Call the Police = Get Strip Searched

Main Page | Report this Page

Science Forum Index » Energy - Hydrogen Forum » Call the Police = Get Strip Searched

Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Author

Message

Guest

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:02 pm

On Feb 2, 6:33 pm, Wanted Dead or Alive
<Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:

On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:54:19 -0800, "Jakthehammer" <jakthh...@aol.com
wrote:

"Wanted Dead or Alive" <Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c8l9q3p3ud01ialmue3f52v
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:38:24 -0000, AZ Nomad
aznoma...@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:20:23 -0600, Wanted Dead or Alive
Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800 (PST), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:

http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Just post the article HERE please. Comcast won't let me connect with
this forbidden article.

Never ascribe malice to that which can be just as easily explained by
ignorance and stupdity. Comcast doesn't block it. It is the crappy
server
that the article is on and and your own stupdity that is your problem.

I'm not stupid. I got the connection. WITHOUT your help. Or anybody
else's.

Hey you A to Z,

The other fucker is Not DUMB, but you are. the site has a Virus! I
checked it, Virus can never attack me because I am its
master........Heehee.......Donchaknow?................

That is WHY Internet Explorer wouldn't let me connect to it.
Mozilla Firefox did, but no viruses were detected. Or they were
filtered.

WHICH virus did you detect? NAME IT. OR GO HANG YOURSELF.

Lg- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Lawrence,

I'm don't recall the name of the worm, but on reboot of your computer
it installs "webcry", or tries to unless blocked, plus multiple
instances of "Adaware" and other less malicious programs. Webcry
primarily redirects the ouput of your search engine to a sales looking
website called "webcry.com". If you get it, you'll know when you
first try to use your seach engine. Very nasty, and generally on XP
Pro it requires an edit of the registry to fix, plus a second
uninfected computer to search how to fix it. If your computer has not
been yet infected, use Google and search on "webcry virus fix" for a
better explanation of how it operates and a solution.

Norton Internet Protect does not appear to detect it, and but there is
a little $29 program names Spyware Doctor that detects and blocks it,
and also can effectively remove it (which I am told is worth alone the
$29 price). PC Tools sells it and, no, I don't get a cut of the action
or have any interest in the firm.

I have had several friends that became infected with webcry, and on
the first one it took over a week of careful registry editing to
eliminate it manually. After going through the initial learning
curves, others were much easier, say two hour/computer. After the
third I purchased Spyware Doctor, which reduces the fix to about 10-
minites.

When I attempted to access the cited website, all kinds of red flags
were sent by Norton, but it was the little $29 package that detected
it, identified the nature and name of the threat, and totally blocked
it. Trust me, you don't want to have your computer infected by this
guy!

You asked the question, and I answered it, for now I'll forgo my
premature hanging! :-)

Harry C.

p.s., The mystery to me is why some people create and propagate
viruses/worms like this one. I'm told that it is most commonly
propagated while watching a free video from a porn site, which puzzles
me. I had presumed that the shady operators of Internet porn sites
gave away pictures and videos in order to attracts paying subscribers,
so why alienate potential purchases by infesting their machines with a
worm or virus? More interesting still is why is this now showing up
on private web servers that are totally unrelated to the porn industry
(I'm tempted to believe that the operators of these sites are unaware
that they are infected.) If you have a better explanation, please
post it. My guess is that it is similar to an email virus that was
kicking about about 4 years ago that attached itself to every piece of
email leaving and infected machine. Today they may be attching
themselves to the websites rather than the emails. Just a guess.

Guest

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:32 pm

On Feb 2, 8:35 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:

Quote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800, knews4u2chew wrote:
http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Natural progression when the police become militarized. Nobody should be
surprised. Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to the contrary they
are hired for obedience. Again, don't blame the grunts, blame the policy
makers and leaders.

-- Regards, Curly

Curly, I tend to agree with your post, but do not fail to realize that
many of those beat cops become more savy than many technical
professionals about what takes place on the streets. I seriously
admire the vast majority of them, since they are the very first to
come to your help when you seriously need help.

Boston's beat cops and traffic cops are noted for being tough, and not
good guys to fool around with. They seem to have this unique ability
to judge people by simply looking at them, than does a trained
psychologist with years of experience. I live in the 'burbs, but when
in Boston City (as we 'burb dwellers call it), our family has had only
3 encounters with the guys that police the streets...all beneficial.
The undercover police that protect the Farmer's Market and Quincy
Market are also spectacular. No need to go into the details.

Now I have not been able to view the link that knews4u2c posted, but I
am quite sure that what took place was appropriate to the
curcumstances at hand, since the press is notorious for not mentioning
all the details. This is not just on blind faith, but what police
officers are going to risk all of their career benefits (and frankly,
these are about as good as benefits and retirements get), for breaking
a rule. Quite likely, some factor that went unmentioned in the article
justified a strip search. I have no way of knowing if it did, but I do
have a neighbor who is a police officer, and he definitely hold the
view that you never want to get closer to an offender than duty
requires. This risk of contracting some disease or being charged with
abuse of authority is simply too great. That makes simple sense to me.

Let's not be inclined to pass judgement until we know ALL of the
facts, and right now I know none of them except knews4u2c's headline,
which if it is similar to the majority of his posts is not very
credible.

Harry C.

Ed Stasiak

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:05 pm

Guest

Quote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote

Natural progression when the police become militarized. Nobody should
be surprised. Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to the contrary they
are hired for obedience. Again, don't blame the grunts, blame the policy
makers and leaders.

Ed Stasiak

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:10 pm

Guest

Quote:

hhc314 wrote

Now I have not been able to view the link that knews4u2c posted, but I
am quite sure that what took place was appropriate to the curcumstances
at hand,

Then I suggest you take a look at the link provided by Winston_Smith;

http://search.wkyc.com/sp?aff=100&keywords=strip+search&submit=Go

Quote:

since the press is notorious for not mentioning all the details.

Except that in this case it seems it's the _police_ who aren't
mentioning
all the details, providing only a suspiciously edited tape of the
events even
thou it's clear that the entire thing was filmed from the start.

Nor do the police explain why the woman was arrested in the first
place,
or why she was stripped naked, or why male officers participated, or
why
she was left naked in a cell for 6 hours.

Guest

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:35 pm

On Feb 4, 12:10 am, Ed Stasiak <estas...@att.net> wrote:

Quote:

hhc314 wrote

Now I have not been able to view the link that knews4u2c posted, but I
am quite sure that what took place was appropriate to the curcumstances
at hand,

Then I suggest you take a look at the link provided by Winston_Smith;

http://search.wkyc.com/sp?aff=100&keywords=strip+search&submit=Go

since the press is notorious for not mentioning all the details.

Except that in this case it seems it's the _police_ who aren't
mentioning
all the details, providing only a suspiciously edited tape of the
events even
thou it's clear that the entire thing was filmed from the start.

Nor do the police explain why the woman was arrested in the first
place,
or why she was stripped naked, or why male officers participated, or
why
she was left naked in a cell for 6 hours.

You actually believe this crap? Take a look at the source of this
information, and its history.

If you really believe that the many police officers involved in this
situation would be willing to lose their pensions if the treatment of
this ;prisoner was not precisely conducted by the rules, then friend
you are living on a different planet than I am.

You will note that the link that you posted contains absoutely no
detail about why the woman was arrested, nor any facts. I want to know
what the details are, what the arrest caue was, what the arrest
situation was, not just the crap that some gutter rag decides to post.
If I knew the facts, I might believe that the police had reason to
suspect her of being a "drug mule" for which elder women and pregnant
girls are frequently employed. Still, the total lack of facts about
this prevents the formation of any informed opinion. What the limited
amount of information so far posted suggests is that the police may
have had very good reason to believe that she was working as a "drug
mule", which can be for many women in financial hardship, a desperate
method of earning an income.

Time for kids to change to another post, because I am going to
graphically describe what a "drug mule" is. Are the kids now gone?
Ok, the drugs like cocane are generally packaged in a condom, and to
avoid detection in a strip search, the mule generally swallows the
drug packed consoms, typically 3 or 4, which are temporarily stored in
the somach. (Men can do this too, but male mules are rare.) When in a
safe target destination, the mule will ingest a quality of a laxitive
like mineral oil to aid in the expusion of the drug filled condoms in
a bowel movement, during which the drug filled condoms are carefully
removed, washed, and returned to the drug merchant.

This seems kind of gross to a majority of readers, but this is the way
the world is today. Five years ago, the drug shipment were simply
stuffed into vaginas, or the anus leading to the colon, but internal
searches effectively halted this.

Now for those without creative imagination, the reason why suspected
drug mules must be held in isolation, is simply becasue the police do
not want ther cargo to be flushed down a toilet. Were that possible,
the evidence would be destroyed.

Does this make sense to any of you, as to why the police do what they
do?

Now it is reasonable for anyone to ask, what make the police suspect
anyone of being a "drug mule"? This is an honest enough qustion. I
really don't think that I would be a very good candidate for being
suspected of being a drug mule, because I have only been out of the
country once during the past 5 years, and then on a round trip to
Belgum.

Now compare that to the travel records of someone who makes 4 or more
round trips to South America each year, with no documented business or
personal needs to do so. How about someone who makes monthly round-
trip visits to a place like Colombia? Would you possibly suspect
someone like this as being a potential drug mule, or simply ignore the
travel frequency?

It is little details like this that are missing from the news report.

If you find out what the facts in this case actually are, please post
them. You might want to start with the police reports, which are
generally the starting points for any investigation. What the tabloid
press posts in generally nothing but hyperbole devoid of fact, and is
thus meaningless

.Harry C.

p.s., If on the job for say 15 years as a police officer, would you be
willing to lose your earned pension by pulling a stupid stunt like
this? Think about Ockham's Razor in this connection. If you don't
know what the concept of Ockham's Razor is, then Google it.

zzbunker@netscape.net

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:22 pm

Guest

On Feb 3, 10:32 pm, hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:

On Feb 2, 8:35 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800, knews4u2chew wrote:
http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Natural progression when the police become militarized. Nobody should be
surprised. Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to the contrary they
are hired for obedience. Again, don't blame the grunts, blame the policy
makers and leaders.

-- Regards, Curly

Curly, I tend to agree with your post, but do not fail to realize that
many of those beat cops become more savy than many technical
professionals about what takes place on the streets. I seriously
admire the vast majority of them, since they are the very first to
come to your help when you seriously need help.

But the technical professionals have been telling the cops
for at least 50 years now, what's going to happen when you bring
modern military technology to a moron street fight. And who's
gonna lose. But a lot of the cops and their idiot mayors and
supervisors
take is as an election or media joke. So until you get rid of the
idiots
running the zoos, the zoos aren't going to change.

Quote:

Boston's beat cops and traffic cops are noted for being tough, and not
good guys to fool around with. They seem to have this unique ability
to judge people by simply looking at them, than does a trained
psychologist with years of experience. I live in the 'burbs, but when
in Boston City (as we 'burb dwellers call it), our family has had only
3 encounters with the guys that police the streets...all beneficial.
The undercover police that protect the Farmer's Market and Quincy
Market are also spectacular. No need to go into the details.

Now I have not been able to view the link that knews4u2c posted, but I
am quite sure that what took place was appropriate to the
curcumstances at hand, since the press is notorious for not mentioning
all the details. This is not just on blind faith, but what police
officers are going to risk all of their career benefits (and frankly,
these are about as good as benefits and retirements get), for breaking
a rule. Quite likely, some factor that went unmentioned in the article
justified a strip search. I have no way of knowing if it did, but I do
have a neighbor who is a police officer, and he definitely hold the
view that you never want to get closer to an offender than duty
requires. This risk of contracting some disease or being charged with
abuse of authority is simply too great. That makes simple sense to me.

Let's not be inclined to pass judgement until we know ALL of the
facts, and right now I know none of them except knews4u2c's headline,
which if it is similar to the majority of his posts is not very
credible.

Harry C.

Wanted Dead or Alive

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:23 am

Guest

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:02:09 -0800 (PST), hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:

On Feb 2, 6:33 pm, Wanted Dead or Alive
Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:54:19 -0800, "Jakthehammer" <jakthh...@aol.com
wrote:

"Wanted Dead or Alive" <Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c8l9q3p3ud01ialmue3f52v
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:38:24 -0000, AZ Nomad
aznoma...@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:20:23 -0600, Wanted Dead or Alive
Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800 (PST), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:

http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Just post the article HERE please. Comcast won't let me connect with
this forbidden article.

Never ascribe malice to that which can be just as easily explained by
ignorance and stupdity. Comcast doesn't block it. It is the crappy
server
that the article is on and and your own stupdity that is your problem.

I'm not stupid. I got the connection. WITHOUT your help. Or anybody
else's.

Hey you A to Z,

The other fucker is Not DUMB, but you are. the site has a Virus! I
checked it, Virus can never attack me because I am its
master........Heehee.......Donchaknow?................

That is WHY Internet Explorer wouldn't let me connect to it.
Mozilla Firefox did, but no viruses were detected. Or they were
filtered.

WHICH virus did you detect? NAME IT. OR GO HANG YOURSELF.

Lg- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Lawrence,

I'm don't recall the name of the worm, but on reboot of your computer
it installs "webcry", or tries to unless blocked, plus multiple
instances of "Adaware" and other less malicious programs. Webcry
primarily redirects the ouput of your search engine to a sales looking
website called "webcry.com". If you get it, you'll know when you
first try to use your seach engine. Very nasty, and generally on XP
Pro it requires an edit of the registry to fix, plus a second
uninfected computer to search how to fix it. If your computer has not
been yet infected, use Google and search on "webcry virus fix" for a
better explanation of how it operates and a solution.

Norton Internet Protect does not appear to detect it, and but there is
a little $29 program names Spyware Doctor that detects and blocks it,
and also can effectively remove it (which I am told is worth alone the
$29 price). PC Tools sells it and, no, I don't get a cut of the action
or have any interest in the firm.

I have had several friends that became infected with webcry, and on
the first one it took over a week of careful registry editing to
eliminate it manually. After going through the initial learning
curves, others were much easier, say two hour/computer. After the
third I purchased Spyware Doctor, which reduces the fix to about 10-
minites.

When I attempted to access the cited website, all kinds of red flags
were sent by Norton, but it was the little $29 package that detected
it, identified the nature and name of the threat, and totally blocked
it. Trust me, you don't want to have your computer infected by this
guy!

You asked the question, and I answered it, for now I'll forgo my
premature hanging! :-)

Harry C.

p.s., The mystery to me is why some people create and propagate
viruses/worms like this one. I'm told that it is most commonly
propagated while watching a free video from a porn site, which puzzles
me. I had presumed that the shady operators of Internet porn sites
gave away pictures and videos in order to attracts paying subscribers,
so why alienate potential purchases by infesting their machines with a
worm or virus? More interesting still is why is this now showing up
on private web servers that are totally unrelated to the porn industry
(I'm tempted to believe that the operators of these sites are unaware
that they are infected.) If you have a better explanation, please
post it. My guess is that it is similar to an email virus that was
kicking about about 4 years ago that attached itself to every piece of
email leaving and infected machine. Today they may be attching
themselves to the websites rather than the emails. Just a guess.

Thank You so much, Harry C. I very much appreciate this information.
I am going to install and run Spyware Doctor right now.

Lg

Curly Surmudgeon

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:22 am

Guest

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:32:42 -0800, hhc314 wrote:

Quote:

On Feb 2, 8:35 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800, knews4u2chew wrote:
http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Natural progression when the police become militarized. Nobody should
be surprised. Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to the contrary
they are hired for obedience. Again, don't blame the grunts, blame the
policy makers and leaders.

-- Regards, Curly

Curly, I tend to agree with your post, but do not fail to realize that
many of those beat cops become more savy than many technical professionals
about what takes place on the streets. I seriously admire the vast
majority of them, since they are the very first to come to your help when
you seriously need help.

"IS," Intelligence Savy, is different than Intelligence Quotient or
Emotional Quotient. I'll agree that IS is an important tool in "law"
enforcement and that the majority of cops are trying to do the right
thing as they believe it to be.

Three of my cousins were cops, good cops, now retired. One has been shot
another lost 85% use of his left forearm in the line of duty. I'm not
anti-cop, I'm anti-cowboy.

With good leaders and direction this shit wouldn't be happening.

Quote:

Perhaps I'm reading more into this than was implied but my take on the
video was that they though she was suicidal and removed her clothing to
prevent hanging herself. That's a ridiculous assumption but the kind that
might cause such a scenario. Then they fucked up the proceedure by using
force and male officers with other males looking on.

Remember, this lady _called_ the police _herself_! Her "crime" was giving
the office her dead sister's drivers license when asked for hers. Given
that she was already terrified (she called 911 remember) and probably not
thinking clearly her explanation was reasonable and she had no reason to
lie about her identity, she was a wife and homemaker.

The cops made a huge blunder, they became a mob attacking a 125lb woman.
Those cops, their department, the municipality, the mayor, and the janitor
are going to pay big-time.

This is a natural outcome with recent moves by the feds to militarize our
local police forces. Arming them with helicopters, chemical weapons,
rubber bullets, tazers, bean bag shotguns, stun grenades, M-14's,
warranteless searches, and training to abuse all these new toys.

This kind of crime was/is inevitable, pre-ordained. It's not the cops
fault, its the leaders who put draconian laws into effect, fascists into
office, and use fear to cow the populace. Illegal laws too, nobody should
submit to bad law or police authority misused or misplaced.

Ultimately the fault is those who voted these politicians into power.

Quote:

I have no way of knowing if it did, but I do have a
neighbor who is a police officer, and he definitely hold the view that
you never want to get closer to an offender than duty requires. This
risk of contracting some disease or being charged with abuse of
authority is simply too great. That makes simple sense to me.

I had a cop neighbor too, the bad kind. Had the whole neighborhood
intimidated. No longer do I want one as a neighbor. The risk of peace
and tranquility is just too great.

Quote:

Let's not be inclined to pass judgement until we know ALL of the facts,
and right now I know none of them except knews4u2c's headline, which if
it is similar to the majority of his posts is not very credible.

Harry C.

In this case police action is so over the top that facts aren't relevant.
There is no excuse for this brutality.

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Osama didn't win, Bush lost. Strike that, Osama didn't win, _we_ lost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jakthehammer

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:30 am

Guest

"Wanted Dead or Alive" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:829dq39nea7i3p7hpq2tnaakvo6ghpgsrm@4ax.com...

Quote:

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:02:09 -0800 (PST), hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:

On Feb 2, 6:33 pm, Wanted Dead or Alive
Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:54:19 -0800, "Jakthehammer" <jakthh...@aol.com
wrote:

"Wanted Dead or Alive" <Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote in
message
news:c8l9q3p3ud01ialmue3f52v
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:38:24 -0000, AZ Nomad
aznoma...@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:20:23 -0600, Wanted Dead or Alive
Lawrence_Glick...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:35:05 -0800 (PST), knews4u2c...@yahoo.com
wrote:

http://podblanc.com/?q=node/13519

The inmates are running the Asylum.

Just post the article HERE please. Comcast won't let me connect
with
this forbidden article.

Never ascribe malice to that which can be just as easily explained
by
ignorance and stupdity. Comcast doesn't block it. It is the crappy
server
that the article is on and and your own stupdity that is your
problem.

I'm not stupid. I got the connection. WITHOUT your help. Or anybody
else's.

Hey you A to Z,

The other fucker is Not DUMB, but you are. the site has a Virus! I
checked it, Virus can never attack me because I am its
master........Heehee.......Donchaknow?................

That is WHY Internet Explorer wouldn't let me connect to it.
Mozilla Firefox did, but no viruses were detected. Or they were
filtered.

WHICH virus did you detect? NAME IT. OR GO HANG YOURSELF.

Lg- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Lawrence,

I'm don't recall the name of the worm, but on reboot of your computer
it installs "webcry", or tries to unless blocked, plus multiple
instances of "Adaware" and other less malicious programs. Webcry
primarily redirects the ouput of your search engine to a sales looking
website called "webcry.com". If you get it, you'll know when you
first try to use your seach engine. Very nasty, and generally on XP
Pro it requires an edit of the registry to fix, plus a second
uninfected computer to search how to fix it. If your computer has not
been yet infected, use Google and search on "webcry virus fix" for a
better explanation of how it operates and a solution.

Norton Internet Protect does not appear to detect it, and but there is
a little $29 program names Spyware Doctor that detects and blocks it,
and also can effectively remove it (which I am told is worth alone the
$29 price). PC Tools sells it and, no, I don't get a cut of the action
or have any interest in the firm.

I have had several friends that became infected with webcry, and on
the first one it took over a week of careful registry editing to
eliminate it manually. After going through the initial learning
curves, others were much easier, say two hour/computer. After the
third I purchased Spyware Doctor, which reduces the fix to about 10-
minites.

When I attempted to access the cited website, all kinds of red flags
were sent by Norton, but it was the little $29 package that detected
it, identified the nature and name of the threat, and totally blocked
it. Trust me, you don't want to have your computer infected by this
guy!

You asked the question, and I answered it, for now I'll forgo my
premature hanging! :-)

Harry C.

p.s., The mystery to me is why some people create and propagate
viruses/worms like this one. I'm told that it is most commonly
propagated while watching a free video from a porn site, which puzzles
me. I had presumed that the shady operators of Internet porn sites
gave away pictures and videos in order to attracts paying subscribers,
so why alienate potential purchases by infesting their machines with a
worm or virus? More interesting still is why is this now showing up
on private web servers that are totally unrelated to the porn industry
(I'm tempted to believe that the operators of these sites are unaware
that they are infected.) If you have a better explanation, please
post it. My guess is that it is similar to an email virus that was
kicking about about 4 years ago that attached itself to every piece of
email leaving and infected machine. Today they may be attching
themselves to the websites rather than the emails. Just a guess.

Thank You so much, Harry C. I very much appreciate this information.
I am going to install and run Spyware Doctor right now.

Lg

The problem is, you were too negative about my advice. Don't fight with
the truth, or you won't get it. Poor Larry, I wish you grow up sooner so
we can have a better communication....Heehee..........

Jakthehammer

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:12 am

Guest

"Wanted Dead or Alive" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:13oaq3l8c1mponk7ocnlavtn0u75a5nj15@4ax.com...

Quote:

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:50:39 -0000, AZ Nomad
aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote:

On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:06:52 -0800, Jakthehammer <jakthhmmr@aol.com
wrote:

Yup...Pussie of Mafia...Heehee......DumbAss Eat shit now before it runs
away from you......Heehee........

Which brings up another aphorism for you:

It is better to be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all
doubt.

I find it astonishing that Law Enforcement allows zombies like
JaketheJackoff to roam at large. Of course, to LE, JaketheJackoff is
perceived as a potential employee.

Lg

Me too, I find it hard why such dumbfuck Larry was created in the first
place, The world would be better off without him....Heehee....... So
stupid, so idiotic...Heehee.....

Jakthehammer

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:16 am

Guest

"AZ Nomad" <aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
news:slrnfqalhf.6b1.aznomad.2@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net...

Quote:

On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:06:52 -0800, Jakthehammer <jakthhmmr@aol.com
wrote:

Yup...Pussie of Mafia...Heehee......DumbAss Eat shit now before it runs
away from you......Heehee........

Which brings up another aphorism for you:

It is better to be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all
doubt.

AZ stands for Alzheimer victim. Your brain indicates correctly that you
have abundance of it. Heehee.........

AZ Nomad

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:33 am

Guest

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:37:06 -0600, Wanted Dead or Alive <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

Quote:

Thank You so much, Harry C. I very much appreciate this information.
I am going to install and run Spyware Doctor right now.

You needed to quote 118 lines to add on a comment that you're an idiot using
a piece of shit excuse for an operating system?

What the hell is the matter with you?

AZ Nomad

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:34 am

Guest

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:16:27 -0800, Jakthehammer <jakthhmmr@aol.com> wrote:

Quote:

"AZ Nomad" <aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
news:slrnfqalhf.6b1.aznomad.2@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net...
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:06:52 -0800, Jakthehammer <jakthhmmr@aol.com
wrote:

Yup...Pussie of Mafia...Heehee......DumbAss Eat shit now before it runs
away from you......Heehee........

Which brings up another aphorism for you:

It is better to be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all
doubt.

Quote:

AZ stands for Alzheimer victim. Your brain indicates correctly that you
have abundance of it. Heehee.........

We don't need any more proof that you're a fool. You've already done nicely.

chasseur

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:35 am

Guest

"Ed Stasiak" <estasiak@att.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:ebeaa498-9641-4ac9-b831-68e39d38bbf5@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Quote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote

Natural progression when the police become militarized. Nobody should
be surprised. Beat cops aren't hired for intelligence, to the contrary
they
are hired for obedience. Again, don't blame the grunts, blame the policy
makers and leaders.

I disagree. If the "grunts" don't pay the penalty for their actions
along
with their superiors, (loss of job, pension and jail time) then
incidents
like this will only continue to happen.

"I was only following orders" is an unacceptable answer.

The simple fact that there is an omnipresent "Code of silence" amongst cops
says it all in my view. They consider themselves above the law and entitled
to the "right" to collateral damage. Throw in also the occasional
"example" to keep the "little people" in line and you have a pretty good
picture of how things are. As far as I am concerned they are a threat high
on the list of threats and all analysis and verifiable intel is useful and
welcome. They don't like the reputation they have, fine, let's see them
clean up their backyard.

Chasseur

Wanted Dead or Alive

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:45 pm

Guest

On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:33:39 -0000, AZ Nomad
<aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote:

Quote:

On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:37:06 -0600, Wanted Dead or Alive <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

Thank You so much, Harry C. I very much appreciate this information.
I am going to install and run Spyware Doctor right now.

You needed to quote 118 lines to add on a comment that you're an idiot using
a piece of shit excuse for an operating system?

What the hell is the matter with you?

I detect a lot of hostility here. What the hell is the matter with
YOU?

Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next All times are GMT - 5 Hours The time now is Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:21 pm Science Forum Index