On Apr 23, 11:56 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
If anybody should have discovered SR before Albert E, it would've been
Lorentz.

But only Einstein challenged the invariance of time.

Poincare did the hard work?

Of course he did! Poincarr� got it before Einstein who largely
"inspired" his work from Poincarr�'s correspondence without a single
citation (no references in his 1905 paper! unbelievable!).

Cite any evidence Einstein ever corresponded with Poincarre'. Or vice
versa.

That's why Einstein did not get the nobel for SR. Everybody knew it was
a plagiat.

Right.

He was a great mathematician, and ahead of his time in many ways
but Einstein beat him too it.

The French can be such sore losers.

Stuart

"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message

BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that

(The person WHO, Bill, ..the person WOO - hoo... )

That depends whether one is using active voice or not - I wasn't.

Where did I say "THE any old matter"?

Landy <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:

Until you come up with evidence that Earth is expanding and explain the
mechanism, your premise is nothing but belief.

Whatever, there is no need for a mechanism to support facts.

Look carefully at this figure:
http://nachon.free.fr/isochrons/antarctic2.png

Is it so difficult to figure out that it is not possible to make a
reconstruction around antarctica based on the aged of seafloor, if one
does not reduce the size of the globe?

--
Florian
"Toute v�rit� passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculis�e;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'�tre accept�e comme
une totale �vidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:41:39 GMT, Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com
wrote:

Do you even have a guess as to the mechanism?

Yes!

Stuart wrote:
On Apr 23, 11:56 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
If anybody should have discovered SR before Albert E, it would've been
Lorentz.

But only Einstein challenged the invariance of time.

Poincare did the hard work?

Of course he did! Poincarr� got it before Einstein who largely
"inspired" his work from Poincarr�'s correspondence without a single
citation (no references in his 1905 paper! unbelievable!).

Cite any evidence Einstein ever corresponded with Poincarre'. Or vice
versa.

That's why Einstein did not get the nobel for SR. Everybody knew it was
a plagiat.

Right.

He was a great mathematician, and ahead of his time in many ways
but Einstein beat him too it.

Beat him to what? You mean Einstein rushed it into print - whilst
Poincarre' was just content with having done it?

you again fail to provide a mechanism for EE.

Really?

Show me the paper where Poincare' made mechanics Lorentz invariant
and came up with E=Mc^2.

Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Really?

Show me the paper where Poincare' made mechanics Lorentz invariant
and came up with E=Mc^2.

Duhh! Are you ignorant!

http://web.ihep.su/library/pubs/tconf05/ps/c5-1.pdf

Rather than point by point reply I will just point out that...

you again fail to provide a mechanism for EE.

you again fail to provide a source for the matter.

you again fail to provide reference to the claimed public record.

you again fail to NOT make a sexually oriented ad hominem.

you again fail to back up your claims.

you again simply fail.

Brian

Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Yeah. Another Kook.

The kook said.

You're ludicrous. Google "poincarré relativity". You'll find hundreds of
documents discussing the anteriority of Poincarré.

Among the first hits:
http://www.annales.org/archives/x/Relativity.doc

Well, you know what? Just forget it. You already proved too many times
that you prefer to live in your fantasy land.

All else being equal, if the Earth expanded in
size and increased mass, its gravitational attraction changes.
What's the result if this? The Moon spirals into the Earth.
Has this happened? Nope. In fact, it has been observed that the
Moon is spiraling AWAY from the Earth at a rate of 38mm per
year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_laser_ranging_experiment

So see? There is evidence directly against expansion theory,

Have rock solid evidence for expansion

Yeah. Another Kook.

On Apr 25, 2:48 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Really?

Show me the paper where Poincare' made mechanics Lorentz invariant
and came up with E=Mc^2.

Duhh! Are you ignorant!

http://web.ihep.su/library/pubs/tconf05/ps/c5-1.pdf


Yeah. Another Kook.

Did you know the French also invented the wheel and slice bread?

Stuart