| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Energy - Hydrogen Forum » The Panic Starts
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Curly Surmudgeon |
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:30:11 -0500, Paul Thomas, CPA wrote:
Quote:
"phil scott" <phil@philscott.net> wrote
Your rose colored glasses were solidly in place
here on this NG a year ago, in denial re the
ramifications of the sub prime mess to a large
extent...
Everyone involved in the sub-prime loans stepped into it of their own free
will.
That's been shown not to be true.
Quote: It's a small fraction of the global loans and global real estate market.
How small?
Quote: It's impact is only magnified today because of other negative economic
factors and the media coverage.
The impact is magnified because of borrowing policies which leverage the
dollars involved. By the time one dollar of mortgage is created $15 is
parlayed in various markets and Fed Reserve dollar creation.
We've not yet seen even the tip of the mortgage disaster yet is already
infecting banking, savings and loan, insurance companies, loan guarantors,
credit markets, international trade, national debt, interest rates and
more.
Quote: ..and now your rose colored glasses are distorting your view of
'recovery'...
Define "recovery".
train wrecks are not recoverable...
But it's just a traain wreck. The wreckage is cleaned up, the track
repaired, lessons learned, the injured treated, the dead buried, and
passengers ride those same rails again - in a very short time. Life
goes on.
Far from over, you're seeing only the first wave.
Quote: The world doesn't come to a grinding stop. All hell doesn't break out.
Ridership on other trains is unaffected.
Yet.
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://feeds.feedburner.com/SL/thegreen
------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Paul Thomas |
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote
Quote: They are priced in dollars (at least here in the US).
That's what I just said, the dollar isn't a valid
reference to compare dollar value by.
Yet, that's how they are priced, and that's how you percieve their *value* -
in US dollars.
Quote: Stop snipping the dialog then use pronouns for reference.
Ok, I'll use adverbs if you'll feel better.
Quote: To recap, we were speaking of the DOW and you said that it
would be worth more in five years in dollars.
And it will. It will take more dollars to buy the same percentage of the
company....pick a company.
Quote: I responded that is a false reference,
You brought it up.
Quote: comparing value in dollars between now and the future
What would you like to compare it to then?
Apples?
Wing Nuts?
Big Macs?
Quote: The companies in the DOW index are trans-national, using any single
currency to value them now and in the future is inherently false.
Then-------what do you propose to value them against?
A glass of water?
A breath of air?
Quote: Ok, doorknobs. What else do you want to put in the basket?
Nothing, let's head to checkout where we'll pay in dollars.
You see, whatever you use will be boiled down to dollars.
Quote: They should be everyday items needed by normal families,
some typical food items, clothing, shoes, transportation,
entertainment and especially foreign currencies.
Oh yeah, foreign currencies are "everyday items needed by normal families".
That reminds me, payday is coming up. Maybe I'll pay my people with a 10
million Zimbabwe dollar note each. Surely it's among your list of "everyday
items needed by normal families". And hey!! They'll have 10 million of
them. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Paul Thomas |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote
Quote: Everyone involved in the sub-prime loans stepped
into it of their own free will.
That's been shown not to be true.
Yeah.........
I've not heard of one person who was forced, beyond their own free will,
actually against their will, into signing a note for a sub-prime loan.
There's laws that would invalidate that contract on the books in all 50
states.
Nope. They might not have *understood* the risks. They might not have
*read* the contract. Greed and lust has a way of blinding some folks into
not caring to understand that what they are doing can be harmful.
No one seemed to care that the market was over blown - way the hell over
blown - yet they kept on buying, and selling, and buying, and buying, and
borrowing against an inflated equity, and buying, and borrowing against an
increasingly bloated unsupportable equity.
The balloon popped. It was a big balloon. It'll take time to pick up the
pieces. But ya know, there'll be winners out of this mess, and there'll be
losers out of this mess. Same for the stock market bubble bust from the
late 90's into the early 00's. People who knew better came out ahead. They
were the ones who made sane choices.
Quote: It's a small fraction of the global loans
and global real estate market.
How small?
Do you not know?
Quote: We've not yet seen even the tip of the mortgage disaster
Yup, there are lots of greedy people out there who didn't bother to read or
understand what they were getting into.....of their own free will.
It's happened before, in other places, with other markets.....
And it'll happend again, in another time and with another market.
It might even happen in the housing market all over again.
We've gotten very good at creating a hyped up market for something - like
who knew that I'd ~need~ to check my e-mail from my phone - what's next? -
making a phone call with my camera?
The stock market was DOOMED-----DOOMED I SAY------and it did go down, and it
came up, and went down, and came up, and came up and went down. And you
know something - it'll go down and come up again, and go down again, and
come up again. Just like the sun.
Same for the housing market. Up - Down - Up - Down - Up - Down - Up. All
you need is a drill seargent barking out cadance.
"Ohhhhhhh.........but the sky is falling...."
Give me a break.
Quote: Far from over, you're seeing only the first wave.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And the cow jumped over the moon, and Ron Paul is going
to have the election stolen from his billions of dedicated followers by the
elite and secretive cartel that rules the world from Area 51, and all those
other wacky things people say. Look, if enough of you make enough claims -
and you guys make all kinds of wild proclomations - you're bound to get
something right every once and a while, and somehow you believe that
validates all the other crap that you put forth.
I predict that housing prices will fall, then go up, then fall again, then
go up.......
I see in the future there will be as many homes sold as there are homes
bought.
--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
----------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:45 am |
|
|
|
|
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:94e6f0c2-56ea-45fb-8802-ff57b8edc201@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 21, 10:14 pm, "Paul Thomas" <paulthomas...@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Quote: "Curly Surmudgeon" <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote
Everyone involved in the sub-prime loans stepped
into it of their own free will.
That's been shown not to be true.
Yeah.........
I've not heard of one person who was forced, beyond their own free will,
actually against their will, into signing a note for a sub-prime loan.
There's laws that would invalidate that contract on the books in all 50
states.
Nope. They might not have *understood* the risks. They might not have
*read* the contract. Greed and lust has a way of blinding some folks into
not caring to understand that what they are doing can be harmful.
No one seemed to care that the market was over blown - way the hell over
blown - yet they kept on buying, and selling, and buying, and buying, and
borrowing against an inflated equity, and buying, and borrowing against an
increasingly bloated unsupportable equity.
The balloon popped. It was a big balloon. It'll take time to pick up the
pieces. But ya know, there'll be winners out of this mess, and there'll be
losers out of this mess. Same for the stock market bubble bust from the
late 90's into the early 00's. People who knew better came out ahead. They
were the ones who made sane choices.
It's a small fraction of the global loans
and global real estate market.
How small?
Do you not know?
We've not yet seen even the tip of the mortgage disaster
Yup, there are lots of greedy people out there who didn't bother to read
or
understand what they were getting into.....of their own free will.
It's happened before, in other places, with other markets.....
And it'll happend again, in another time and with another market.
It might even happen in the housing market all over again.
We've gotten very good at creating a hyped up market for something - like
who knew that I'd ~need~ to check my e-mail from my phone - what's next? -
making a phone call with my camera?
The stock market was DOOMED-----DOOMED I SAY------and it did go down, and
it
came up, and went down, and came up, and came up and went down. And you
know something - it'll go down and come up again, and go down again, and
come up again. Just like the sun.
Same for the housing market. Up - Down - Up - Down - Up - Down - Up. All
you need is a drill seargent barking out cadance.
"Ohhhhhhh.........but the sky is falling...."
Give me a break.
Far from over, you're seeing only the first wave.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And the cow jumped over the moon, and Ron Paul is going
to have the election stolen from his billions of dedicated followers by
the
elite and secretive cartel that rules the world from Area 51, and all
those
other wacky things people say. Look, if enough of you make enough claims -
and you guys make all kinds of wild proclomations - you're bound to get
something right every once and a while, and somehow you believe that
validates all the other crap that you put forth.
I predict that housing prices will fall, then go up, then fall again, then
go up.......
I see in the future there will be as many homes sold as there are homes
bought.
--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
----------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia
Anyone want to predict what Tuesday will bring?
TMT
I predict you will suffer more on oil, by January 31, 2008. $125/barrel
could pop up, $200/barrel by the end of 2009. Don't blame me when I
laugh, because you guys never want to listen to me, you believe intelligent
people ought to have perfect English, that's your flaw right there.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:20 am |
|
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
Quote: Anyone want to predict what Tuesday will bring?
Buying opportunities. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:24 am |
|
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism theloneranger100@aol.com wrote:
Quote: stocks will not be struggling...they will be sinking...then turning to
sludge at the bottom of the pond shortly..
My advice to you is to short some indexes. If you are confident in your
prediction, you could make a fortune.
But do you EVER bet your resources on your dire predictions? Or do you
jsut stand on the sidelines, gibbering about things of which you have
litte knowledge?
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:31 am |
|
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism Curly Surmudgeon <Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote:
Quote: Not really, both are based upon the value of the dollar not any basis in
reality. The dollar is disintegrating,
Think about that. So if the stocks are higher, and dollars are worth
less, then the stocks are MUCH higher in real terms.
Quote: Lost of things move in different directions for lots of reasons.
Gold and other hard commodities like that often move in opposite
directions than that of stocks.
Then pick a basket of commodities.
I pick residential real estate. So far, the dollar has gottn MUCH more
valuable. I can buy LOTS more house for the same dollars.
Ain't it great!
Of course, if I were to pick imported luxury goods, the story would be
different.
Maybe stocks are the way to go - they will rise as the dollar falls, right
Curley?
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:35 am |
|
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism Paul Thomas <paulthomascpa@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Quote: Nothing, let's head to checkout where we'll pay in dollars.
You see, whatever you use will be boiled down to dollars.
That is his basic misconception, right there. He is very confused by
foreign exchange rates, and their effect upon domestic transactions.
Quote: They should be everyday items needed by normal families,
some typical food items, clothing, shoes, transportation,
entertainment and especially foreign currencies.
Oh yeah, foreign currencies are "everyday items needed by normal families".
Yes, this nicely ilustrates the misconception.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:40 am |
|
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism P. Maffia <pmaffia@centurytel.net> wrote:
Quote: In simple words you might understand --- Since I was replying solely to your
last note, I snipped all that came before as being unessential. There were
no grammatical errors. And all I did was accurately and tersely point out
your inanities.
Yep. Trolling. I've done exactly that, and it was described by Curly as
trolling. He doesn't like that.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Curly Surmudgeon |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:47:51 -0500, Paul Thomas wrote:
Again, you snipped the thread avoiding the original words. You posted:
"Five years from now we'll see much higher DOW numbers than today" which
elicited my question: "No doubt but will the numbers in five years
represent greater value than in January 2000?"
My point was/is that the "numbers" you imply meaningful really aren't
without relationship to some real world merchandise or property. The
"numbers" represent dollar prices of 25 stocks. Each of these stocks are
transnational both in services and ownership. The Dow moves not only by
company perceived value but by international currency fluxuations.
That elicted my response: "That's what I just said, the dollar isn't a
valid reference to compare dollar value by. To which you replied:
Quote: Yet, that's how they are priced, and that's how you percieve their
*value* - in US dollars.
No, that is _not_ how I perceive value. Nor most of the world, the dollar
is but the barter commodity however that commodity varies continuously
and must be factored into "value."
Quote: Stop snipping the dialog then use pronouns for reference.
Ok, I'll use adverbs if you'll feel better.
Stop snipping and use nouns.
Quote: To recap, we were speaking of the DOW and you said that it would be
worth more in five years in dollars.
And it will. It will take more dollars to buy the same percentage of
the company....pick a company.
I responded that is a false reference,
You brought it up.
Yes, I did and you've lost sight of the thread and morphed the dialog by
snipping and speaking in pronouns.
Quote: comparing value in dollars between now and the future
What would you like to compare it to then?
Apples?
Wing Nuts?
Big Macs?
The companies in the DOW index are trans-national, using any single
currency to value them now and in the future is inherently false.
Then-------what do you propose to value them against?
A glass of water?
A breath of air?
Ok, doorknobs. What else do you want to put in the basket?
Nothing, let's head to checkout where we'll pay in dollars.
You see, whatever you use will be boiled down to dollars.
They should be everyday items needed by normal families, some typical
food items, clothing, shoes, transportation, entertainment and
especially foreign currencies.
Oh yeah, foreign currencies are "everyday items needed by normal
families".
Do you really fail to comprehend or playing stupid?
Quote: That reminds me, payday is coming up. Maybe I'll pay my people with a
10 million Zimbabwe dollar note each. Surely it's among your list of
"everyday items needed by normal families". And hey!! They'll have 10
million of them.
If you want to have a real dialog then stop the distractions and
misrepresentation.
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://feeds.feedburner.com/SL/thegreen
------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| John R. Carroll |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
Quote: On Jan 21, 10:14 pm, "Paul Thomas" <paulthomas...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <Curly.is....@home.com> wrote
Everyone involved in the sub-prime loans stepped
into it of their own free will.
That's been shown not to be true.
Yeah.........
I've not heard of one person who was forced, beyond their own free
will, actually against their will, into signing a note for a
sub-prime loan. There's laws that would invalidate that contract on
the books in all 50 states.
Nope. They might not have *understood* the risks. They might not have
*read* the contract. Greed and lust has a way of blinding some folks
into not caring to understand that what they are doing can be
harmful.
No one seemed to care that the market was over blown - way the hell
over blown - yet they kept on buying, and selling, and buying, and
buying, and borrowing against an inflated equity, and buying, and
borrowing against an increasingly bloated unsupportable equity.
The balloon popped. It was a big balloon. It'll take time to pick up
the pieces. But ya know, there'll be winners out of this mess, and
there'll be losers out of this mess. Same for the stock market
bubble bust from the late 90's into the early 00's. People who knew
better came out ahead. They were the ones who made sane choices.
It's a small fraction of the global loans
and global real estate market.
How small?
Do you not know?
We've not yet seen even the tip of the mortgage disaster
Yup, there are lots of greedy people out there who didn't bother to
read or understand what they were getting into.....of their own free
will.
It's happened before, in other places, with other markets.....
And it'll happend again, in another time and with another market.
It might even happen in the housing market all over again.
We've gotten very good at creating a hyped up market for something -
like who knew that I'd ~need~ to check my e-mail from my phone -
what's next? - making a phone call with my camera?
The stock market was DOOMED-----DOOMED I SAY------and it did go
down, and it came up, and went down, and came up, and came up and
went down. And you know something - it'll go down and come up again,
and go down again, and come up again. Just like the sun.
Same for the housing market. Up - Down - Up - Down - Up - Down - Up.
All you need is a drill seargent barking out cadance.
"Ohhhhhhh.........but the sky is falling...."
Give me a break.
Far from over, you're seeing only the first wave.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And the cow jumped over the moon, and Ron Paul is
going to have the election stolen from his billions of dedicated
followers by the elite and secretive cartel that rules the world
from Area 51, and all those other wacky things people say. Look, if
enough of you make enough claims - and you guys make all kinds of
wild proclomations - you're bound to get something right every once
and a while, and somehow you believe that validates all the other
crap that you put forth.
I predict that housing prices will fall, then go up, then fall
again, then go up.......
I see in the future there will be as many homes sold as there are
homes bought.
--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
----------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia
Anyone want to predict what Tuesday will bring?
January 22, 2008
In Asia, Global Market Decline Accelerates
By KEITH BRADSHER
HONG KONG - Stock markets across Asia plunged even farther and faster on
Tuesday than they had on Monday, as anxious sellers dumped huge numbers of
shares on worries that an economic slowdown in the United States could drag
down growth around the world.
A decade after a credit crisis in Southeast Asia triggered an Asian
contagion of stock market declines around the world, the credit crisis in
the United States is now producing an American contagion to which no stock
market seems immune.
Heavy selling hit each Asian market as soon as it opened. Some of the
regions easternmost exchanges, which had closed on Monday before the
sharpest declines occurred in India and then Europe, suffered particularly
steep drops, but some exchanges rebounded slightly by mid-afternoon from
their lowest levels of the day.
By mid-afternoon, the Nikkei 225 index in Tokyo had dropped 5.65 percent and
the All Ordinaries index had plunged 7 percent in Australia. The Hang Seng
index had plummeted 6.77 percent, after being off more than 8 percent
earlier in the day. The Shanghai market closed with a loss of 7.22 percent.
One of the biggest losers on Monday and again on Tuesday was India. Trading
on the Bombay Stock Exchange was halted for an hour after the Sensex index
dropped 11.5 percent shortly after the opening.
Finance Minister P. Chidambaram of India tried to soothe markets during a
news conference. "My advice to investors is to stay calm," he said, adding
that India's economy was slated to grow 9 percent this year and 8.5 percent
next year.
Investors did not immediately heed his words, though, and when the market
reopened the Sensex fell to more than 12 percent below Monday's close,
before improving somewhat by midday, when it was off 5.81 percent at 16,582
points.
Across the region, government officials and economists blamed the selling on
worries about the United States economy, while expressing lingering hopes
that the region's economies would not suffer quite as much in the months
ahead as the American economy. Markets in the United States were closed on
Monday for the observance of Martin Luther King's Birthday, but will open
Tuesday morning.
"The prospects for ongoing growth in Asia and the developing markets are
assisting us to withstand the fallout occurring elsewhere," said Wayne Swan,
Australia's federal treasurer. He blamed the broader market decline on
continued worries about the full scope of problems stemming from losses on
subprime mortgages in the United States.
But the scope of the selling reflected worries that Asian economies would
not escape unscathed. While trade within Asia has expanded rapidly over the
past decade, much of it still consists of raw materials and components that
are shipped among countries before final assembly, usually in China, and
then shipment to the United States or the European Union.
While the European Union overtook the United States as China's largest
export market early last year, there have been growing signs of a possible
economic slowdown as well in Europe. European banks have also sustained
heavy losses on mortgage-backed securities from the United States, and the
region's exports are starting to face difficulty from the strength of the
euro.
Contributing reporting were Tim Johnston in Sydney and Heather Timmons in
New Delhi.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/22/business/worldbusiness/23cnd-asiastox.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
--
John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:00 am |
|
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism nick hull <nhull@isp.com> wrote:
Lots more made fortunes buying in 1987.
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
-- Bertrand Russel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Paul Thomas, CPA |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <Curly.is.not@home.com> wrote
Quote: Again, you snipped the thread avoiding the original words.
Again, you've pieced it together without help. Amazing.
Quote: You posted: "Five years from now we'll see
much higher DOW numbers than today"
And in five years we will know if that is true.
Quote: which elicited my question: "No doubt but
will the numbers in five years represent
greater value than in January 2000?"
Define "value".
For the seller, value means they trade for something (generally stock) they
think has greater value than what they are giving up (generally cash).
For the buyer, value means they trade for something (generally cash) they
think has greater value than what they are giving up (generally stock).
How do you propose to value the stocks in January 2000 and in January 2013?
By the Dollar. By the Euro? By the Yen? All you're doing is pricing the
stock, not valuing it.
Quote: My point was/is that the "numbers" you imply meaningful really aren't
without relationship to some real world merchandise or property. The
"numbers" represent dollar prices of 25 stocks. Each of these stocks are
transnational both in services and ownership. The Dow moves not only by
company perceived value but by international currency fluxuations.
That elicted my response: "That's what I just said, the dollar isn't a
valid reference to compare dollar value by. To which you replied:
Yet, that's how they are priced, and that's how you percieve their
*value* - in US dollars.
No, that is _not_ how I perceive value.
Yet, that's how you buy the stocks. In currency.
"The DOW is down." "The DOW is up."
Both based not on values, but on prices.
Quote: Nor most of the world, the dollar is but the barter
commodity however that commodity varies
continuously and must be factored into "value."
It's factored into the trade price......what the buyer and seller settle on
as the equal value of the numbers of shares -v- the value of the number of
dollars, euros, etc.
Quote: Yes, I did and you've lost sight of the thread and morphed the dialog by
snipping and speaking in pronouns.
Do you mean to tell me that the English language tripped you up?
Quote: They should be everyday items needed by normal families, some typical
food items, clothing, shoes, transportation, entertainment and
especially foreign currencies.
If you want to have a real dialog then stop the distractions and
misrepresentation.
ME?? Misrepresentation? Yet you declare that foreign currencies are
"everyday items needed by normal families"?
What normal family do you know that needs foreign currencies (plural) on an
everyday basis? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Paul Thomas, CPA |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote
Quote: Anyone want to predict what Tuesday will bring?
Yup. The stock market will go down.
Then it will come up.
Then it will go down.
Then it will come up.
Life goes on. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Paul Thomas, CPA |
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"John R. Carroll" <not@here.com> wrote
Quote: Across the region, government officials and economists
blamed the selling on worries about the United States economy,
Amazing. Simply amazing.
The OPEC nations think they can jerk our economy around by bumping down oil
production.
We can show them. All thos Arab billionaires will be normal millionaires by
noon today.
Ain't this a great country, or what. The world looks to see how we're doing
to find out how they're doing.
It sucks being idolized like that.
Is there any other country that is cared about by anyone else in a like-kind
manner?
--
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
----------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:50 pm
|
|