|
Science Forum Index » Geology - Earthquakes Forum » Can earthquake predict the weather?
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:59 am |
|
|
|
|
On Mar 17, 10:33 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
Quote: rog...@lpbroadband.net wrote in news:8637097d-4e5d-4b54-8ccb-4958cb215c86
@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Maybe I should check the moon too. You think?
Yes. So long as you don't fudge the data.
Oh, and lest I forget, the quake doesn't count if it falls on
odd tuesdays. The pattern never seems to fit those days.
Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Brian;
I checked the syzygys against the fatal cyclones list and found that
over 25% of the cyclones fall within an 8 day window from 1 day before
syzygy to 6 days after syzygy.
Jim B. will be so happy! No doubt he will cite this as proof of his
theories.
Roger
PS: Odd Tuesdays??? I don't even know how to compute that. Your theory
is becoming untestable. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
In article <4570ee61-365b-4b4f-8ec7-720515636f09@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
<rogerh@lpbroadband.net> wrote:
Quote: PS: Odd Tuesdays??? I don't even know how to compute that. Your
theory is becoming untestable.
Maybe you just need to include dew points? <ducking> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Skywise |
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Skywise |
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Charles |
| Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:59:06 -0700 (PDT), rogerh@lpbroadband.net
wrote:
Quote: On Mar 17, 10:33 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
rog...@lpbroadband.net wrote in news:8637097d-4e5d-4b54-8ccb-4958cb215c86
@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Maybe I should check the moon too. You think?
Yes. So long as you don't fudge the data.
Oh, and lest I forget, the quake doesn't count if it falls on
odd tuesdays. The pattern never seems to fit those days.
Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Brian;
I checked the syzygys against the fatal cyclones list and found that
over 25% of the cyclones fall within an 8 day window from 1 day before
syzygy to 6 days after syzygy.
Jim B. will be so happy! No doubt he will cite this as proof of his
theories.
Roger
PS: Odd Tuesdays??? I don't even know how to compute that. Your theory
is becoming untestable.
That's about the same statistics for when twins are conceived. Must
be a connection. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:48 am |
|
|
|
|
On Mar 19, 7:46 am, JimLillie <jimlil...@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote: Skywise wrote:
rog...@lpbroadband.net wrote in news:4570ee61-365b-4b4f-8ec7-720515636f09
@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
PS: Odd Tuesdays??? I don't even know how to compute that. Your theory
is becoming untestable.
Odd numbers...ya know? 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc...
Sheesh, you scientist types are so dumb. :)
Brian
No no no.
Any week where the data does not match the theory
is odd, to be ignored.
Jim Lillie engineer
Jim;
Now THAT computes! It's a standard method in certain fields and gives
very good results.
Roger |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mirage |
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:05 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mar 15, 9:39 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
Quote: No shit. Ya just can't "make this shit up". Someone has to actually
believe it in order to toss such a great salad. One must become
one with the salad. One must make loooove to the salad.
Brian
LOL!
--mirage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mirage |
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
All this has got me thinking. I was just noticing all the quake
activity around the geysers in northern california. I'm old enough to
remember when the quake maps did _not_ show that kind of activity.
Same for Mammoth lakes. If you think about it, it's pretty clear that
the installation of the seismometers is probably sparking the
tremors. Certainly, we can test this idea -- take out the
seismometers and then look at the quake maps. I'll bet there's a
strong correlation.
--mirage |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| JimLillie |
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Skywise wrote:
Quote: rogerh@lpbroadband.net wrote in news:4570ee61-365b-4b4f-8ec7-720515636f09
@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
PS: Odd Tuesdays??? I don't even know how to compute that. Your theory
is becoming untestable.
Odd numbers...ya know? 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc...
Sheesh, you scientist types are so dumb. :)
Brian
No no no.
Any week where the data does not match the theory
is odd, to be ignored.
Jim Lillie engineer |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Skywise |
| Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
rogerh@lpbroadband.net wrote in
news:03f8b799-dcbf-4f3a-8040-1633be955d4a@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Quote: On Mar 19, 7:46 am, JimLillie <jimlil...@comcast.net> wrote:
Skywise wrote:
rog...@lpbroadband.net wrote in
news:4570ee61-365b-4b4f-8ec7-720515636f09
@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
PS: Odd Tuesdays??? I don't even know how to compute that. Your
theory is becoming untestable.
Odd numbers...ya know? 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc...
Sheesh, you scientist types are so dumb. :)
Brian
No no no.
Any week where the data does not match the theory
is odd, to be ignored.
Jim Lillie engineer
Jim;
Now THAT computes! It's a standard method in certain fields and gives
very good results.
SEE!!! I just can't think that low. Damnit!!
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:44 am |
|
|
|
|
In article <13u3ike8vvged2f@corp.supernews.com>,
Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
Quote: SEE!!! I just can't think that low. Damnit!!
Perhaps that should be something to be proud of. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Skywise |
| Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Cathryn |
| Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Skywise wrote:
Quote:
And I've invented a michine that can detect all of this and all
of my research has been analyzed by an unknown professional and
it's all going to published sometime in the future in a yet to
be announced publication.
Brian
And I bet at some indeterminate time in the future, you will be able to
purchace one of these machines that do little more than make the
inventor rich enough to vacation in Arizona without having to sleep in a
tent.
Cathryn |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Skywise |
| Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Cathryn <rocket@lovetowrite.com> wrote in news:fslvh201np7
@enews2.newsguy.com:
Quote: Skywise wrote:
And I've invented a michine that can detect all of this and all
of my research has been analyzed by an unknown professional and
it's all going to published sometime in the future in a yet to
be announced publication.
Brian
And I bet at some indeterminate time in the future, you will be able to
purchace one of these machines that do little more than make the
inventor rich enough to vacation in Arizona without having to sleep in a
tent.
And I'll name it the Vortex 2000!!!
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:59 pm |
|
|
|
|
In article <UHDHj.6979$Tl2.5596@fe103.usenetserver.com>,
Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
Quote: And I'll name it the Vortex 2000!!!
You're a little late. Maybe Vortex 2010 would be better. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
