Thank you for not replying to yet another Jabriol sock-puppet - in
rec.ponds.
You know, I've never seen a woman try to challenge the theory of

How can the theory of evolution be tested? The most obvious way is
to examine the fossil record to see if a gradual change from one kind
to another really happened. Did it? No, as a number of scientists
honestly admit. One, Francis Hitching, writes: "When you look for
links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't there."

obvious is this lack of evidence in the fossil record that
evolutionists have come up with alternatives to Darwin's theory of
gradual change. The truth is, though, that the sudden appearance of
animal kinds in the fossil record supports special creation much more
than it does evolution.

Moreover, Hitching shows that living creatures are programmed to
reproduce themselves exactly rather than evolve into something else.

He says: "Living cells duplicate themselves with near-total fidelity.

The degree of error is so tiny that no man-made machine can approach

A thorny question that evolutionists have failed to answer is: What
was the origin of life?

which we are all supposed to have descended-come into existence?
Centuries ago, this would not have appeared to be a problem. Most
people then thought that flies could develop from decaying meat and
that a pile of old rags could spontaneously produce mice. But, more
than a hundred years ago, the French chemist Louis Pasteur clearly
demonstrated that life can come only from preexisting life.

which we are all supposed to have descended-come into existence?
Centuries ago, this would not have appeared to be a problem. Most
people then thought that flies could develop from decaying meat and
that a pile of old rags could spontaneously produce mice. But, more
than a hundred years ago, the French chemist Louis Pasteur clearly
demonstrated that life can come only from preexisting life.

?? uh, no he didn't. he DID prove that life couldnt come from decaying
meat or a pile of old rags and that was pretty much it.

On 10 Mar 2007 15:39:30 -0800, in alt.talk.creationism
"~Sable~" <geis...@mailinator.com> wrote in
1173569970.265681.282...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>:



On Mar 10, 6:34 pm, "wf3h" <w...@vsswireless.net> wrote:

which we are all supposed to have descended-come into existence?
Centuries ago, this would not have appeared to be a problem. Most
people then thought that flies could develop from decaying meat and
that a pile of old rags could spontaneously produce mice. But, more
than a hundred years ago, the French chemist Louis Pasteur clearly
demonstrated that life can come only from preexisting life.

?? uh, no he didn't. he DID prove that life couldnt come from decaying
meat or a pile of old rags and that was pretty much it.

Has anyone demonstrated life come non life?

The universe has.

Zhadow wrote:
How can the theory of evolution be tested? The most obvious way is
to examine the fossil record to see if a gradual change from one kind
to another really happened. Did it? No, as a number of scientists
honestly admit. One, Francis Hitching, writes: "When you look for
links between major groups of animals, they simply aren't there."

------ snip -----

On Mar 10, 6:34 pm, "wf3h" <w...@vsswireless.net> wrote:

?? uh, no he didn't. he DID prove that life couldnt come from decaying
meat or a pile of old rags and that was pretty much it.



Has anyone demonstrated life come non life?

How can the theory of evolution be tested?

On Mar 10, 2:36 pm, "Kathy" <Kathy9...@gmail.com> wrote:> Thank you for not replying to yet another Jabriol sock-puppet - in
rec.ponds.

You know, I've never seen a woman try to challenge the theory of
evolution. Nor one who thot the moon shot was a hoax, or that that the
Nazi gas chambers were only showers. [even tho there are no fawcets to
adjust the temp or turn them off]

I've seen several women attacking evolutionary theory. At

But I have seen the names of some well known women posted as asking
for a new 911 investigation, most especially those who lost loved ones
in the twin towers.

Are there in fact women who try to support Creationism in the
postings? Or debunk the moon shot and the Nazi death camps?

I don't know any examples of the latter two sorts of women. In

I can see that evolutionarily, that men'd be spread out wider on the
bell curve, and while you'd get more genuises, you'd also get more
nutcases.

-- Steven J.

~Sable~ wrote:
On Mar 10, 6:34 pm, "wf3h" <w...@vsswireless.net> wrote:
?? uh, no he didn't. he DID prove that life couldnt come from decaying
meat or a pile of old rags and that was pretty much it.


Has anyone demonstrated life come non life?

has anyone cured the common cold?

science has unknowns. live with it.