|
Science Forum Index » Energy - Hydrogen Forum » Dead Man Makes Fire from Water
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| Eeyore |
 Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Terryc wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Cavitation has nothing to do with 'breaking down water'.
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
To 'break down' water you need electrolysis, not voodoo.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gunner |
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:43:31 GMT, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Terryc wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Cavitation has nothing to do with 'breaking down water'.
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
To 'break down' water you need electrolysis, not voodoo.
Graham
Odd..a google search comes up with at least 4 methods.
Are you really this ignorant or do you simply play stupid on Usenet?
Gunner
"Try thinking of the Libertarian Party as a rolled-up newspaper,
useful in making the Republican puppy (I've given up on the Democratic bitch)
go where he's supposed to -- not on that beautiful antique carpet
we call the Constitution." -- L. Neil Smith, Bill Clinton's Reichstag Fire |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Gunner wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Terryc wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Cavitation has nothing to do with 'breaking down water'.
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
To 'break down' water you need electrolysis, not voodoo.
Odd..a google search comes up with at least 4 methods.
Perhaps you'd like to select even one that actually works ?
Quote: Are you really this ignorant or do you simply play stupid on Usenet?
LOL !
The 'bubbles' formed by cavitation are voids btw - not gases being formed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavitation
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gunner |
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:07:58 GMT, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Gunner wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Terryc wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Cavitation has nothing to do with 'breaking down water'.
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
To 'break down' water you need electrolysis, not voodoo.
Odd..a google search comes up with at least 4 methods.
Perhaps you'd like to select even one that actually works ?
Of course. There appears to be at least 4 that do.
Quote:
Are you really this ignorant or do you simply play stupid on Usenet?
LOL !
The 'bubbles' formed by cavitation are voids btw - not gases being formed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavitation
Graham
Cavitation wasnt mentioned among the 4. You are indeed, stupid.
<plink>
Gunner who wont waste his time chatting with morons, or even the
moderately retarded.
"Try thinking of the Libertarian Party as a rolled-up newspaper,
useful in making the Republican puppy (I've given up on the Democratic bitch)
go where he's supposed to -- not on that beautiful antique carpet
we call the Constitution." -- L. Neil Smith, Bill Clinton's Reichstag Fire |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Gunner wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Gunner wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
To 'break down' water you need electrolysis, not voodoo.
Odd..a google search comes up with at least 4 methods.
Perhaps you'd like to select even one that actually works ?
Of course. There appears to be at least 4 that do.
Which you've failed to provide links for.
Let's face it, you're just making it up. Let's see these examples of the
mechanical separation of hydrogen and oxygen in water.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Terryc |
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote: Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
AFAIRI , it was mentioned in new scientinst. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Terryc wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
AFAIRI , it was mentioned in new scientinst.
New Gullible Fool more like. Everything's so dumbed down these days it's scary.
Microcavitation is the method by which ultrasonic cleaners work.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Terryc |
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:15 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote: AFAIRI , it was mentioned in new scientinst.
New Gullible Fool more like. Everything's so dumbed down these days it's scary.
Well, yes. That dumbing down was why I stopped subscribing. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| BR |
| Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote:
Terryc wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
AFAIRI , it was mentioned in new scientinst.
New Gullible Fool more like. Everything's so dumbed down these days it's scary.
Microcavitation is the method by which ultrasonic cleaners work.
Graham
It may be by an entirely different mechanism. I've seen videos of the
demonstrations. However, what has never been mentioned is how much RF
power must be applied to get the effect. I'll bet is more than the
energy you get out of the "burning water".
--
Remove the TOS star ship captain to reply. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore |
| Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 6:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
BR wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Terryc wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Well, what was the term for the breaking down of water that didn't
involve electoylsis. I thought it was actually micro-cavitation.
Doubtless the k00ks would have you believe that.
AFAIRI , it was mentioned in new scientinst.
New Gullible Fool more like. Everything's so dumbed down these days it's > scary.
Microcavitation is the method by which ultrasonic cleaners work.
It may be by an entirely different mechanism. I've seen videos of the
demonstrations. However, what has never been mentioned is how much RF
power must be applied to get the effect. I'll bet is more than the
energy you get out of the "burning water".
You don't need to bet. Science say it *has* to be.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gunner |
| Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:46:28 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Gunner wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Gunner wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
To 'break down' water you need electrolysis, not voodoo.
Odd..a google search comes up with at least 4 methods.
Perhaps you'd like to select even one that actually works ?
Of course. There appears to be at least 4 that do.
Which you've failed to provide links for.
Let's face it, you're just making it up. Let's see these examples of the
mechanical separation of hydrogen and oxygen in water.
Graham
Your sudden change in goalpost by adding the words "mechanical
seperation" is noted and laughed at. You stepped on your dick and you
suddenly realized how badly you did it.
Sorry you ignorant bastard..you are not getting off that
easily...snicker
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000456
http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~vurade/PEC%20Generation%20of%20Hydrogen/Methods%20fo%20hydrogen%20production%20from%20solar%20energy.htm
(5) methods noted besides Electrolysis....
http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/proj_production_delivery.html
(3) methods not covered above.....
Looks like we are up to ( so far
You do know btw..the most hydrogen is currently generated by thermal
reforming of steam, are you not? Not electrolysis.
http://www.physorg.com/news6068.html
So Cracker Grahm....Ive shown you to be an utter buffon 8 times and I
simply hit the high spots before I got bored with proving what the
readers have already figured out. That you are a mindless bigoted and
frankly..stupid ambulatory skin graft storage vessel.
Gunner
This Message is guaranteed environmentally friendly
Manufactured with 10% post consumer ASCII
Meets all EPA regulations for clean air
Using only naturally occuring fibers
Use the Message with confidance.
(Some settling may occure in transit.)
(Best if Used before May 13, 2009) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
