I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

On Mar 14, 8:18 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

FALSE!!! Your perspective is constrained, which limits your
realization to just one part of the actual relationships. The reality
is that weather and quakes and the world's waters are inter-related
components of a constantly combining aquameteoseismological cycle.
Quakes cause weather, weather causes quakes, and everything goes
downhill, eventually reaching the oceans. Traditional seismologists
cannot hold a candle to the power of the aquameteoseismological
formulas that derive the expansion and contraction of the oceans and,
therefore, through their weight and caloric potential, to the
expansion and contraction of the sea floor which directly affects the
earth's ongoing crustal evolution. Expanding here, contracting there,
leading to global asymmetries of roundness and a continuing
misunderstanding of the planet's size and age. It is clear that the
variability of the crustal fractions will create conditions leading to
a semi-aquatic transference of vibrationally tuned energies. Soon.

--mirage

Or, to put it another way:

"A shift in harmonic energy back to domination by the fundamental deep
crustal infrasonics has occurred. The replenishment of strong harmonic
energy, which can later increase the dangerous upper level shear stress is
happening in the Gulf of California tonight. The time period for conversion
from one form of energy to the other is now becoming much shorter. The most
recent observations taken at 05:30 UTC was that the 24 hour peak fundamental
infrasonic resonant harmonic was measured at 0.59 Hz (-67.66 dBv), which is
associated with the latitude for the Gulf of California in Baja Mexico. The
Fundamental Deep Crustal energy is what drives these upper level shear
resonant harmonics into a frenzy, or erratic mode. The 24 hour peak upper
level shear resonant harmonic frequency was measured at 5.54 (-77.04 dBv)
The output for the tracking filter indicated a band of energy from 4.8 to
6.2 Hz with a peak reading at 5.56 Hz (-68.30 dBv). The source of this deep
crustal energy is definitely the Gulf of California and the East Pacific
Rise and based upon its sustained activity near 0.60 Hz, and about 3
decibels above its long term average amplitude, which was (-70.00 dBv) up
until last October 2006.

Currently, strong global seismic events are increasing in frequency at a
rapid pace.
The change is due to the increase in solar energetic particles, which are
increasing the amplitude of the convective currents coming from the
core-mantle boundary along the Magnetic Equator at the Pacific Plate's
Stress Center located in Polynesia. Seismc activity in the region from the
Kermadec Islands to Fiji is going to substantially increase as solar cycle
24 activity coming from the sun changes."

The preceding courtesy of Frank Condon, Geoseismic Labs, as reported at the
Syzygy/Job website . . .

Mike Williams

Or, to put it another way:

"A shift in harmonic energy back to domination by the fundamental deep
crustal infrasonics has occurred. The replenishment of strong harmonic
energy, which can later increase the dangerous upper level shear stress is
happening in the Gulf of California tonight. The time period for conversion
from one form of energy to the other is now becoming much shorter. The most
recent observations taken at 05:30 UTC was that the 24 hour peak fundamental
infrasonic resonant harmonic was measured at 0.59 Hz (-67.66 dBv), which is
associated with the latitude for the Gulf of California in Baja Mexico. The
Fundamental Deep Crustal energy is what drives these upper level shear
resonant harmonics into a frenzy, or erratic mode. The 24 hour peak upper
level shear resonant harmonic frequency was measured at 5.54 (-77.04 dBv)
The output for the tracking filter indicated a band of energy from 4.8 to
6.2 Hz with a peak reading at 5.56 Hz (-68.30 dBv). The source of this deep
crustal energy is definitely the Gulf of California and the East Pacific
Rise and based upon its sustained activity near 0.60 Hz, and about 3
decibels above its long term average amplitude, which was (-70.00 dBv) up
until last October 2006.

Currently, strong global seismic events are increasing in frequency at a
rapid pace.
The change is due to the increase in solar energetic particles, which are
increasing the amplitude of the convective currents coming from the
core-mantle boundary along the Magnetic Equator at the Pacific Plate's
Stress Center located in Polynesia. Seismc activity in the region from the
Kermadec Islands to Fiji is going to substantially increase as solar cycle
24 activity coming from the sun changes."

The preceding courtesy of Frank Condon, Geoseismic Labs, as reported at the
Syzygy/Job website . . .

Mike Williams

In article <13tmfvvo1akl059@corp.supernews.com>,
Skywise <into@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:

I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

I hope you realize that someone is going to take that
seriously.

On Mar 14, 8:18 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

FALSE!!! Your perspective is constrained, which limits your
realization to just one part of the actual relationships. The reality
is that weather and quakes and the world's waters are inter-related
components of a constantly combining aquameteoseismological cycle.
Quakes cause weather, weather causes quakes, and everything goes
downhill, eventually reaching the oceans. Traditional seismologists
cannot hold a candle to the power of the aquameteoseismological
formulas that derive the expansion and contraction of the oceans and,
therefore, through their weight and caloric potential, to the
expansion and contraction of the sea floor which directly affects the
earth's ongoing crustal evolution. Expanding here, contracting there,
leading to global asymmetries of roundness and a continuing
misunderstanding of the planet's size and age. It is clear that the
variability of the crustal fractions will create conditions leading to
a semi-aquatic transference of vibrationally tuned energies. Soon.

Thanks Mike. I know I'll sleep better for that. Reading this I
realize what a rank beginner I am at tossing word salad (Brian's term)
compared to the real professionals out there. To those who provide so
much unintended entertainment, I tip my propellor beanie.

I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be
used to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

rog...@lpbroadband.net wrote in news:460e276e-0628-46d2-aea4-591115440d62
@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com:



On Mar 14, 8:18 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com-Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

Brian;

Nonsense. You have it backwards.

I compared major quakes to hurricanes impacting the US from 1873 to
2005. There were more quakes the month before the hurricanes than the
month after. So clearly the quakes cause the hurricanes.

Roger

No. I'm right. It takes about 10-12 months for the quakes to hit.

I did mention that, right?

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On Mar 14, 8:18 pm, Skywise <i...@oblivion.nothing.com> wrote:
I'd like to propose a new theory - that earthquakes can be used
to predict the weather.

It seems that any time there's a big earthquake somewhere,
somewhere else a short time later there's some bad weather
somewhere.

Brian
--http://www.skywise711.com- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ:http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions":http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

Brian;

Nonsense. You have it backwards.

I compared major quakes to hurricanes impacting the US from 1873 to
2005. There were more quakes the month before the hurricanes than the
month after. So clearly the quakes cause the hurricanes.

Roger

Maybe I should check the moon too. You think?