| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Psychology - Psychotherapy Forum » Legal Notice - Napolis v. Aquino, Devereaux, et al.
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Linda |
 Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 2, 2:31 pm, Linda <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote:
Quote: On Apr 2, 3:36 am, Anonymous <x...@hermetix.org> wrote:
Linda wrote:
I beg your pardon?
Don't play stupid.
It's a matter of public documented record that hundreds
of criminally insane individuals conspired in the
*terrorfication* of Diana Napolis...
That's not what the public record says.
It sure is what the public record says.
Your interpretation is skewed to assuage your own paranoia.
What paranoia?
Then-APA Prez Gerald Koocher stated in an email to members of the PENS
Task Force that Koochers unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities to protect
wayward goverment employees from the consequences of their illegal
activities, by, contributing to imprisonment, commitment or even
the 2nd Degree Murder of innocent individuals, often without the
innocent individuals ever being aware of Koochers unethical kooks
involvement in their great misfortune.
Oops!
The criminal insanity of Gerry Koocher and the rest of Koochers
Unethical KOOKS is such that neither Gerald Koocher nor the rest of
Koochers Unethical KOOKS acknowledge Koochers unethical kooks are
GUILTY AS SIN of both illegal and unconstitutional activities for
chosing to participate in criminal vigilantism to obstruct justice to
bypass the local, state and federal courts which we the people
established to mete out justice.
The criminal insanity of Gerald Koocher and the rest of Koochers
unethical kooks is such that Koocher and the rest of Koochers
Unethical Kooks actually perceive themselves and other criminal
accomplices GUILTY AS SIN of complicity in the criminal vigilantism
engaged in by corrupt local, state and federal agencies to obstruct
justice and bypass the local, state, and federal courts we the
people established to mete out justice as "innocents" in need of
protection from potential perpetrators (i.e. their crime victims and/
or whistleblowers).
As a result, Gerald Koocher assertions in his emails to the PENS Task
Force list-serv mischaracterized corrupt individuals who are guilty as
sin as "innocents", and, their crime victims and/or
whistleblowers as "potential perpetrators" as follows:
www.ethicalapa.com/files/Coalition_Letter_to_APA_Sharon_Brehm.pdf+
May 6, 2005: "In many of the circumstances we will discuss when we
meet the psychologist's role may bear on people who are not 'clients'
in the traditional sense. Example, the psychologist employed by the
CIA, Secret Service, FBI, etc., who helps formulate profiles for risk
prevention, negotiation strategy, destabilization, etc., or the
psychologist asked to assist interrogators in eliciting data or
detecting dissimulation with the intent of preventing harm to many
other people. In this case the client is the agency, government, and
ultimately the people of the nation (at risk). The goal of such
psychologists' work will ultimately be the protection of others (i.e.,
innocents) by contributing to the incarceration, debilitation, or even
death of the potential perpetrator, who will often remain unaware of
the psychologists' involvement."""""
Quote:
The correct word is *terrorization*.
False!
Terrorization is the appropriate term for the criminal activities of
garden variety terrorists whose crime victims can avail themselves of
equal protection of the law.
Terrorfication is the appropriate term for the criminal activities of
state sponsored terrorism illegally engaged in to deprive targeted
individuals the equal protection of the law.
A state of terrorization only lasts until law enforcement agencies
affords victims the protection of the law, whilst a state of
terrorfication comes with a lifetime warranty since it's the result of
criminal activites being engaged in to deprive targeted individuals
the equal protection of the law.
Your posts are being collected and will be sent to the
New Jersey State Board of Regents, requesting the same
rescind the degree awarded you by Rutgers University.
You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism don't resign
themselves to earning a living without relying on their degrees,
professional credentials or previous professional accomplishments the
minute they find themselves the object of the frightening obsessive of
state sponsored terrorists.
Rofl.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous Sender |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: It sure is what the public record says.
Nope. You're too deluded to have a correct
interpretation of the public record.
The one which originates your following statement
without providing credible proof:
Quote: ...unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities...
Quote: Terrorfication is the appropriate term...
No such word found in two major dictionaries.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorfication
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorfication
You're not qualified to fashion words on your own.
Quote: You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism
don't resign themselves to earning a living without relying
on their degrees...
You're not important enough to be any state's radar screen.
Quote: Rofl....
Hope you're laughing when, upon review of you unintelligible usenet
postings, Rutgers will conclude they made an error in awarding you
a college degree, and promptly rescind it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: It sure is what the public record says.
Nope. You're too deluded to have a correct
interpretation of the public record.
The one which originates your following statement
but fails to cite any credible proof:
Quote: ...unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities...
Terrorfication is the appropriate term...
No such word found in two major dictionaries.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorfication
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorfication
You're not qualified to fashion words on your own.
Quote: You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism
don't resign themselves to earning a living without relying
on their degrees...
You're not important enough to be any state's radar screen.
You don't earn a living. You're on public assistance.
Upon review of your unintelligible usenet postings, Rutgers will
conclude they made an error in awarding you a college degree.
Hope you're still laughing when Rutgers rescinds it.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Borked Pseudo Mailed |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: It sure is what the public record says.
Nope. You're too deluded to have a correct
interpretation of the public record.
The one which originates your following statement
but fails to cite any credible proof:
Quote: ...unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities...
Terrorfication is the appropriate term...
No such word found in two major dictionaries.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorfication
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorfication
You're not qualified to fashion words on your own.
Quote: You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism
don't resign themselves to earning a living without relying
on their degrees...
You're not important enough to be any state's radar screen.
You don't earn a living. You're on public assistance.
Upon review of your unintelligible usenet postings, Rutgers will
conclude they made an error in awarding you a college degree.
Hope you're still laughing when Rutgers rescinds it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous Sender |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: It sure is what the public record says.
Nope. You're too deluded to have a correct
interpretation of the public record.
The one which originates your following statement
but fails to cite any credible proof:
Quote: ...unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities...
Terrorfication is the appropriate term...
No such word found in two major dictionaries.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorfication
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorfication
You're not qualified to fashion words on your own.
Quote: You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism
don't resign themselves to earning a living without relying
on their degrees...
You're not important enough to be any state's radar screen.
You don't earn a living. You're on public assistance.
Upon review of your unintelligible usenet postings, Rutgers will
conclude they made an error in awarding you a college degree.
Hope you're still laughing when Rutgers rescinds it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Nomen Nescio |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: Oops!
The criminal insanity of Gerry Koocher and the rest of
Koochers Unethical KOOKS is such that neither Gerald
Koocher nor the rest of Koochers Unethical KOOKS acknowledge
Koochers unethical kooks are GUILTY AS SIN....
Oops!
The same way you fail to provide credible proof for your
delusional allegations....
The same way you are paranoid....
The same way Rutgers will rescind your degree.....
The same way you'll soon end up a ward of the state
through civil commitment....
:-D |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: It sure is what the public record says.
Nope. You're too deluded to have a correct
interpretation the public record here.
As usual, with no credible proof for your statement here:
Quote: ...unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities...
it's called P A R A N O I A.
Quote: Terrorfication is the appropriate term...
No such word found in two major dictionaries.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorfication
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorfication
You're not qualified to fashion words on your own.
Quote: You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism
don't resign themselves to earning a living without relying
on their degrees...
You're not important enough to be any state's radar screen.
Hope you're still laughing when, upon review of unintelligible
usenet postings, Rutgers concludes they made a mistake in awarding you
a college degree, and promptly rescinds it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Linda wrote:
Quote: Oops!
The criminal insanity of Gerry Koocher and the rest of
Koochers Unethical KOOKS is such that neither Gerald
Koocher nor the rest of Koochers Unethical KOOKS acknowledge
Koochers unethical kooks are GUILTY AS SIN....
Oops!
The same way you fail to provide credible proof for your
delusional allegations....
The same way you are paranoid....
The same way Rutgers will rescind your degree.....
The same way you'll soon end up a ward of the state
through civil commitment....
:-D |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:40 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 2, 5:50 pm, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
wrote:
Quote: Linda wrote:
It sure is what the public record says.
Nope.
Yes, it is.
Quote:
What paranoia?
The one which originates your following statement
without providing credible proof:
You are confused.
I'm not amongst the cybercriminals who empower psychotics and/or
criminals to adjudicate issues that WE THE PEOPLE established local,
state, and federal courts to adjudicate.
Quote: No such word found in two major dictionaries.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorficationhttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorfication
You're not qualified to fashion words on your own.
You aren't empowered to decide who is and isn't qualified to coin new
words.
Quote:
You say that AS IF targets of state sponsored terrorism
don't resign themselves to earning a living without relying
on their degrees...
You're not important enough to be any state's radar screen.
You aren't empowered to decide who is and isn't important enough to be
on the State's radar screen.
Quote: Rofl....
Hope you're laughing when, upon review of you unintelligible usenet
postings, Rutgers will conclude they made an error in awarding you
a college degree, and promptly rescind it.
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Degrees, professional credentials, and prior professional
accomplishments are rendered meaningless where earning a living is
concerned AFTER one is the target of state sponsored terrorism. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 2, 6:15 pm, Anonymous <x...@hermetix.org> wrote:
Quote: Linda wrote:
Oops!
The criminal insanity of Gerry Koocher and the rest of
Koochers Unethical KOOKS is such that neither Gerald
Koocher nor the rest of Koochers Unethical KOOKS acknowledge
Koochers unethical kooks are GUILTY AS SIN....
Oops!
The same way you fail to provide credible proof for your
delusional allegations....
You are confused.
I don't empower psychotics possesed by the delusions they are deities
to adjudicate issues WE THE People established courts of law to
adjudicate.
Quote:
The same way you are paranoid....
Libelous lie.
Quote: The same way Rutgers will rescind your degree.....
Says you.
Quote:
The same way you'll soon end up a ward of the state
through civil commitment....
Says you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 2, 6:12 pm, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
Quote: Linda wrote:
It sure is what the public record says.
Nope. You're too deluded to have a correct
interpretation the public record here.
What paranoia?
As usual, with no credible proof for your statement here:
Koochers Unethical KOOKS routinely hire themselves out
to government agencies engaged in illegal activities...
it's called P A R A N O I A.
Using the original greek meaning of the word paranoia which is "To
Know", eh? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anonymous |
| Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 3, 12:15 am, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
Quote: Linda wrote:
Yes it is.
I'm afraid not.
I'm afraid so.
Quote: But you'll learn the hard way.
Rofl...
Meanwhile, back in reality, a certain party recently filed a
$9,999,000 lawsuit against the dirtbags who conspired to deprive that
certain party of her constritutional right to free speech, after,
the dirtbags devoted 10 years of their lives exacting retribution
against that certain party on the WWW, and, after the dirtbags
successfully recruited both a major university and a major city
newspaper to assist the dirtbags in depriving that certain party of
their court ordered right to anonymous free speech, and, after, the
dirtbags recruited both the criminal and mental health systems to
exact retribution against that certain party for the alleged crimes
the dirtbags criminally facilitated by their engaging in illegal
activities to incite that certain party to come to believe some of
their BS.
Those dirtbags sure taught her!
Not!
Quote:
I'm not amongst the cybercriminals who empower psychotics
and/or criminals to adjudicate issues that WE THE PEOPLE
established local, state, and federal courts to adjudicate.
You are a cyber-criminal, soon to be indicted.
Says you.
Quote: ... court-appointed defense attorney
Paul Weeks, Esq.?
Paul Anthony Gowder, Esq,?
The hubby of Lucida?
:-)))))))
Quote: They'll make you take your meds, Linda! 
Really?
Kindly provide me a link to the law enacted which permits US
physicians to prescribe psychotoxins to individuals with my general
medical condition despite the existence of a wide body of scientific
data evidencing that *all* psychotoxins have been found to be
extraordinarily DEBILITATING when taken by individuals with my
particular general medical condition (Hashimoto Thyroid Disease).
..> > You aren't empowered to decide who is and isn't qualified
Quote: to coin new words.
The word you _coined_ isn't found in
either dictionary.
Duh!
Quote: Even *the cause* doesn't recognize you as *one of their own*.
Cease and desist cyberharassing me with your relentless effort to
falsely associate me with OTHER peoples causes.
Quote:
You aren't empowered to decide who is and isn't important
enough to be on the State's radar screen.
It's not a matter of my empowerment. Your postings on usenet
never have any credible proof.
Neither you nor any other usenet reader is legally empowered to decide
whether or not myself or any other author of articles published to
public unmoderated ngs possess information which lends credence to the
opinions expressed.
Quote: You simply ramble on like a
mentally disturbed person.
Since neither you nor any other reader is legally empowered to decide
whether or not authors of articles published to public unmoderated ngs
possess information lending credence to the opinions they express,
neither you nor any other usenet reader are capable of discerning
which authors of articles to usenet are "mentally disturbed".
The state's radar screen doesn't
Quote: pick up nuisances, which you are.
You aren't empowered to decide what the state will or won't pick up on
it's radar, nor, are you empowered to decide the value or worth of
articles published to PUBLIC UNMODERATED discussion forums.
They leave that for the
Quote: local authorities to deal with.
local authorities have no jurisdiction over the constitutional issues
which have arisen as a consequence of the US DOD agenizing Koochers
Unethical KOOKS to illegally and unconstitutionally wage domestic war
against Jane Q. Public.
Quote:
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Guaranteed you won't be LOL when Rutgers rescinds your degree.
I sure will!
All the way to the BANK....
Quote: They certainly made a mistake awarding you one.
Really?
Then, they compounded that "mistake" when they offered me....
And, they re-compounded that "mistake" when they admitted yours
truly to ...........
Quote: It'll mean your release from commitment will be delayed
that much longer the magistrate will find you have no
employable skills to support yourself.
Dream on!
I studied Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape strategies the
moment I learned that Koochers Unethical KOOKS may be utilizing
reverse engineered SERE tactics in the illegal and unconstitutional
domestic warfare the DOD hired them to wage against Jane Q. Public. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Linda |
| Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Apr 3, 11:31 am, Liz <lben...@teranews.com> wrote:
But, nothing....
After yesterdays news releases, everyone with their eyes wide open
now KNOWS the waxing and waning of the illegal and unconstitutional
public warfare which Pablo waged against this APOLITICAL, then-stay
at home, apple pie baking, american soccer mom, coincides perfectly
with A) John Yoo's issuing the bogus 2001 memo misinforming the CIA,
Pentagon, and Bush that it was perfectly legal
for the US military to have employees of the US military wage domestic
warfare on APOLITICAL, then-stay at home, apple pie baking,
american soccer mom, like yours truly, B) the rescinding of Yoo's
bogus memo in 2002, C) the issuance of a brand new bogus memo in 2003
reasserting that its was perfectly OK for employees of the US military
to illegally and unconstitutionally wage domestic warfare against
APOLITICAL, then-stay at home, apple pie baking, american soccer
moms, like yours truly, and, D) the 2005 rescinding of the bogus
2003 memo....
Vegas ought to open a betting line and place odds on whether or not
myself and/or my heirs will be in possession of all the evidence we
need to PROVE beyond all reasonable doubt that the lives of myself and
my children were RECKLESSLY ENDANGERED by employees of the US military
waging illegal and unconstitutional domestic warfare against, John Q.
Public, then, later, against Jane Q. Public, (me) ---before the 10
year statute of limitations begins to expire of some of the crimes the
dirty rat bsatards perpetrated against me and mine |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Borked Pseudo Mailed |
| Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Liz wrote:
Quote: But she is very important to you and many other posters
to SPP.
She's as important as bird crap on my windshield in a wind storm.
On the other hand, she's very important for you to rise to
her defense. What's the matter? She can't defend herself?
Or does she wears a strap-on for you?
Quote: BTW, do you really mean that she is not important enough to
be any state's radar screen or are your language skills failing?
Congrats! You've displayed some vocational aptitude in proofreading!
Kinda wish you could do your life over again?
Quote: When did public assistance start paying for computers,
internet connections and the monthly fees required to maintain
internet connections?
Working the streets, collecting pop cans, reselling stolen
property, selling illicit drugs.... the usual underground
stuff that public assistance recipients are known to do.
Netzero is $9.95/month.
Posting on usenet can be done using an old computer
running Windows95. They go for about $75.
Quote: Very funny. Be interesting to see you pull that one off.
It'll be interesting to watch your sense of humor when
Rutgers does it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue May 20, 2008 1:47 pm
|
|
