IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them is
both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do so is a
weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best and
dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than to attract
attention and/or give others ammo with which to ruin you at their
convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and fix it.

In a text based medium, how do you suppose one can "fix it" without
admitting it?

That depends on the fuckup.

People have very strange ideas about what "fix it" means. I'll be
interested to see the viewpoints you elicit.

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after all;
maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was thinking
the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with the laptop
stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after all;
maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was thinking
the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with the laptop
stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

I'm gonna have to start a list of messages where you stick your foot in
your mouth,

so I can quickly relocate them and laugh at them

from time to
time. There's that nasty "buds" one from a while back, and now this gem.
I imagine there will be more.

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and
hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a
loud sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut
said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when Pablo
started posting to spp. I was here the entire time,
and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much
disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about lack
of reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence of
her posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will find
some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive
dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ...
which, of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the
Ignore Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26, 2000
in a discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with
Dr. Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM
folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for quite
some time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after her
reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your
assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent
enough for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly
wouldn't consider her a regular spp poster until 2004.
Maybe I ignored most of those crossposted threads she
participated in - something I did with a lot of the
alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same goes for
Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly around Jan.
2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links first,
and there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you
had to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to admit
fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest in
personal improvement that might be one way of looking at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them
is both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do so
is a weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best
and dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than to
attract attention and/or give others ammo with which to ruin
you at their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and fix
it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those who
make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason to announce your fuckup is to attract attention (pathetic)
and it's likely to attract destructive attention (stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only assume
that you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody who
brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was
aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until
2004."), her response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your
point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call it
bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you want, but
the term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message,
Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20, could not be found.

LOLOL

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

I'm gonna have to start a list of messages where you stick your foot
in your mouth,

Meh. A list. Be my guest, k00ky.

so I can quickly relocate them and laugh at them

You misspelled titter.

from time to
time. There's that nasty "buds" one from a while back, and now this
gem. I imagine there will be more.

Your delusional snippage does not change the facts.

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q806c.5el.19.1@news.alt.net:

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

I'm gonna have to start a list of messages where you stick your foot
in your mouth,

Meh. A list. Be my guest, k00ky.

so I can quickly relocate them and laugh at them

You misspelled titter.

from time to
time. There's that nasty "buds" one from a while back, and now this
gem. I imagine there will be more.

Your delusional snippage does not change the facts.

I<BITCHSLAP

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after all;
maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was thinking
the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with the laptop
stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

Being a juicenet illiterate must suck, though the public
self-flaggelation is, in a word, rich. Btw, since you appear to be
ruefully clueless, this is who you just responded to:

http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/e67d5becddb7a3a6

Hth! LOLOL

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:68fmh2yughsd.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud sucking
noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men,
and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8483CA17940E817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8473FDFB5CBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in
news:1lpsibd1x7zme$.dlg@fallen.angel:

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.usenet.kooks,soc.men, and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A8470037CEBE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A84637A0A36CLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 18 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard gregvk cry out in
news:Xns9A846AD18429BE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1...

ThePsyko <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A845F0DC1F72LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy and heard Frank cry out in
news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a loud
sucking noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed
the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when Pablo
started posting to spp. I was here the entire time, and
I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much
disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about lack of
reading comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence of her
posting here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will find
some reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much
involved in the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ...
which,
of course, spilled over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the Ignore
Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26, 2000 in
a
discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with Dr.
Price, Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM
folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for quite
some
time, in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after her
reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your
assertion, "No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent
enough for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly
wouldn't
consider her a regular spp poster until 2004. Maybe I ignored
most of those crossposted threads she participated in -
something I did with a lot of the alt.flame.psychiatry and
Andrew stuff. Same goes for Pablo, who started posting to spp
regularly around Jan. 2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links first,
and
there are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you had
to duck n run under fire too!
rotflmao.


at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be corrected...

Another way of looking at that is she's stupid enough to admit
fault.


I suppose if you're a closed minded dolt with no interest in
personal improvement that might be one way of looking at it.

IMO admitting ones mistakes and being willing to correct them is
both an honorable and respectable trait. Refusing to do so is a
weakness and makes one unworthy of debate.

Recognizing and correcting one's mistakes is honorable and
respectable, but openly admitting to them is pathetic at best and
dangerous at worst; whining serves no purposes other than to
attract attention and/or give others ammo with which to ruin you
at
their convenience.

Life Rule #602: When you fuck up, just shut your mouth and fix
it.

People respond to admissions of mistakes made. It makes those who
make said mistakes seem more human.

It makes them seem pathetic and stupid. Like I said, the only
reason
to announce your fuckup is to attract attention (pathetic) and it's
likely to attract destructive attention (stupid).

The *only* reason? Erm... okay. LOLOL

Since you didn't bother to cite any exceptions, I can only assume that
you agree (despite your rather childish response).

There will always be those who are
looking for faults in others. They will undoubtedly find it.

There is no need for anyone to look when it involves somebody who
brags about their faults like they're proud of them.

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was
aware of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until 2004."),
her response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your point is moot.

Announcing your faults only serves to attract attention. Call it
bragging, call it attention-whoring, call it whatever you want, but
the
term you use won't change what it is.

Glass houses being what they are...

news:Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA3571D6@204.153.245.20

Thanks for sharing! LOLOL

The requested message, Xns9A26D9F9E289DE2904E5AB90FA357D6@204.153.245.20,
could not be found.

LOLOL

On 17 Apr 2008 I stormed the castle called
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
and heard Frank cry out in news:fu95lt$nnf$1@aioe.org...


"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu8r9m$11c$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <6a9vpdezhzdc$.dlg@fallen.angel>, ^reaper^
knocking@deaths.door said:
While sipping absinthe, Kali <kali@powder.keg> heard a loud sucking
noise
coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily inscribed the
following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:fu81nh$svt$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

In <fu64uq$a0i$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

"Kali" <kali@powder.keg> wrote in message
news:fu5f4m$nqd$6@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In <fu3q43$rsg$1@aioe.org>, Frank dawgface@ten.hut said:

No one in spp was aware of her until 2004, when Pablo started
posting to spp. I was here the entire time, and I know this.

Being aware of her is not the subject, posting is.

What did the facts ever do to you, to deserve so much disdain?


Are you really that blind or ignorant? Speak about lack of reading
comprehension.

Here is a clue for you, I'm sure I can find evidence of her
posting
here
before 2004 or Pablo, I'm also pretty sure you will find some
reason to
discount it or obfuscate the posts will excessive dribble.

It won't change the facts.

Evidence would.

You seem to have forgotten Gore & Pablo were very much involved in
the Andrew Chimelewski / Mark Morin bit ... which, of course,
spilled
over into
spp bc Morin was a regular poster in this group

http://snipurl.com/24sn7

I do remember Andrew very well, and remember using the Ignore
Thread option with a lot of his stuff.

Before that, her first post to spp was on August 26, 2000 in a
discussion
on "Ritalin vs. Spanking-CPS laws lead to drugging" with Dr. Price,
Nancy
Alvarado, Andrew Chimelewski, and a couple of other ASDM folk.

news:taae5$8ge$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Fwiw, here's the complete thread

http://snipurl.com/24snc

Both Alvarado & Price were regular spp posters (for quite some time,
in
fact), and when I asked Price about Gore shortly after her
reappearance in
2004, he was more than aware of her. Which refutes your assertion,
"No one
in spp was aware of her until 2004."

Her posts apparently just weren't remarkable or frequent enough
for me to remember until 2004, and I certainly wouldn't consider
her a regular spp poster until 2004. Maybe I ignored most of
those crossposted threads she participated in - something I did
with a lot of the alt.flame.psychiatry and Andrew stuff. Same
goes for Pablo, who started posting to spp regularly around Jan.
2001, maybe a bit sooner.

Color me technically corrected, with thanks.


Figures, I expected the same had I posted some links first, and there
are others.

Excuses, excuses, always excuses in your life. I'd bet you had to
duck
n run under fire too!
rotflmao.




at least Kali has the maturity and dignity to be corrected...

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was
aware
of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until 2004."), her
response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your point is moot.

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in message
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel...
snip

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was aware
of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until 2004."), her
response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your point is moot.


Problem with stating it like that makes it look like she believes she is
the all important one and no one else counted, a Freudian slip.

"Frank" <dawgface@ten.hut> wrote in message
news:fuboki$frd$1@aioe.org...

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in message
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel...
snip

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was
aware
of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until 2004."), her
response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your point is moot.


Problem with stating it like that makes it look like she believes she
is the all important one and no one else counted, a Freudian slip.


If the implication is that you are unimportant and do not count, then
she was quite correct, hey.

While sipping absinthe, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> heard a loud
sucking noise coming from sci.psychology.psychotherapy and hastily
inscribed the following unintelligible Sanskrit in
news:Xns9A84AEB67795CE817AC3D8380227@127.0.0.1>:

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1q7uf7.jds.17.1@news.alt.net:

Whoops, scratch that. Turns out the disk I used wasn't OEM after
all; maybe that's why it wasn't "locked" to a particular machine and
activated succesfully.

I went digging through all the old laptop junk, looking for the EULA
because I wanted to see what the exact wording was. I couldn't find
the book with the EULA on it, but I found two disks -- the OEM one
that came with the laptop, and another one that I apparently bought
separately (for reasons that escape me at the moment). I was
thinking the one I used on the Sun was OEM, because I had it with
the laptop stuff, but it isn't.

/hangs head in shame, slinks away
//makes mental note to toss all the old laptop shit

Nice confession o' failure, loser.

Being a juicenet illiterate must suck, though the public
self-flaggelation is, in a word, rich. Btw, since you appear to be
ruefully clueless, this is who you just responded to:

Hth! LOLOL

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1q8ec6.rp0.19.1@news.alt.net...
"Frank" <dawgface@ten.hut> wrote in message news:fuboki$frd$1@aioe.org...

"^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door> wrote in message
news:zq1xyfvhuh8f.dlg@fallen.angel...
snip

While she quite obviously missed the point (i.e, "No one in spp was
aware
of her until 2004." versus "I was unaware of her until 2004."), her
response was not even remotely a brag. Hence, your point is moot.


Problem with stating it like that makes it look like she believes she is
the all important one and no one else counted, a Freudian slip.


If the implication is that you are unimportant and do not count, then she
was quite correct, hey.


Wow, lame flamers coming out of the wood work.

Kad Man, now that's rich.