"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RrRVi.2926$p%.1388@trndny03...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:H1kVi.2047$BD.1333@trndny06...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:TJ9Ui.22964$Qj3.19111@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:wG%Ti.3856$hG2.2150@trndny05...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:LzGTi.5613$Qj3.4728@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RhASi.272$aB2.233@trndny07...
Kevysmom wrote:
Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the
Pharmecutical
companies that
is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!!
Care to prove that? Even if he is, he fully discloses.
Dr. Offit has been a member of the Centers for Disease
Control's (CDC)
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is also an
author and
a consultant to pharmaceutical giant Merck, with whom he shares
a
rotavirus vaccine patent (number 353547).
You forgot to prove he is paid.
Hmm... So Dr. Offit is being funded by Merck, but he's not being
paid by Merck. How interesting!
His research is funded by Merck. Do prove he personally derived a
profit.

So, Mr. Probert, would it be correct to say that Dr Offit is not
being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not being
paid for your efforts?
Only morons use that.

Drivel deleted
So I'm giving you an opportunity to confirm that you are not being
paid for your efforts, and you decline to do so?
I do not have to confirm shit to assholes like you. You
anti-vaccination, pro-dead children morons use that tactic as a
feeble attempt to poison the well.

I do not play your moronic, asinine games.

If this post ruins your day, I would not be unhappy.
And so, Mr. Probert is still leaving open the possibility that he's
being remunerated for his efforts here...
Do you "think" you are the first asshole to play this game with me?
The record is clear, and you are in the dark.

BTW why is it that these advocates for Corporate Medicine happen to
be so foul-mouthed? Is this the latest trend in 'evidence based
medicine'?
Morons like you bring that out in us. You post feces, and it is hard
to ignore the stench.
I've simply asked you a question of whether or not Dr Offit is not
being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not being paid
for your efforts?
You have not simply asked anything.You have asked an accusatory question
where you implicitly claim that I am being paid for posting here.

I do not play with assholes who play that game
Mark, since you do spend most of your time here defending mainstream
medicine, for better or for worse, you _are_ the face of mainstream
medicine in these ngs. So perhaps it might be a good idea for you to
think about this, and to consider that all this gutter language that
you're using may reflect directly on the mainstream medicine, the
reputation of which is apparently so dear to your heart.
You give me way too much power, moron.

Don't you worry about giving mainstream medicine a bad name?
Nope. Why should I when morons such as yourself give ample evidence of the
stupidity of alt med? Nothing I do can overcome that.

Ad hominem attacks can never serve as a persuasive argument in a debate.
You're old enough to know this, Mark.

I asked you a simple question, but instead of a simple answer we get all
this cussing...
Like I said, dingbat, it was not a simple question. Of course, being
simple, like yourself, you would not know that.

Well, according to you, Dr Offit is not being paid for his efforts in
vaccine promotion. And I'm sure you'll also swear that you are not being
paid for your efforts here. So then where's the problem in comparing you to
Dr Offit?

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary
depends upon his not understanding it!" -- Upton Sinclair

Gene's don't produce proteins. Ribosomes do.

Rather, genes provide the code for the proteins. The code is transcribed
to RNA then translated to protein by the ribosomes.

In addition, genes also help regulate gene expression and provide the
code for ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA and miRNA (microRNA).

cognite tute wrote:
Kevysmom wrote:

This is the only HINT I will give you.

Our results suggest that ubiquitination system
might be involved in protection against the toxicity of mercury
compounds, such as methylmercury, in eukaryotic cells.

http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/cgi/reprint/61/4/738.pdf#search=%22...

One more hint for the dummies....

Every Scientist, or Doctor who has studied mercury poisoning all agree
there are genes involved in protection from mercury poisoning. This is
why NOT all the kids in Japan were poisoned from the contaminated
fish.

On Oct 31, 11:38 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com
wrote:

Kevysmom wrote:

Nope. First, genes do not chelate anything.

You are a complete idiot. Of course there are genes that chelate heavy
metals.

Not in a million years or more, of evolution.

Please spend some time reading Biology for Dummies.

On Oct 29, 8:05 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:

Kevysmom wrote:

While all the causes are not known, it appears that there has to
be a
genetic component for autism to exist.

A genetic component...Like the gene that is used to chelate mercury
from the body?

Nope. First, genes do not chelate anything. Second, the idea that
there
are poor mercury excreters is a M Y T H, and has never been proven.
I do
acknowledge that there are studies showing something like this, but
they
rely on wacko labs and poor science.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

well, I will give you a hint.

Genes produce proteins. that's it.

They don't do anything else.

Gene's don't produce proteins. Ribosomes do.

Rather, genes provide the code for the proteins. The code is transcribed
to RNA then translated to protein by the ribosomes.

In addition, genes also help regulate gene expression and provide the
code for ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA and miRNA (microRNA).

Jeff



If some kids are less susceptable to Mercury poison, this may be
genetic, ie an inherent inherited capability of their body.

although there may be some other reason.

j.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Gene's don't produce proteins. Ribosomes do.

Rather, genes provide the code for the proteins. The code is transcribed
to RNA then translated to protein by the ribosomes.

In addition, genes also help regulate gene expression and provide the
code for ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA and miRNA (microRNA).

Thank You Jeff for explaining this in easy terminology that even Mark
could understand it.

Donna

We're still all awaiting your theory of how genes do chelate heavy
metals. Please elaborate.

On Nov 2, 6:15 pm, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:

Gene's don't produce proteins. Ribosomes do.

Rather, genes provide the code for the proteins. The code is transcribed
to RNA then translated to protein by the ribosomes.

In addition, genes also help regulate gene expression and provide the
code for ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA and miRNA (microRNA).

Thank You Jeff for explaining this in easy terminology that even Mark
could understand it.

Donna

We're still all awaiting your theory of how genes do chelate heavy
metals. Please elaborate.

On Nov 2, 6:15 pm, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
Gene's don't produce proteins. Ribosomes do.
Rather, genes provide the code for the proteins. The code is transcribed
to RNA then translated to protein by the ribosomes.
In addition, genes also help regulate gene expression and provide the
code for ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA and miRNA (microRNA).
Thank You Jeff for explaining this in easy terminology that even Mark
could understand it.

Donna

We're still all awaiting your theory of how genes do chelate heavy
metals. Please elaborate.

We're still all awaiting your theory of how genes do chelate heavy
metals. Please elaborate.

I hope this isnt to elaborate for you.

You are begining to sound like A) An attorney or B) A Pharma Shill.

But since this is common knowledge that even the attorneys would have
access to, I will share it
with the Mercury dummies.

[...]

I know, its not the gene that actually excretes the mercury, Its the
Gene
that is needed to prevent mercury poisoning. The ubiquitin needs to
be working not only to
protect against mercury, but also to chelate mercury from the body.

The E1 site activates cysteine which chelates mercury.

Activation of ubiquitin - Ubiquitin is activated in a two-step
reaction by an E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme in a process requiring
ATP as an energy source. The initial step involves production of a
ubiquitin-adenylate intermediate. The second step transfers ubiquitin
to the E1 active site cysteine residue, with release of AMP. This step
results in a thioester linkage between the C-terminal carboxyl group
of ubiquitin and the E1 cysteine sulfhydryl group.
Transfer of ubiquitin from E1 to the active site cysteine of a
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 via a trans(thio)esterification
reaction. Mammalian genomes contain 20-30 UBCs.
The final step of the ubiquitylation cascade generally requires the
activity of one of the hundreds of E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases (often
termed simply ubiquitin ligase). E3 enzymes function as the substrate
recognition modules of the system and are capable of interaction with
both E2 and substrate. E3 enzymes possess one of two domains:

The pro-oxidative effects of the metals are compounded by the fact
that the metals also inhibit antioxidative enzymes and deplete
intracellular glutathione. The metals also have the potential to
disrupt the metabolism and biological activities of many proteins due
to their high affinity for free sulfhydryl groups. Cysteine has a
pivotal role in inducible, endogenous detoxication mechanisms in the
body

Connect the dots, and you will see how mercury poisoning occurs.

Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RrRVi.2926$p%.1388@trndny03...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:H1kVi.2047$BD.1333@trndny06...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:TJ9Ui.22964$Qj3.19111@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:wG%Ti.3856$hG2.2150@trndny05...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:LzGTi.5613$Qj3.4728@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RhASi.272$aB2.233@trndny07...
Kevysmom wrote:
Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the
Pharmecutical
companies that
is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!!
Care to prove that? Even if he is, he fully discloses.
Dr. Offit has been a member of the Centers for Disease
Control's (CDC)
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is also an
author and
a consultant to pharmaceutical giant Merck, with whom he
shares a
rotavirus vaccine patent (number 353547).
You forgot to prove he is paid.
Hmm... So Dr. Offit is being funded by Merck, but he's not
being paid by Merck. How interesting!
His research is funded by Merck. Do prove he personally derived
a profit.

So, Mr. Probert, would it be correct to say that Dr Offit is
not being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not
being paid for your efforts?
Only morons use that.

Drivel deleted
So I'm giving you an opportunity to confirm that you are not
being paid for your efforts, and you decline to do so?
I do not have to confirm shit to assholes like you. You
anti-vaccination, pro-dead children morons use that tactic as a
feeble attempt to poison the well.

I do not play your moronic, asinine games.

If this post ruins your day, I would not be unhappy.
And so, Mr. Probert is still leaving open the possibility that he's
being remunerated for his efforts here...
Do you "think" you are the first asshole to play this game with me?
The record is clear, and you are in the dark.

BTW why is it that these advocates for Corporate Medicine happen to
be so foul-mouthed? Is this the latest trend in 'evidence based
medicine'?
Morons like you bring that out in us. You post feces, and it is hard
to ignore the stench.
I've simply asked you a question of whether or not Dr Offit is not
being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not being paid
for your efforts?
You have not simply asked anything.You have asked an accusatory
question where you implicitly claim that I am being paid for posting
here.

I do not play with assholes who play that game
Mark, since you do spend most of your time here defending mainstream
medicine, for better or for worse, you _are_ the face of mainstream
medicine in these ngs. So perhaps it might be a good idea for you to
think about this, and to consider that all this gutter language that
you're using may reflect directly on the mainstream medicine, the
reputation of which is apparently so dear to your heart.
You give me way too much power, moron.

Don't you worry about giving mainstream medicine a bad name?
Nope. Why should I when morons such as yourself give ample evidence of
the stupidity of alt med? Nothing I do can overcome that.

Ad hominem attacks can never serve as a persuasive argument in a debate.
You're old enough to know this, Mark.

That was not an ad hominem.

I asked you a simple question, but instead of a simple answer we get
all this cussing...
Like I said, dingbat, it was not a simple question. Of course, being
simple, like yourself, you would not know that.

Well, according to you, Dr Offit is not being paid for his efforts in
vaccine promotion. And I'm sure you'll also swear that you are not being
paid for your efforts here. So then where's the problem in comparing you
to Dr Offit?

Raising the issue is an ad hominem.

"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:NEwWi.36$Ie.1@trndny04...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RrRVi.2926$p%.1388@trndny03...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:H1kVi.2047$BD.1333@trndny06...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:TJ9Ui.22964$Qj3.19111@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:wG%Ti.3856$hG2.2150@trndny05...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:LzGTi.5613$Qj3.4728@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RhASi.272$aB2.233@trndny07...
Kevysmom wrote:
Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the
Pharmecutical
companies that
is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!!
Care to prove that? Even if he is, he fully discloses.
Dr. Offit has been a member of the Centers for Disease
Control's (CDC)
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is also an
author and
a consultant to pharmaceutical giant Merck, with whom he
shares a
rotavirus vaccine patent (number 353547).
You forgot to prove he is paid.
Hmm... So Dr. Offit is being funded by Merck, but he's not
being paid by Merck. How interesting!
His research is funded by Merck. Do prove he personally derived
a profit.

So, Mr. Probert, would it be correct to say that Dr Offit is
not being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not
being paid for your efforts?
Only morons use that.

Drivel deleted
So I'm giving you an opportunity to confirm that you are not
being paid for your efforts, and you decline to do so?
I do not have to confirm shit to assholes like you. You
anti-vaccination, pro-dead children morons use that tactic as a
feeble attempt to poison the well.

I do not play your moronic, asinine games.

If this post ruins your day, I would not be unhappy.
And so, Mr. Probert is still leaving open the possibility that he's
being remunerated for his efforts here...
Do you "think" you are the first asshole to play this game with me?
The record is clear, and you are in the dark.

BTW why is it that these advocates for Corporate Medicine happen to
be so foul-mouthed? Is this the latest trend in 'evidence based
medicine'?
Morons like you bring that out in us. You post feces, and it is hard
to ignore the stench.
I've simply asked you a question of whether or not Dr Offit is not
being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not being paid
for your efforts?
You have not simply asked anything.You have asked an accusatory
question where you implicitly claim that I am being paid for posting
here.

I do not play with assholes who play that game
Mark, since you do spend most of your time here defending mainstream
medicine, for better or for worse, you _are_ the face of mainstream
medicine in these ngs. So perhaps it might be a good idea for you to
think about this, and to consider that all this gutter language that
you're using may reflect directly on the mainstream medicine, the
reputation of which is apparently so dear to your heart.
You give me way too much power, moron.

Don't you worry about giving mainstream medicine a bad name?
Nope. Why should I when morons such as yourself give ample evidence of
the stupidity of alt med? Nothing I do can overcome that.
Ad hominem attacks can never serve as a persuasive argument in a debate.
You're old enough to know this, Mark.
That was not an ad hominem.

And the earth is not round.

I asked you a simple question, but instead of a simple answer we get
all this cussing...
Like I said, dingbat, it was not a simple question. Of course, being
simple, like yourself, you would not know that.
Well, according to you, Dr Offit is not being paid for his efforts in
vaccine promotion. And I'm sure you'll also swear that you are not being
paid for your efforts here. So then where's the problem in comparing you
to Dr Offit?
Raising the issue is an ad hominem.

Raising the issue that you're not being paid is an ad hominem??

Well, we're well beyond the Looking Glass here!

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather
scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean --
neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make
words mean so many different things."
-- Lewis Carrol, "Through the Looking Glass"

Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:NEwWi.36$Ie.1@trndny04...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RrRVi.2926$p%.1388@trndny03...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:H1kVi.2047$BD.1333@trndny06...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:TJ9Ui.22964$Qj3.19111@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:wG%Ti.3856$hG2.2150@trndny05...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:LzGTi.5613$Qj3.4728@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in
message news:RhASi.272$aB2.233@trndny07...
Kevysmom wrote:
Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the
Pharmecutical
companies that
is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!!
Care to prove that? Even if he is, he fully discloses.
Dr. Offit has been a member of the Centers for Disease
Control's (CDC)
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is also an
author and
a consultant to pharmaceutical giant Merck, with whom he
shares a
rotavirus vaccine patent (number 353547).
You forgot to prove he is paid.
Hmm... So Dr. Offit is being funded by Merck, but he's not
being paid by Merck. How interesting!
His research is funded by Merck. Do prove he personally
derived a profit.

So, Mr. Probert, would it be correct to say that Dr Offit is
not being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not
being paid for your efforts?
Only morons use that.

Drivel deleted
So I'm giving you an opportunity to confirm that you are not
being paid for your efforts, and you decline to do so?
I do not have to confirm shit to assholes like you. You
anti-vaccination, pro-dead children morons use that tactic as a
feeble attempt to poison the well.

I do not play your moronic, asinine games.

If this post ruins your day, I would not be unhappy.
And so, Mr. Probert is still leaving open the possibility that
he's being remunerated for his efforts here...
Do you "think" you are the first asshole to play this game with
me? The record is clear, and you are in the dark.

BTW why is it that these advocates for Corporate Medicine happen
to be so foul-mouthed? Is this the latest trend in 'evidence
based medicine'?
Morons like you bring that out in us. You post feces, and it is
hard to ignore the stench.
I've simply asked you a question of whether or not Dr Offit is not
being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not being
paid for your efforts?
You have not simply asked anything.You have asked an accusatory
question where you implicitly claim that I am being paid for posting
here.

I do not play with assholes who play that game
Mark, since you do spend most of your time here defending mainstream
medicine, for better or for worse, you _are_ the face of mainstream
medicine in these ngs. So perhaps it might be a good idea for you to
think about this, and to consider that all this gutter language that
you're using may reflect directly on the mainstream medicine, the
reputation of which is apparently so dear to your heart.
You give me way too much power, moron.

Don't you worry about giving mainstream medicine a bad name?
Nope. Why should I when morons such as yourself give ample evidence of
the stupidity of alt med? Nothing I do can overcome that.
Ad hominem attacks can never serve as a persuasive argument in a
debate. You're old enough to know this, Mark.
That was not an ad hominem.

And the earth is not round.

It is not truly "round" in the sense of a circle. I am glad to see you are
reading kindergarten level science books.


I asked you a simple question, but instead of a simple answer we get
all this cussing...
Like I said, dingbat, it was not a simple question. Of course, being
simple, like yourself, you would not know that.
Well, according to you, Dr Offit is not being paid for his efforts in
vaccine promotion. And I'm sure you'll also swear that you are not
being paid for your efforts here. So then where's the problem in
comparing you to Dr Offit?
Raising the issue is an ad hominem.

Raising the issue that you're not being paid is an ad hominem??

Well, we're well beyond the Looking Glass here!

No, Yuri, YOU are beyond the Looking Glass and off the deep end.

Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather
scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean --
neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make
words mean so many different things."
-- Lewis Carrol, "Through the Looking Glass"

"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:kw4Xi.185$FO.118@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:NEwWi.36$Ie.1@trndny04...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:RrRVi.2926$p%.1388@trndny03...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:H1kVi.2047$BD.1333@trndny06...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:TJ9Ui.22964$Qj3.19111@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:wG%Ti.3856$hG2.2150@trndny05...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:LzGTi.5613$Qj3.4728@trndny01...
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in
message news:RhASi.272$aB2.233@trndny07...
Kevysmom wrote:
Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the
Pharmecutical
companies that
is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!!
Care to prove that? Even if he is, he fully discloses.
Dr. Offit has been a member of the Centers for Disease
Control's (CDC)
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is also an
author and
a consultant to pharmaceutical giant Merck, with whom he
shares a
rotavirus vaccine patent (number 353547).
You forgot to prove he is paid.
Hmm... So Dr. Offit is being funded by Merck, but he's not
being paid by Merck. How interesting!
His research is funded by Merck. Do prove he personally
derived a profit.

So, Mr. Probert, would it be correct to say that Dr Offit is
not being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not
being paid for your efforts?
Only morons use that.

Drivel deleted
So I'm giving you an opportunity to confirm that you are not
being paid for your efforts, and you decline to do so?
I do not have to confirm shit to assholes like you. You
anti-vaccination, pro-dead children morons use that tactic as a
feeble attempt to poison the well.

I do not play your moronic, asinine games.

If this post ruins your day, I would not be unhappy.
And so, Mr. Probert is still leaving open the possibility that
he's being remunerated for his efforts here...
Do you "think" you are the first asshole to play this game with
me? The record is clear, and you are in the dark.

BTW why is it that these advocates for Corporate Medicine happen
to be so foul-mouthed? Is this the latest trend in 'evidence
based medicine'?
Morons like you bring that out in us. You post feces, and it is
hard to ignore the stench.
I've simply asked you a question of whether or not Dr Offit is not
being paid for his efforts in the same way as you are not being
paid for your efforts?
You have not simply asked anything.You have asked an accusatory
question where you implicitly claim that I am being paid for posting
here.

I do not play with assholes who play that game
Mark, since you do spend most of your time here defending mainstream
medicine, for better or for worse, you _are_ the face of mainstream
medicine in these ngs. So perhaps it might be a good idea for you to
think about this, and to consider that all this gutter language that
you're using may reflect directly on the mainstream medicine, the
reputation of which is apparently so dear to your heart.
You give me way too much power, moron.

Don't you worry about giving mainstream medicine a bad name?
Nope. Why should I when morons such as yourself give ample evidence of
the stupidity of alt med? Nothing I do can overcome that.
Ad hominem attacks can never serve as a persuasive argument in a
debate. You're old enough to know this, Mark.
That was not an ad hominem.
And the earth is not round.
It is not truly "round" in the sense of a circle. I am glad to see you are
reading kindergarten level science books.

I asked you a simple question, but instead of a simple answer we get
all this cussing...
Like I said, dingbat, it was not a simple question. Of course, being
simple, like yourself, you would not know that.
Well, according to you, Dr Offit is not being paid for his efforts in
vaccine promotion. And I'm sure you'll also swear that you are not
being paid for your efforts here. So then where's the problem in
comparing you to Dr Offit?
Raising the issue is an ad hominem.
Raising the issue that you're not being paid is an ad hominem??

Well, we're well beyond the Looking Glass here!
No, Yuri, YOU are beyond the Looking Glass and off the deep end.

And this is not an ad hominem, right?

In article <1193660982.762665.199...@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,





Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic

You are aware the CDC sent out an ALARM to pediatricians all across
the Nation about
the epidemic of sick neurologically sick children. According to the
CDC 1 out of 6 children
have a developmental disorder. Would you call that an epidemic? Or
shall we wait until its
1 out of 3?

Thimerosal was still on the shelves until 2003. The children who have
taken this drug would be about 3-4 years old.
I am not sure when a child gets a diagnosis of Autism?

Oh my god. You do all this blathering about the dangers of thimerosal
and you don't even know when children are diagnosed with autism?

Sheesh.

Well, let me bring a little candle into the vast cavern of darkness
that you exhibit. Autism is seldom diagnosed before about 18 months
of age, though the age at which it *can* be diagnosed keeps dropping.
This is good, because the sooner you intervene with an autistic child,
the more good you can do (with behavioral therapy etc).

Autism, however, is often not diagnosed until after age 2, or
sometimes not until a child enters school. It partly depends on the
severity of the case.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Saddam Hussein was a bad man, connected with some incredibly dangerous
people: Cheney, Rumsfeld, George Galloway." -- Marcus Brigstocke





On Oct 29, 8:00 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 7:32 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:zE%Ti.3855$hG2.2058@trndny05...
Kevysmom wrote:
You are an innocent Mark.
I am far from "innocent" in that sense. I am far more informed than you
are.
Since you're so well informed, how about telling us about what causes
autism? Please clarify this for us...
While all the causes are not known, it appears that there has to be a
genetic component for autism to exist.

A genetic component is that boys have different dominant hormones than
girls. ( 3x as many males as
females develop the symptoms.)

The second genetic component is that some humans handle toxins and
excrete mercury and aluminum
better than others. ( That is why autistic kids retain the metals in
their brains and go nutzoid.)

This still leaves vaccines with mercury,aluminum, and toxins as the
causative agent/agents.

Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic

You are aware the CDC sent out an ALARM to pediatricians all across
the Nation about
the epidemic of sick neurologically sick children. According to the
CDC 1 out of 6 children
have a developmental disorder. Would you call that an epidemic? Or
shall we wait until its
1 out of 3?

Thimerosal was still on the shelves until 2003. The children who have
taken this drug would be about 3-4 years old.
I am not sure when a child gets a diagnosis of Autism?

On Oct 29, 8:00 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 7:32 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:zE%Ti.3855$hG2.2058@trndny05...
Kevysmom wrote:
You are an innocent Mark.
I am far from "innocent" in that sense. I am far more informed than you
are.
Since you're so well informed, how about telling us about what causes
autism? Please clarify this for us...
While all the causes are not known, it appears that there has to be a
genetic component for autism to exist.

A genetic component is that boys have different dominant hormones than
girls. ( 3x as many males as
females develop the symptoms.)

The second genetic component is that some humans handle toxins and
excrete mercury and aluminum
better than others. ( That is why autistic kids retain the metals in
their brains and go nutzoid.)

This still leaves vaccines with mercury,aluminum, and toxins as the
causative agent/agents.

Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

In article <1193660982.762665.199820@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
Kevysmom <bluebunny8@gmail.com> wrote:
Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic

You are aware the CDC sent out an ALARM to pediatricians all across
the Nation about
the epidemic of sick neurologically sick children. According to the
CDC 1 out of 6 children
have a developmental disorder. Would you call that an epidemic? Or
shall we wait until its
1 out of 3?

Thimerosal was still on the shelves until 2003. The children who have
taken this drug would be about 3-4 years old.
I am not sure when a child gets a diagnosis of Autism?

Oh my god. You do all this blathering about the dangers of thimerosal
and you don't even know when children are diagnosed with autism?

Sheesh.

Well, let me bring a little candle into the vast cavern of darkness
that you exhibit. Autism is seldom diagnosed before about 18 months
of age, though the age at which it *can* be diagnosed keeps dropping.
This is good, because the sooner you intervene with an autistic child,
the more good you can do (with behavioral therapy etc).

Autism, however, is often not diagnosed until after age 2, or
sometimes not until a child enters school. It partly depends on the
severity of the case.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Saddam Hussein was a bad man, connected with some incredibly
dangerous
people: Cheney, Rumsfeld, George Galloway." -- Marcus Brigstocke




On Oct 29, 8:00 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 7:32 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:zE%Ti.3855$hG2.2058@trndny05...
Kevysmom wrote:
You are an innocent Mark.
I am far from "innocent" in that sense. I am far more informed than
you
are.
Since you're so well informed, how about telling us about what
causes
autism? Please clarify this for us...
While all the causes are not known, it appears that there has to be a
genetic component for autism to exist.

A genetic component is that boys have different dominant hormones than
girls. ( 3x as many males as
females develop the symptoms.)

The second genetic component is that some humans handle toxins and
excrete mercury and aluminum
better than others. ( That is why autistic kids retain the metals in
their brains and go nutzoid.)

This still leaves vaccines with mercury,aluminum, and toxins as the
causative agent/agents.

Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David Wright! You are answering a post from October!!! It is the
middle of December, where have you been?

On Dec 13, 9:45 pm, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote:
In article <1193660982.762665.199...@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,





Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic

You are aware the CDC sent out an ALARM to pediatricians all across
the Nation about
the epidemic of sick neurologically sick children. According to the
CDC 1 out of 6 children
have a developmental disorder. Would you call that an epidemic? Or
shall we wait until its
1 out of 3?

Thimerosal was still on the shelves until 2003. The children who have
taken this drug would be about 3-4 years old.
I am not sure when a child gets a diagnosis of Autism?

Oh my god. You do all this blathering about the dangers of thimerosal
and you don't even know when children are diagnosed with autism?

Sheesh.

Well, let me bring a little candle into the vast cavern of darkness
that you exhibit. Autism is seldom diagnosed before about 18 months
of age, though the age at which it *can* be diagnosed keeps dropping.
This is good, because the sooner you intervene with an autistic child,
the more good you can do (with behavioral therapy etc).

Autism, however, is often not diagnosed until after age 2, or
sometimes not until a child enters school. It partly depends on the
severity of the case.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Saddam Hussein was a bad man, connected with some incredibly dangerous
people: Cheney, Rumsfeld, George Galloway." -- Marcus Brigstocke





On Oct 29, 8:00 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 7:32 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:zE%Ti.3855$hG2.2058@trndny05...
Kevysmom wrote:
You are an innocent Mark.
I am far from "innocent" in that sense. I am far more informed
than you
are.
Since you're so well informed, how about telling us about what causes
autism? Please clarify this for us...
While all the causes are not known, it appears that there has to be a
genetic component for autism to exist.

A genetic component is that boys have different dominant hormones than
girls. ( 3x as many males as
females develop the symptoms.)

The second genetic component is that some humans handle toxins and
excrete mercury and aluminum
better than others. ( That is why autistic kids retain the metals in
their brains and go nutzoid.)

This still leaves vaccines with mercury,aluminum, and toxins as the
causative agent/agents.

Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"David Wright" <wright@l1000.prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:F7m8j.5867$fl7.998@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
In article <1193660982.762665.199820@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>,
Kevysmom <bluebunny8@gmail.com> wrote:
Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic

You are aware the CDC sent out an ALARM to pediatricians all across
the Nation about
the epidemic of sick neurologically sick children. According to the
CDC 1 out of 6 children
have a developmental disorder. Would you call that an epidemic? Or
shall we wait until its
1 out of 3?

Thimerosal was still on the shelves until 2003. The children who have
taken this drug would be about 3-4 years old.
I am not sure when a child gets a diagnosis of Autism?

Oh my god. You do all this blathering about the dangers of thimerosal
and you don't even know when children are diagnosed with autism?

Sheesh.

Well, let me bring a little candle into the vast cavern of darkness
that you exhibit. Autism is seldom diagnosed before about 18 months
of age, though the age at which it *can* be diagnosed keeps dropping.
This is good, because the sooner you intervene with an autistic child,
the more good you can do (with behavioral therapy etc).

Autism, however, is often not diagnosed until after age 2, or
sometimes not until a child enters school. It partly depends on the
severity of the case.

You are right, but they are developing new tests that seem to show early
signs.

On Oct 29, 8:00 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 7:32 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:zE%Ti.3855$hG2.2058@trndny05...
Kevysmom wrote:
You are an innocent Mark.
I am far from "innocent" in that sense. I am far more informed than
you
are.
Since you're so well informed, how about telling us about what
causes
autism? Please clarify this for us...
While all the causes are not known, it appears that there has to be a
genetic component for autism to exist.

A genetic component is that boys have different dominant hormones than
girls. ( 3x as many males as
females develop the symptoms.)

The second genetic component is that some humans handle toxins and
excrete mercury and aluminum
better than others. ( That is why autistic kids retain the metals in
their brains and go nutzoid.)

This still leaves vaccines with mercury,aluminum, and toxins as the
causative agent/agents.

Explain why the rate of Autism has NOT decrease since the removal of
thimerosal according the the California numbers, which the
pro-epidemicists used to claim was absolute proof of an epidemic.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -