I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1.  Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2.  Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3.  Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4.  Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"?  Does that mean
anything to you?

5.  Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6.  Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7.  Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

James Harris

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken

in communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important,

so I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely

but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me,

so responses to those question would be appreciated:

1.  Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2.  Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3.  Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4.  Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"?  Does that mean
anything to you?

5.  Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6.  Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7.  Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

James Harris

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1.  Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2.  Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3.  Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4.  Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"?  Does that mean
anything to you?

5.  Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6.  Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7.  Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

James Harris

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1.  Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2.  Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3.  Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4.  Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"?  Does that mean
anything to you?

5.  Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6.  Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7.  Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Sorry, I killfiled you ages ago, so I've no idea what this means.

(And post less, yes!)

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

"JSH" <jst...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4b921ba5-659f-4274-815d-aa958d93fed4@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

yes, extending to larger numbers may be difficult

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

Deliberately yes, in the one case where your paper was withdrawn because of
errors, it is their responsibility to prevent substandard technical content
(any paper with errors) from being published. No fraud involved, that is
too time consuming and complicated.

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

yes, check out early days of PHP. Also there are several free complex multi
level encription/decrytion SW on the internet that no Goveernment can break
anyway. The Gov just want their stuff to stay secure, most of that are very
very large Psudo Random number streams, and have nothing to do with
factoring.

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

yes, but how much does it improve anything in quantitave terms?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

You may run into something that really works, and others do review what you
have so far, and you have brought up interesting points in Abstract Algebra
that are complicated. The whining is distracting and invites attacks.

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

Some are really trying to help you. Some attack the whining.

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Most do tell the truth, it is an honor, and their truth is in the language
of Math and honorable traceable back to Newton, and before thousands of
years, etc Most are too busy working on hard problems, like you are, and
have no time to spend even thinking of being deceptive.

I just ordered "How to quit posting on Usenet in 10 easy steps" from
amazon

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

James Harris

Thanks for the replies so far. �I will not reply to them all.

But I have a reply here. �Comments below...

On Mar 5, 7:09 pm, "CarterBanks" <spaml...@nospam.com> wrote:

"JSH" <jst...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4b921ba5-659f-4274-815d-aa958d93fed4@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. �Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

yes, extending to larger numbers may be difficult

Ok.

2. �Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

Deliberately yes, in the one case where your paper was withdrawn because of
errors, it is their responsibility to prevent substandard technical content
(any paper with errors) from being published. �No fraud involved, that is
too time consuming and complicated.

The journal had the paper for nine months and I was in continual
communication by email and told them that I was an amateur researcher.

As a rhetorical question, why would the editors publish a paper from
an admitted amateur that had errors?

One of my favorite later emails AFTER publication from one of the
editors in reply to me thinking them for publication noted that
mathematics was important regardless of the source, even if it came
from a janitor.

I'm not a janitor. �The cultural reference seemed obvious to me.

So then, if the editors were that all the way in, how does it make
sense to so many of you that the paper was actually flawed?

Isn't a cover-up more likely? �

Especially considering that later the
journal DIED? �And Cameron University removed all mention of it from
their websites so that EMIS had to save 9 years of math papers out of
the goodness of its heart?

Do you really think that one paper had the power to destroy and entire
math journal and 9 years of other papers, because it was wrong?

3. �Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

yes, check out early days of PHP. Also there are several free complex multi
level encription/decrytion SW on the internet that no Goveernment can break
anyway. The Gov just want their stuff to stay secure, most of that are very
very large Psudo Random number streams, and have nothing to do with
factoring.

I'm afraid that is the case, which is why I am somewhat paused as I
consider what to do next.



4. �Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? �Does that mean
anything to you?

yes, but how much does it improve anything in quantitave terms?

It shows an equation

that defines z when T mod 3 = 2, and

z^2 = y^2 + T.

Then z = (1 + 2�2)k/(2�), where

k^2 = (1 + �2)^{-1}(nT) mod p

and p is an odd prime of your choice chosen such that k exists, and
since there are (p-1)/2 prime residues, it should exist about 50% of
the time.

Then you also get factors mod p:

f_1 = �k mod p

and

f_2 = �^{-1}(1 + �2)k mod p.

But you'd still need to find k, but the research shows that k is near
the k such that

abs(T - (1 + �2)k^2)

is a minimum in that with positive k it is greater than or equal to
that value, and has the residue given by the equation above.

So attacking an RSA number could be feasible if all that is true just
by picking a large prime p, and trying it. �If it doesn't work, try
another, and 50% of them should work, and then you'd have z.

5. �Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

You may run into something that really works, and others do review what you
have so far, and you have brought up interesting points in Abstract Algebra
that are complicated. �The whining is distracting and invites attacks.

But what if I've followed the rules--like with publication--and it
hasn't mattered?

Is my only hope factoring a large number?

6. �Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

Some are really trying to help you. Some attack the whining.

Ok.

7. �Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Most do tell the truth, it is an honor, and �their truth is in the language
of Math and honorable traceable back to Newton, and before thousands of
years, etc �Most are too busy working on hard problems, like you are, and
have no time to spend even thinking of being deceptive.

Thanks for the reply.

I appreciate further feedback from others. �I'm unlikely to reply, but
I will try to read them all in this thread, within reason.

James Harris

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.


James Harris

I am curious about the effectiveness of the approach I have taken in
communicating mathematical ideas and research I feel is important, so
I am making this post to ask your opinion!

You can answer freely but I will give a few questions that reflect
areas that are of great interest to me, so responses to those question
would be appreciated:

1. Do you believe that I may have valuable mathematical ideas?

2. Do you believe that it is at all possible that mathematicians are
fraudulently and deliberately blocking those ideas?

3. Can important ideas in factoring be presented loudly without
anyone around the world noticing or caring, like governments or
security agencies if those factoring ideas could lead to major
breaches in security?

4. Have you heard me talk of a "z constraint"? Does that mean
anything to you?

5. Do you think I should just shut-up, or should I post as much as I
want--like anyone else?

6. Why do you think so many posters reply to me?

7. Do you trust mathematicians of today to tell the truth as best
they know about mathematical ideas and research regardless of the
source?

Thank you.

James Harris