Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:oa6dnb0WHq2ZxaDanZ2dnUVZ_ramnZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


alvinj@Example.com> wrote in message
news:fhgcc8$ln4$2@reader1.panix.com...

In sci.engr.metallurgy Grimly Fiendish wrote:

You don't know what C4 is? :/
How old are you GF? :/


...

From my childhood now... I remember the Brits called it "Cyclonite"
and the Yankees called it RDX and mixed it with something to make
it
moldable like [modeling] clay (plastic).



Just read it on Wikipedia that RDX is a British name! :)



Jesus you Americans are dumb!!

That's about the only place it shows up and Wikipedia is American, if
you do a UK search there are practically no results -
2,800,000 worldwide
61,700 UK - and that's mainly electronics, nothing to do with
explosives.

Cool, always wondered about the initials and what they meant.


What do they mean ?

I wouldn't know about explosives anyway, it may well be C4.



What the heck? :/
G.F., you are a -guy- right? :/


Oh sorry i forgot all guys in the US learn how to make bombs at school.


No, normal boys (and a lot of normal girls) have fun with fireworks and
pyrotechnics.


Very pupular in the US by the sounds of it.

Some of us grow up and take chemistry in high school, and learn to make
our own KNO3, KClO3, KClO4 and do some rudimentary nitrations on things
like cellulose, put together some compounds like nitrogen triiodide and
make some interesting salts like lead azide and potassium picrate - all
of which are nice explosives (but dangerous in unlucky or stupid hands).


Now i did Chemistry at secondary school but we didn't experiment with
such explosive and dangerous things, perhaps it was thought that teaching
impressionable students how to make explosives wasn't a good idea and not
really necesary - but then you follks like to be different (and awkward),
although i believe it is mandatory in Iraq, as are lessons in wife
beating, weapons use and racial hatred.

Then, many of us go on to college and major in chemistry and physics and
get advanced degrees - all the while perfecting that pyro mixture or
whatever firework it was that struck our fancy.


Yeah.

- I guess playtime fun in the UK doesn't go anywhere, huh?


Only as far as the odd teenager lighting a rocket, sending it
horizontally across the street and blowing a 6 month old babies legs off.

Well, you Brits have always led the world in cruelty and torture. I'll
yield that point to you.

And where did I ever say that I was taught about explosives and
pyrotechnics in school? At that time, learning about them was a driving
force to keep teaching myself more and more about chemistry. A few
friends and I with the same interests were months ahead of our classes -
we wanted to learn about redox, about work funcions, about ionization - we
read ahead and taught ourselves.

Wife beating, weapons use and racial hatred? Talking about yourselves
again, I think

Oh sorry i forgot all guys in the US learn how to make bombs
at school.

Actually it's mostly an "extra curricular" activity, you must be
confusing the USA with Ireland? ;)

And where did I ever say that I was taught about explosives and
pyrotechnics in school? At that time, learning about them was a
driving force to keep teaching myself more and more about
chemistry. A few friends and I with the same interests were
months ahead of our classes - we wanted to learn about redox,
about work funcions, about ionization - we read ahead and taught
ourselves.
[Bob]

Cool Bob, I followed the same route. :)

Taught myself stoichiometryt and later learned what it was called
one day in chemistry class. It had been a necessary tool to help
balance out the "firecracker powder" formulas for testing.

Comparing, figuring out firecracker powder and teaching myself how
to heat treat high carbon steel to make knives and springs...

There's more to the metallurgy but the information is all written
out and easy to find. Just read it.

The firecracker powder took quite a bit more effort in the research
and experimentation to really "know" what was going on since most of
the inner-workings of a firecracker is mostly hidden.

Alvin in AZ (Tolerantly Friendish)

In article <473f4200$0$47107$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>,
"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:

"You" <You@shadow.orgs> wrote in message
news:You-5925BA.09230217112007@netnews.worldnet.att.net...

C-4 is a Military mixture who's main component is RDX, with some other
Energetic Materials, and a Plasticizer, mixed to make it mauluable.

Cyclonite is the american name for RDX, and is used bacause it is
cheap to make, because the precursers are Petrochemical byproducts,
and it has significant Power Density when compared with other
Energetics, in the same class. RDX also has a well defined Entropy
Knee, which makes it very stable, mechanicaly, and chemicaly. This
makes it a very safe Energetic, which requires less training to use,
than other Energetics in its Power Density class. NO Cap and Booster,
No Boom.....

Fucking hell, i didn't realise so many Americans studied explosives, is
it
part of the school curriculum ?


No, we don't....You just happen to be CrossPosting into the
alt.eng.explosives NewsGroup, where the Energetic Materials Science
crowd hangs out. In this NewsGroup we DO have folks that have spent
a lifetime Researching, Studing, Compounding, and using Energetic
Materials.

and if you don't want our expertiese, DON"T crosspost into our NewsGroup

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:29:27 -0000, "Grimly Fiendish"
Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:


"Gunner" <gunner@NOSPAM.lightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:q1ktj3pcmamk2mfhmki898r7hiodvs3umd@4ax.com...
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:37:13 -0000, "Grimly Fiendish"
Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:


"Gunner" <gunner@NOSPAM.lightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:dfuqj31vpkf9g95j1jc93smh5qk24spd73@4ax.com...
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:26:39 -0000, "Grimly Fiendish"
Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:


"Gunner Asch" <gunner@NOSPAM.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d8fkj3p0l0ge1idhqnvrgdlfp549iibu80@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:46:18 -0000, "Grimly Fiendish"
Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:


Oh and i guess conniption must be another twisting of English by
the
US
as it's not in the old English dictionary, only the modern ones
that
include US spellings and words, it's also described as "origin
unknown"
but we all know where it came from really don't we ?


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conniption

But - since you only care about the "old" English dictionary, I
guess
you
have no place in modern society.

You have no place on the planet.

As has been said 'oft of you (old English, btw) - you're an
arsehole -
and the more you say, the more you prove it.

Say something fuck face ?


Now roll up your rug boy...and creep off into the woodwork. You have
been spanked repeatedly and are now reverting to really pathetic
replies and 3rd grade repartee.

Pathetic..no wonder the US doesnt want to acknowledge they own the
UK...pimples like you have given it such a bad reputation.


You get back under your rock, or should that be shitrock ?

Looks like the pissant is suddenly realizing he is owned by the
US..and he isnt happy about it.

Tough

Deal with it, serf

Gunner

Haven't you shot yourself yet ?


Why would I? I am quite comfortable being part owner of the UK and
the 65 million serfs that we now own.

Gunner

You own naff all, except a big head.


Might I suggest a good 12 step program to help you deal with your
denial issues?

Though Im sure it came as a shock to find out you were the bitch of
the US, you must come to terms with it sooner or later.

"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:hLCdnZBrPcZfTqLanZ2dnUVZ_uiknZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:bP-dnSsE49pVyKDanZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:473BB8A2.6C56FEE@comcast.net...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:


"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net> wrote
bob <bob@sss.net> wrote:
Grimly Fiendish wrote:
"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote

Hey dipshit - I was talking about the term "conniption fit"
- >> >> we
already know that you don't know what sheetrock is (and,
actually,
since it is US and Canadian vernacular due to our local
industries,
why would a rube like you know what it is?)

Quite, wassock.

But - reading and understanding context should certainly
have >> >> been
part of your massive education in English grammar - I guess
you >> >> were
napping through that part, right?

No, GF was having a conniption fit during that part! :-]

"Built using sheetrock" has no context that can possibly
indicate >> > what
sheetrock is other than it is something used in construction
you >> > thick
twat !!
Just as "My house is built with blue circle" has not.

Oh and i guess conniption must be another twisting of
English by
the >> > US
as it's not in the old English dictionary, only the modern ones
that
include US spellings and words, it's also described as
"origin >> > unknown"
but we all know where it came from really don't we ?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conniption

But - since you only care about the "old" English dictionary,
I >> guess
you have no place in modern society. As has been said 'oft of
you >> (old
English, btw) - you're an arsehole - and the more you say, the
more >> you
prove it.

So GF is using the "old" English dictionary of 1611??
No wonder his understanding of the English language
is so out of date!!

Americans don't speak English they merely abuse and change it.




No, its the Brits who do that! :-)


Obviuosly you know nothing of the history of America and why Enlish
is spoken at all, we wooped you !!!



??? Who "wooped" whom? Please - tell us your version of the
history of "America".



Oh come on, half of Americans came from England, we colonised that
land :
http://uk.geocities.com/haywardlass/

"The established inhabitants were swept aside, their lands seized."


You really are an idiot. Besides forgetting about the French, the
Spanish, the Portugeuse, the Norse, the Celts and the Asians who also
came here at various times to colonise this continent - just exactly
whom do you think you are talking to relative to who wooped whom?


We took control of America like taking a baby.

Before our Declaration of Independence in 1776, we were British here -
or maybe you didn't know that? When it was decided that we could no
longer take the crap that you were heaping on your own people, enough
was enough, and we kicked your butts with help from the French, who
also hated you. I guess you haven't gotten that far in your intro to
western civilization class?


Yeah you were lucky you found some allies because you wouldn't have done
fuck all on your own.

"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdnav_a-9nRaLanZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13juhrdmaq6id20@corp.supernews.com...


"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473f418d$0$47129$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...

"Martin H. Eastburn" <lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote in
message news:1195260418_389@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Old English began a long time ago. A very long time ago in human
time.



Yes before the roman invasion.

The Romans ruled the roost and made forts and gave forth their
language.



That doesn't make Latin English
http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/arl_latin_language.htm

The Catholic religion the country was beneath was in Latin.
Schooling
in those days were in mostly Latin. When they were finally run
out and
left, what was left. Scottish and Latin and some local words
for jargon.

The Indo-European language tree for Modern English is thus:

Germanic --> Western Germanic --> Low German --> Anglo-Saxon
(Old English)
Thence: from Anglo-Saxon --> Middle English (what most think of
old English)
then to Modern English.

The Dutch were Old Saxon replacing Anglo-Saxon --> Middle Low
German - Plattdeutsch.

Remember in the days of old Kings and Queens were family members
all across
Europe and even Russia.

Anglo-Saxon was a mixture of Low German, Latin, and the common
and in-common
language of the Anglos and those from Saxony - And the French
language came from Latin. So Saxony was mixed with Latin as
well as the local common and religion
based words.


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.



Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is
British English. Just because it evolved differently over the last
500 years doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.



You "gave" us nothing. We TOOK your english, your froggish, your
spanish, your scandihoovian, your russian, your yiddish, your
chinese, your japanese, your whatever else and formed the base for
American English. We fought a war and kicked your silly red-coated
asses back to limeyland because we intended and accomplished the
right to personal self ownership. In your case you are a subject. If
the queen tells the headsman to put your silly head on a pike and
display it in front of Buckingham Palace there is NOTHING you can do
but run.


Ah that must be that American dream thing you bunch of cock munchers
keep going on about, but dreams aren't real you know.


So tell us about the British Dream - or has it now become the dhimmi
dream?


Of course, praise Allah

"strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:1195337550_549@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...


snipped


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.


Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is British
English. Just because it evolved differently over the last 500 years
doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.



The *American identity* was formed between 1607 and 1775 when the
colonists were subjects of the Crown. The language was the same on
both sides of the Atlantic.


Yeah but it ain't now is it.

"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdnar_a-8IRKLanZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

Al Dykes wrote:

In article <1195337550_549@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
strabo <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote:

Grimly Fiendish wrote:

"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...


snipped

Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.


Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is
British English. Just because it evolved differently over the last
500 years doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.


The *American identity* was formed between 1607 and 1775 when the





The idea that there is such a thing as an "American identity" and it
is what you assert it makes my skin crawl.



Nice. Put it YouTube. The Brits love to watch torture


You missed a word out there thou dost believeth.

"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdnan_a-9ESqLanZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...

"Martin H. Eastburn" <lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:1195260418_389@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Old English began a long time ago. A very long time ago in human
time.



Yes before the roman invasion.

The Romans ruled the roost and made forts and gave forth their
language.



That doesn't make Latin English
http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/arl_latin_language.htm

The Catholic religion the country was beneath was in Latin.
Schooling
in those days were in mostly Latin. When they were finally run
out and
left, what was left. Scottish and Latin and some local words for
jargon.

The Indo-European language tree for Modern English is thus:

Germanic --> Western Germanic --> Low German --> Anglo-Saxon (Old
English)
Thence: from Anglo-Saxon --> Middle English (what most think of
old English)
then to Modern English.

The Dutch were Old Saxon replacing Anglo-Saxon --> Middle Low
German - Plattdeutsch.

Remember in the days of old Kings and Queens were family members
all across
Europe and even Russia.

Anglo-Saxon was a mixture of Low German, Latin, and the common and
in-common
language of the Anglos and those from Saxony - And the French
language came from Latin. So Saxony was mixed with Latin as well
as the local common and religion
based words.


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.



Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is British
English. Just because it evolved differently over the last 500 years
doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.


We had to be different, since we started out as YOU, and that was
totally unacceptable. Look where you ended up.


Didn't you hear that song, "Tony Bliar Rules The Waves" ?

Tony Bliar? Who's that? I know Blair - ! lol. Sorry - I'm guilty of

"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdna7_a-_9SqLanZ2dnUVZ_rGrnZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:

"Martin H. Eastburn" <lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:1195260418_389@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Old English began a long time ago. A very long time ago in human time.



Yes before the roman invasion.

The Romans ruled the roost and made forts and gave forth their
language.



That doesn't make Latin English
http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/arl_latin_language.htm

The Catholic religion the country was beneath was in Latin. Schooling
in those days were in mostly Latin. When they were finally run out and
left, what was left. Scottish and Latin and some local words for
jargon.

The Indo-European language tree for Modern English is thus:

Germanic --> Western Germanic --> Low German --> Anglo-Saxon (Old
English)
Thence: from Anglo-Saxon --> Middle English (what most think of old
English)
then to Modern English.

The Dutch were Old Saxon replacing Anglo-Saxon --> Middle Low German
- Plattdeutsch.

Remember in the days of old Kings and Queens were family members all
across
Europe and even Russia.

Anglo-Saxon was a mixture of Low German, Latin, and the common and
in-common
language of the Anglos and those from Saxony - And the French
language came from Latin. So Saxony was mixed with Latin as well as
the local common and religion
based words.


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.


Yes, we no longer say "whilst", among other things. Our language is
moving ahead in response to social challenges, as has been pointed out
here by many posters. Yes, indeed, vernacular English language
(American English at least) is being continuously revised by
contributions - and outright thefts - from other languages. On the
other hand, words and phrases from English are being taken wholesale
by other languages. It happens both ways. GF - if you insist on
speaking and writing as if you are a Dickens contemporary, do whatever
makes you happy. But - you are more and more irrelevant as your
speech patterns age and get stuck in the past.


Haven't you noticed? Only Americans speak American English, everyone
else speaks proper English except when it's foerced on them by dick
heads like BG.

Grimly Fiendish wrote:

"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:hLCdnZBrPcZfTqLanZ2dnUVZ_uiknZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:bP-dnSsE49pVyKDanZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:473BB8A2.6C56FEE@comcast.net...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote:


"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net> wrote
bob <bob@sss.net> wrote:
Grimly Fiendish wrote:
"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote

Hey dipshit - I was talking about the term "conniption fit"
- >> >> we
already know that you don't know what sheetrock is (and,
actually,
since it is US and Canadian vernacular due to our local
industries,
why would a rube like you know what it is?)

Quite, wassock.

But - reading and understanding context should certainly
have >> >> been
part of your massive education in English grammar - I guess
you >> >> were
napping through that part, right?

No, GF was having a conniption fit during that part! :-]

"Built using sheetrock" has no context that can possibly
indicate >> > what
sheetrock is other than it is something used in construction
you >> > thick
twat !!
Just as "My house is built with blue circle" has not.

Oh and i guess conniption must be another twisting of
English by
the >> > US
as it's not in the old English dictionary, only the modern
ones
that
include US spellings and words, it's also described as
"origin >> > unknown"
but we all know where it came from really don't we ?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conniption

But - since you only care about the "old" English dictionary,
I >> guess
you have no place in modern society. As has been said 'oft of
you >> (old
English, btw) - you're an arsehole - and the more you say, the
more >> you
prove it.

So GF is using the "old" English dictionary of 1611??
No wonder his understanding of the English language
is so out of date!!

Americans don't speak English they merely abuse and change it.




No, its the Brits who do that! :-)


Obviuosly you know nothing of the history of America and why Enlish
is spoken at all, we wooped you !!!



??? Who "wooped" whom? Please - tell us your version of the history
of "America".



Oh come on, half of Americans came from England, we colonised that land
:
http://uk.geocities.com/haywardlass/

"The established inhabitants were swept aside, their lands seized."


You really are an idiot. Besides forgetting about the French, the
Spanish, the Portugeuse, the Norse, the Celts and the Asians who also
came here at various times to colonise this continent - just exactly
whom do you think you are talking to relative to who wooped whom?


We took control of America like taking a baby.

Before our Declaration of Independence in 1776, we were British here -
or maybe you didn't know that? When it was decided that we could no
longer take the crap that you were heaping on your own people, enough
was enough, and we kicked your butts with help from the French, who also
hated you. I guess you haven't gotten that far in your intro to western
civilization class?


Yeah you were lucky you found some allies because you wouldn't have done
fuck all on your own.

Yeah - I guess the same could be said about you in 1917 and 1940 ....

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdnav_a-9nRaLanZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13juhrdmaq6id20@corp.supernews.com...


"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473f418d$0$47129$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...

"Martin H. Eastburn" <lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:1195260418_389@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Old English began a long time ago. A very long time ago in human
time.



Yes before the roman invasion.

The Romans ruled the roost and made forts and gave forth their
language.



That doesn't make Latin English
http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/arl_latin_language.htm

The Catholic religion the country was beneath was in Latin.
Schooling
in those days were in mostly Latin. When they were finally run
out and
left, what was left. Scottish and Latin and some local words for
jargon.

The Indo-European language tree for Modern English is thus:

Germanic --> Western Germanic --> Low German --> Anglo-Saxon (Old
English)
Thence: from Anglo-Saxon --> Middle English (what most think of
old English)
then to Modern English.

The Dutch were Old Saxon replacing Anglo-Saxon --> Middle Low
German - Plattdeutsch.

Remember in the days of old Kings and Queens were family members
all across
Europe and even Russia.

Anglo-Saxon was a mixture of Low German, Latin, and the common and
in-common
language of the Anglos and those from Saxony - And the French
language came from Latin. So Saxony was mixed with Latin as well
as the local common and religion
based words.


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.



Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is British
English. Just because it evolved differently over the last 500 years
doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.



You "gave" us nothing. We TOOK your english, your froggish, your
spanish, your scandihoovian, your russian, your yiddish, your chinese,
your japanese, your whatever else and formed the base for American
English. We fought a war and kicked your silly red-coated asses back
to limeyland because we intended and accomplished the right to
personal self ownership. In your case you are a subject. If the queen
tells the headsman to put your silly head on a pike and display it in
front of Buckingham Palace there is NOTHING you can do but run.


Ah that must be that American dream thing you bunch of cock munchers
keep going on about, but dreams aren't real you know.


So tell us about the British Dream - or has it now become the dhimmi
dream?


Of course, praise Allah

Figured that! Too bad you've all become so spineless.

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdnar_a-8IRKLanZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

Al Dykes wrote:

In article <1195337550_549@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
strabo <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote:

Grimly Fiendish wrote:

"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...


snipped

Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.


Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is British
English. Just because it evolved differently over the last 500 years
doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.


The *American identity* was formed between 1607 and 1775 when the





The idea that there is such a thing as an "American identity" and it
is what you assert it makes my skin crawl.



Nice. Put it YouTube. The Brits love to watch torture


You missed a word out there thou dost believeth.

Blameth the missed word on the lateness of the day and keyboard problems.
Sorry.

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:1195337550_549@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...


snipped


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.


Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is British
English. Just because it evolved differently over the last 500 years
doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.



The *American identity* was formed between 1607 and 1775 when the
colonists were subjects of the Crown. The language was the same on
both sides of the Atlantic.


Yeah but it ain't now is it.

Thank God its not. You can keep whatever it is you call English.

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"bob" <bob@sss.net> wrote in message
news:zYOdnan_a-9ESqLanZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

Grimly Fiendish wrote:


"Don T." <-painter-@louvre.org> wrote in message
news:13ju0h8lcmp35d2@corp.supernews.com...

"Grimly Fiendish" <Alien@Sexfiend.fsnot.co.youK> wrote in message
news:473ef8d0$0$47127$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...

"Martin H. Eastburn" <lionslair@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:1195260418_389@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Old English began a long time ago. A very long time ago in human
time.



Yes before the roman invasion.

The Romans ruled the roost and made forts and gave forth their
language.



That doesn't make Latin English
http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/arl_latin_language.htm

The Catholic religion the country was beneath was in Latin.
Schooling
in those days were in mostly Latin. When they were finally run out
and
left, what was left. Scottish and Latin and some local words for
jargon.

The Indo-European language tree for Modern English is thus:

Germanic --> Western Germanic --> Low German --> Anglo-Saxon (Old
English)
Thence: from Anglo-Saxon --> Middle English (what most think of old
English)
then to Modern English.

The Dutch were Old Saxon replacing Anglo-Saxon --> Middle Low
German - Plattdeutsch.

Remember in the days of old Kings and Queens were family members all
across
Europe and even Russia.

Anglo-Saxon was a mixture of Low German, Latin, and the common and
in-common
language of the Anglos and those from Saxony - And the French
language came from Latin. So Saxony was mixed with Latin as well as
the local common and religion
based words.


Yes whilst American English is an attempt to be different.



Ignorant ass. American English is a polyglot language as is British
English. Just because it evolved differently over the last 500 years
doesn't make American English an "attempt" to be different.


We gave you English and you wanted to be different as you had no
identity of your own.


We had to be different, since we started out as YOU, and that was
totally unacceptable. Look where you ended up.


Didn't you hear that song, "Tony Bliar Rules The Waves" ?

Tony Bliar? Who's that? I know Blair - ! lol. Sorry - I'm guilty of
typos myself all too often. Couldn't resist.