Well, if you and Kirby are so sure, maybe you can
help me find where I got the math wrong.

"Dan Bloomquist" wrote

Well, if you and Kirby are so sure, maybe you can
help me find where I got the math wrong.






Math (or lack thereof) isn't what brought down WTC.

Weight and heat did. And unless you were there taking measurements, you're
"best guess" isn't going to amount to anything - - ever.

On Sep 10, 3:28 pm, "Paul Maffia" <pmaf...@centurytel.net> wrote:
The Village Idiot makes another of his moronic
statements.<knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:1189440946.445306.62240@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

On Sep 9, 7:01 pm, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025

It doesn't get any more compelling.
What are we going to do to clean House in America?

If we did, it would mean getting rid of boobs like you. Just getting rid
of
you would raise the average IQ in the US by at least 5 points.

Why don't you attack Dan's math about the Pentagram hit?
Something wrong with you?

Moron, I never claimed to be math genius. But I will say that if his
math says it did not happen, he is as stupid as you.

You didn't read a word I wrote

If you can't do the math, you can't claim you know.......

"Dan Bloomquist" wrote

You didn't read a word I wrote

And why? Like it's "the truth" or something.

Get a life.

"Dan Bloomquist" wrote

If you can't do the math, you can't claim you know.......

Hey sparkey. I can "do the math" on a tax return to make it look like you
have seven children and earned $12 million of income.

Would "the math" make it true?

If not, what makes your math any better?

They're numbers on a page and they can never mesh up with what happens when
you go outside in the real world.

It is an 'observation'.

What does that have to do with science?

They're numbers on a page and they can never mesh up
with what happens when you go outside in the real world.

Quite a claim. Now, back it up......

Paul Maffia wrote:


Moron, I never claimed to be math genius. But I will say that if his
math says it did not happen, he is as stupid as you.

No, it means you have no wit. ( to wit, you are shooting your mouth off
like so many on alt.) If you can't do the math, you can't claim you
know.......

Just who do you think you are fooling besides, Kirgby, Chewy, Paul, to
name a few????????

(I can't wait tell Gunner chimes in with his knowledge of science.)

"Dan Bloomquist" wrote

It is an 'observation'.





And I observed a fucking plane fly into the building.




Gosh.


All the math in the world can't trump what happened after that.




Do you realize YOU are cross posting to a tax group?

You can "prove" whatever you want with math.

For example, one can easily
prove via the mah of flight that bumblebees cannot fly, yet they do.

In
this case, if your math shows that an airliner could not have inflicted
the damage on the Pentagon...

, then it is useless math exercise on your
part since it flies in the face of reality.

Paul Maffia wrote:

You can "prove" whatever you want with math.

There are no 'proofs' in science.

For example, one can easily prove via the mah of flight that bumblebees
cannot fly, yet they do.

You got that one ass backwards. It was that a proper hypothesis of bee
flight was lacking. (Where do these guys get this stuff???)

In this case, if your math shows that an airliner could not have
inflicted the damage on the Pentagon...

You lack reading comprehension, if you read what I wrote at all. The major
content of my observation was about the approach, not the damage to the
pentagon.

, then it is useless math exercise on your part since it flies in the face
of reality.

Huh? This makes no sense and is meaningless in the context of my post.

Hey math savant, learn to read. In your own words, "I merely made an
observation," in response to your VILLAGE IDIOT mentor, knews4u. I did
not question your math, but his statement implied, in no uncertain
terms, that you proved an airliner did not inflict the damage on the
pentagon.

, that IF your math proved the airliner did
not damage the Pentagon, then your math was worthless.

You then
idiotically chimed in with your "another scientific ignoramus" (or words
to that effect) and I reiterated my observation that IF your math
purportedly proved what the VILLAGE IDIOT claimed you math was useless.

Now I know to a math savant like you that the little two letter word
"IF" may be a stumbling block to comprehension...

, but it is critical that
a sane person grasp its significance before hurling your epithets.