| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Relativity Forum » My New Energy Formula
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:48 am |
|
|
|
|
Dear newsgroup:
Since the Google group does not have attachments (allowed in their
postings), please see the math forum, the text is followed as bellow:
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1726525&tstart=0
As you have noticed from my diagram (Math-Chart), the Riccati
differential equation is the central source of mathematics.
Namely all other major mathematical structures such as polynomials,
linear and non-linear differential equations, integrals and thus their
numerical applications are rooted in Riccati differential equations.
This is my over a quarter century extensive research experience on
this topic.
If you want to challenge the Math-chart and thus the above claim, I
believe you need to engage in at least 5 years of international
research on these issues on my new mathematics, to be able to
understand its complex domain.
Simply it is a universe of its own right.
Since mainly energy formulas rooted say in partial differential
equations, and for solving those we need to have at least in part
Riccati equations (with all branches in the chart).
Thus confidently I can declare that the energy formula of the world is
linked with the Riccati differential equation as seen in this PDF
diagram.
This is purely mathematical formula (If we assume the equation of the
heat or similar equations are correct, i.e. their PDE).
The formula E=m c^2 has a physics postulate of constancy of the speed
of light (If assumed it is correct) which is different one from the
mathematics version (as attached in the second PDF file).
Please also see my research statements as PDF files posted in math
forum:
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1726436&tstart=0
This will give you more imagination of the new world of math.
I am interested to present a seminar on ABC of Riccati differential
equations (i.e. my new methods).
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti
PS: I am posting this article also here, since I have a different
mathematical representation of energy formula (broadly interpreted)
than the one presented by Albert Einstein (E=m c^2). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:39 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dear newsgroup:
I have now posted my article on " My New Energy formula" on several
newsgroups in sci math (such as sci math symbolic and sci math) and
also in physics newsgroups such as (sci physics and sci physics
relativity).
These are unmoderated sites.
I have also sent a copy to a moderated group" sci physics research".
This is the answer I got from professor Igor Khavkine,
sci.physics.research co-moderator:
"Unfortunately, the article you posted to sci.physics.research is
inappropriate for the newsgroup because it is overly speculative.
"
Well, how the moderator knows the statement is overly speculative?
The whole Idea is based on a new science, which I have claimed to be
as strong as Newton's calculus or Descartes analytic geometry.
This is the research I have done for over 25 years.
If you want to challenge it, you could initially get to know its
science and then initiate further research on it and debate the issue
within scientific domain (and also help me to write my lecture notes
and present seminars on these issues).
But blindly even ignoring it for others to see it, is a naïve
decision.
The issue of new energy formula as a Riccati equation, I believe is
more realistic mathematical perspective.
When I see the picture of the sun, I imagine there is a sole
mathematical formula presenting and governing its activities.
One may say that you may have experienced the constancy of the speed
of the light around may be up to the planet of Mars.
But who knows it is correct for environments many light years away?
Is this not speculative?
I am not here to approve or reject this idea, certainly I am not
physicist.
Bertrand Russell in his ABC of relativity, I believe mentioned (read
27 years ago, I do not have a copy now) that the theory is logically
true (assuming the universal truth of constancy of the speed of light)
but I believe it had doubts in its philosophical status (Please check
his ABC of relativity).
I personally believe the issue of Albert Einstein also has some
political and social dimensions associated with all of his science
and
all scientists working on the subject (and I am not going to get
involved in complexity of the arguments surrounding it here).
Any way, the new science is here and its centre is Riccati
differential equation, this is my claim (and I am so proud of this
discovery).
I hope the math and physics community try to understand this new
science, instead of a power struggle within the societies.
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:36 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dear Newsgroup:
Certainly my aim here is not to reject or echo E = m c^2 formula.
The only claim is the Math-chart diagram demonstrating that the
Riccati differential equation
dx/dt+x^2=g(t)
represents the sole center of major mathematical structures.
In order to understand it, you need to know how I calculate for
example polynomials on Riccati differential equations.
The Riccati formula is a mathematical version of Energy formula
governing the universe.
This also means from top to bottom of the mathematical physics
formulas should be recalculated within the new science.
Please read my research statements.
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eric Gisse |
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 12, 8:36 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
Certainly my aim here is not to reject or echo E = m c^2 formula.
The only claim is the Math-chart diagram demonstrating that the
Riccati differential equation
dx/dt+x^2=g(t)
represents the sole center of major mathematical structures.
...and it is a breathtakingly stupid claim that is obviously wrong to
anyone who has studied mathematics at any significant level.
[snip] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:58 pm |
|
|
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Quote: ...and it is a breathtakingly stupid claim that is obviously wrong to
anyone who has studied mathematics at any significant level.
[snip]
Dear Newsgroup:
Well, this is the result of my over 25 years of work on Riccati and
polynomials.
With words and internal power struggle one cannot change its course.
It is one of the beautiful structures of the universe, and every thing
is converged to Riccati.
Whether they like it or not, it will not change the inner structure of
the universe.
Yes, the Riccati differential equation is the centre of the
mathematical structure of the universe (including Energy).
Once this research is developed in the international level, every
formula and mathematical activities will be centered on Riccat
differential equations.
I imagine much mathematical research both abstract and physical will
be affected by this research.
Simply the universe views its mathematical structure in Riccati.
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eric Gisse |
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 12, 11:58 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Eric Gisse wrote:
...and it is a breathtakingly stupid claim that is obviously wrong to
anyone who has studied mathematics at any significant level.
[snip]
Dear Newsgroup:
Well, this is the result of my over 25 years of work on Riccati and
polynomials.
With words and internal power struggle one cannot change its course.
It is one of the beautiful structures of the universe, and every thing
is converged to Riccati.
Whether they like it or not, it will not change the inner structure of
the universe.
Yes, the Riccati differential equation is the centre of the
mathematical structure of the universe (including Energy).
Once this research is developed in the international level, every
formula and mathematical activities will be centered on Riccat
differential equations.
Fine. Show me how to obtain the Lorentz group, or the Schroedinger
equation, or general relativity.
Quote:
I imagine much mathematical research both abstract and physical will
be affected by this research.
Simply the universe views its mathematical structure in Riccati.
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti
Doctor of what? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:54 am |
|
|
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
Quote: Fine. Show me how to obtain the Lorentz group, or the Schroedinger
equation, or general relativity.
Doctor of what?
Dear newsgroup:
The claim is that the tools of solving PDE or ODE of mathematical
physics equations, eventually boils down to solving Riccati
differential equations.
This may be a Riccati differential equation or any satellites in the
Math-chart diagram.
It is unimaginable that all polynomials, integrals, linear
differential equations of variable coefficients of any higher order
and any non-linear higher order differential equations of any order
are indeed included in Riccati differential equations!
Well, after we have several years of international research on this
topic, the convergence along with sequences of examples and existence
theorems of PDE and ODE demonstrates the claim.
Yes, it is beautiful to look at the stars on the sky, and feel that a
single equation, such as Riccati differential equations is behind the
fountain of mathematical structure.
I need to write my lecture notes and first I have to pass through the
power struggle, which exists in the math community.
They are strangely silent.
I have also written my experience of dealing with the math community
in an article on" sci math symbolic" newsgroup, entitled Fermat's Last
Theorem ,have a look.
By the way my Ph.D. degree is on qualitative theory of ODE from
Cambridge University, UK, 1979.
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:04 am |
|
|
|
|
Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Dear Newsgroup:
This also means from top to bottom of the mathematical physics
formulas should be recalculated within the new science.
Please read my research statements.
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti
Dear newsgroup:
I have to clarify myself here that, what I meant from the above
statment, was the equations like Bessel, Legendre, Hermite, etc (i.e.
classical Ordinary differential equations of physics) will be
recalculated.
Indeed the proper way to solve Bessel differential equations in
infinite series terms is that we place infinite series on its Riccati
version instead of second order linear differential equation (Bessel).
In this way we naturally connect to many issues such as polynomials.
A lot of textbooks of future research on this topic are subject to
change.
Sincerely
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eric Gisse |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 13, 7:54 am, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Eric Gisse wrote:
Fine. Show me how to obtain the Lorentz group, or the Schroedinger
equation, or general relativity.
Doctor of what?
[snip]
Quote: By the way my Ph.D. degree is on qualitative theory of ODE from
Cambridge University, UK, 1979.
It is always a shame when someone with a good education goes insane.
Quote:
Sincerely
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dono |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 12, 11:48 am, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
So, Bozo
How does the equation
dx/dt+x^2=\gamma
relate to any energy?
What are the dimensions for \gamma ? (Eric, please do not pick this
one up  ) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:40 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dono wrote:
Quote:
How does the equation
dx/dt+x^2=\gamma
relate to any energy?
What are the dimensions for \gamma ? (Eric, please do not pick this
one up )
Dear newsgroup:
Read my statements very carefully.
Once any energy presented itself like heat or wave etc. it will have a
partial differential equation.
The heart of solving it ,is Riccati differential equation (along with
all I had mentioned in the Math-chart diagram).
This represents the fountain of math activity within the phenomena.
Read my statements carefully.
It is a mathematical version in its heart not interpreted in physics.
Behave your language in public.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dono |
| Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:04 am |
|
|
|
|
Dear newsgroup:
The Math-chart is pretty strong mathematical statement describing the
fountain of mathematical activity of the universe at large.
That is why it is a representative of Energy formula, which
constitutes the existence of the universe (matter, particle, motion
and energy).
This is my over a quarter century research on my new math which I am
sure you will get the same conclusion after reading my lecture notes
(yet to be written) and about 5 years of international research on the
topic (you need to gain experience about this new math universe).
One may obtain some understanding from the inner structure of the
chart through its mathematical dynamics and indeed to it actual
interpretations from physics point of view.
For example we will notice that a class of polynomials represent a
particular type of differential equations (in its Riccati form).
Other classes have different forms.
This is true when we formulate an equation to be used for solving
Riccati equations of say Bessel differential equations.
What I am saying is that for other types of applications such as
Legendre equations we need to formulate different setting.
I do remember when I had submitted a paper to a Journal; I used a
formula to get the solutions of the Bessel differential equations,
whereas the referee thought the formula also could be used for others
(which is not true).
The whole idea above means each class of polynomials has its own
unique differential equations and they are not the same within
different classes. Also true about Riccati.
This also gives me an idea that possibly a group of stars(millions of
them) within a Galaxy, may have one class of polynomial or Riccati
equation associated with them.
I hope somehow I made myself clear that the broad mathematical
characteristic of the major branches in math as a chart and their
inner dynamic as related to Riccati, will reveal some understanding
about the structure of the universe at large (from physics view
point).
I am interested to present seminars on my new Math.
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:00 pm |
|
|
|
|
Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Dear newsgroup:
The Math-chart is pretty strong mathematical statement describing the
fountain of mathematical activity of the universe at large.
That is why it is a representative of Energy formula, which
constitutes the existence of the universe (matter, particle, motion
and energy).
This is my over a quarter century research on my new math which I am
sure you will get the same conclusion after reading my lecture notes
(yet to be written) and about 5 years of international research on the
topic (you need to gain experience about this new math universe).
Dear Newsgroup
Today I have received a form letter from chair of MIT applied math,
rejecting my application for a position there.
My answer to Dr.Toomre was the following:
“
It is sad that M.I.T thinks inside a box”.
He replied my e-mail as follows:
“Dear Dr Basti,
Well, yes, maybe we are guilty of thinking inside a box. But
it is a pretty large box ... and for me as a theoretical astronomer
something like 10^10 light years on the side!
Cheers again, Alar Toomre”
If 15 years ago in 1993 they had initiated developing my new Math, we
would have already many strong fields and new textbooks and software.
But instead they tried to capitalize in no good and highly abstract
proof of Fermat Last Theorem for their own games in the academia.
Well, my new methods are here and my new energy formula is also here,
it will be there for centuries to come.
This is my position.
Dr.Mehran Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dono |
| Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 18, 3:00 pm, Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Basti...@aol.com wrote:
Dear newsgroup:
The Math-chart is pretty strong mathematical statement describing the
fountain of mathematical activity of the universe at large.
That is why it is a representative of Energy formula, which
constitutes the existence of the universe (matter, particle, motion
and energy).
This is my over a quarter century research on my new math which I am
sure you will get the same conclusion after reading my lecture notes
(yet to be written) and about 5 years of international research on the
topic (you need to gain experience about this new math universe).
Dear Newsgroup
Today I have received a form letter from chair of MIT applied math,
rejecting my application for a position there.
My answer to Dr.Toomre was the following:
“
It is sad that M.I.T thinks inside a box”.
He replied my e-mail as follows:
“Dear Dr Basti,
Well, yes, maybe we are guilty of thinking inside a box. But
it is a pretty large box ... and for me as a theoretical astronomer
something like 10^10 light years on the side!
Cheers again, Alar Toomre”
If 15 years ago in 1993 they had initiated developing my new Math, we
would have already many strong fields and new textbooks and software.
But instead they tried to capitalize in no good and highly abstract
proof of Fermat Last Theorem for their own games in the academia.
Well, my new methods are here and my new energy formula is also here,
it will be there for centuries to come.
This is my position.
Dr.Mehran Basti
Have you applied to the closest lunatic asylum? We are quite sure
you'll be accepted in a heartbeat. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:14 pm
|
|