In sci.archaeology Martin Reboul <martin@spamfukreboul1471.freeserve.co.uk
wrote:

: Yuri "Konspirisy" Kuchinsky wrote...

It's true that from time to time I enjoy making fun of the conspiracy
buffs in these ngs.

For those logically-impaired, opposing conspiracies isn't the same as
embracing them... But I'm afraid this distinction is entirely lost on Mr.
Reboul. Alas!

It seems like Mr. Reboul is only interested in making false accusations
here. He's made the same accusation many times already...

Plonk!

Inger E Johansson wrote:

That specific group might have been descendents to Greenlanders and the
Cree
Indians they had lived close by.

What complete and utter BS.
The Cree speak an Algonquian language, the Mandan speak a Siouan
language. The Cree got nowhere near the Middle Missouri where the Mandan
still live.

Doug,
since we do have persons in this group with more knowledge
about the copy, and since Philip managed to send a ref to
an url where at least part of the information quoted by the
author were word by word identical to correct information
re. Verendrye's voyage respectively Verendrye's meeting
with a Swedish scholar discussing the stone's text; I find
it hard to believe that you can be serious if you continue
to ask me to produce ref.

Please go to the text in French
where Verendrye's voyage is written down. You will no doubt
find the information you are asking for if you do so.

since we do have persons in this group with more knowledge about the copy,
and since Philip managed to send a ref to an url where at least part of the
information quoted by the author were word by word identical to correct
information re. Verendrye's voyage respectively Verendrye's meeting with a
Swedish scholar discussing the stone's text; I find it hard to believe that
you can be serious if you continue to ask me to produce ref.

"t(nospam)kavanagh" <"tkavanag"@(nospam)indiana.edu> skrev i meddelandet
news:c63lea$5mh$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu...
Inger E Johansson wrote:

That specific group might have been descendents to Greenlanders and the
Cree
Indians they had lived close by.

What complete and utter BS.
The Cree speak an Algonquian language, the Mandan speak a Siouan
language. The Cree got nowhere near the Middle Missouri where the Mandan
still live.

tk,
that's exactly why I didn't want to go into discussions regarding any
possible(in my view not plausible) connections between Mandan and the
Greenlanders.

I do have knowledge of contacts between Greenlanders and Cree indians.

later travelled north to Hudson Bay once a year for centuries to sell furs
to the Greenlanders.

Greenlanders aren't known from sources I have seen, well give or take some
Norse trappers and also a few sailings in the Great Lakes but that doesn't
make the Cree's anything but Indians.

settled close by in northern parts of todays Michigan and Wisconsin.

it the Cree or the Mandans that are mentioned in sources I have seen as
intermarrying the Greenlanders.

More about that in my book and articles on the way,

anything indicating that the Mandans were descendants of Norwegians. Others
are but not the named tribes.

Inger E

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:07:27 GMT, Inger E Johansson wrote:

since we do have persons in this group with more knowledge about the
copy,
and since Philip managed to send a ref to an url where at least part of
the
information quoted by the author were word by word identical to correct
information re. Verendrye's voyage respectively Verendrye's meeting with
a
Swedish scholar discussing the stone's text; I find it hard to believe
that
you can be serious if you continue to ask me to produce ref.

Philip gave no reference to anything verifying your claim for a copy. Once
again, as with your alleged EU law, your dictionary, etc., you are
refusing
to offer information. I want you to substantiate your claim for an extant
copy, nothing else. Since you won't, I assume that as with other such
claims (the EU law, your dictionary), you can't.

[SNIP]

Doug

No, it is your problem, if you make claims but fail to support
them, then get out of science groups.

(20 more to go and only 9 days left).

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:55:34 GMT, Philip Deitiker
Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> in sci.archaeology, wrote the following:

To Inger:

No, it is your problem, if you make claims but fail to support
them, then get out of science groups.

Since Inger fails to give proper references and gives pointers to sites
which don't prove what she says they do, why does she bother to post at
all?

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:55:34 GMT, Philip Deitiker
Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> in sci.archaeology, wrote the following:

To Inger:

No, it is your problem, if you make claims but fail to support
them, then get out of science groups.

Since Inger fails to give proper references and gives pointers to sites
which don't prove what she says they do, why does she bother to post at
all? It is as if she invites abuse by her actions purposely, and then
complains about it?

Sad.

(20 more to go and only 9 days left).

So what happens when she reaches 50? I seem to have missed that.


--
Katherine Griffis-Greenberg

Oriental Institute
Oriental Studies Doctoral Program [Egyptology]
Oxford University
Oxford, United Kingdom

http://www.griffis-consulting.com

Katherine Griffis-Greenberg <egylist@deadspamgriffis-consulting.com
wrote in news:toad801nk8ec57hql06jjdg1inn6e2cbri@4ax.com:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:55:34 GMT, Philip Deitiker
Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> in sci.archaeology, wrote the following:

To Inger:

No, it is your problem, if you make claims but fail to support
them, then get out of science groups.

Since Inger fails to give proper references and gives pointers to sites
which don't prove what she says they do, why does she bother to post at
all?

I've asked that myself. Guess what? She didn't answer...

David

--
_______________________________________________________________________
David Johnson home.earthlink.net/~trolleyfan

"You're a loony, you are!"
"They said that about Galileo, they said that about Einstein..."
"Yeah, and they said it about a good few loonies, too!"

Doug,
are you a scholar? I thought every scholar knew how to
follow the references presented within refered text written
in a reference. It takes time to do so. I know it's much
easier to have other doing the search and validation. I
will not do yours.

So what happens when she reaches 50? I seem to have missed
that.

Katherine,
I don't fail to give references. On the contrary - I have sent the
references for everything over and over in discussions during the years -
contrary to you I know how to do prover studies: either you look closer into
the references given or you have to accept that you have to wait. I am
neither here to do your homework or to repeat the references over and over
again!
We have discussed the details over the last 7 years. If you haven't been
here that long, your problem not mine.
I suggest that you stopp abusing me and that includes your personal attacks
where you have attacked me over and over in the group. Yes I do have the
right to defend myself and Yes I will not take anything alike the lines
below from you anymore.

Inger E

"Katherine Griffis-Greenberg" <egylist@deadspamgriffis-consulting.com> skrev
i meddelandet news:toad801nk8ec57hql06jjdg1inn6e2cbri@4ax.com...

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:55:34 GMT, Philip Deitiker
Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> in sci.archaeology, wrote the following:

To Inger:


No, it is your problem, if you make claims but fail to support
them, then get out of science groups.

Since Inger fails to give proper references and gives pointers to sites
which don't prove what she says they do, why does she bother to post at
all? It is as if she invites abuse by her actions purposely, and then
complains about it?

Sad.


(20 more to go and only 9 days left).

So what happens when she reaches 50? I seem to have missed that.


--
Katherine Griffis-Greenberg

Oriental Institute
Oriental Studies Doctoral Program [Egyptology]
Oxford University
Oxford, United Kingdom

http://www.griffis-consulting.com

David,
I gave you the opportunity long ago that if you had sent me
a correct mailaddress to my mailbox you would have had the
information. You didn't thus you can't complain now.