"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing, not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Hmm. Einstein's 1905 paper was pretty much universally accepted within
a couple years of publication.

Of course it was. The idea was in the air for quite some times.
Everybody with a culture in Physics knows that he did not get the nobel
for SR because Lorentz and Poincarré did all the hard work.

Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Translation: "I don't like those arguments"

Not possible to like or dislike them, you don't have counterarguments.

thermal convection is a working mechanism, a near ubiquitous
process in the Universe.

Dude. Convection as a driving force remains an hypothesis. Considering
that it is a working mechanism is a severe epistemological mistake.

Doglioni still doesn't understand that viscosity isn't an elastic
modullii.

False, and irrelevant to the point.

Not me, I don't do that stuff anymore. I get paid
to do other stuff.

That's right. You're out of the business. Meanwhile the others struggle
to find a model...

All you contribute is misinformation and obfuscations.

Interesting, you talk to yourself now...

You have absolutely no contributions to geological science anywhere,
except in your dreams.

I don't have dreams. I'm way too rational for that.
But you certainly live on "wishful thinking island".

Regarding to my contribution to Science. It's allright, thanx.

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing, not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

Landy wrote:

"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that

(The person WHO, Bill, ..the person WOO - hoo... )

Are you an ozzie
or wot? An ozzie with a cozzie

getting bitten by a mozzie, who
doesn't know a pozzie from a wozzziegraphical error.

doesn't know the difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing,
not
just any old "matter".

Ah, ..you mean "THE any old matter" ...who always wozz, izz now, ..and
alwiz willbee? Wonder who that could be. (Josephus probably) ( ..or
Ye Old One... - otherwise presenting himself as YOO.)

Landy wrote:

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything
else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

Don't be daft. Why do you think the laws of physics wouldn't work if
the Earth got bigger tomorrow?

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing, not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

Landy wrote:

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing, not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

Don't be daft. Why do you think the laws of physics wouldn't work if
the Earth got bigger tomorrow?

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:56 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

This, of course, is the conclusion you come to because you do not know
any better.

Which says it all

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:vsiv045dv49q665ge6ch7kqj157bqnll85@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:56 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

This, of course, is the conclusion you come to because you do not know
any better.

Which says it all

Until you come up with evidence that Earth is expanding and explain the
mechanism, your premise is nothing but belief.

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:57:15 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:vsiv045dv49q665ge6ch7kqj157bqnll85@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:56 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter
come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything
else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

This, of course, is the conclusion you come to because you do not know
any better.

Which says it all

Until you come up with evidence that Earth is expanding and explain the
mechanism, your premise is nothing but belief.


Have rock solid evidence for expansion,

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:mrjv049slapr0s7n88tbfsgnpnjqqd314a@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:57:15 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:vsiv045dv49q665ge6ch7kqj157bqnll85@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:56 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter
come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything
else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

This, of course, is the conclusion you come to because you do not know
any better.

Which says it all

Until you come up with evidence that Earth is expanding and explain the
mechanism, your premise is nothing but belief.


Have rock solid evidence for expansion,

What a crock of shit.

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:14:41 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:mrjv049slapr0s7n88tbfsgnpnjqqd314a@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:57:15 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:vsiv045dv49q665ge6ch7kqj157bqnll85@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:56 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net
wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter
come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of
nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a
source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the
Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything
else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is
expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

This, of course, is the conclusion you come to because you do not know
any better.

Which says it all

Until you come up with evidence that Earth is expanding and explain the
mechanism, your premise is nothing but belief.


Have rock solid evidence for expansion,

What a crock of shit.


The age pattern on the ocean floor is in rock and shows nothing but
expansion, and falsifies Plate Tectonics.

On Apr 20, 11:51 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Translation: "I don't like those arguments"

Not possible to like or dislike them, you don't have counterarguments.

thermal convection is a working mechanism, a near ubiquitous
process in the Universe.

Dude. Convection as a driving force remains an hypothesis. Considering
that it is a working mechanism is a severe epistemological mistake.

Doglioni still doesn't understand that viscosity isn't an elastic
modullii.

False, and irrelevant to the point.

Not me, I don't do that stuff anymore. I get paid
to do other stuff.

That's right. You're out of the business. Meanwhile the others struggle
to find a model...

Struggling?

Hardly, there is plenty of work being done. I don't see any
struggling.

All you contribute is misinformation and obfuscations.

Interesting, you talk to yourself now...

No, just talking to you.

You have absolutely no contributions to geological science anywhere,
except in your dreams.

I don't have dreams. I'm way too rational for that.
But you certainly live on "wishful thinking island".

Translation: "I have made no contributions to geological science"

Regarding to my contribution to Science. It's allright, thanx.

You mean science fiction.

"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:hupv04h2i67tdkngog2ke1755co7b2jtlb@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:14:41 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:mrjv049slapr0s7n88tbfsgnpnjqqd314a@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:57:15 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:vsiv045dv49q665ge6ch7kqj157bqnll85@4ax.com...
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:42:56 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:b6fu04pp8teu3ima0o085qsn5apci914p5@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +1000, "Landy" <noone@nowhere.net
wrote:


"don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> wrote in message
news:5c76128c-2d38-413f-b743-537af96c5a6f@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...


Skywise wrote:


BTW, where does the matter come from?

(Your grammar's fucken awful.)

That sounds great coming from the person that doesn't know the
difference
between "your" and "you're" and constantly uses the wrong one.
And I think he meant exactly what he said. "Where does THE matter
come
from?", meaning THE matter that is magically appearing out of
nothing,
not
just any old "matter".


What matter? If you do not think the Earth is expanding, or has, it
is a non-question. However, since it is expanding, there is a
source,
and since there is a source, it is the box we try to fit the
Universe
into that needs to change. It is that simple.

JT

So we are totally upheave the laws of physics (which work everything
else)
just to find a mechanism behind your BELIEF that the Earth is
expanding.
Got it - now I understand how your brain works.

This, of course, is the conclusion you come to because you do not know
any better.

Which says it all

Until you come up with evidence that Earth is expanding and explain the
mechanism, your premise is nothing but belief.


Have rock solid evidence for expansion,

What a crock of shit.


The age pattern on the ocean floor is in rock and shows nothing but
expansion, and falsifies Plate Tectonics.


The FACT that that subduction occurs shows you are talking through your hat.
PLONK.