Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Agriculture - Poultry Forum  »  Wales set to ban GM crops
Page 3 of 5    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
Old Codger
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:57 am
Guest
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:48:14 -0000, "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie>
wrote:

Quote:
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64p25hF2cunpmU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs6o6b$sn8$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n9mhF2atdq2U1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5lhf$d9g$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

why not start by telling us which varieties of Maize, wheat and rape are
GM,
and the growing conditions they need plus the acreages of grain maize and
wheat grown in Wales (as opposed to grown for fodder)

Are you really trying to deny that those crops could be grown in Wales?

legally yes,

As "Pete" puts it...

" Stop wriggling Jim. You blurted out "the utter irrelevance of the
Welsh decision is mind boggling, as they don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist"

Which was quite a prejudicial thing for the CLA to say about the Welsh
farming community. When pulled up on it instead of confessing you were
wrong AND sorry, you started to huff, puff & wriggle some more, though
you might call it line dancing, by moving the goalposts "what GM crop
can be grown economically in Wales?" now we're looking at yet another
rapid diversion in" legally yes, what GM crops are licenced ?" So you
see Jim you're just digging a rather large hole.

I shall be contacting The CLA on Tuesday and also Welsh Farming bodies
to see what they think about this. So you best start coming up with
something better than goalpost juggling."

Spot on.

what GM crops are licenced ?

'September 8 2004

EU Allows Monsanto GM Maize - Move Called 'A Disaster'

US biotechnology industry giant Monsanto, has successfully
pressured the European Commission into officially accepting 17
of its genetically engineered varieties of Maize to be cultivated in
Europe. Monsanto enlisted the help of the Bush administration,
which complained
http://www.dw-world.de/english/0,3367,1431_A_951489_1_A,00.html
to the WTO over European 'intrasigence' on the question of
GM in agriculture.

One would think that the disastrous GM experience in Argentina http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,1192869,00.html
and more recently in Mexico
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4112 should have
taught us something, but it appears that "free trade" mechanisms
are powerful enough to ride roughshod over both public preference
and government - in this case even European regional - resistance.

It would appear that the EU is giving up the fight, pushing that
responsibility further down to the member countries - and even
to the public - to sustain. In this connection the words of Health
Commissioner David Byrne, who also oversaw the passing of a
controversial ban on high dose and advanced formulation food
supplements http://tinyurl.com/74qxj , are revealing. Byrne, in a
leaked memo available to Friends of the Earth, stated that "any
Member State may object to the marketing on their territory of
any such GM variety if they consider there is a risk for human
health, the environment or agronomic reasons." One might be
tempted to ask whether Byrne is keeping his options open for
lucrative employment with big business after his stint at the EU
Commission, which is drawing to a close...

From: GM WATCH http://www.gmwatch.org

Friends of the Earth Europe
September 2004
GM CROPS: RECIPE FOR DISASTER
Friends of the Earth urges Governments to ban GM seeds

Brussels, 8 September - Friends of the Earth has condemned
today's decision by the European Commission to allow farmers
to commercially grow up to 17 different types of genetically
modified (GM) maize seeds in fields across the whole of Europe.
..'
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/09/08/eu_allows_monsanto_gm_maize_move_called_a_disaster.htm

http://tinyurl.com/2pmtej

'EU Commission caves in to biotech industry - again! (13/1/2006)
EU Commission caves in to biotech industry, Monsanto GM
maize authorized

Friends of the Earth Europe
Press release

Brussels, January 13th, 2006 " The European Commission today
ignored environmental and health concerns of Member States and
approved the import and use of three Monsanto genetically modified
(GM) maize (1).

This authorization comes despite studies showing that farmers in the
US and elsewhere are not seeing the reduced pesticide use and higher
profits promised by the biotech industry.

Helen Holder, GMO campaign coordinator at Friends of the Earth
Europe, said: "In whose interests is the EU commission acting?
GM crops have failed, yet the Commission continues to authorize
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in the EU despite there
being no EU law protecting conventional and organic farming from
genetic pollution."

"The EU Commission is going against the wish of European citizens,
and does not have the required majority support from Member States
for GMO approvals", she added

Since August, three other GMOs have been authorized by the
Commission (2). "In all six cases, Member States' concerns were
ignored because of the undemocratic EU system allowing the
Commission to take a decision despite there not being a qualified
majority in favour of GMOs in food and animal feed", Holder said.

All GMOs commercialized in the EU and worldwide have the same
two traits: insect resistance and herbicide tolerance, which have no
benefits for consumers. This is a poor result for 30 years of research
and public money spending. With 70% of EU citizens opposed to
GMOs, and a growing number of EU Regions stating their wish to be
GM-free (3), the EU Commission is caving in to the biotech industry
lobby and to US pressure.

Earlier this week, a report by Friends of the Earth made public
Monsanto'Ts aim to genetically modify all of the European
continent's maize production between now and 2010. However, the
number of EU countries and regions banning GM products has
increased over recent years (4).

NOTES
(1) Monsanto maize GA21 (food and food ingredients); Monsanto
maize MON 863 (food and food ingredients); Monsanto maize
MON863x810 (import and processing)

(2) See list:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/pending/approvals_timetable_Nov05.pdf

(3) 175 Regions throughout the EU have now declared themselves
GMO free. See: www.gmofree-europe.org

(4) http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2006/who_benefits_from_gm_crops_Jan_2006.pdf,
page 15

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6130

'The row followed the possibility that GM oilseed rape may have already
been sold and grown in Wales.

then it is purely a legal matter,

You can say that again!

the welsh banning GM crops is about as
meaningless as them banning theft, it is already illegal, and GM crops are
only legal is they are passed by the EU. Perhaps you will tell me which GM
crops suitable for welsh conditions have been passed for growing by the EU

See above.

'Under EU decision-making rules, the European Commission makes
the final decision whether the GM crop will be authorised. Friends of
the Earth Europe has expressed concern because in previous cases,
the pro-biotech Commission has systematically authorised genetically
modified organisms (GMOs) regardless of the general voting pattern
by national Ministers.[2]
..
2] For example, in August 2005, the European Commission approved
the import of a controversial genetically modified (GM) maize, MON863,
for use as animal feed, even though the majority of member states had
either abstained or voted against import.
..'
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=7043

They do however produce excellent lamb which grows superbly on the
fine mountain pastures
and is well worth tasting

Doubtless producing plump, succulent welsh children..... right,
troll?

why do you eat children?

I don't.

then why introduce the topic?

Did I?

yes, you are the first person introducing succulent children

I've restored what you snipped. Why did you snip that jim?

And as for trolling, you are the one who is
cross posting to UBA, if you don't like the responses, cut the x post

'On the Internet, troll is a slang term used to describe:

1. Statements presented by an Internet user to others that are solely
intended
to incite controversy or conflict or cause annoyance or offense.


you mean like slagging off meat production on a farming group

Rational discussion of relevant issues. You can't help yourself.

Over to you Jim. Hope you don't mind if we sing along?

Grab your partner by the hand lets go dancing to the band

With my saddle all shedded and the cattle all bedded
Nothing wild seems to be wrong;
Make my bed 'neath the skies, I look up at the stars,
And then I can sing you this call.

Grab your partner by the hand lets go dancing to the band.

You dance real good Jim.
pearl
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:05 am
Guest
"Old Codger" <oldcodger@anyoldwherewilldo.com> wrote in message news:avreu3d81gh8giqckp0ckcprilg28ej2ao@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:22:06 -0000, "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie
wrote:

"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64n2u7F2ccckqU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5kel$coa$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n17oF2av1ngU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs590n$7pf$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

/Really/.


the utter irrelevence of the Welsh decision is mindboggling, as they
don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist

Major crops, huh. Of note again is your evasion of the major issues.

what major issue,

Like... "GM feeding trials (12 animal and 1 human) ...... found
negative health effects (all controlled against non-GM crops)."?

.... snipped.

Quote:
what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

Did I mention sugar beet, flax, linseed, peas and beans?

They won't plant trees for fear of what might be happening in
twenty-odd years (certainly no trees .. apples .. damsons, ...)
but are hoping for the GM genie to fulfil all of their wishes..

Talk about mind-boggling.
pearl
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:26 am
Guest
Smile
"Old Codger" <oldcodger@anyoldwherewilldo.com> wrote in message news:n59fu3lcl6oligrpibfnhvdc53d6t3gn6k@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:48:14 -0000, "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie
wrote:

"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64p25hF2cunpmU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs6o6b$sn8$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n9mhF2atdq2U1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5lhf$d9g$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

why not start by telling us which varieties of Maize, wheat and rape are
GM,
and the growing conditions they need plus the acreages of grain maize and
wheat grown in Wales (as opposed to grown for fodder)

Are you really trying to deny that those crops could be grown in Wales?

legally yes,

As "Pete" puts it...

" Stop wriggling Jim. You blurted out "the utter irrelevance of the
Welsh decision is mind boggling, as they don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist"

Which was quite a prejudicial thing for the CLA to say about the Welsh
farming community. When pulled up on it instead of confessing you were
wrong AND sorry, you started to huff, puff & wriggle some more, though
you might call it line dancing, by moving the goalposts "what GM crop
can be grown economically in Wales?" now we're looking at yet another
rapid diversion in" legally yes, what GM crops are licenced ?" So you
see Jim you're just digging a rather large hole.

I shall be contacting The CLA on Tuesday and also Welsh Farming bodies
to see what they think about this. So you best start coming up with
something better than goalpost juggling."

Spot on.

what GM crops are licenced ?

'September 8 2004

EU Allows Monsanto GM Maize - Move Called 'A Disaster'

US biotechnology industry giant Monsanto, has successfully
pressured the European Commission into officially accepting 17
of its genetically engineered varieties of Maize to be cultivated in
Europe. Monsanto enlisted the help of the Bush administration,
which complained
http://www.dw-world.de/english/0,3367,1431_A_951489_1_A,00.html
to the WTO over European 'intrasigence' on the question of
GM in agriculture.

One would think that the disastrous GM experience in Argentina http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,1192869,00.html
and more recently in Mexico
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4112 should have
taught us something, but it appears that "free trade" mechanisms
are powerful enough to ride roughshod over both public preference
and government - in this case even European regional - resistance.

It would appear that the EU is giving up the fight, pushing that
responsibility further down to the member countries - and even
to the public - to sustain. In this connection the words of Health
Commissioner David Byrne, who also oversaw the passing of a
controversial ban on high dose and advanced formulation food
supplements http://tinyurl.com/74qxj , are revealing. Byrne, in a
leaked memo available to Friends of the Earth, stated that "any
Member State may object to the marketing on their territory of
any such GM variety if they consider there is a risk for human
health, the environment or agronomic reasons." One might be
tempted to ask whether Byrne is keeping his options open for
lucrative employment with big business after his stint at the EU
Commission, which is drawing to a close...

From: GM WATCH http://www.gmwatch.org

Friends of the Earth Europe
September 2004
GM CROPS: RECIPE FOR DISASTER
Friends of the Earth urges Governments to ban GM seeds

Brussels, 8 September - Friends of the Earth has condemned
today's decision by the European Commission to allow farmers
to commercially grow up to 17 different types of genetically
modified (GM) maize seeds in fields across the whole of Europe.
..'
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/09/08/eu_allows_monsanto_gm_maize_move_called_a_disaster.htm

http://tinyurl.com/2pmtej

'EU Commission caves in to biotech industry - again! (13/1/2006)
EU Commission caves in to biotech industry, Monsanto GM
maize authorized

Friends of the Earth Europe
Press release

Brussels, January 13th, 2006 " The European Commission today
ignored environmental and health concerns of Member States and
approved the import and use of three Monsanto genetically modified
(GM) maize (1).

This authorization comes despite studies showing that farmers in the
US and elsewhere are not seeing the reduced pesticide use and higher
profits promised by the biotech industry.

Helen Holder, GMO campaign coordinator at Friends of the Earth
Europe, said: "In whose interests is the EU commission acting?
GM crops have failed, yet the Commission continues to authorize
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in the EU despite there
being no EU law protecting conventional and organic farming from
genetic pollution."

"The EU Commission is going against the wish of European citizens,
and does not have the required majority support from Member States
for GMO approvals", she added

Since August, three other GMOs have been authorized by the
Commission (2). "In all six cases, Member States' concerns were
ignored because of the undemocratic EU system allowing the
Commission to take a decision despite there not being a qualified
majority in favour of GMOs in food and animal feed", Holder said.

All GMOs commercialized in the EU and worldwide have the same
two traits: insect resistance and herbicide tolerance, which have no
benefits for consumers. This is a poor result for 30 years of research
and public money spending. With 70% of EU citizens opposed to
GMOs, and a growing number of EU Regions stating their wish to be
GM-free (3), the EU Commission is caving in to the biotech industry
lobby and to US pressure.

Earlier this week, a report by Friends of the Earth made public
Monsanto'Ts aim to genetically modify all of the European
continent's maize production between now and 2010. However, the
number of EU countries and regions banning GM products has
increased over recent years (4).

NOTES
(1) Monsanto maize GA21 (food and food ingredients); Monsanto
maize MON 863 (food and food ingredients); Monsanto maize
MON863x810 (import and processing)

(2) See list:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/pending/approvals_timetable_Nov05.pdf

(3) 175 Regions throughout the EU have now declared themselves
GMO free. See: www.gmofree-europe.org

(4) http://www.foeeurope.org/publications/2006/who_benefits_from_gm_crops_Jan_2006.pdf,
page 15

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6130

'The row followed the possibility that GM oilseed rape may have already
been sold and grown in Wales.

then it is purely a legal matter,

You can say that again!

the welsh banning GM crops is about as
meaningless as them banning theft, it is already illegal, and GM crops are
only legal is they are passed by the EU. Perhaps you will tell me which GM
crops suitable for welsh conditions have been passed for growing by the EU

See above.

'Under EU decision-making rules, the European Commission makes
the final decision whether the GM crop will be authorised. Friends of
the Earth Europe has expressed concern because in previous cases,
the pro-biotech Commission has systematically authorised genetically
modified organisms (GMOs) regardless of the general voting pattern
by national Ministers.[2]
..
2] For example, in August 2005, the European Commission approved
the import of a controversial genetically modified (GM) maize, MON863,
for use as animal feed, even though the majority of member states had
either abstained or voted against import.
..'
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=7043

They do however produce excellent lamb which grows superbly on the
fine mountain pastures
and is well worth tasting

Doubtless producing plump, succulent welsh children..... right,
troll?

why do you eat children?

I don't.

then why introduce the topic?

Did I?

yes, you are the first person introducing succulent children

I've restored what you snipped. Why did you snip that jim?

And as for trolling, you are the one who is
cross posting to UBA, if you don't like the responses, cut the x post

'On the Internet, troll is a slang term used to describe:

1. Statements presented by an Internet user to others that are solely
intended
to incite controversy or conflict or cause annoyance or offense.


you mean like slagging off meat production on a farming group

Rational discussion of relevant issues. You can't help yourself.

Over to you Jim. Hope you don't mind if we sing along?

Grab your partner by the hand lets go dancing to the band

With my saddle all shedded and the cattle all bedded
Nothing wild seems to be wrong;
Make my bed 'neath the skies, I look up at the stars,
And then I can sing you this call.

Grab your partner by the hand lets go dancing to the band.

You dance real good Jim.
Jim Webster
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:22 pm
Guest
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs87u1$jjf$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
Quote:
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64p25hF2cunpmU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs6o6b$sn8$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n9mhF2atdq2U1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5lhf$d9g$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

why not start by telling us which varieties of Maize, wheat and rape
are
GM,
and the growing conditions they need plus the acreages of grain maize
and
wheat grown in Wales (as opposed to grown for fodder)

Are you really trying to deny that those crops could be grown in Wales?

legally yes,

As "Pete" puts it...

" Stop wriggling Jim. You blurted out "the utter irrelevance of the
Welsh decision is mind boggling, as they don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist"

and you have produced a list of the GM varieties they can grow,

and also that are legal

obviously not

Jim Webster
Jim Webster
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:24 pm
Guest
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs88ug$ju1$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
Quote:
"Old Codger" <oldcodger@anyoldwherewilldo.com> wrote in message
news:avreu3d81gh8giqckp0ckcprilg28ej2ao@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:22:06 -0000, "pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie
wrote:

"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n2u7F2ccckqU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5kel$coa$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:64n17oF2av1ngU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs590n$7pf$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

/Really/.


the utter irrelevence of the Welsh decision is mindboggling, as
they
don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist

Major crops, huh. Of note again is your evasion of the major
issues.

what major issue,

Like... "GM feeding trials (12 animal and 1 human) ...... found
negative health effects (all controlled against non-GM crops)."?

... snipped.

what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

Did I mention sugar beet, flax, linseed, peas and beans?

how much commerical flax and linseed production is there in wales,
also how much commercial sugar beet, pea and bean production is there in
wales,

and of course what varieties of GM are legally available to grow in wales?

It is obvious when pearl finds she cannot answer questions, she switches to
personal insult

Jim Webster
Jim Webster
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:26 pm
Guest
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs88ug$ju1$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

Quote:
They won't plant trees for fear of what might be happening in
twenty-odd years (certainly no trees .. apples .. damsons, ...)
but are hoping for the GM genie to fulfil all of their wishes..


sorry, but you know anything about commerical timber production, Note we
were not discussing top fruit production

Jim Webster
Old Codger
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:31 pm
Guest
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:22:31 -0000, "Jim Webster"
<jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs87u1$jjf$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64p25hF2cunpmU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs6o6b$sn8$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n9mhF2atdq2U1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5lhf$d9g$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

why not start by telling us which varieties of Maize, wheat and rape
are
GM,
and the growing conditions they need plus the acreages of grain maize
and
wheat grown in Wales (as opposed to grown for fodder)

Are you really trying to deny that those crops could be grown in Wales?

legally yes,

As "Pete" puts it...

" Stop wriggling Jim. You blurted out "the utter irrelevance of the
Welsh decision is mind boggling, as they don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist"

and you have produced a list of the GM varieties they can grow,

Which you, the CLA, claimed was not possible in Wales and at the same
time undermining Welsh agriculture in it's entirety apart from
admitting it knew how to produce lamb!!

Stop digging Jim.
Old Codger
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:32 pm
Guest
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:26:02 -0000, "Jim Webster"
<jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs88ug$ju1$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

They won't plant trees for fear of what might be happening in
twenty-odd years (certainly no trees .. apples .. damsons, ...)
but are hoping for the GM genie to fulfil all of their wishes..


sorry, but you know anything about commerical timber production, Note we
were not discussing top fruit production

You apparently know nothing about farming in general, which is
astounding given your working for the CLA.
pearl
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:01 pm
Guest
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64q9rbF2ctoekU1@mid.individual.net...
Quote:

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs87u1$jjf$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64p25hF2cunpmU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs6o6b$sn8$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64n9mhF2atdq2U1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs5lhf$d9g$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

what GM crop can be grown economically in Wales?

Maize? Wheat? Rape? Potatoes? And why stop there...?

why not start by telling us which varieties of Maize, wheat and rape
are
GM,
and the growing conditions they need plus the acreages of grain maize
and
wheat grown in Wales (as opposed to grown for fodder)

Are you really trying to deny that those crops could be grown in Wales?

legally yes,

As "Pete" puts it...

" Stop wriggling Jim. You blurted out "the utter irrelevance of the
Welsh decision is mind boggling, as they don't
actually grow any of the major crops for which GM varieties exist"

and you have produced a list of the GM varieties they can grow,

and also that are legal

obviously not

You snipped this..

'And Bayer's decision to shelve plans to commercialise Chardon LL in
the UK was hailed by campaigners as a classic illustration of the value
of devolution when Wales Countryside Minister Carwyn Jones made it
clear he could not agree to the product being grown in Wales.
...'
http://tinyurl.com/26f3sp

'Wales blocks go-ahead for Britain's first GM crop
The Guardian,
Monday February 9 2004

The government has been forced to postpone plans to announce today
the go-ahead for GM crops in Britain after Wales and Scotland refused
to cooperate.

The announcement was supposed to allow, in principle, the first GM
crop in Britain, a strain of GM maize called Chardon LL or T25 and
patented by Bayer. The crop came out well in the three-year crop trials.

The Welsh executive, which is keen to foster organic farming, was
eager to safeguard farmers and declined to give permission for the crop.

Scottish opposition to Chardon LL was more muted because maize is
a warm weather crop, so none would be grown north of the border.
But the Scottish executive has also refused permission.

The government was considering giving the green light for maize to be
grown in England alone. But the Welsh executive pointed out that UK
regulations stipulate that a particular crop can be grown in one country
only if the other two agree.
...'
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/feb/09/gm.food

Excellent.
pearl
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:14 pm
Guest
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64qa1tF2ddvkaU1@mid.individual.net...
Quote:

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs88ug$ju1$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

They won't plant trees for fear of what might be happening in
twenty-odd years (certainly no trees .. apples .. damsons, ...)
but are hoping for the GM genie to fulfil all of their wishes..


sorry, but you know anything about commerical timber production, Note we
were not discussing top fruit production

So not interested if it isn't financial gain from death and destruction.

Your grandkids won't be thanking you for a yearly bounty of fruit.
Jim Webster
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:35 am
Guest
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs9isd$6qp$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

Quote:
You snipped this..

yes because it had nothing to do with the question
If you want to believe it is a great leap forward then that is fine, I'm not
going to waste my life trying to convince you, I've just flagged up the
issue to those people smart enough to know gesture politics when they see it
have their suspicions confirmed

so bye for now

Jim Webster
Jim Webster
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:36 am
Guest
"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs9jlj$740$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
Quote:
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64qa1tF2ddvkaU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs88ug$ju1$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

They won't plant trees for fear of what might be happening in
twenty-odd years (certainly no trees .. apples .. damsons, ...)
but are hoping for the GM genie to fulfil all of their wishes..


sorry, but you know anything about commerical timber production, Note we
were not discussing top fruit production

So not interested if it isn't financial gain from death and destruction.

so vegans never use timber based products such as paper?


Quote:
Your grandkids won't be thanking you for a yearly bounty of fruit.


duh, what has top fruit got to do with timber production?

Jim Webster

>
pearl
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:40 am
Guest
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64rkrjF2cecdsU1@mid.individual.net...
Quote:

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs9jlj$740$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:64qa1tF2ddvkaU1@mid.individual.net...

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs88ug$ju1$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

They won't plant trees for fear of what might be happening in
twenty-odd years (certainly no trees .. apples .. damsons, ...)
but are hoping for the GM genie to fulfil all of their wishes..


sorry, but you know anything about commerical timber production, Note we
were not discussing top fruit production

So not interested if it isn't financial gain from death and destruction.

so vegans never use timber based products such as paper?

Ethically-minded people minimize usage, recycle, and choose
recycled. Eco-friendly hemp would be the preferred option.

'Farming

*A Hemp crop produces nearly 4 times as much raw fibre as
an equivalent-sized tree plantation

*Hemp needs no pesticides because it is unpalatable to insects

*Hemp needs no herbicides because it grows too quickly for
any weed to compete

*Hemp grows very close together which helps prevent weeds
from growing in the crop

*For more than a thousand years Cannabis/Hemp was our planet's
largest agricultural crop. It produced the majority of earth's fibre,
fabric, lighting oil, paper, incense and medicines, as well as being
a primary source of protein for humans and animals

*Hemp uses the sun more efficiently than virtually any other plant
on the planet

*Hemp can grow in virtually any climate and soil condition. It is
excellent for reclaiming otherwise-unusable land
...
Paper

*Until 1883, more than three quarters of the world's paper was
made from Hemp fibre

*80% of English wood pulp is imported, destroying the forests
and their delicate eco-systems in Canada and Scandinavia

*Trees take approximately 20 years to mature. Hemp takes 4 months

*Environmentally-sound Hemp paper is stronger, finer and longer-
lasting than wood-based papers

*Hemp paper is used for bank notes and archives

*Hemp paper does not need chlorine bleach, which heavily pollutes
rivers near wood-pulp paper mills

*Much of the world's paper was made from Hemp until about 1850.
Since the 1900s, all newspapers and most books and magazines
were printed on wood-pulp paper

*Our forests, what is left of them, are being cut down 3 times as
fast as they can grow
...'
http://www.hempfabric.co.uk/hempresource.asp

Quote:
Your grandkids won't be thanking you for a yearly bounty of fruit.


duh, what has top fruit got to do with timber production?

16 March 2008 07:43

Buxqi <prplbn@hotmail.com> wrote
Quote:

I'm not overly familiar with the legislation of which you speak. Are you
saying that by making laws against cutting down trees, the government is
putting people off planting them?

Oz:

Absolutely. Plant a tree and once its above a certain (quite small) size
you need permission to fell, and even if you get such you are invariably
obliged to replant. As an example we planted a small group (about 100
trees) in a corner between two (dirt) tracks. One track fell into disuse
and it would be nice to pull out the small trees and simplify the field
but this is not possible. Equally we would like to plant about 2500 in
various other places but since one cannot see even a few decades into
the future, let alone centuries, we decided not to. This is now typical,
fossilising what was once a dynamic countryside.

On the upside ALL the woods on our downland were planted for shooting,

----
Where do you see explicit mention of "timber production" there?

Eventually, on 22 March 2008 09:58 :

Robert Seago:

Quote:
As I have stated, rules have never hindered our trust to my knowledge,
either felling or plating where we have wanted to.

jim:
are you commercial? that is the issue. If I plant trees I use our families
money and have to get that money back over the years.
pearl
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:47 am
Guest
"Jim Webster" <jim@websterpagebank.freeswerve.co.uk> wrote in message news:64rkptF2cftioU1@mid.individual.net...
Quote:

"pearl" <tea@signguestbook.ie> wrote in message
news:fs9isd$6qp$1@reader01.news.esat.net...

You snipped this..

yes because it had nothing to do with the question

jim:

Quote:
and you have produced a list of the GM varieties they can grow,

and also that are legal

obviously not

pearl:

You snipped this..

'And Bayer's decision to shelve plans to commercialise Chardon LL in
the UK was hailed by campaigners as a classic illustration of the value
of devolution when Wales Countryside Minister Carwyn Jones made it
clear he could not agree to the product being grown in Wales.
...'
http://tinyurl.com/26f3sp

So there's at least one EU-authorized GM variety they could grow.

Quote:
If you want to believe it

?

Quote:
is a great leap forward then that is fine, I'm not
going to waste my life trying to convince you, I've just flagged up the
issue

?

Quote:
to those people

?

Quote:
smart enough to know gesture politics
when they see it

?

Quote:
have their suspicions confirmed

LOL!

Quote:
so bye for now

Jim Webster

Thanks for the laughs, jim. (I really do mean it Smile.
Dead Paul
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:38 am
Guest
Wales set to ban GM crops. Good!

The more places that ban that poisonous rubbish the better.

--
___ _______ ___ ___ ___ __ ____
/ _ \/ __/ _ | / _ \ / _ \/ _ |/ / / / /
/ // / _// __ |/ // / / ___/ __ / /_/ / /__
/____/___/_/ |_/____/ /_/ /_/ |_\____/____/
 
Page 3 of 5    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:53 pm