You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

On Mar 19, 5:35 am, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

YOU dont have to if YOU dont want to mate

BUT

If you think any Muslim country will ever tolerate ANY christian army
in their country for very long

THEN you need to bring GOD into the picture

even if you think there is no GOD

IF you want your army in a Muslim country you must bring GOD into the
plan , cos he / she / it will decide the way the war goes

CLEARLY western countries thought like you and failed to account for
GOD , when they went to war in Muslim countries and 4000 dead yanks
later the west has STILL not worked out they can NEVER defeat a muslim
country ever again

You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

On Mar 19, 5:35 am, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

--

Have you ever noticed that gods never appear and speak and act for
themselves? not to mention the behavior of those who claim to represent
those gods? or any sign that priests or laity are in regular contact with
infinite wisdom and infinite justice?

YOU dont have to if YOU dont want to mate

BUT

If you think any Muslim country will ever tolerate ANY christian army
in their country for very long

THEN you need to bring GOD into the picture

even if you think there is no GOD

IF you want your army in a Muslim country you must bring GOD into the
plan , cos he / she / it will decide the way the war goes

CLEARLY western countries thought like you and failed to account for
GOD , when they went to war in Muslim countries and 4000 dead yanks
later the west has STILL not worked out they can NEVER defeat a muslim
country ever again

kanga
=====

Tokay Pino Gris wrote:
Mike E. Fullerton wrote:
Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious
Universe and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

Let's have it!

Its extremely simple Tokay. You are a system of pure energy.

You are conscious. Therefore energy must be conscious unless of course you hold
the patently absurd belief that consciousness magically emerges out of
nothing. The Universe is a system of the same pure energy (all the
energy there is). Therefore the Universe is conscious.

--
Skeptopathy (pathological skepticism)
the unscientific belief that unusual phenomena are bunk.

Tokay Pino Gris wrote:
Mike E. Fullerton wrote:
Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious
Universe and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

Let's have it!

Its extremely simple Tokay. You are a system of pure energy. You are
conscious. Therefore energy must be conscious unless of course you hold
the patently absurd belief that consciousness magically emerges out of
nothing. The Universe is a system of the same pure energy (all the
energy there is). Therefore the Universe is conscious.

Hatter wrote:
On Mar 19, 1:08 pm, "Mike E. Fullerton" <inforequ...@spam-killer-
remove-techie.com> wrote:
Tokay Pino Gris wrote:
Mike E. Fullerton wrote:
Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?
Reason and God are mutually exclusive.
That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious
Universe and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.
Let's have it!
Its extremely simple Tokay. You are a system of pure energy. You are
conscious. Therefore energy must be conscious unless of course you hold
the patently absurd belief that consciousness magically emerges out of
nothing. The Universe is a system of the same pure energy (all the
energy there is). Therefore the Universe is conscious.

The logical fallacies are manifold:
Primarily red herring, appeal to absurdity, and irrelavent conclusion.

I am a system of pure energy, I have a nickle in my pocket. Therefore
energy must have a nickle in it pocket.

Uhmm...first, the pocket and the nickel are energy too. Secondly the
nickel is not an inherent property of yours. Consciousness is. Thirdly
the nickel is not even part of your system, its external to it.

It is really bad logic.

Sorry my logic is pristine, you just can't follow it. The addictions to
your beliefs preclude it.

--
You logic has fallacies, it isn't pristine...If you wish to redefine

mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious Universe
and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

"KANGAROOISTAN = the land of kangaroos" <kangarooistan@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:f78807b5-da91-403a-9e32-861d13dfd956@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 19, 5:35 am, mimus <tinmimu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

--

Have you ever noticed that gods never appear and speak and act for
themselves? not to mention the behavior of those who claim to represent
those gods? or any sign that priests or laity are in regular contact with
infinite wisdom and infinite justice?
YOU dont have to if YOU dont want to mate

BUT

If you think any Muslim country will ever tolerate ANY christian army
in their country for very long

THEN you need to bring GOD into the picture

even if you think there is no GOD

IF you want your army in a Muslim country you must bring GOD into the
plan , cos he / she / it will decide the way the war goes

CLEARLY western countries thought like you and failed to account for
GOD , when they went to war in Muslim countries and 4000 dead yanks
later the west has STILL not worked out they can NEVER defeat a muslim
country ever again

kanga
=====

Idiots or rebel-rousers notwithstanding, the USA has no interest in
'defeating' muslim nations. We ARE ONLY interested in seeing Democracy
replace tyranny because Democracy leads to 'stability' and puts down monster
tyrants forthwith, leaving the world to develop in a much more peaceful
manner.

Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious Universe
and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

Mike E. Fullerton wrote:
Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious
Universe and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

Let's have it!

Tokay Pino Gris wrote:
Mike E. Fullerton wrote:
Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?

Reason and God are mutually exclusive.

That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious
Universe and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

Let's have it!

Its extremely simple Tokay. You are a system of pure energy. You are
conscious. Therefore energy must be conscious unless of course you hold
the patently absurd belief that consciousness magically emerges out of
nothing. The Universe is a system of the same pure energy (all the
energy there is). Therefore the Universe is conscious.

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:57:13 GMT, "Mike E. Fullerton"
inforequest@spam-killer-remove-techie.com> wrote:

Geoff wrote:
mimus wrote:
You don't need to drag God into it, now, do you?
Reason and God are mutually exclusive.
That depends on what you mean by God. I see God as a conscious Universe
and have extremely sound reasoning behind this.

Silly baseless claim time.