Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Energy - Hydrogen Forum  »  Ten Years After
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Don Lancaster
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:58 am
Guest
User wrote:
Quote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:51:46 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2chew@yahoo.com
wrote:

"Dan,
We would be happy to see you and your results of your experimentations
on yahoo.watercar.grp. I am replicating stan meyers work at a rate of
60lpm to run a vw engine at 3600rpm constant driving a 20kw
genset.Artinvegas..."

Never mind that he needs a separate 60 kW genset to supply power to
his Super Magical Stanley Cell.

But that's just a small, unimportant detail. Not worth mentioning.
Just like Stan never bothered to mention that his Water Powered Car
("Jesus Christ Is Lord!") was really fueled with hydrogen from
compressed gas bottles.



Was he trucking in the hydrogen from Pittsburgh, like the Chicago demo
people did?



--
Many thanks,

Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@tinaja.com

Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
Guest
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:26 am
On Mar 22, 2:28 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Quote:
On Mar 22, 2:13 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:

knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 1:12 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Meyer had designed

Designed ???? Was he an architect too ?

He had a "general plan" which included change of use from Agriculture
to Industrial for the parcel(s). He also ad to get approval for the
air strip for executive and military jets to fly in.

I would call that 'design' myself. I'm a designer and know the meaning of the
word. 'General plans' do not count as a design.

a Reasearch/Developement/Manufactuting/Meeting
facility and the plans had been approved by the county just before the
land was purchased, a normal contingency.

Cite !

Cite what?
A Grove City city coucil meeting?
You are nuts.

So you admit you could be making this up. Or Meyer was making it up.

No.
You can call Grove City and ask them to di up the meeting minutes
yourself.

If it's not in the archives it's not allowable as a fact. It's pure hearsay.

Graham

What archives?
Grove City or the County?
Why should I bother?
You don't and won't believe anything I present.
I have better things to do than give you more things to dispute.
I spoke to the Broker who sold the land to the Belgians.
That's good enough for me.
You want more call the county Clerk and dso a Grantor Grantee seach
for the Belgians names.http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2007/07/08/hy...
"Coroner's report

The Grove City police investigation of Meyer's death included taped
interviews of more than a dozen witnesses.

Absent, however, were audiotapes of the two Belgians, Phillippe
Vandemoortele and Marc Vancraeyenest.

The men had agreed to purchase 56 acres along Seeds Road in Grove
City. The city had approved a research campus there two months before
Meyer's death.

Lt. Steve Robinette said it's possible the men's interviews were not
taped.

Calls and e-mails to Vandemoortele and Vancraeyenest for this story
were not returned."
snip


I just got off the phone with the Seller of one of the properties, 14
acres, sold to Stan Meyer on Seeds Rd. He is going to pull the file to
give me address, APN, and other details. He thought it was sold for
$495K as it had a house and a barn on it also. He states that the
property has fallen into disrepair now.
This is a bit odd as there was no real property in Meyer's estate
inventory I recieved from the Probate court.
When I get the address and APN I will be able to see in who's name it
was purchased or who owns it now. I hope to be able to find out
without having to pay a title company for this research.
User
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:38 am
Guest
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2chew@yahoo.com
wrote:

Quote:
This is a bit odd as there was no real property in Meyer's estate
inventory I recieved from the Probate court.

It is odd, isn't it, now so many of the things you "know" about
Stanley Meyer simply aren't supported by facts.
Guest
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:40 am
On Mar 27, 3:38 am, u...@email.address.here (User) wrote:
Quote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com
wrote:

This is a bit odd as there was no real property in Meyer's estate
inventory I recieved from the Probate court.

It is odd, isn't it, now so many of the things you "know" about
Stanley Meyer simply aren't supported by facts.


No.
The FACT is the Seller says Meyer BOUGHT the 14 acres.
Maybe he put it in his wifes name or a Trust before his demise since
even the Seller of the property said Meyer always "thought he'd be
knocked off before he would be able to bring the Water Fuel Cell to
the world."
Guest
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:29 pm
On Mar 27, 4:40 pm, u...@email.address.here (User) wrote:
Quote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:40:26 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com
wrote:

On Mar 27, 3:38 am, u...@email.address.here (User) wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com
wrote:

This is a bit odd as there was no real property in Meyer's estate
inventory I recieved from the Probate court.

It is odd, isn't it, now so many of the things you "know" about
Stanley Meyer simply aren't supported by facts.

No.
The FACT is the Seller says Meyer BOUGHT the 14 acres.

Correction: The fact is that the seller *says* Meyer bought the 14
acres, not that Meyer bought the 14 acres. You can't find any records
of Meyer buying the land because he never did.

No.

I haven't looked beyond the Seller who has his file and knows who the
buyer was at the close of his sale.
When I have the exact address and APN I fcan do a chain of title to
see who owns it now and who did before.
So you are calling the Seller a liar when you don't believe he knows
he sold the property to Meyer.

Quote:
Meyer said he had a water powered car. Meyer said he had visits from
Arabs and military bigwigs. Meyer said a lot of things, but he was
full of sh** on every one. Meyer was a fraud.

No.

Many of these things happened and there are many witnesses to the
events.

Quote:
Maybe he put it in his wifes name or a Trust before his demise since
even the Seller of the property said Meyer always "thought he'd be
knocked off before he would be able to bring the Water Fuel Cell to
the world."

Or maybe he never bought it, and you're being lead down a primrose
path yet again. (Or you're simply making this all up as you go.)

Why would the Seller lie about who he sold it to and tell me he would
get the details from the file? His reason and advantage for doing this
is???

This is the second of TWO SELLERS who say Meyer was the beneficiary of
the Sales.
So everyone is a liar except you who has done NO RESEARCH, WITNESSING,
OR VERIFICATIONS.
Sure.
Idiot.
User
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:40 pm
Guest
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:40:26 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2chew@yahoo.com
wrote:

Quote:
On Mar 27, 3:38 am, u...@email.address.here (User) wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com
wrote:

This is a bit odd as there was no real property in Meyer's estate
inventory I recieved from the Probate court.

It is odd, isn't it, now so many of the things you "know" about
Stanley Meyer simply aren't supported by facts.


No.
The FACT is the Seller says Meyer BOUGHT the 14 acres.

Correction: The fact is that the seller *says* Meyer bought the 14
acres, not that Meyer bought the 14 acres. You can't find any records
of Meyer buying the land because he never did.

Meyer said he had a water powered car. Meyer said he had visits from
Arabs and military bigwigs. Meyer said a lot of things, but he was
full of sh** on every one. Meyer was a fraud.

Quote:
Maybe he put it in his wifes name or a Trust before his demise since
even the Seller of the property said Meyer always "thought he'd be
knocked off before he would be able to bring the Water Fuel Cell to
the world."

Or maybe he never bought it, and you're being lead down a primrose
path yet again. (Or you're simply making this all up as you go.)
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:08 am