Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Statistics - Math Forum  »  Curious Fourier Transform question from Akhila Raman
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
akhila raman
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:33 pm
Guest
i noticed F.T. has its share of curiosity:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransform1.html

let us do this without using duality property.
we want the Fourier transform of f(x)=1:

F(k)= [Lt X->inf] [int -X,X] exp(-i*2*pi*k*x) dx

= [Lt X->inf] sin(2*pi*k*X)/(pi*k)

if we wish to argue F(k)= delta(k), then by definition
of delta function, for k # 0, F(k)=0.
[ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DeltaFunction.html ]

that means for k # 0,
[Lt X->inf] sin(2*pi*k*X) = 0 !

which says for X->inf, a sinusoid goes to zero, which
is not quite right by the definition of sinusoidal
function. it should remain oscillating between [-1,1] as
X-> infinity by definition...

-Akhila Raman
Gordon Sande
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:34 pm
Guest
On 2007-03-18 01:33:13 -0300, "akhila raman" <akhila.raman@gmail.com> said:

Quote:
i noticed F.T. has its share of curiosity:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransform1.html

let us do this without using duality property.
we want the Fourier transform of f(x)=1:

F(k)= [Lt X->inf] [int -X,X] exp(-i*2*pi*k*x) dx

= [Lt X->inf] sin(2*pi*k*X)/(pi*k)

if we wish to argue F(k)= delta(k), then by definition
of delta function, for k # 0, F(k)=0.
[ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DeltaFunction.html ]

that means for k # 0,
[Lt X->inf] sin(2*pi*k*X) = 0 !

which says for X->inf, a sinusoid goes to zero, which
is not quite right by the definition of sinusoidal
function. it should remain oscillating between [-1,1] as
X-> infinity by definition...

-Akhila Raman

You posted the same content in sci.num-analysis without
bothering to set the headings to indicate crossposting.

There is an answer there. The student needs to pay more attention
to the details of the assumptions as the FT is defined on L_2
and is being applied to a function which is not in L_2. Much
mathematical foolishness can be derived from such violation of
assumptions.
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 1:50 am