|
Science Forum Index » Optics Forum » Polarization separation
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Helpful person |
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:30 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 674
|
I am looking for a vendor who can supply me with a polarization
separating prism pair. By this, I mean a pair of thin prisms
(preferably cemented together) that will split (in angle) the e and o
rays. This is to be used for an imaging application in collimated
space with the splitting being only a mRad or two. The prism pair
should be thin (less than 5mm).
Anyone know of an off the shelf source or a company (preferably but
not necessarily in the United States) that can make such an item? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helpful person |
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:01 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 674
|
On Dec 28, 10:38 am, Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@ .- --- -. DOT .- t>
wrote:
Quote:
5 mm thickness? How large is the diameter?http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wollaston-Prisma
I'm looking for apertures between 10mm and 20mm. A Wollaston might do
the trick although I believe they usually diverge greater than 1mrad. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Barry Cense |
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Dec 28, 8:30 am, Helpful person <rrl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: I am looking for a vendor who can supply me with a polarization
separating prism pair. By this, I mean a pair of thin prisms
(preferably cemented together) that will split (in angle) the e and o
rays. This is to be used for an imaging application in collimated
space with the splitting being only a mRad or two. The prism pair
should be thin (less than 5mm).
Anyone know of an off the shelf source or a company (preferably but
not necessarily in the United States) that can make such an item?
Karl Lambrecht Co (http://www.klccgo.com/) made some custom Wollaston
prisms for me with a separation angle as small as 6 degrees. I am not
sure if they can do such a small angle in a thin prism though. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helmut Wabnig |
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:30:20 -0800 (PST), Helpful person
<rrllff@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: I am looking for a vendor who can supply me with a polarization
separating prism pair. By this, I mean a pair of thin prisms
(preferably cemented together) that will split (in angle) the e and o
rays. This is to be used for an imaging application in collimated
space with the splitting being only a mRad or two. The prism pair
should be thin (less than 5mm).
Anyone know of an off the shelf source or a company (preferably but
not necessarily in the United States) that can make such an item?
5 mm thickness? How large is the diameter?
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wollaston-Prisma
w. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Andy Resnick |
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Dec 28 2007, 8:30 am, Helpful person <rrl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: I am looking for a vendor who can supply me with a polarization
separating prism pair. By this, I mean a pair of thin prisms
(preferably cemented together) that will split (in angle) the e and o
rays. This is to be used for an imaging application in collimated
space with the splitting being only a mRad or two. The prism pair
should be thin (less than 5mm).
Anyone know of an off the shelf source or a company (preferably but
not necessarily in the United States) that can make such an item?
What about a DIC prism from one of the major microscope
manufacturers? The divergence is fairly small, AFAIK. They are stock
parts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helpful person |
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:01 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 674
|
On Jan 8, 1:14 pm, Andy Resnick <andy.resn...@case.edu> wrote:
Quote:
What about a DIC prism from one of the major microscope
manufacturers? The divergence is fairly small, AFAIK. They are stock
parts.
A DIC prism does not have a large enough aperture and it's separation
may be too small. However, suppliers of these prisms (if I can find
them) may do what I want. My application is for an anti aliasing
prism for CCD cameras.
Thanks for the suggestion. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helpful person |
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:16 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 674
|
On Jan 9, 1:14 pm, Phil Hobbs
Quote: Why not put a walkoff plate at the pupil? Those you can get for
boxtops, iirc.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
What is a walk off plate? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phil Hobbs |
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Andy Resnick wrote:
Quote: On Dec 28 2007, 8:30 am, Helpful person <rrl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I am looking for a vendor who can supply me with a polarization
separating prism pair. By this, I mean a pair of thin prisms
(preferably cemented together) that will split (in angle) the e and o
rays. This is to be used for an imaging application in collimated
space with the splitting being only a mRad or two. The prism pair
should be thin (less than 5mm).
Anyone know of an off the shelf source or a company (preferably but
not necessarily in the United States) that can make such an item?
What about a DIC prism from one of the major microscope
manufacturers? The divergence is fairly small, AFAIK. They are stock
parts.
Why not put a walkoff plate at the pupil? Those you can get for
boxtops, iirc.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Helpful person |
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:17 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 674
|
On Jan 9, 1:25 pm, Phil Hobbs <p...@SpamMeSenseless.pergamos.net>
wrote:
Quote: Helpful person wrote:
On Jan 9, 1:14 pm, Phil Hobbs
Why not put a walkoff plate at the pupil? Those you can get for
boxtops, iirc.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
What is a walk off plate?
Just a random chunk of calcite or birefringent polymer, whose optic axis
doesn't lie in the plane of incidence. The O ray goes through as
specified by Snell's Law, but the E ray 'walks off' sideways in the
process--its path lies between the O ray and the optic axis. Once they
come out the other side, they're back to being parallel, but with a
lateral shift.
Doing that at the pupil is equivalent to your device at the image. (In
fact I think the CCD devices are walkoff plates and not Wollastons, but
I don't know for sure.)
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
Thanks for the information. Using a "walk off plate" before the image
makes more sense than a Wollaston. I'm sure that's what is used. Now
all I need to do is find a source.
Thanks again.
www.richardfisher |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phil Hobbs |
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Helpful person wrote:
Quote: On Jan 9, 1:14 pm, Phil Hobbs
Why not put a walkoff plate at the pupil? Those you can get for
boxtops, iirc.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
What is a walk off plate?
Just a random chunk of calcite or birefringent polymer, whose optic axis
doesn't lie in the plane of incidence. The O ray goes through as
specified by Snell's Law, but the E ray 'walks off' sideways in the
process--its path lies between the O ray and the optic axis. Once they
come out the other side, they're back to being parallel, but with a
lateral shift.
Doing that at the pupil is equivalent to your device at the image. (In
fact I think the CCD devices are walkoff plates and not Wollastons, but
I don't know for sure.)
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |