Bawana wrote:
On Apr 6, 5:18 pm, rktz <noth...@nowhere.com> wrote:
Bawana wrote:
If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument,
his retorts will bear no relation to what you said--
In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to
the next.
It's like arguing with a retard with Attention Deficit Disorder.
"His critics notwithstanding, Thomas Paine was in many ways the father
of modern liberalism,

Your copy/paste delusions are meaningless, you insipidly stupid
fucktard.
The Classical liberalism of Thomas Paine have nothing in common with
the the left-liberalism of today, you insipidly stupid fucktard.
Look to Stalin, Mao, Hitler, for the roots of your failed
ideologies' , you insipidly stupid fucktard.

and thus one of the most important of the founders
of what both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson referred to as that
"liberal" experiment, the United States of America.

Your copy/paste delusions are meaningless, you insipidly stupid
fucktard.
Yeah, you insipidly stupid fucktard, the liberal experiment was a
Constitutional Republic.

Liberals, after all, founded our nation...

Classic liberals, you insipidly stupid fucktard.
That would be the Libertarian Party of today, you insipidly stupid
fucktard, not the demonkraps.

It wasn't FDR who first
seriously promoted the progressive income tax in the USA: it was Thomas
Paine.

Why no cite, you lying insipidly stupid fucktard?

But it was Stalin and the Communist Manifesto that inspired FDR, not
any of the founding fathers, you insipidly stupid fucktard.

[lies flushed]

Lots of blah, blah,...no proof.
Got any proof of your claims, you insipidly stupid fucktard?
Come back with proper proof of your Thomas Paine delusions, you
insipidly stupid fucktard.

There is one struggle.

There has always been one struggle. The suits
against the dungarees.