| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Cognitive Science Forum » Rationality of insulting posters
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
|
| Author |
Message |
| Tom Potter |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 7:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3FD5669E.E1D5B22F@mchsi.com...
Quote: Tom Potter wrote:
As can be seen by the number of posts in this thread,
and the references to his web site in thousands of other posts,
a computer programmer, who took some data processing classes
at a third rate California college, has become a highly regarded expert
in math, physics, and other science disciplines, and
many people, who pretend to be rational, intelligent, open-minded
scientists (Or at least, pretend to have a scientific mind.),
frequently use this programmer as a major reference.
What third rate California college? Who rated it? What criteria?
Hey Wormley,
as you use this programmer's web site as your primary rederence,
it seems to me that you should know what college your resident expert
attended.
If you want to know how this college rates,
I suggest that you learn how to use Google.
I'll give you some hints.
Caltech and Stanford and first rate California colleges.
The college that Baez teaches at is a second rate college.
Your expert took some data processing classes at a third rate college.
Quote: Most scientist are computer programmers... are you knocking us Potter?
Wormley,
why do you always try to identify yourself with some group?
Does identifying yourself with a group make you feel more secure,
or do you think [sic] that it lends strength to your position?
Do you have the courage to express any independent ideas you have
(Assuming that you have an independent idea.),
or the knowledge to address the point of a dichotomy,
rather than try to position an opponents point
against some group that you identify with?
In other words Wormley,
are you a man or a mouse?
--
Tom Potter http://tompotter.us
===============
WHO instigates conflict and war for power and wealth?
WHO instigated the class wars of the 1900's?
WHO is instigating the religious wars of the 2000's?
WHO has a well organized propaganda machine?
WHO gang attacks all who expose their agenda and methods?
Visit my web site, and download the world's best physics tutorial!
=============== |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| C. Bond |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 11:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Paul R. Mays wrote:
Quote: Snipped.....
--
There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable --
and the obvious.
I just want to address this this above errorent line......
Its wrong on several levels......
Noone can prove anything individually... Best you can
do is supply evidence ... Something is proven only
when there is concensus that the supplied evidence is
valid and the conclusions made are, by concensus, agreed too.
Also noone can know if something is unprovable for all
only have a knowledge base of the moment and new information
may at some point be dirived that allows the proofs required
to prove by consessus the concept that was unprovable before
the new information was aquired.....
And the obvious is not always obvious and when the obvious
seems obvious to some, it may very well be illusion... If
being obvious were the rule then David Copperfield would
not be drawing very many crowds.....
"Look before you leap" is also wrong on many levels. It doesn't apply to the
blind or to paraplegics, it doesn't tell you which way to look or how long to
do so and fails to provide details on the proper distance to leap. Both that
expression and my signature line are aphorisms. Get over it.
--
There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the
obvious.
--
Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle.
--
http://www.crbond.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |-|erc |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 2:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
cite?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Justin" <no@spam.com> wrote in
Quote: No, that's not true.
Justin
In sci.math |-|erc <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
: that's because you're quoting text book problems in here, try saying
anything : against the grain and you'll get your head shot off
: Herc
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Justin |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 2:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You're the one who made the initial claim, so it up to you to provide
proof.
In any case, JSH is not saying anything "against the grain", as you so
nobly put it, he is saying things which are downright mathematically
incorrect. Go and follow the threads with your own eyes.
Best regards,
Justin
In sci.math |-|erc <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
: cite?
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: "Justin" <no@spam.com> wrote in
:> No, that's not true.
:>
:> Justin
:>
:>
:> In sci.math |-|erc <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
:>
:> : that's because you're quoting text book problems in here, try saying
:> anything : against the grain and you'll get your head shot off
:>
:> : Herc
:> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |-|erc |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 7:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
anyone? anyone at all have a post thats against the grain in sci.math that
didn't get them verbally abused?
such a nice crowd according to you all must be 1000s
Herc
Quote: cite?
"Justin" <no@spam.com> wrote in
No, that's not true.
: that's because you're quoting text book problems in here, try saying
anything : against the grain and you'll get your head shot off
: Herc
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Pat |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 8:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"raydpratt" <raydpratt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:17b9a07c.0312082004.73d80ff5@posting.google.com...
Quote: David Moran wrote:
But James, by not insulting those people back, you are sure to show
others
that you're more mature than the ones doing the insulting. Wouldn't that
help in your favor?
That presumes that maturity and intelligent new ideas go hand in hand,
and that immaturity precludes brilliant new ideas. When openly stated
as a proposition, would you be so bold as to say that it is
categorically true? You may assume it sub silentio, on moral grounds,
as a precondition to whether you will listen to a person's ideas, but
is your presupposition actually true? Would you care to defend such a
proposition with facts?
Very Respectfully,
Ray
LOL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Dik T. Winter |
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 9:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <br4mvi$1cpo$1@agate.berkeley.edu> magidin@math.berkeley.edu (Arturo Magidin) writes:
Quote: In article <HpLv5n.91H@cwi.nl>, Dik T. Winter <Dik.Winter@cwi.nl> wrote:
Look at posters like James Harris who insults people to let them stop
postings. Who even contacts employers to get posters to stop posting.
And only because they provide factual counterproofs of his claims.
You have called Arturo Magidin a liar many times on the way. He never
has insulted you.
That's not accurate; I have, in the past, insulted James.
Oh. Eh, sorry. .
--
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Brian Quincy Hutchings |
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I don't see how playing amateur (or "non-") mathematician has anything
to do with civilization. personally,
if I don't stop habituating this ****, it's not going to look very good
for *me*.
so, why don't you ignore "uncle Al," "Virgil," and
all of the others who (usually) don't bother with any math,
instead of using them as opportunities to get to their level --
instead of working on your own proofs?
I mean, you never reply to *me*.... anyway,
don't use your glorious insights into the Iraq situation, if
you don't intend to do a damn thing about it,
just because Dick Cheeny would like that;
are you guys, buddies?
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0312081103.29b019d7@posting.google.com>...
Quote: people like Marc Olschok and "Uncle Al" want because they're not
civilized!
Now I'm not talking about insults here and there as things can get
--Give the Gift of Dick Cheeny -- out of public office!
http://www.wlym.com/antidummies/part52.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Wolf Kirchmeir |
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 7:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:12:39 -0500, Paul R. Mays wrote:
Quote: Something is proven only
when there is concensus that the supplied evidence is
valid and the conclusions made are, by concensus, agreed too.
Logic is not a popularity contest.
--
Wolf Kirchmeir, Blind River ON Canada
"Nature does not deal in rewards or punishments, but only in consequences."
(Robert Ingersoll) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| James Harris |
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Justin" <no@spam.com> wrote in message news:<br5ot1$re6$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
Quote: You're the one who made the initial claim, so it up to you to provide
proof.
In any case, JSH is not saying anything "against the grain", as you so
nobly put it, he is saying things which are downright mathematically
incorrect. Go and follow the threads with your own eyes.
Like what?
James Harris |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| C. Bond |
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 11:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
James Harris wrote:
Quote: "Justin" <no@spam.com> wrote in message news:<br5ot1$re6$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
You're the one who made the initial claim, so it up to you to provide
proof.
In any case, JSH is not saying anything "against the grain", as you so
nobly put it, he is saying things which are downright mathematically
incorrect. Go and follow the threads with your own eyes.
Like what?
Your errors are ubiquitous. A Google search on "James Harris" and "OOPS!" reveals that
you have acknowledged over 80 of them yourself. Add to that the number of errors you
refuse to acknowledge and...hold it...the results are just in! YOU ARE A CRANK!
--
There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and the obvious.
--
Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle.
--
http://www.crbond.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| neepy |
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2003 8:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<EtcBb.124$_U4.3093@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
Quote: nice post James, good general FAQ or introductory material about posting.
Herc
now will anyone look at MY claim?
Just look at the "supporters" you attract, James. Doesn't that tell you something?
What can I say? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |-|erc |
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2003 1:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
--
www.StealthHostiing.com You rule Truman. http://tinyurl.com/iky4
Hey Trueman...love the show. YOU ARE the Truman I heard him. Very spooky!
Quote: Is the truman living in Townsville? I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
Webmasters help the TRUEman by joining www.theBanner.net Current:1 Goal:1000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Tom Potter" <tdp@hotsheet.com> wrote
Quote: "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in
Tom Potter wrote:
As can be seen by the number of posts in this thread,
and the references to his web site in thousands of other posts,
a computer programmer, who took some data processing classes
at a third rate California college, has become a highly regarded expert
in math, physics, and other science disciplines, and
many people, who pretend to be rational, intelligent, open-minded
scientists (Or at least, pretend to have a scientific mind.),
frequently use this programmer as a major reference.
What third rate California college? Who rated it? What criteria?
Hey Wormley,
as you use this programmer's web site as your primary rederence,
it seems to me that you should know what college your resident expert
attended.
If you want to know how this college rates,
I suggest that you learn how to use Google.
I'll give you some hints.
Caltech and Stanford and first rate California colleges.
The college that Baez teaches at is a second rate college.
Your expert took some data processing classes at a third rate college.
Most scientist are computer programmers... are you knocking us Potter?
Wormley,
why do you always try to identify yourself with some group?
Does identifying yourself with a group make you feel more secure,
or do you think [sic] that it lends strength to your position?
Do you have the courage to express any independent ideas you have
(Assuming that you have an independent idea.),
or the knowledge to address the point of a dichotomy,
rather than try to position an opponents point
against some group that you identify with?
In other words Wormley,
are you a man or a mouse?
--
Tom Potter http://tompotter.us
You show 2 mutually exclusive beliefs here :
One must belong to a named college
One must act independently
Which is it?
Will you proudly tell us what University *you* attended?
Or do you proudly stand as an idividual with your own exploits?
Herc |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |-|erc |
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2003 2:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:38 am
|
|