Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Bio Evolution Forum  »  Quantum processes in the brain?
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
dkomo
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:56 am
Guest
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quantum%20brain.cogsci.pdf


--dkomo@cris.com
DK
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:27 am
Guest
In article <ftivvh$2mho$1@darwin.ediacara.org>, dkomo <dkomo871@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quantum%20brai
n.cogsci.pdf

Duh!
verulam
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:28 am
Guest
On Apr 10, 5:27 pm, d...@no.email.thankstospam.net (DK) wrote:
Quote:
In article <ftivvh$2mh...@darwin.ediacara.org>, dkomo <dkomo...@comcast.net> wrote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quan...
n.cogsci.pdf

Duh!

DK wrote "duh!"

I can only reply that the meaning or substance of the term "duh!"
escapes me. Some elaboration of this term and the message you wish to
convey might be useful.
For my part, I agree with the authors of the cited paper. Despite the
current fashion for books entitled "Quantum Psychology" or such like,
I can see no compelling reason to invoke quantum level effects to
understand brain function.
DK
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:14 am
Guest
In article <fto73e$2b4q$1@darwin.ediacara.org>, verulam <johnhewitt22@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 10, 5:27 pm, d...@no.email.thankstospam.net (DK) wrote:
In article <ftivvh$2mh...@darwin.ediacara.org>, dkomo <dkomo...@comcast.net
wrote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quan...
n.cogsci.pdf

Duh!

DK wrote "duh!"

I can only reply that the meaning or substance of the term "duh!"
escapes me. Some elaboration of this term and the message you wish to
convey might be useful.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/duh

DK
r norman
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:14 am
Guest
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:28:14 -0400 (EDT), verulam
<johnhewitt22@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Apr 10, 5:27 pm, d...@no.email.thankstospam.net (DK) wrote:
In article <ftivvh$2mh...@darwin.ediacara.org>, dkomo <dkomo...@comcast.net> wrote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quan...
n.cogsci.pdf

Duh!

DK wrote "duh!"

I can only reply that the meaning or substance of the term "duh!"
escapes me. Some elaboration of this term and the message you wish to
convey might be useful.
For my part, I agree with the authors of the cited paper. Despite the
current fashion for books entitled "Quantum Psychology" or such like,
I can see no compelling reason to invoke quantum level effects to
understand brain function.

You just wrote "Duh!" but used a lot more words.
Perplexed in Peoria
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:48 am
Guest
"r norman" <r_s_norman@_comcast.net> wrote in message news:ftqu60$k79$1@darwin.ediacara.org...
Quote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:28:14 -0400 (EDT), verulam
johnhewitt22@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Apr 10, 5:27 pm, d...@no.email.thankstospam.net (DK) wrote:
In article <ftivvh$2mh...@darwin.ediacara.org>, dkomo <dkomo...@comcast.net> wrote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quan...
n.cogsci.pdf

Duh!

DK wrote "duh!"

I can only reply that the meaning or substance of the term "duh!"
escapes me. Some elaboration of this term and the message you wish to
convey might be useful.
For my part, I agree with the authors of the cited paper. Despite the
current fashion for books entitled "Quantum Psychology" or such like,
I can see no compelling reason to invoke quantum level effects to
understand brain function.

You just wrote "Duh!" but used a lot more words.

Well, duh!
A. Tellez
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:29 am
Guest
dkomo wrote:
Quote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq

http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quantum%20brain.cogsci.pdf


--dkomo@cris.com



I have a few articles detailing the effects of anesthetics on neuron
microtubules as well as rather convincing mathematics deducing the
possibility of quantum coherence within said microtubules. If any one
would like the articles, please email me.
DK
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:09 am
Guest
In article <funrku$2cn1$1@darwin.ediacara.org>, "A. Tellez" <ATellezRodriguez@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
dkomo wrote:
These authors say nay:

Is the Brain a Quantum Computer?

"We argue that computation via quantum mechanical processes is
irrelevant to explaining how brains produce thought, contrary to the
ongoing speculations of many theorists."

http://tinyurl.com/2e7pxq


http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~celiasmi/Papers/litt%20et%20al.2006.quantum%20bra
in.cogsci.pdf


--dkomo@cris.com



I have a few articles detailing the effects of anesthetics on neuron
microtubules as well as rather convincing mathematics deducing the
possibility of quantum coherence within said microtubules. If any one
would like the articles, please email me.

Feel free to post them. They would be easy to take apart, for the
errors are almost certainly in assumptions that precede the said
math.

DK
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:48 pm