Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Optics Forum  »  Conic constant temperature invariant?
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Florian
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:58 pm
Guest
Hello fellows,

I am doing some thinking about the temperature dependence of the conic
constant of a non-spherical surface. Can anybody recommand literature about
this topic or knows how it behaves? I would like to know if the concic
constant changes when e.g. a hyperbolic mirror is heated homogenously.

Thank you very much,

Greetings

Florian
Richard F.L.R.Snashall
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:19 pm
Guest
Florian wrote:
Quote:
Hello fellows,

I am doing some thinking about the temperature dependence of the conic
constant of a non-spherical surface. Can anybody recommand literature about
this topic or knows how it behaves? I would like to know if the concic
constant changes when e.g. a hyperbolic mirror is heated homogenously.

There is no change in the conic conic constant when the mirror is
heated homogeneously. The only parts that change is the [central]
radius of curvature and the size/thickness.
Florian
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:20 am
Guest
Hello Richard,

thank you very much for the answer. Can you also tell me some literature
where I can find information about the thermal analysis of optical elements?

Greetings

Florian


"Richard F.L.R.Snashall" <rflrs@notnotrcn.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:x9CdnbUi-YQxuAvanZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@rcn.net...
Quote:
Florian wrote:
Hello fellows,

I am doing some thinking about the temperature dependence of the conic
constant of a non-spherical surface. Can anybody recommand literature
about this topic or knows how it behaves? I would like to know if the
concic constant changes when e.g. a hyperbolic mirror is heated
homogenously.

There is no change in the conic conic constant when the mirror is
heated homogeneously. The only parts that change is the [central]
radius of curvature and the size/thickness.
Richard F.L.R.Snashall
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:27 am
Guest
Florian wrote:
Quote:
Hello Richard,

thank you very much for the answer. Can you also tell me some literature
where I can find information about the thermal analysis of optical elements?

Your first question was simple enough to be demonstrable.

However, I'm not familiar enough with the topic to answer
your second question.
Guest
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:07 pm
Quote:
thank you very much for the answer. Can you also tell me some literature
where I can find information about the thermal analysis of optical elements?

Greetings

Florian

Florian:


You can find some info in Chapter 39 Thermal Compensation Techniques
by Phillip Rodgers and Michael Roberts in Hdbk of Optics Vol I
They talk about the active and passive athermalization of optical
system.

For thermal analysis of optics mounts see Paul Yoder's book on
Mounting Optics in Optical Instruments
and also Chap 9 by Victor Genberg in Hdbk of Optomechanical
Engineering by Anees Ahmad
Genberg and Co also have a book on thermal modeling FEA of optical
systems

For optical design specifics look up athermalization in Applied
Optics, JOSA A&B and SPIE Proceedings

Thanks for asking the question, I had not thought about this and had
to think back to my calculus of conic section and ellipses &
hyperbolas.
Right now I am not sure I agree with the answer given yet, can you
tell us more about the rest of the system?

Are these mirrors in a telescope or hyperbolic lens surfaces?

Thanks,

Michael
www.oscintl.com
Florian
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:39 am
Guest
Thank you for the answer.

The concic surfaces are two mirrors (hyperbolic) in a Richey-Chretien
Telescope.

Greetings

Florian

<mpate@oscintl.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:eb79eba6-7f35-406c-be9f-4435a078777b@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
thank you very much for the answer. Can you also tell me some literature
where I can find information about the thermal analysis of optical
elements?

Greetings

Florian

Florian:

You can find some info in Chapter 39 Thermal Compensation Techniques
by Phillip Rodgers and Michael Roberts in Hdbk of Optics Vol I
They talk about the active and passive athermalization of optical
system.

For thermal analysis of optics mounts see Paul Yoder's book on
Mounting Optics in Optical Instruments
and also Chap 9 by Victor Genberg in Hdbk of Optomechanical
Engineering by Anees Ahmad
Genberg and Co also have a book on thermal modeling FEA of optical
systems

For optical design specifics look up athermalization in Applied
Optics, JOSA A&B and SPIE Proceedings

Thanks for asking the question, I had not thought about this and had
to think back to my calculus of conic section and ellipses &
hyperbolas.
Right now I am not sure I agree with the answer given yet, can you
tell us more about the rest of the system?

Are these mirrors in a telescope or hyperbolic lens surfaces?

Thanks,

Michael
www.oscintl.com
Guest
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:05 pm
Quote:
Right now I am not sure I agree with the answer given yet, can you
tell us more about the rest of the system?

Are these mirrors in a telescope or hyperbolic lens surfaces?

After having done some more thinking and some ray tracing I do agree
with Richards answer.
The conic constant of the hyperbola stays the same, and the vertex
radii changes.

If this is in a two mirrors (hyperbolic) in a Richey-Chretien
Telescope and the mirrors are glass and seperated with aluminum
housing between the primary and secondary mirror.
As the telescope is heated the telescope goes out of focus.
In my thermal model (113mm efl, f/4.7, 0.1 deg field) the design has a
5um spot size and with a 20 deg C temp change it went to a 400um spot
and then after refocusing it came back to about 7.5um spot size.
The two main aberrations were spherical and asti at both temps, the
spherical changed signs and the asti was about the same and mainly
from the primary mirror.

Very interesting.

Michael
www.oscintl.com
Richard F.L.R.Snashall
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:51 am
Guest
Florian wrote:
Quote:
Hello fellows,

I am doing some thinking about the temperature dependence of the conic
constant of a non-spherical surface. Can anybody recommand literature about
this topic or knows how it behaves? I would like to know if the concic
constant changes when e.g. a hyperbolic mirror is heated homogenously.

This just came from Robert Houdart in another group. It might relate
to your problem:

Quote:
I've recently created a software that can help to evaluate the thermal
behavior of a telescope mirror. Here's a screen shot of the application:
www.cruxis.com/scope/img/MirrorCooling_1.gif .

The application simulates the temperature evolution in a mirror subject
to varying ambient temperature and chosen heat transfer conditions on
the front and back surface. It displays a plot of the temperature
profile at every time step, and a graph of the evolution of the mirror
core, optical surface and air temperature.

You can download the software:
www.cruxis.com/scope/download/MirrorCooling.zip . The archive contains a
single executable file MirrorCooling.exe.
The following parameters are used by the program:
- Mirror Thickness
- Initial Mirror Temperature
- Initial and Final Air Temperature (varying linearly between start and
end)
- Film Coefficients for front and back (recommended values are between 5
and 15 without fans, between 20 and 100 with fans)
- Radiation Coefficients for front and back (0.04 for aluminum coating
on front surface)
- Simulation duration and time step

It's amazing to see how slowly a 2" thick mirror cools if no fans are
installed. And with thinner mirrors you can see how the temperature
drops below the ambient air temperature because of the heat radiation to
the sky.

Any comments, questions or suggestions about the software are welcome.
Cheers,

Robert Houdart
www.cruxis.com/scope
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:49 pm