A way to reduce the advertising fee......

Main Page | Report this Page

Science Forum Index » Medicine - Vision Forum » A way to reduce the advertising fee......

Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Author

Message

Neil Brooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:45 am

Guest

On Jun 6, 7:41 am, Dan Abel <d...@sonic.net> wrote:

Quote:

In article <1181102195.604591.55...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,

p.clar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 4:27 pm, Revival <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:
In sincere apology, Neil.

It was not my intention to offend you.

I can't think of any legitimate reason that you would be attempting to
post using anyone else's identity.

He's a kid. Kids try stuff.

..... which sometimes backfires, leading to negative consequences.

Quote:

Sounds like your google posting days are numbered. Perhaps you are
intending some kind of identity-theft which is certainly frowned upon
these days. sucks to be you about now.

Putting a different return Email address in a newsgroup posting is
trivial and causes no system harm. Using some one else's name and Email
address in your posting is very bad manners, though. Note that Revival
used his own Email address, not Neil's. I don't see how this relates to
the classical identity theft (trying to steal money).

Note the postings from "Odis". Is that fraudulent?

Nope. Just like selling "Kleeneks" isn't usually considered to be
trademark infringement.

Note that you, and everybody else, could readily and easily
differentiate.

Posting/e-mailing under a fraudulent identity (somebody else's) is in
violation of most ISP's Terms of Service.

Neil Crooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:12 pm

Guest

Quote:

Note the postings from "Odis". Is that fraudulent?

Aw, shucks. I guess I'm a tad bit of a hypocrite =).

Well, that's me in a nutshell.

As I have stated -

Quote:

Actions have consequences.

I sure bet that "revival" kid is 'shaking in his boots' right about
now!

*grin grin snigger snigger*

I am so amazing at sarcasm! As you know, most of my posts have that
'slight tinge' of incredibly witty sarcasm. Ergo, you are all inferior
to me. In addition, I am "master of the pun". (As you can see from my
first post in this thread) And yes, I know I do need to get over
myself, 'seriously'.

Neil Crooks

Neil Brooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:20 pm

Guest

On Jun 6, 10:12 am, Neil Crooks <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

I annoy you and "attack" Otis Brown.

Whoopdy-$hit.

Otis has induced--to MY KNOWLEDGE--more than a dozen cases of
diplopia, and has prevented myopia in ZERO cases.

Who's doing /substantive/ harm here?

Find somebody to defend who actually merits defense. Your criteria
for hero selection is awfully suspect.

Revival

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:36 pm

Guest

It seems Neil has taken to replying to his own posts.

Off our meds again, Uncle Brookie?

*Here, have a cookie boy.*

Revival

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:37 pm

Guest

Hm.

It is unfortunate that Neil enjoys replying to his own posts with such
sparity.

Revival

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:40 pm

Guest

It seems someone is unable to recall the subject title -

"A way to reduce the advertising fee"

Why so off topic, Neil?

Did I make you wince?

Neil Crooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:53 pm

Guest

As I say, it's not my fault that I have to keep feeding the trolls!

I mean, it's the only way I can make friends. =(

It's a shame I haven't got a life outside Usenet and the internet.

For those of you who haven't heard my rants -

Quote:

Otis has induced--to MY KNOWLEDGE--more than a dozen cases of
diplopia, and has prevented myopia in ZERO cases.

Translation:

Don't you see, Revival!!? Think of all those vulnerable parents and
children!! Whatever would they do without me?! As I so often like to
say:

'Otis hurts people'.

[supermanspeech] It is my duty to protect the innocent. I am your
saviour. Otis is dangerous - I will fight him to the end of
existence!! *insert super man music*[/supermanspeech]

Darn, I *know* that there are so many better ways of helping people. I
mean, sure I could give some money to Africa - but, as you know, those
peasants are far too inferior for the likes of me. Anyhow, why on
earth would I want to help these people suffering from trachoma, when
I can help *all* these vulnerable parents and kids unsuspecting coming
to the *internet* (define: a place where one is to receive valid
information) to the likes of Otis!! Those poor chaps - I think I'll
just do their thinking for them. It's only a shame I'm not too great a
thinker myself. Aww... darn it, I hope you didn't hear that!

- Your heroic super duper Neil Crooks

Neil Crooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:04 pm

Guest

Quote:

Note the postings from "Odis". Is that fraudulent?

Aw, shucks. I guess I'm a tad bit of a hypocrite =).

Well, that's me in a nutshell.

As I have stated -

Quote:

Actions have consequences.

Revival

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:16 pm

Guest

Quote:

Note that you, and everybody else, could readily and easily differentiate.

Funnily enough, Neil, I might say the same.

Suffice to say, you have thoroughly humiliated yourself, once again.
Perhaps in future you should cover up such obvious hypocrisies. Don't
want your camp followers to be let down, surely?

Get over yourself, kid.

Zetsu

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:27 pm

Guest

Quote:

Note that you, and everybody else, could readily and easily differentiate.

Funnily enough, Neil, I might say the same.

Suffice to say, you have - once again - thoroughly humiliated
yourself. Perhaps in future you should "cover up" such obvious
hypocrisies. Don't want your camp followers to be let down, surely?

Get over yourself, kid.

Zetsu

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:34 pm

Guest

Quote:

You f***** with the wrong guy ... once too often.

Temper temper now, Neil.The fact that my little brother has been able
to provoke you so eloquently gives one the

impression that you are an outright fool, and have fallen right down
his 'trap'. Dear oh dear.

Quote:

Note that you, and everybody else, could readily and easily differentiate.

Funnily enough, Neil, I might say the same.

Suffice to say, you have thoroughly humiliated yourself, once again.
Perhaps in future you should cover up such obvious

hypocrisies. Don't want your camp followers to be let down, surely?

Get over yourself, kid.

Zetsu

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:36 pm

Guest

Quote:

You f***** with the wrong guy ... once too often.

Temper temper now, Neil.The fact that my little brother has been able
to provoke you with such ease and so eloquently gives one the
impression that you are an outright fool, and have fallen right down
his 'trap'. Dear oh dear.

Quote:

Note that you, and everybody else, could readily and easily differentiate.

Funnily enough, Neil, I might say the same.

Suffice to say, you have thoroughly humiliated yourself, once again.
Perhaps in future you should cover up such obvious
hypocrisies. Don't want your camp followers to be let down, surely?

Get over yourself, kid.

Neil Brooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:45 pm

Guest

On Jun 6, 11:36 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Temper temper now, Neil.

No temper here.

As usual, I simply stated facts.

Zetsu

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:56 pm

Guest

It isn't even fun playing with you anymore, Neil.

Neil Brooks

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 1:59 pm

Guest

On Jun 6, 11:56 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

It isn't even fun playing with you anymore, Neil.

Then, I presume, you'll just have to go back to playing with yourself.

Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next All times are GMT - 5 Hours The time now is Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:05 am Science Forum Index