspelled titter.

from time to
time. There's that nasty "buds" one from a while back, and now this
gem. I imagine there will be more.

Your delusional snippage does not change the facts.

I have not attempted to change any facts. I simply responded to the
last fourteen (or so) lines of your post.

Post edit noted, thwarted, and laughed at.

What about you, bitchboi?

Don't you just *hate* it when you post-edit and then "follow up" to that
with something, and then somebody else reverses your edits and makes your
"follow up" look fucking stupid?

You may now return to your usual routine, which I presume involves
checking out underdeveloped girls. HAND

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:k3j1usd1gxe7.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

Being a juicenet illiterate must suck, though the public
self-flaggelation is, in a word, rich. Btw, since you appear to be
ruefully clueless, this is who you just responded to:

Hth! LOLOL

The attribution marks make it quite clear who I responded to, cl00bie.

"MSmith" <Msmith@aol.com> wrote in
news:48094542$0$12890$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:

Worked for me.

You found "Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20" huh?

LOL. That message does not exist, hon. Never has.

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A84DCF214A94E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:k3j1usd1gxe7.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine
and activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the
EULA because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I
couldn't find the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks
-- the OEM one that came with the laptop, and another one that I
apparently bought separately (for reasons that escape me at the
moment). I was thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM,
because I had it with the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

Being a juicenet illiterate must suck, though the public
self-flaggelation is, in a word, rich. Btw, since you appear to be
ruefully clueless, this is who you just responded to:

Hth! LOLOL

The attribution marks make it quite clear who I responded to,
cl00bie.

Lie all you want.

It won't change this.

http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/e67d5becddb7a
3a6

LOLOL

Well I got back an article written by you about Winxp.

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84DD7A4B3C0E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"MSmith" <Msmith@aol.com> wrote in
news:48094542$0$12890$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:

Worked for me.

You found "Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20" huh?

LOL. That message does not exist, hon. Never has.

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84DF28D4802E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q81j4.aks.19.1@news.alt.net:

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84B4FFF42B5E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q806c.5el.19.1@news.alt.net:

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM
after all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular
machine
and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the
EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't
find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM
one that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently
bought separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I
was thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it
with the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

I'm gonna have to start a list of messages where you stick your
foot in your mouth,

Meh. A list. Be my guest, k00ky.

so I can quickly relocate them and laugh at them

You misspelled titter.

from time to
time. There's that nasty "buds" one from a while back, and now
this gem. I imagine there will be more.

Your delusional snippage does not change the facts.

I have not attempted to change any facts. I simply responded to
the last fourteen (or so) lines of your post.

Post edit noted, thwarted, and laughed at.

Damn you!

What about you, bitchboi?

Don't you just *hate* it when you post-edit and then "follow up" to
that with something, and then somebody else reverses your edits and
makes your "follow up" look fucking stupid?

Sure do! <grumble

You may now return to your usual routine, which I presume involves
checking out underdeveloped girls. HAND

You have a vivid, runaway imagination involving "underdeveloped
girls."

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much
disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence
of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will
find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ...
which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with
Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM
folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after
her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your
assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent
enough for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly
wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster until 2004.
Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted threads she
participated in - something I did with a lot of the
alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same goes for
Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly around Jan.
2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you
had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest in
personal improvement that might be one way of looking at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them
is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do
so is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best
and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than
to attract attention and/or give others ammo with which to
ruin you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and
fix it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those
who make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only assume
that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody
who brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp
was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until
2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your
point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call it
bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you want,
but the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

You sure about that?

runs

/points and laughs

gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much
disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence
of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will
find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ...
which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with
Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM
folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after
her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your
assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent
enough for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly
wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster until 2004.
Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted threads she
participated in - something I did with a lot of the
alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same goes for
Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly around Jan.
2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you
had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest in
personal improvement that might be one way of looking at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them
is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do
so is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best
and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than
to attract attention and/or give others ammo with which to
ruin you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and
fix it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those
who make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only assume
that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody
who brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp
was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until
2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your
point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call it
bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you want,
but the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

You sure about that?

puzzled> Sure about what?

runs

/points and laughs

I've got something better to point and laugh at: my daughter trying to
keep up with three five-day old orphaned kittens that some woman
brought
into her store and pawned off on her. We have two cats, and we're
moving
at the end of the month. (I already know we're going to end up with at
least one of them, so you may continue to point and laugh at me too.)

P.S. Need a kitty? They'll be ready in about 8 weeks.

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fudhbm$fqi$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a
loud sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so
much disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence
of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will
find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit
... which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging"
with Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other
ASDM folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after
her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes
your assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or
frequent enough for me to remember until 2004, and I
certainly wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster
until 2004. Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted
threads she participated in - something I did with a
lot of the alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same
goes for Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly
around Jan. 2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet
you had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest
in personal improvement that might be one way of looking
at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct
them is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing
to do so is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at
best and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes
other than to attract attention and/or give others ammo
with which to ruin you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and
fix it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those
who make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only
assume that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody
who brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp
was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her
until 2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag.
Hence, your point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call
it bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you
want, but the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

You sure about that?

puzzled> Sure about what?

Well, that part seems to have pretty much run its course, so I'll go
ahead and reveal it.

The message ID that I was whining about is not the same one that
whatsisname posted. Compare them very carefully, you'll see.

YHBT (You and about three others.)

/snicker

runs

/points and laughs

I've got something better to point and laugh at: my daughter trying
to keep up with three five-day old orphaned kittens that some woman
brought into her store and pawned off on her. We have two cats, and
we're moving at the end of the month. (I already know we're going to
end up with at least one of them, so you may continue to point and
laugh at me too.)

P.S. Need a kitty? They'll be ready in about 8 weeks.

No. But I'll tell you a good way to get rid of them (that doesn't
involve a gunny sack, a big rock and a lake). Some years back I
found a scrawny little cat cowering behind a dumpster, so I took it
to work and told some woman she could have it if she flashed me, and
she actually did it. Maybe the same thing would work in reverse.

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fudhbm$fqi$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much
disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence
of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will
find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ...
which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with
Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM
folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after
her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your
assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent
enough for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly
wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster until 2004.
Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted threads she
participated in - something I did with a lot of the
alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same goes for
Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly around Jan.
2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you
had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest in
personal improvement that might be one way of looking at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them
is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do
so is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best
and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than
to attract attention and/or give others ammo with which to
ruin you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and
fix it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those
who make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only assume
that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody
who brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp
was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until
2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your
point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call it
bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you want,
but the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

You sure about that?

puzzled> Sure about what?

Well, that part seems to have pretty much run its course, so I'll go
ahead and reveal it.

The message ID that I was whining about is not the same one that
whatsisname posted. Compare them very carefully, you'll see.

YHBT (You and about three others.)

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A858F89B7216E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fudhbm$fqi$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a
loud sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a
loud sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard
a loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting
is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so
much disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find
evidence of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will
find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very
much involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin
bit ... which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging"
with Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other
ASDM folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly
after her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes
your assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or
frequent enough for me to remember until 2004, and I
certainly wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster
until 2004. Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted
threads she participated in - something I did with a
lot of the alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff.
Same goes for Pablo, who started posting to spp
regularly around Jan. 2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet
you had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest
in personal improvement that might be one way of looking
at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct
them is both an honorable and respectable trait.
Refusing to do so is a weakness and makes one unworthy of
debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at
best and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes
other than to attract attention and/or give others ammo
with which to ruin you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and
fix it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes
those who make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the
only reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only
assume that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody
who brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in
spp was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of
her until 2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag.
Hence, your point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call
it bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you
want, but the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

You sure about that?

puzzled> Sure about what?

Well, that part seems to have pretty much run its course, so I'll go
ahead and reveal it.

The message ID that I was whining about is not the same one that
whatsisname posted. Compare them very carefully, you'll see.

YHBT (You and about three others.)

You added a 1. Good one! LOLOLOL

gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fudhbm$fqi$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <nimue@databasix.com> wrote in news:fubc0f$n2r$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

gregvk wrote:
"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a
loud sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when
Pablo started posting to spp. I was here the
entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so
much disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about
lack of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence
of her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will
find some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit
... which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26,
2000 in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging"
with Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other
ASDM folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for
quite some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after
her reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes
your assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or
frequent enough for me to remember until 2004, and I
certainly wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster
until 2004. Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted
threads she participated in - something I did with a
lot of the alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same
goes for Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly
around Jan. 2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links
first, and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet
you had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be
corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to
admit fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest
in personal improvement that might be one way of looking
at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct
them is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing
to do so is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at
best and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes
other than to attract attention and/or give others ammo
with which to ruin you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and
fix it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those
who make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention
(pathetic) and it's likely to attract destructive attention
(stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only
assume that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody
who brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp
was aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her
until 2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag.
Hence, your point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call
it bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you
want, but the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be
found.

LOLOL

innocently> It came right up on my server.

You sure about that?

puzzled> Sure about what?

Well, that part seems to have pretty much run its course, so I'll go
ahead and reveal it.

The message ID that I was whining about is not the same one that
whatsisname posted. Compare them very carefully, you'll see.

Ah, it was a test of alphabetical skills (what's the difference between
"E" and "F") not a topical object lesson.

Well, it served the latter purpose just as well...right up until the
moment you ruined it, you bastard.

YHBT (You and about three others.)

How refreshing. A harmless, not cruel, not vindictive troll.

/snicker

runs

/points and laughs

I've got something better to point and laugh at: my daughter trying
to keep up with three five-day old orphaned kittens that some woman
brought into her store and pawned off on her. We have two cats, and
we're moving at the end of the month. (I already know we're going to
end up with at least one of them, so you may continue to point and
laugh at me too.)

P.S. Need a kitty? They'll be ready in about 8 weeks.

No. But I'll tell you a good way to get rid of them (that doesn't
involve a gunny sack, a big rock and a lake). Some years back I
found a scrawny little cat cowering behind a dumpster, so I took it
to work and told some woman she could have it if she flashed me, and
she actually did it. Maybe the same thing would work in reverse.

In my case, I know only one person on whom such a tactic would be both
honorable and effective. Given that, I may as well keep the damn cat
because I'll eventually get it back anyway.