| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Electromagnetic Forum » johnreed take 24-what is super electromagnetic gravitation
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| johnlawrencereedjr |
 Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Concept continued from recent prior posts:
.... what then does the planet attractor act on if not on inertial
mass? The planet attractor acts on matter. At first thought, with
this conclusion, I appear to have returned to pre-Newtonian physics.
This is a momentary illusion. Newtonian physics applies to us as
inertial mass objects, and our quantitative interaction with inertial
mass objects, which quantity inertial mass, is emergent in the
electromagnetic universe (see my most recent, prior posts on mass and
the electromagnetic universe).
What immediate benefit arises from this view? Had Newton known of
atoms and the periodic table he would have had something more
fundamentally universal than the quantitative, but nonetheless
subjective, less fundamentally universal, inertial mass matter, to
work with. Stable inertial mass matter today, reduces to stable
atoms.
The planet attractor acts on atoms (see Uncle Al's independent, as yet
unverified (but supporting) experimental results), which is our
gateway into super-electromagnetic, so called "gravitational"
attraction [1].
What is super electromagnetic? It is the result of "constructive
fusion" which is the logical consequence of the atomic structure that
enables super conduction, albeit at a different physical extreme.
Increased compression rather than decreased temperature. The
consequences of each case taken separately are startling (see
johnreed
take 6 and addendum to same and johnreed take 23 - Dark Matter).
Taken
together, they are even more startling. The compression is theorized
to force an efficient constructive join prior to a collapse. Unlike
Black holes which absurdly solely follow from our quantitative but
nonetheless subjective notion for mass generated gravity. Action and
reaction is alive and well as follows:
Where observed electro-magnetism manifests with efficient atomic
structure and resists, conducts, attracts, or repels, by virtue of
different states of atomic structure. Where we have produced magnets
out of plastic by modifying an atomic quantity we call spin. Where
when we reduce the Earth's (or a bar magnet's) magnetic field
structure and view it as a projection of a single atom, it is
reasonable to suspect that the observed magnetic field structure
reflects an especially 'efficient' state of atomic structure (see the
brief introduction to this idea in Take 6 and addendum to same),
where
atomic structure in general, optimally efficient or not, is based on
the structural principle of the observed magnetic field itself
(broadly justified here on the introductory face, in terms of the
well
worn notion of "form follows function").
I put forward the idea of "constructive fusion" where the extreme
pressure theorized to exist within star forming galactic clouds
results in a collapsed, super efficient, contiguous, 'neutron star'
order of magnitude massive, electromagnetic star core, that attracts
or repels (not clearly obvious yet in all cases) all forms of matter,
at any stage of atomic structure, efficient or not. This star core is
the source of super electromagnetism.
If viable, this idea replaces the intellectually untenable blackhole
as well as the neutron star. Moreover, it replaces the idea of
particles in equilibrium for atomic structure. Where here, the atom is
built mathematically, starting from the simplest Occam's razor
representation for a 3D object. That is two circles set orthogonally
with each circle circumference passing through the center of the
other
circle. The periodic table can be mirrored using this template as the
primordial base for an atomic ring structure. One can see rings,
strings, or threads, here. Constructive fusion for star formation
mechanics follows from this structure.
Author's Afternote
Starting from this physical locked join of two rings (representing
say, tired light), a straight forward initially qualitative schematic
representation for atomic structure unfolds. It soon grows in
complexity in any form other than the original orthogonal ring
structure, where additional rings are added on the same planes. Here
one set of rings contracts representing the nucleus while the other
set expands representing the orbital's which orbital's separate
arranging themselves uniformly around the contracted nucleus
according
to shell locations as reflected by the periodic table. The outermost
orbital's are active and interface with the atom's external surround.
The removal or ejection or absorption of an electron is metered by
the
atom where a 'hole' or non shell filling condition near the nucleus
manifests as a metered charged property of the atom itself. Its
missing or excess charge. Thus quantification of a standard magnitude
for charge follows logically. The collapse of the wave function here
(the orbital itself) is the ejected and/or absorbed electron. The wave
function orbits as an integral unit describing a torus around the
nucleus. However the symmetry of this stable state is broken with
electric current which must pass through the nucleus in this proposed
structure for the atom.
Endnote
[1] See the paper by Andre Michaud at: http://www.wbabin.net/science/michaud1.pdf
johnreed |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:57 am
|
|
